Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 445 - 455 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.548717 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2021

Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS

Öz:
In a search process, getting trapped in a local minimum or jumping the global minimum problems are also one of the biggestproblems of meta-heuristic algorithms as in artificial intelligence methods. In this paper, causes of these problems are investigatedand novel solution methods are developed. For this purpose, a novel framework has been developed to test and analyze the metaheuristic algorithms. Additionally, analysis and test studies have been carried out for Symbiotic Organisms Search (SOS)Algorithm. The aim of the study is to measure the mimicking a natural ecosystem success of symbiotic operators. Thus, problemsin the search process have been discovered and operators' design mistakes have been revealed as a case study of the developedtesting and analyzing method. Moreover, ways of realizing a precise neighborhood search (intensification) and getting rid of thelocal minimum (increasing diversification) have been explored. Important information that enhances the performance of operatorsin the search process has been achieved through experimental studies. Additionally, it is expected that the new experimental testmethods developed and presented in this paper contributes to meta-heuristic algorithms studies for designing and testing.
Anahtar Kelime:

Meta-Sezgisel Arama Sürecinin Analiz, Test ve Yönetimi: SOS Üzerine Deneysel Bir Çalışma

Öz:
Bir arama sürecinde, yerel minimum tuzağına düşmek ya da küresel minimum noktasını atlamak tıpkı yapay zeka yöntemlerinde olduğu gibi meta-sezgisel algoritmaların en büyük sorunlarından biridir. Bu çalışmada, bu sorunların nedenleri araştırılmış ve yeni çözüm yöntemleri geliştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla, meta-sezgisel algoritmaları test ve analiz etmek için yeni bir çerçeve geliştirilmiştir. Ayrıca yeni ve güçlü bir meta-sezgisel yöntem olan Simbiyotik Organizmalar Arama (SOS) Algoritması için analiz ve test çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın amaçlarından biri, simbiyotik operatörlerin doğal ekosistem taklit başarısını ölçmektir. Böylece, arama sürecindeki problemler keşfedilmiş ve geliştirilen test ve analiz yönteminin bir örneği olarak operatörlerin tasarım hataları ortaya çıkmıştır. Dahası, kesin bir komşuluk arayışını gerçekleştirme ve yerel minimumdan kurtulma yolları (çeşitliliği arttırmak) araştırılmıştır. Araştırma sürecindeki operatörlerin performansını arttıran önemli bilgiler deneysel çalışmalarla sağlanmıştır. Ayrıca, bu çalışmada geliştirilen ve sunulan yeni deneysel test yöntemlerinin, tasarım ve test için meta-sezgisel algoritma çalışmalarına katkıda bulunması beklenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Blum C. and Roli A., “Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison”, ACM Computing Surveys, 35(3): 268-308, (2003).
  • [2] Yang X.S., Scholarpedia, 6(8):1147, (2011).
  • [3] Lin, A., Sun, W., Yu, H., Wu, G., & Tang, H., “Global genetic learning particle swarm optimization with diversity enhancement by ring topology”, Swarm and evolutionary computation, 44: 571-583, (2019).
  • [4] Ali, A. F., Tawhid, M. A., “A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm with population partitioning for large scale optimization problems”, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 8(2): 191-206, (2017).
  • [5] Dorigo M., “Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms”, PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, (1992).
  • [6] Chen, Z., Zhou, S., & Luo, J., “A robust ant colony optimization for continuous functions”, Expert Systems with Applications, 81: 309-320, (2017).
  • [7] Dorigo M. and Stützle T., “Ant Colony optimization”, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, (2004).
  • [8] Jana, B., Mitra, S., & Acharyya, S., “Repository and Mutation based Particle Swarm Optimization (RMPSO): A new PSO variant applied to reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Network”, Applied Soft Computing, 74: 330- 355, (2019).
  • [9] Mason, K., Duggan, J., & Howley, E., “A meta optimisation analysis of particle swarm optimisation velocity update equations for watershed management learning”, Applied Soft Computing, 62: 148-161, (2018).
  • [10] Rajabioun R., “Cuckoo Optimization Algorithm”, Applied Soft Computing, 11:5508-5518, (2011).
  • [11] Harfouchi, F., Habbi, H., Ozturk, C., & Karaboga, D., “Modified multiple search cooperative foraging strategy for improved artificial bee colony optimization with robustness analysis”, Soft Computing, 1-24, (2017).
  • [12] Karaboga, D., Kaya, E., “An adaptive and hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm (aABC) for ANFIS training”, Applied Soft Computing, 49: 423-436, (2016).
  • [13] Sun, G., Ma, P., Ren, J., Zhang, A., & Jia, X., “A stability constrained adaptive alpha for gravitational search algorithm”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 139: 200-213, (2018).
  • [14] Kahraman H. T., Sagiroglu S., and Colak I., “The development of intuitive knowledge classifier and the modeling of domain dependent data”, Knowledge Based Systems, 37: 283-295, (2013).
  • [15] Rao R.V., Savsani V.J, and Vakharia D.P., “Teaching– learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems”, Computer-Aided Design, 43: 303–315, (2011).
  • [16] Cheng M.Y., and Prayogo D., “Symbiotic Organisms Search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm”, Computers and Structures, 139: 98–112, (2014).
  • [17] Trana D.H., Cheng M.Y., and Prayogo D., “A novel Multiple Objective Symbiotic Organisms Search (MOSOS) for time–cost–labor utilization tradeoff problem”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 94: 132–145, (2016).
  • [18] Meng A., Li, Z., Yin, H., Chen, S., and Guo, Z., “Accelerating particle swarm optimization using crisscross search”, Information Sciences, 329: 52–72, (2016).
  • [19] Wang Z., Xing H., Li T., Yang Y., Qu R., and Pan, Y., “A Modified Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Network Coding Resource Minimization”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 20(3): 325- 342, (2016).
  • [20] Lin Q., Chen J., Zhan Z.H., Chen W.N., Coello C.A.C., Yin Y., Lin C.M., and Zhang J., “A Hybrid Evolutionary Immune Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization Problems”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 20(5): 711-729, (2016).
  • [21] Seçkiner S.U., Eroğlu Y., Emrullah M., and Dereli T., “Ant colony optimization for continuous functions by using novel pheromone updating”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(9): 4163-4175, (2013).
  • [22] Civicioglu P., “Backtracking search optimization algorithm for numerical optimization problems”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(15): 8121-8144, (2013).
  • [23] Topal A. O., and Altun O., “A novel meta-heuristic algorithm: Dynamic Virtual Bats Algorithm”, Information Sciences, 354: 222-235, (2016).
  • [24] Baykasoğlu A., and Akpinar Ş., “Weighted Superposition Attraction (WSA): A swarm intelligence algorithm for optimization problems–Part 1: Unconstrained optimization”, Applied Soft Computing, 56: 520-540, (2017).
  • [25] Özkış A., and Babalık A., “A novel metaheuristic for multi-objective optimization problems: The multiobjective vortex search algorithm”, Information Sciences, 402: 124-148, (2017).
  • [26] Babalik A., Ozkis A., Uymaz S.A., and Kiran, M.S., “A multi-objective artificial algae algorithm”, Applied Soft Computing, 68: 377-395, (2018).
  • [27] Aydilek İ.B., “A hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm for computationally expensive numerical problems”, Applied Soft Computing, 66: 232- 249, (2018).
  • [28] Melki G., Kecman V., Ventura S., and Cano A., “OLLAWV: OnLine Learning Algorithm using WorstViolators”, Applied Soft Computing, 66: 384-393, (2018).
  • [29] Zhang J., Xiao M., Gao L., and Pan Q., “Queuing search algorithm: A novel metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 63: 464-490, (2018).
  • [30] Trunfio G.A., Topa P., Was J., “A new algorithm for adapting the configuration of subcomponents in largescale optimization with cooperative coevolution”, Information Sciences, 372: 773–795, (2016).
  • [31] Karafotias G., Hoogendoorn M., and Eiben A.E., “Parameter Control in Evolutionary Algorithms: Trends and Challenges”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 19(2): 167-187, (2015).
  • [32] Sun G., Zhang A., Yao Y., and Wang Z., “A novel hybrid algorithm of gravitational search algorithm with genetic algorithm for multi-level thresholding”, Applied Soft Computing, 46: 703–730, (2016).
  • [33] Sahin, O., Akay, B., “Comparisons of metaheuristic algorithms and fitness functions on software test data generation”, Applied Soft Computing, 49: 1202–1214, (2016).
  • [34] Gupta, S., & Deep, K. “A novel random walk grey wolf optimizer”, Swarm and evolutionary computation, 44: 101-112, (2019).
APA kahraman h, Aras S, Sönmez Y, guvenc u, Gedikli E (2020). Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. , 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
Chicago kahraman hamdi tolga,Aras Sefa,Sönmez Yusuf,guvenc ugur,Gedikli Eyup Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. (2020): 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
MLA kahraman hamdi tolga,Aras Sefa,Sönmez Yusuf,guvenc ugur,Gedikli Eyup Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. , 2020, ss.445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
AMA kahraman h,Aras S,Sönmez Y,guvenc u,Gedikli E Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. . 2020; 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
Vancouver kahraman h,Aras S,Sönmez Y,guvenc u,Gedikli E Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. . 2020; 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
IEEE kahraman h,Aras S,Sönmez Y,guvenc u,Gedikli E "Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS." , ss.445 - 455, 2020. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
ISNAD kahraman, hamdi tolga vd. "Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS". (2020), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.548717
APA kahraman h, Aras S, Sönmez Y, guvenc u, Gedikli E (2020). Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. Politeknik Dergisi, 23(2), 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
Chicago kahraman hamdi tolga,Aras Sefa,Sönmez Yusuf,guvenc ugur,Gedikli Eyup Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. Politeknik Dergisi 23, no.2 (2020): 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
MLA kahraman hamdi tolga,Aras Sefa,Sönmez Yusuf,guvenc ugur,Gedikli Eyup Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. Politeknik Dergisi, vol.23, no.2, 2020, ss.445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
AMA kahraman h,Aras S,Sönmez Y,guvenc u,Gedikli E Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. Politeknik Dergisi. 2020; 23(2): 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
Vancouver kahraman h,Aras S,Sönmez Y,guvenc u,Gedikli E Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS. Politeknik Dergisi. 2020; 23(2): 445 - 455. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
IEEE kahraman h,Aras S,Sönmez Y,guvenc u,Gedikli E "Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS." Politeknik Dergisi, 23, ss.445 - 455, 2020. 10.2339/politeknik.548717
ISNAD kahraman, hamdi tolga vd. "Analysis, test and management of the metaheuristic searching process: an experimental study on SOS". Politeknik Dergisi 23/2 (2020), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.548717