Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31 Sayfa Aralığı: 257 - 277 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2021
Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar
Öz: Günümüz kentlerinde sanayileşme, nüfus artışı, göç, gelişmişlik düzeyi, ulusal politikalar gibi çeşitli faktörler doğrultusunda gerçekleşen yoğun, planlanmamış ve çarpık kentleşmeye bağlı pek çok sorun görülmektedir. Bu sorunların çevresel kaynaklar, kent mekanı ve kentin yaratıcı ve yürütücü unsuru insan üzerinde neden olduğu etkiler on yıllardır pek çok disiplinde tartışılmaktadır. Dolayısıyla insan ve çevre arasındaki karşılıklı ve kuvvetli etkileşim, insanın bedensel ve psikolojik sağlığını, kentsel tasarımda ele alınması kaçınılmaz konulardan biri yapmaktadır. Özellikle çevre psikolojisi alanında yer bulan insan psikolojisi ve çevre arasındaki ilişki, kentsel sorunlar konusuyla ilgili olarak ekopsikoloji yaklaşımında karşılık bulmaktadır (Rozsak, 1992). İnsan ve doğa arasında yeniden kurulacak bağın çevresel sorunların çözümündeki rolüne dikkat çeken yaklaşım, bu bağın kurulabilmesi için ise bireylerin doğal alanlarda vakit geçirmesi ile elde ettikleri ekoterapi hizmetinin gerekliliğinden bahsetmektedir. Bu gereklilik doğrultusunda bu çalışma, kentin ekoterapi hizmeti sağlayan fonksiyonları ve özelliklerinin araştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla ekopsikoloji ve ekoterapi konu başlıklarında sistematik literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiş, ulaşılan 37 makale içerisinde terapötik mekânların türleri, özellikleri, faydaları ve terapötik aktiviteler incelenmiştir. İncelenen 4 eksen dâhilinde anahtar kelimeler halinde çekilerek gruplanan tanımlar söylem analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Belirlenen fayda, tür, özellik ve aktivitelerin mekânının niteliklerini belirleme konusundaki en önemli araçlardan olan kentsel tasarım süreçlerine sunabileceği katkılar ve dâhil olabileceği aşamalar tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Abdelaal, M. S., & Soebarto, V. (2019). Biophilia and Salutogenesis as restorative design approaches in healthcare architecture. Architectural Science Review, 62(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 038628.2019.1604313
- Arthur, M., Liu, G., Hao, Y., Zhang, L., Liang, S., Asamoah, E. F., & Lombardi, G. V. (2019). Urban food-energy-water nexus indicators: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151(February), 104481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2019.104481
- Bagot, K. L., Allen, F. C. L., & Toukhsati, S. (2015). Perceived restorativeness of children’s school playground environments: Nature, playground features and play period experiences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 1–9. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.005
- Barnes, M. R., Donahue, M. L., Keeler, B. L., Shorb, C. M., Mohtadi, T. Z., & Shelby, L. J. (2019). Characterizing nature and participant experience in studies of nature exposure for positive mental health: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.02617
- Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Bhugra, D., Castaldelli-Maia, J. M., Torales, J., & Ventriglio, A. (2019). Megacities, migration, and mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(11), 884–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2215-0366(19)30294-9
- Bornioli, A., Parkhurst, G., & Morgan, P. L. (2018). The psychological wellbeing benefits of place engagement during walking in urban environments: A qualitative photo-elicitation study. Health and Place, 53(March), 228–236. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.018
- Brazier, C. (2017). Ecotherapy in Practice. In Ecotherapy in Practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208268
- Burls, A. (2007). People and green spaces: promoting public health and mental well-being through ecotherapy Ambra. Journal of Public Mental Health, 6(3), 24–29.
- Chamie, J. (2020). World Population: 2020 Overview. https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/ world-population-2020-overview
- Chatalos, P. A. (2013). Nachhaltigkeit: Öko-psychologische Einsichten und personzentrierte Beiträge. Person- Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 12(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757. 2013.855136
- Clatworthy, J., Hinds, J., & Camic, P. M. (2013). Gardening as a mental health intervention: A review. Mental Health Review Journal, 18(4), 214–225. https:// doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-02-2013-0007
- Clinebell, H. (1996). Ecotherapy: healing ourselves.
- Cole, D. N., & Hall, T. E. (2010). Experiencing the restorative components of wilderness environments: Does congestion interfere and does length of exposure matter? Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 806–823. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013916509347248
- Davis, K. M., & Atkins, S. S. (2009). Ecotherapy: Tribalism in the mountains and forest. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 4(3), 273–282. https://doi. org/10.1080/15401380903192747
- Flies, E. J., Mavoa, S., Zosky, G. R., Mantzioris, E., Williams, C., Eri, R., Brook, B. W., & Buettel, J. C. (2019). Urban-associated diseases: Candidate diseases, environmental risk factors, and a path forward. Environment International, 133(September), 105187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envint.2019.105187
- Gill, C., Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2019). Spiritual retreats as a restorative destination: Design factors facilitating restorative outcomes. Annals of Tourism Research, 79(June), 102761. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102761
- Grassini, S., Revonsuo, A., Castellotti, S., Petrizzo, I., Benedetti, V., & Koivisto, M. (2019). Processing of natural scenery is associated with lower attentional and cognitive load compared with urban ones. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.007
- Greenleaf, A. T., Bryant, R. M., & Pollock, J. B. (2014). Nature-Based Counseling: Integrating the Healing Benefits of Nature Into Practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 36(2), 162–174. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10447-013-9198-4
- Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
- Hauru, K., Lehvävirta, S., Korpela, K., & Kotze, D. J. (2012). Closure of view to the urban matrix has positive effects on perceived restorativeness in urban forests in Helsinki, Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(4), 361–369. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.002
- Ibes, D., Hirama, I., & Schuyler, C. (2018). Greenspace ecotherapy interventions: The stress-reduction potential of green micro-breaks integrating nature connection and mind-body skills. Ecopsychology, 10(3), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1089/ eco.2018.0024
- Ichimura, M. (2003). Urbanization, urban environment and land Use: Challenges and opportunities an issue paper, Asia-Pacific Forum for Environment and Development Experting Meeting, Guilin, China.
- Jackson, L. E. (2003). The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 191–200. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X
- Jordan, M., & Marshall, H. (2010). Taking counselling and psychotherapy outside: Destruction or enrichment of the therapeutic frame? European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 12(4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2010.530105
- Juan, C. S., Subiza-Pérez, M., & Vozmediano, L. (2017). Restoration and the city: The role of public urban squares. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(DEC), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02093
- Jung, C. G. (1999). Keşfedilmemiş Benlik. İlhan Yayınevi.
- Kamitsis, I., & Simmonds, J. G. (2017). Using Resources of Nature in the Counselling Room: Qualitative Research into Ecotherapy Practice. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 39(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10447-017-9294-y
- Kellert, S. (2014). Biophilia and biomimicry: evlutionary adaptation of human versus nonhuman nature, Intelligent Buildings International, 8:2, 51-56, DO I:10.1080/17508975.2014.902802
- Kindel, P. J. (2019). Biomorphic urbanism: A guide for sustainable cities. https://medium.com/@SOM/ biomorphic-urbanism-a-guide-for-sustainable-cities- 4a1da72ad656.
- Kumar, P., Druckman, A., Gallagher, J., Gatersleben, B., Allison, S., Eisenman, T. S., Hoang, U., Hama, S., Tiwari, A., Sharma, A., Abhijith, K. V., Adlakha, D., McNabola, A., Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., Skeldon, A. C., de Lusignan, S., & Morawska, L. (2019). The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure and human health. Environment International, 133(June), 105181. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105181
- Kusmane, A. S., Ile, U., & Ziemelniece, A. (2019). Importance of trees with low-growing branches and shrubs in perception of urban spaces. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/471/9/092061
- Lindal, P. J., & Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 26–36. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.003
- Liu, L., Zhong, Y., Ao, S., & Wu, H. (2019). Exploring the relevance of green space and epidemic diseases based on panel data in China from 2007 to 2016. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph16142551
- Moore, M., Gould, P., & Keary, B. S. (2003). Global urbanization and impact on health. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 206(4–5), 269–278. https://doi. org/10.1078/1438-4639-00223
- Mutatkar, R. K. (1995). Public health problems of urbanization. Social Science and Medicine, 41(7), 977–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00398-D
- Pálsdóttir, A. M., Wissler, S. K., Nilsson, K., Petersson, I. F., & Grahn, P. (2015). Nature-based rehabilitation in peri-urban areas for people with stress-related Illnesses -A controlled prospective study. Acta Horticulturae, 1093, 31–35. https:// doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1093.2
- Pasanen, T., Johnson, K., Lee, K., & Korpela, K. (2018). Can nature walks with psychological tasks improve mood, self-reported restoration, and sustained attention? Results from two experimental field studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(OCT), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02057
- Pedersen, E., Weisner, S. E. B., & Johansson, M. (2019). Wetland areas’ direct contributions to residents’ well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2018.07.236
- Pedersen Zari, M. (2010). Regenerative design for the future. BUILD, Vol. 115, January 2010, 68–69.
- Pedretti-Burls, A. (2007). Ecotherapy: a therapeutic and educative model. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology, 8, 19–25.
- Phelps, C., Butler, C., Cousins, A., & Hughes, C. (2015). Sowing the seeds or failing to blossom? A feasibility study of a simple ecotherapy-based intervention in women affected by breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience, 9, 1–9. https://doi. org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.602
- Phillips, D. R. (1993). Urbanization and human health. Parasitology, 106(S1), S93–S107. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0031182000086145
- Qiu, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, Z. (2019). Exploring the linkage between the neighborhood environment and mental health in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph16173206
- Reed, B. (2007). Forum: Shifting from “sustainability” to regeneration. Building Research and Information, 35(6), 674–680. https://doi. org/10.1080/09613210701475753
- Reese, R. F., & Lewis, T. F. (2019). Greening counseling: examining multivariate relationships between ecowellness and holistic wellness. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 58(1), 53–67. https://doi. org/10.1002/johc.12089
- Reichert, M., Braun, U., Lautenbach, S., Zipf, A., Ebner- Priemer, U., Tost, H., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2020). Studying the impact of built environments on human mental health in everyday life: methodological developments, state-of-the-art and technological frontiers. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. copsyc.2019.08.026
- Restivo, V., Cernigliaro, A., & Casuccio, A. (2019). Urban sprawl and health outcome associations in sicily. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1–9. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph16081350
- Rozsak, T. (1992). The Voice of Earth: An Exploration of Ecopsychology. Simon & Schuster.
- Sackett, C. R. (2010). Ecotherapy: A counter to society’s unhealthy trend? Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540 1383.2010.485082
- Schebella, M. F., Weber, D., Lindsey, K., & Daniels, C. B. (2017). For the love of nature: exploring the ımportance of species diversity and micro-variables associated with favorite outdoor places. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.02094
- Scopelliti, M., Carrus, G., & Bonaiuto, M. (2019). Is it really nature that restores people? A comparison with historical sites with high restorative potential. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02742
- Scull, J. (2008). Ecopsychology: Where does it fit in psychology in 2009? The Trumpeter, 24(3), 68–85.
- Singh, R. L. (2017). Introduction to Environmental Biotechnology. In Principles and Applications of Environmental Biotechnology for a Sustainable Future (pp. 1–12). Springer. http://www.springer. com/series/13085
- Steg, L., van den Berg, A. E., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental Psychology : An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. http:// ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/itup/detail. action?docID=888149
- Stevens, P. (2010). Embedment in the environment: A new paradigm for well-being? Perspectives in Public Health, 130(6), 265–269. https://doi. org/10.1177/1757913910384047
- Stoltz, J., & Schaffer, C. (2018). Salutogenic affordances and sustainability: Multiple benefits with edible forest gardens in urban green spaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.02344
- Summers, J. K., & Vivian, D. N. (2018). Ecotherapy - A forgotten ecosystem service: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(AUG), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01389
- Szczygiel, B. (2003). “City beautiful” revisited: An analysis of nineteenth-century civic improvement efforts. Journal of Urban History, 29(2), 107–132. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0096144202238870
- T.C. Resmi Gazete. Mekansal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği. 14.6.2014. Sayı:29030, Başbakanlık Basımevi, Ankara
- Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Behavior and the Natural Environment, 85–125. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4
- Wang, D., & MacMillan, T. (2013). The benefits of gardening for older adults: A systematic review of the literature. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 37(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788. 2013.784942
- Weimann, A., & Oni, T. (2019). A systematised review of the health impact of urban informal settlements and implications for upgrading interventions in South Africa, a rapidly urbanising middle-income country. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 1–17. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193608
- Wheeling, S. D. (1993). Making sense. The West Virginia Medical Journal, 89(3), 113.
- Wilson, N., Fleming, S., Jones, R., Lafferty, K., Cathrine, K., Seaman, P., & Knifton, L. (2010). Green shoots of recovery: the impact of a mental health ecotherapy programme. Mental Health Review Journal, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.5042/ mhrj.2010.0366
- Wilson, N., Ross, M., Lafferty, K., & Jones, R. (2009). A review of ecotherapy as an adjunct form of treatment for those who use mental health services. Journal of Public Mental Health, 7(3), 23–35.
- Wolsko, C., & Hoyt, K. (2012). Employing the restorative capacity of nature: Pathways to practicing ecotherapy among mental health professionals. Ecopsychology, 4(1), 10–24. https://doi. org/10.1089/eco.2012.0002
| APA | Kara D, Oruç G (2020). Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. , 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| Chicago | Kara Didem,Oruç Gülden Demet Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. (2020): 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| MLA | Kara Didem,Oruç Gülden Demet Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. , 2020, ss.257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| AMA | Kara D,Oruç G Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. . 2020; 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| Vancouver | Kara D,Oruç G Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. . 2020; 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| IEEE | Kara D,Oruç G "Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar." , ss.257 - 277, 2020. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| ISNAD | Kara, Didem - Oruç, Gülden Demet. "Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar". (2020), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| APA | Kara D, Oruç G (2020). Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. Tasarım+Kuram, 16(31), 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| Chicago | Kara Didem,Oruç Gülden Demet Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. Tasarım+Kuram 16, no.31 (2020): 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| MLA | Kara Didem,Oruç Gülden Demet Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. Tasarım+Kuram, vol.16, no.31, 2020, ss.257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| AMA | Kara D,Oruç G Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. Tasarım+Kuram. 2020; 16(31): 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| Vancouver | Kara D,Oruç G Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar. Tasarım+Kuram. 2020; 16(31): 257 - 277. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| IEEE | Kara D,Oruç G "Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar." Tasarım+Kuram, 16, ss.257 - 277, 2020. 10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
| ISNAD | Kara, Didem - Oruç, Gülden Demet. "Birey-Doğa İlişkisinin Yeniden Kurgulanması Bağlamında Ekoterapötik Mekânlar". Tasarım+Kuram 16/31 (2020), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.32548 |
