Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31 Sayfa Aralığı: 123 - 139 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2021

Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey

Öz:
In recent years, the application of modern transportation modes to the current routes changes the urban layout. As a part of these transformation modes, the HSR applications promise various transformations on the urban space. In this context, rearrangements of axes, the facilities on these axes and the urban space in the surrounding of these facilities put forward an important design problem. Pendik, a large district on the Southern Istanbul periphery; the recent application of HSR Station has started to transform its centre into an intercity transportation node since its opening in 2013. In accordance with the new role, reorganization of HSR hub and its surroundings provides an experimental teaching in the design studio. Due to the exploratory nature of Architectural Design Studio, the content analysis approach is conducted. The integration of the learning experience in the urban design scale was crucial. The reports collected systematically from the students during the semester were coded with respect to content analysis. Both the final design decisions’ and the field-specific evaluations’ levels of relevance with the literature were interpreted. Among the design criteria compiled from the literature; security, connections between places, pedestrian’s ability to use the space easily, diversity of activities and users, and integration of urban texture with the HSR station have emerged for the project site. Research results have shown that content analysis can be a consistent and systematic method in guiding designs in the interface of architectural and urban design project topics.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akıncıtürk, N., Erbil, Y., & Yücel, Ç. (2011). Cooperative Learning in Architectural Design Studio. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 16(2), 35-43.
  • Albalate, D., & Bel, G. (2012). The Economics and Politics of High-Speed Rail, Lessons from Experiences Abroad. USA: Lexington Books.
  • Aydınlı, S. & Avcı, O. (2010). Relational Thinking that Enhance the Critical Thinking: A studio Case Based on Discovery of Knowledge. (Eds) Spiridonidis C., Voyatzaki, M., in Educating Architects Towards Innovative Architecture, pp. 89-100, EAAE: ENHSA Publication.
  • Blaha, P. (2013). Urban Scene Safety, Proposal of Urban Safety Assessment Method. Terra Specta Stu, Planning Studies - Central European Journal of Spatial and Landscape Planning Stu, 1, 11. California High Speed Rail Authority and Pb’s Placemaking
  • Group. (2011). Urban Design Guidelines, California High Speed Train Project. CA.
  • Cozens, P., & Hillier, D. (2008). The Shape of Things to Come: New Urbanism, The Grid and the Cul-De- Sac. International Planning Studies, 13(1), 51-73. Edward, T. H. (1966). The Hidden Dimension, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Elshater, A. M., & Ibraheem, F. (2014). From Typology Concept to Smart Transportation Hub. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 153, 531-541.
  • Fasli, M., & Hassanpour B. (2017). Rotational Critique System as A Method of Culture Change in an Architecture Design Studio: Urban Design Studio as Case Study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 194-205, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1174142
  • Hammond, J.S. (1980). Learning by the Case Method (Pdf Document). Accessed through web site https:// www.study.net/sample/pdf/Learning_by_the_ Case_Method.pdf in 12.10.2020.
  • Inan, M., & Demir, M. (2017). Demiryolu Ulaşımı ve Türkiye’de Hızlı Tren Yatırımlarının Etkileri: Eskişehir-Konya Örneği. The Journal of International Social Sciences, 27(1), 99-120.
  • Jacobson, J., & Forsyth, A. (2008). Seven American Tods: Good Practices for Urban Design in Transit- Oriented Development Projects. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1 (2), 51-88.
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Mcallister, K. (2010). Design Process - Making It Relevant for Students, Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research (Special Volume: Design Education: Explorations and Prospects for a Better Built Environment Ashraf M. Salama and Michael J. Crosbie - editors), 4, 76-89.
  • Khankzad, M. (2015). Architecture Students’ Understanding of Landscape Issues in Design Studios. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 5(3), 33-42.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
  • Özçelik Güney S. & Karaman Öztaş, S. (2018) Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, MİM222 Mimari Tasarım IV Stüdyosu Öğrenci Projeleri Arşivi. Gebze, Kocaeli.
  • Peters, D. (2009). The Renaissance of Inner-City RailStation Areas: A Key Element in Contemporary Urban Restructuring Dynamics. Paper for Critical Planning’s 2009 Special Issue on Urban Restructuring.
  • Sanfeliu, C.B., & Ganges, L.S. (2016). The High-Speed Rail Project as an Urban Development Tool: The Cases of Zaragoza and Valladolid, Belgeo, (3), 1-18.
  • Shi, S. (2016). Study on Land Development Strategy for Inter-city railway Transport Hub. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 216, 172-180.
  • Toivonen, T., & Friederici N. (2015). Time to Define What a “Hub” Really Is. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring Issue. https://ssir.org/articles/ entry/time_to_define_what_a_hub_really_is, a. date 14.11.2018.
  • Trace, C. (2001). Applying Content Analysis to Case Study Data: A Preliminary Report. (Department of Information Studies University of California). Los Angeles.
  • Trip, J.J. (2008). Urban Quality in High-speed Train Station Area Redevelopment: The Cases of Amsterdam Zuidas and Rotterdam Central. Planning, Practice and Research, 23(3), 383-401. doi: 10.1080/02697450802423633
  • Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and Disjunction. England: The MIT Press.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Railroad Policy and Development. (2011). Station Area Planning for High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail. Accessed through web site: https://railroads. dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/fra_net/2358/ FRA_Station_Area_Planning_June_2011_c.pdf in 12.10.2020
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Xu, S., Zhang, & D., Cao, C. (2012). City Transportation Hub Region Planning Based on the Urban Design Integrating Strategy: A Case Study of Conceptual Reform Design of the Changchun Railway Station North Area. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 211, 763-766.
APA özçelik s, karaman öztaş s, SALIHOGLU T (2020). Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. , 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
Chicago özçelik sedef,karaman öztaş saniye,SALIHOGLU TAYFUN Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. (2020): 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
MLA özçelik sedef,karaman öztaş saniye,SALIHOGLU TAYFUN Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. , 2020, ss.123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
AMA özçelik s,karaman öztaş s,SALIHOGLU T Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. . 2020; 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
Vancouver özçelik s,karaman öztaş s,SALIHOGLU T Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. . 2020; 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
IEEE özçelik s,karaman öztaş s,SALIHOGLU T "Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey." , ss.123 - 139, 2020. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
ISNAD özçelik, sedef vd. "Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey". (2020), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
APA özçelik s, karaman öztaş s, SALIHOGLU T (2020). Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. Tasarım+Kuram, 16(31), 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
Chicago özçelik sedef,karaman öztaş saniye,SALIHOGLU TAYFUN Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. Tasarım+Kuram 16, no.31 (2020): 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
MLA özçelik sedef,karaman öztaş saniye,SALIHOGLU TAYFUN Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. Tasarım+Kuram, vol.16, no.31, 2020, ss.123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
AMA özçelik s,karaman öztaş s,SALIHOGLU T Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. Tasarım+Kuram. 2020; 16(31): 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
Vancouver özçelik s,karaman öztaş s,SALIHOGLU T Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey. Tasarım+Kuram. 2020; 16(31): 123 - 139. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
IEEE özçelik s,karaman öztaş s,SALIHOGLU T "Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey." Tasarım+Kuram, 16, ss.123 - 139, 2020. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507
ISNAD özçelik, sedef vd. "Exploring Urban Design Criteria For High Speed Rail (HSR) Station Through the Design Studio Experience - Case of Pendik/Turkey". Tasarım+Kuram 16/31 (2020), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.74507