Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 18 Sayfa Aralığı: 359 - 372 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2021
Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?
Öz: Despite the existence of several cognitive influences, metacognitive factors on eating and satiation still remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated a relatively recent metacognitive regulation approach and its measurement method in a lab-experiment.Participants (N=216) were shownphotografsof varying portions of common lunch foods (selected after a separate study, N=94) and asked to makepredicted judgmentsof satiation (JOS) for each via considering their actual hunger levels and whilst imagining other bodily states (e.g., extremely hungry and completely full). Differencescalculated between observed-JOS and their reference scores -thosepresumed to yield accurate matches for the cases-produced either deviances or none at all (discordant-or concordant-JOS). Hungry-group yielded significantly lower concordant-JOS percentage than full-group regardless of portion size, indicating a clearercognitive tendency to lose control over consumption when being hungry than satiated. Critically, full-group could notimagine extreme hunger as hungry-group whereas hungry-group imagined complete fullness just as full-group did, suggesting that whilst hunger was not an obstacle to imagine fullness,fullness hindered the ability to imagine hunger. These findingssuggestthathunger and fullness mightnotbe the polar opposites on the very same dimension, which would, for instance,reveal a need to revisit the treatments of eating disorders accordingly.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Brunstrom, J. M., Brown, S., Hinton, E. C., Rogers, P. J., & Fay, S. H. (2011). ‘Expected satiety’ changes hunger and fullness in the inter-meal interval. Appetite, 56(2), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.002
- Brunstrom, J. M., Shakeshaft, N. G., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2008). Measuring “expected satiety” in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite, 51(3), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.017
- Galak, J., Redden, J. P., Yang, Y., & Kyung, E. J. (2014). How perceptions of temporal distance influence satiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.008
- Green, S. M., & Blundell, J. E. (1996). Subjective and objective indices of the satiating effect of foods. Can people predict how filling a food will be? European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 50(12), 798–806.
- Guzel, M. A. (2015). A metacognitive regulation approach for judgment of satiation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(8), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1057148
- Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1984). A boundary model for the regulation of eating. Research Publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19831201-03
- Higgs, S. (2005). Memory and its role in appetite regulation. Physiology & Behavior, 85(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.04.003
- Higgs, Suzanne. (2008). Cognitive influences on food intake: The effects of manipulating memory for recent eating. Physiology & Behavior, 94(5), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.012
- Higgs, Suzanne, & Woodward, M. (2009). Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women. Appetite, 52(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.07.007
- Larson, J. S., Redden, J. P., & Elder, R. S. (2014). Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.001
- Loeber, S., Grosshans, M., Korucuoglu, O., Vollmert, C., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Schneider, S., Wiers, R. W., Mann, K., & Kiefer, F. (2012). Impairment of inhibitory control in response to food-associated cues and attentional bias of obese participants and normal-weight controls. International Journal of Obesity, 36(10), 1334–1339. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.184
- Loeber, Sabine, Grosshans, M., Herpertz, S., Kiefer, F., & Herpertz, S. C. (2013). Hunger modulates behavioral disinhibition and attention allocation to food-associated cues in normal-weight controls. Appetite, 71, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.008
- Morewedge, C. K., Huh, Y. E., & Vosgerau, J. (2010). Thought for food: imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science (New York, N.Y.), 330(6010), 1530–1533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195701
- Murray, M., & Vickers, Z. (2009). Consumer views of hunger and fullness. A qualitative approach. Appetite, 53(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.06.003
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. (pp. 1–25). The MIT Press.
- Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985). Dieting and binging: A causal analysis. American Psychologist, 40(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.2.193
- Redden, J. P. (2015). Desire Over Time: The Multi-Faceted Nature of Satiation. In W. Hofmann & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The Psychology of Desire (pp. 82–103). Guilford Press.
- Redden, J. P., & Galak, J. (2013). The subjective sense of feeling satiated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028896
- Robinson, E., Aveyard, P., Daley, A., Jolly, K., Lewis, A., Lycett, D., & Higgs, S. (2013). Eating attentively: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of food intake memory and awareness on eating. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 97(4), 728–742. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.045245
- Rozin, P., Dow, S., Moscovitch, M., & Rajaram, S. (1998). What Causes Humans to Begin and End a Meal? A Role for Memory for What Has Been Eaten, as Evidenced by a Study of Multiple Meal Eating in Amnesic Patients. Psychological Science, 9(5), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00073
- Schachter, S. (1971). Some extraordinary facts about obese humans and rats. American Psychologist, 26(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030817
- Seibt, B., Häfner, M., & Deutsch, R. (2007). Prepared to eat: how immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.365
- Stirling, L. J., & Yeomans, M. R. (2004). Effect of exposure to a forbidden food on eating in restrained and unrestrained women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10232
- Stroebe, W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review, 120(1), 110–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030849
- Veltkamp, M., Aarts, H., & Custers, R. (2008). On the emergence of deprivation-reducing behaviors: Subliminal priming of behavior representations turns deprivation into motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 866–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.08.005
| APA | Güzel M, Güngör D (2020). Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. , 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| Chicago | Güzel Mehmet Akif,Güngör Duygu Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. (2020): 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| MLA | Güzel Mehmet Akif,Güngör Duygu Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. , 2020, ss.359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| AMA | Güzel M,Güngör D Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. . 2020; 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| Vancouver | Güzel M,Güngör D Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. . 2020; 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| IEEE | Güzel M,Güngör D "Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?." , ss.359 - 372, 2020. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| ISNAD | Güzel, Mehmet Akif - Güngör, Duygu. "Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?". (2020), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| APA | Güzel M, Güngör D (2020). Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. Nesne Dergisi, 8(18), 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| Chicago | Güzel Mehmet Akif,Güngör Duygu Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. Nesne Dergisi 8, no.18 (2020): 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| MLA | Güzel Mehmet Akif,Güngör Duygu Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. Nesne Dergisi, vol.8, no.18, 2020, ss.359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| AMA | Güzel M,Güngör D Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. Nesne Dergisi. 2020; 8(18): 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| Vancouver | Güzel M,Güngör D Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?. Nesne Dergisi. 2020; 8(18): 359 - 372. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| IEEE | Güzel M,Güngör D "Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?." Nesne Dergisi, 8, ss.359 - 372, 2020. 10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
| ISNAD | Güzel, Mehmet Akif - Güngör, Duygu. "Testing a Metacognitive Regulation Approach for Judgment of Satiation: Might Hunger and Fullness not be the Polar Opposites of the Same Dimension?". Nesne Dergisi 8/18 (2020), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-08-18-01 |
