GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS

Dilek TEKE, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum, Türkiye)
Elif MERAL, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum, Türkiye)
Zeynep BAŞÇI NAMLI, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum, Türkiye)
Muhammed GÜLER (Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi, Ağrı, Türkiye)
IOJET
9 2
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 564 - 587 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 22-06-2021

GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS

Öz:
This study, which was based on qualitative research design, aimed to examine the research trends and results of bibliometric mapping analyses of articles about the Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) in education in the past ten years. For this purpose, 126 articles published with the keywords; flipped classroom, education, social science, science, chemistry, biology, and physicsbetween the years of 2010- 2019 were accessed through the Web of Science database. Out of these 126 articles, 63 were selected using criterion sampling model for the bibliometric and the content analysis. As a result of the bibliometric analysis, it was seen that the most frequently mentioned keywords were flipped classroom, active learning, and chemical education with many of them focusing more on “motivation”. The result of the content analysis showed that the variables included not only “motivation” and “perception” but also “academic achievement/performance” as the most common topics in the studies. The results also revealed that the most commonly used data collecting instruments were achievement tests, questionnaires and scales; the most commonly preferred sample groups were university students; and the most commonly utilized research design was the quantitative method.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aidinopoulou, V., & Sampson, D. G. (2017). An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom model in primary school history teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 237-247.
  • Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345.
  • Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2019). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-35.
  • AlJarrah, A., Thomas, M. K., & Shehab, M. (2018). Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1.
  • Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day: International society for technology in education.
  • Bicen, H., & Beheshti, M. (2019). Assessing perceptions and evaluating achievements of ESL students with the usage of infographics in a flipped classroom learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-29.
  • Blackburn, R. A. (2018). Write my next lecture: Prelecture problem classes and in-lecture discussion to assist case-study teaching of synthesis. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 104-107.
  • Capone, R., Del Sorbo, M. R., & Fiore, O. (2017). A flipped experience in physics education using CLIL methodology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6579-6582.
  • Chang, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239.
  • Chen, C.-K., Huang, N.-T. N., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019). Findings and implications of flipped science learning research: A review of journal publications. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.
  • Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta‐analysis. Medical education, 52(9), 910-924.
  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
  • Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793-824.
  • Christiansen, M. A., Nadelson, L., Etchberger, L., Cuch, M., Kingsford, T. A., & Woodward, L. O. (2017). Flipped learning in synchronously-delivered, geographically-dispersed general chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 662-667.
  • Chung, C.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019). Roles and research trends of flipped classrooms in nursing education: a review of academic publications from 2010 to 2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-22.
  • Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
  • Donnelly, J., & Hernández, F. E. (2018). Fusing a reversed and informal learning scheme and space: student perceptions of active learning in physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 520-532.
  • Dooley, L. M., Frankland, S., Boller, E., & Tudor, E. (2018). Implementing the flipped classroom in a veterinary pre-clinical science course: Student engagement, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 45(2), 195- 203.
  • Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205-209.
  • Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Jiménez-Rodríguez, M. Á., Torralba-Estelles, J., Garzón-Farinós, F., Pérez-Bermejo, M., & Fernández-Ehrling, N. (2016). Distance learning ects and flipped classroom in the anatomy learning: comparative study of the use of augmented reality, video and notes. BMC medical education, 16(1), 230.
  • Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a smallgroup learning course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 77(1).
  • Goff, E. E., Reindl, K. M., Johnson, C., McClean, P., Offerdahl, E. G., Schroeder, N. L., & White, A. R. (2017). Efficacy of a meiosis learning module developed for the virtual cell animation collection. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar9.
  • González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2019). Enhancing science selfefficacy and attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers (PST) through a flipped classroom learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12.
  • González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Rodríguez, D. A. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: an initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450-459.
  • Gostelow, N., Barber, J., Gishen, F., & Berlin, A. (2018). Flipping social determinants on its head: Medical student perspectives on the flipped classroom and simulated patients to teach social determinants of health. Medical teacher, 40(7), 728-735.
  • Green, R. D., & Schlairet, M. C. (2017). Moving toward heutagogical learning: Illuminating undergraduate nursing students' experiences in a flipped classroom. Nurse education today, 49, 122-128.
  • Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015). Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), ar36.
  • He, W., Holton, A. J., & Farkas, G. (2018). Impact of partially flipped instruction on immediate and subsequent course performance in a large undergraduate chemistry course. Computers & Education, 125, 120-131.
  • Hibbard, L., Sung, S., & Wells, B. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of a semi-self-paced flipped learning format in a college general chemistry sequence. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 24-30.
  • Jensen, J. L., Holt, E. A., Sowards, J. B., Ogden, T. H., & West, R. E. (2018). Investigating strategies for pre-class content learning in a flipped classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 523-535.
  • Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2019). How does a flipped classroom course affect the affective domain toward science course? Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13.
  • Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398-411.
  • Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
  • Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA open, 5(3), 2332858419870489.
  • Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140.
  • Lax, N., Morris, J., & Kolber, B. J. (2017). A partial flip classroom exercise in a large introductory general biology course increases performance at multiple levels. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 412-426.
  • Li, Y.-B., Zheng, W.-Z., & Yang, F. (2017). Cooperation learning of flip teaching style on the MBA mathematics education efficiency. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6963-6972.
  • Lin, H.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technologyenhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1011-1027.
  • Little, C. (2015). The flipped classroom in further education: literature review and case study. Research in post-compulsory education, 20(3), 265-279.
  • Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Applying “First Principles of Instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers & Education, 118, 150-165.
  • Loveys, B. R., & Riggs, K. M. (2019). Flipping the laboratory: improving student engagement and learning outcomes in second year science courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 64-79.
  • Lundin, M., Rensfeldt, A. B., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018). Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: a systematic review of flipped classroom research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 20.
  • Maloy, J., Fries, L., Laski, F., & Ramirez, G. (2019). Seductive details in the flipped classroom: the impact of interesting but educationally irrelevant information on student learning and motivation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar42.
  • Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE transactions on education, 56(4), 430-435.
  • Matthew, S. M., Schoenfeld-Tacher, R. M., Danielson, J. A., & Warman, S. M. (2019). Flipped classroom use in veterinary education: a multinational survey of faculty experiences. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 46(1), 97-107.
  • Mooring, S. R., Mitchell, C. E., & Burrows, N. L. (2016). Evaluation of a flipped, largeenrollment organic chemistry course on student attitude and achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1972-1983.
  • Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC medical education, 15(1), 27.
  • Morton, D. A., & Colbert‐Getz, J. M. (2017). Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy. Anatomical sciences education, 10(2), 170-175.
  • Muñoz‐Merino, P. J., Ruipérez‐Valiente, J. A., Delgado Kloos, C., Auger, M. A., Briz, S., de Castro, V., & Santalla, S. N. (2017). Flipping the classroom to improve learning with MOOCs technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(1), 15-25.
  • Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608.
  • Mylott, E., Kutschera, E., Dunlap, J. C., Christensen, W., & Widenhorn, R. (2016). Using biomedically relevant multimedia content in an introductory physics course for life science and pre-health students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 222-231.
  • O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The internet and higher education, 25, 85-95.
  • Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 76(10).
  • Rau, M. A., Kennedy, K., Oxtoby, L., Bollom, M., & Moore, J. W. (2017). Unpacking “active learning”: A combination of flipped classroom and collaboration support is more effective but collaboration support alone is not. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1406-1414.
  • Reid, S. A. (2016). A flipped classroom redesign in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 914-922.
  • Robert, J., Lewis, S. E., Oueini, R., & Mapugay, A. (2016). Coordinated implementation and evaluation of flipped classes and peer-led team learning in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1993-1998.
  • Rodríguez, G., Díez, J., Pérez, N., Baños, J., & Carrió, M. (2019). Flipped classroom: Fostering creative skills in undergraduate students of health sciences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100575.
  • Roehling, P. V., Root Luna, L. M., Richie, F. J., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (2017). The benefits, drawbacks, and challenges of using the flipped classroom in an introduction to psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 44(3), 183-192.
  • Ryan, M. D., & Reid, S. A. (2016). Impact of the flipped classroom on student performance and retention: A parallel controlled study in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 13-23.
  • Santikarn, B., & Wichadee, S. (2018). Flipping the classroom for English language learners: A study of learning performance and perceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(09), 123-135.
  • Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 758-768.
  • Sezer, B. (2017). The effectiveness of a technology-enhanced flipped science classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(4), 471-494.
  • Shattuck, J. C. (2016). A parallel controlled study of the effectiveness of a partially flipped organic chemistry course on student performance, perceptions, and course completion. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 1984-1992.
  • Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514-524.
  • Sozbilir, M., Kutu, H., & Yasar, M. D. (2012). Science education research in Turkey: A content analysis of selected features of published papers. In Science Education Research and Practice in Europe (pp. 341-374): Brill Sense.
  • Srinivasan, S., Gibbons, R. E., Murphy, K. L., & Raker, J. (2018). Flipped classroom use in chemistry education: results from a survey of postsecondary faculty members. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1307-1318.
  • Styers, M. L., Van Zandt, P. A., & Hayden, K. L. (2018). Active learning in flipped life science courses promotes development of critical thinking skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar39.
  • Teo, T. W., Tan, K. C. D., Yan, Y. K., Teo, Y. C., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). How flip teaching supports undergraduate chemistry laboratory learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 550-567.
  • Touchton, M. (2015). Flipping the classroom and student performance in advanced statistics: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(1), 28- 44.
  • Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in physiology education, 37(4), 316-320.
  • Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1437- 1448.
  • Williams, C., Perlis, S., Gaughan, J., & Phadtare, S. (2018). Creation and implementation of a flipped jigsaw activity to stimulate interest in biochemistry among medical students. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(4), 343-353.
  • Winter, J. W. (2018). Performance and motivation in a middle school flipped learning course. TechTrends, 62(2), 176-183.
  • Xiao, N., Thor, D., Zheng, M., Baek, J., & Kim, G. (2018). Flipped classroom narrows the performance gap between low-and high-performing dental students in physiology. Advances in physiology education, 42(4), 586-592.
  • Xu, P., Chen, Y., Nie, W., Wang, Y., Song, T., Li, H., . . . Zhao, L. (2019). The effectiveness of a flipped classroom on the development of Chinese nursing students' skill competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse education today, 80, 67-77.
  • Ye, S. H., Hsiao, T. Y., & Sun, C. T. (2018). Using commercial video games in flipped classrooms to support physical concept construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 602-614.
  • Yough, M., Merzdorf, H. E., Fedesco, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2019). Flipping the classroom in teacher education: Implications for motivation and learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 410-422.
  • Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660-670.
  • Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: what are the gaps and future trends? On the Horizon.
  • Zeng, X., Yu, C., Liu, Y., Hu, X., Hao, Q., Jiang, Y., . . . Teng, B. (2018). The construction and online/offline blended learning of small private online courses of Principles of Chemical Engineering. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1519- 1526.
  • Zhang, L. (2018). English flipped classroom teaching model based on cooperative learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(6).
APA Teke D, MERAL E, başcı namlı z, GÜLER M (2021). GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. , 564 - 587.
Chicago Teke Dilek,MERAL Elif,başcı namlı zeynep,GÜLER MUHAMMED GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. (2021): 564 - 587.
MLA Teke Dilek,MERAL Elif,başcı namlı zeynep,GÜLER MUHAMMED GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. , 2021, ss.564 - 587.
AMA Teke D,MERAL E,başcı namlı z,GÜLER M GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. . 2021; 564 - 587.
Vancouver Teke D,MERAL E,başcı namlı z,GÜLER M GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. . 2021; 564 - 587.
IEEE Teke D,MERAL E,başcı namlı z,GÜLER M "GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS." , ss.564 - 587, 2021.
ISNAD Teke, Dilek vd. "GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS". (2021), 564-587.
APA Teke D, MERAL E, başcı namlı z, GÜLER M (2021). GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. IOJET, 8(2), 564 - 587.
Chicago Teke Dilek,MERAL Elif,başcı namlı zeynep,GÜLER MUHAMMED GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. IOJET 8, no.2 (2021): 564 - 587.
MLA Teke Dilek,MERAL Elif,başcı namlı zeynep,GÜLER MUHAMMED GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. IOJET, vol.8, no.2, 2021, ss.564 - 587.
AMA Teke D,MERAL E,başcı namlı z,GÜLER M GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. IOJET. 2021; 8(2): 564 - 587.
Vancouver Teke D,MERAL E,başcı namlı z,GÜLER M GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS. IOJET. 2021; 8(2): 564 - 587.
IEEE Teke D,MERAL E,başcı namlı z,GÜLER M "GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS." IOJET, 8, ss.564 - 587, 2021.
ISNAD Teke, Dilek vd. "GENERAL TRENDS OF STUDIES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMMODEL: BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING AND CONTENT ANALYSIS". IOJET 8/2 (2021), 564-587.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 20:26

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları