Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 281 - 285 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361 İndeks Tarihi: 28-06-2021

IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility

Öz:
Aim: To compare IVF-ICSI outcomes in single-versus-double lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients diagnosed with unexplained infertilityMaterials and Methods: A total of 188 patients aged 23-33 years who were diagnosed as unexplained infertility and underwent IVF/ICSI treatment were included and divided into two groups according to whether the catheter used in oocyte collection was single or double lumened: group 1 patients with single lumen (n: 59) and group 2 patients with double lumen (n:129). In addition, patients were divided into two subgroups according to the treatment protocol: antagonist protocol (n:134; 45 patient in group 1 and 89 patient in group 2) and long agonist protocol (n:54; 14 patient in group 1 and 40 patient in group 2). Results: Implantation rate (32.2% vs. 48.1%, p:0.042) clinical pregnancy rate (25.4% vs. 41.9%, p:0.03) and live birth rate (17.2% vs. 28.6%, p: 0.011) were higher in patients to whom double-lumen was used. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, double lumen use was found to be an independent predictor for clinical pregnancy (p = 0.041). According to the treatment protocol; clinical pregnancy rates (15 (25.4%) vs. 54 (41.9%), p: 0.011) and live birth rates (8 (13.6%) vs. 40 (31.0%), p: 0.030) of patients to whom double lumen was used during oocyte pick-up after the antagonist protocol were significantly higher. Conclusion: Our study showed that the use of double lumen increased implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate and it is evaluated as an independent factor that increases IVF/ICSI outcomes.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Levy G, Hill MJ, Ramirez CI, et al. The use of follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction 2012;27:2373-9.
  • 2. Wongtra-ngan S, Vutyavanich T, Brown J. Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010.
  • 3. Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Payson MD, et al.Ovarian follicular flushing among low-responding patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1381-4.
  • 4. Haydardedeoglu B, Cok T, Kilicdag EB, et al. Invitro fertilization–intra cytoplasmic sperm injectionout comes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in normally responding patients: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2011;95:812-4.
  • 5. Sharara FI, Mcclamrock HD. High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1999;72:401-5.
  • 6. Haydardedeoglu B, Gjemalaj F, Aytac PC, et al. Direct aspiration versus follicular flushing in poor responders undergoing intra cytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International J Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2017;124:1190-6.
  • 7. Georgiou EX, Melo P, Brown J, et al. Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018.
  • 8. Neumann K, Griesinger G. Follicular flushing in patients with poor ovarian response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive biomedicine online 2018;36:408-15.
  • 9. Von Horn K, Depenbusch M, Schultze-Mosgau A, et al. Randomized, open trial comparing a modified double-lumen needle follicular flushing system with a single-lumen aspiration needle in IVF patients with poor ovarian response. Human Reproduction 2017;32: 832-5.
  • 10. Kovacs G. Oocyte collection. In: Gardner, D. K., Weissman, A., Howles, C. M., Shoham, Z, Eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Volume 2: Clinical Perspectives. 5th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018;604-11.
  • 11. Hill MJ, Levens ED. Is there a benefit in follicularflushing in assisted reproductive technology? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010;22:208-12.
  • 12. Lozano DHM, Scheffer JB, Frydman N, et al. Optimal reproductive competence of oocytes retrieved through follicular flushing in minimal stimulation IVF. Reproductive biomedicine online 2008;16:119-23.
APA YENIGUL N, Ozelci R, DİLBAZ S, Baser E, Aldemir O, Dilbaz B, moraloglu tekin o (2021). IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. , 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
Chicago YENIGUL Nefise Nazlı,Ozelci Runa,DİLBAZ Serdar,Baser Emre,Aldemir Oya,Dilbaz Berna,moraloglu tekin ozlem IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. (2021): 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
MLA YENIGUL Nefise Nazlı,Ozelci Runa,DİLBAZ Serdar,Baser Emre,Aldemir Oya,Dilbaz Berna,moraloglu tekin ozlem IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. , 2021, ss.281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
AMA YENIGUL N,Ozelci R,DİLBAZ S,Baser E,Aldemir O,Dilbaz B,moraloglu tekin o IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. . 2021; 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
Vancouver YENIGUL N,Ozelci R,DİLBAZ S,Baser E,Aldemir O,Dilbaz B,moraloglu tekin o IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. . 2021; 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
IEEE YENIGUL N,Ozelci R,DİLBAZ S,Baser E,Aldemir O,Dilbaz B,moraloglu tekin o "IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility." , ss.281 - 285, 2021. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
ISNAD YENIGUL, Nefise Nazlı vd. "IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility". (2021), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
APA YENIGUL N, Ozelci R, DİLBAZ S, Baser E, Aldemir O, Dilbaz B, moraloglu tekin o (2021). IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. Annals of Medical Research, 28(2), 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
Chicago YENIGUL Nefise Nazlı,Ozelci Runa,DİLBAZ Serdar,Baser Emre,Aldemir Oya,Dilbaz Berna,moraloglu tekin ozlem IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. Annals of Medical Research 28, no.2 (2021): 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
MLA YENIGUL Nefise Nazlı,Ozelci Runa,DİLBAZ Serdar,Baser Emre,Aldemir Oya,Dilbaz Berna,moraloglu tekin ozlem IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. Annals of Medical Research, vol.28, no.2, 2021, ss.281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
AMA YENIGUL N,Ozelci R,DİLBAZ S,Baser E,Aldemir O,Dilbaz B,moraloglu tekin o IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 28(2): 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
Vancouver YENIGUL N,Ozelci R,DİLBAZ S,Baser E,Aldemir O,Dilbaz B,moraloglu tekin o IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility. Annals of Medical Research. 2021; 28(2): 281 - 285. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
IEEE YENIGUL N,Ozelci R,DİLBAZ S,Baser E,Aldemir O,Dilbaz B,moraloglu tekin o "IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility." Annals of Medical Research, 28, ss.281 - 285, 2021. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361
ISNAD YENIGUL, Nefise Nazlı vd. "IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility". Annals of Medical Research 28/2 (2021), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.361