ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK

Mustafa ATATORUN (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)
Alternatif Politika
1 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 487 - 515 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2021

ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK

Öz:
Bu çalışma, uluslararası siyaset ve etik ilişkisini sonuççu ve deontolojiktemellerüzerindenkurantoplulukçuluk ve kozmopolitanizminahlakiiddialarının açmazlarasahipolduğunugöstermeyi amaçlamaktadır.Postyapısalcı bir yaklaşımla ele alınan bu teorilerin, dışlama veya aynılaştırmayı ifade eden açmazlarınınolduğu iddia edilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, makalede ,postyapısalcı yaklaşımın üzerindedurduğu “failin yerinden edilerek” edimsel niteliğinin ortaya çıkarılmasıbağlamında, toplulukçuluk ve kozmopolitanizmdekimliklerinnasıl bir rasyonalite anlayışıtarafından kurulduğuve evrenselleştirilebilirlikleri ortaya konulmaktadır. Zygmunt Bauman’ın temel-karşıtıfikirleriniiçeren, ötekinekarşısağlam sorumluluk olarak tanımladığıetikanlayışı, uluslararasıetik teorilerle diyalojik bir formatta bir araya getirilerek, teorilerin açmazlarırasyonalite, kimlik ve evrenselleştirilebilirlik temaları etrafında tartışılmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

THE IMPASSES OF THE THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL ETHICS: RATIONALITY, IDENTITY AND UNIVERSALIZABILITY

Öz:
This study aims to show that moral claims of communitarianism and cosmopolitanism, which establish the relationship between international politics and ethics on consequentialist and deontological foundations, have impasses. It is claimed that those theories discussed within poststructural approach in this paper, implyexclusion or assimilation.Accordingly,inthecontextof poststructuralism’s uncovering performative feature of the subjectivity through“unsettling of the subject”, by what kind of rationality, identities incommunitarianism and cosmopolitanism is built and their universalizability areelaborated. ZygmuntBauman’sunderstandingofethics, embracing anti-foundational ideas and defined by him as durable responsibility towards other, is gathered with theories of international ethics in a dialogical format, so the impasses of the theories are addressed within the themes of rationality, identity and universalizability.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ağcan, Muhammed A. (2012), “Immanuel Kant ve Uluslararası: Egemen Devlet, Kozmopolitan Siyaset ve Evrensellik/Farklılık”, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 8 (32): 1-41.
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (2011), Postmodern Etik (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları) (Çev. Alev Türker).
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (1997), Modernite ve Holocaust (İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi) (Çev. Suha Sertabiboğlu).
  • Bauman, Zygmunt (1992), “Soil, Blood, Identity”, The Sociological Review, 40 (4): 675-701.
  • Beitz, Charles R. (1999), Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Benhabib, Seyla (2007), Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Benn, Piers (2001), Ethics (London: University College London Press).
  • Billington, Ray (1995), Living Philosophy: An Introduction to Moral Thought (Cornwall: Routhledge).
  • Boucher, David (1998), Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Bukovansky, Mlada (1997), “American Identity and Neutral Rights from Independence to the War of 1812”, International Organization, 51 (2): 209-243.
  • Burke, Anthony (2008), “Postmodernism”, Reus-Smit, Christian ve Duncan Snidal (Der.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Wiltshire: Oxford University Press): 359-377.
  • Campbell, David (1998), National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press).
  • Campbell, David (1992), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press).
  • Chabot, Dana (1995), “Thomas Hobbes: Skeptical Moralist”, American Political Science Review, 89 (2): 401-410.
  • Chafetz, Glenn, Michael Spirtas ve Benjamin Frankel (1998), “Introduction: Tracing the Influence of Identity on Foreign Policy”, Security Studies, 8 (2-3): 7-22.
  • Cheah, Pheng (2006), “Cosmopolitanism”, Theory, Culture & Society, 23 (2-3): 486-496.
  • Cochran, Molly (2004), Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Dallmayr, Fred (2003), “Cosmopolitanism Moral and Political”, Political Theory, 31 (3): 421-442.
  • Devetak, Richard (2005), “Postmodernism”, Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit ve Jacqui True (Der.), Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan): 161-187.
  • Donaldson, Thomas (1992), “Kant’s Global Rationalism”, Nardin, Terry ve David R. Mapel (Der.), Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 136-157.
  • Donnelly, Jack (2004), Realism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Dunne, Tim (2008), “The English School”, Reus-Smit, Christian ve Duncan Snidal (Der.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Wiltshire: Oxford University Press): 267-285.
  • Eaglestone, Robert (2004), “Postmodernism and Ethics against Metaphysics of Comprehension”, Connor, Steven (Der.), The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism (New York: Cambridge University Press): 182-195.
  • Fine, Robert (2007), Cosmopolitanism (London: Routhledge).
  • Freyberg-Inan, Annette (2004), What Moves Man: The Realist Theory on International Relations and Its Judgment of Human Nature (Albany: State University of New York Press).
  • George, Jim (1995), “Realist ‘Ethics’, International Relations and Postmodernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24 (2): 195-223.
  • Gilpin, Robert G. (1984), “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism”, International Organization, 38 (2): 287-304.
  • Gould, Carol C. (2010), “Do Cosmopolitan Ethics and Cosmopolitan Democracy Imply Each Other?”, Van Hooft, Stan ve Wim Vandekerckhove (Der.), Questioning Cosmopolitanism (New York: Springer): 153-166.
  • Grotius, Hugo (2005), The Rights of War and Peace, Tuck, Richard (Der.) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (2001), Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press) (Çev. Max Pensky).
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1999), “Bestiality and Humanity: A War on the Border between Legality and Morality”, Constellations, 6 (3): 263-272.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: MIT Press) (Çev. William Rehg).
  • Hall, Ian (2006), The International Thought of Martin Wight (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Harvey, David (1992), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers).
  • Hayden, Patrick (2009), “Cosmopolitanism Past and Present”, Hayden, Patrick (Der.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Ethics and International Relations (Cornwall: Ashgate Publishing Limited): 43-62.
  • Hogg, Michael A. ve Dominic Abrams (1988), Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes (London: Routhledge).
  • Hutchings, Kimberly (1999), International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era (London: Sage Publications).
  • Kagan, Shelly (1998), Normative Ethics (Boulder: Westview Press).
  • Kant, Immanuel (1991), The Metaphysics of Morals (New York: Cambridge University Press) (Çev. Mary Gregor).
  • Laclau, Ernesto ve Chantal Mouffe (1992), Hegemony & Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso).
  • Lawler, Peter (2008), “The Ethics of Postmodernism”, Reus-Smit, Christian ve Duncan Snidal (Der.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Wiltshire: Oxford University Press): 378-390.
  • Lévinas, Emmanuel (2011), Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press) (Çev. Alphonso Lingis).
  • Lévinas, Emmanuel (1987), Collected Philosophical Papers (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers) (Çev. Alphonso Lingis).
  • Lévinas, Emmanuel (1985), Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press) (Çev. Richard A. Cohen).
  • Linklater, Andrew (2004), The Transformation of Political Community (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Logstrup, Knud E. (1971), The Ethical Demand (Philadelphia: Fortress Press) (Çev. Theodor I. Jensen).
  • Lu, Catherine (2000), “The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8 (2): 244-267.
  • Lynch, Cecelia (1994), “Kant, the Republican Peace, and Moral Guidance in International Law”, Ethics & International Affairs, 8: 39-58.
  • Miller, David (1988), “The Ethical Significance of Nationality”, Ethics, 98 (4): 647-662.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1947), Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (London: Latimer House Limited).
  • Murphy, Cornelius F. (1982), “The Grotian Vision of World Order”, The American Journal of International Law, 76 (3): 477-498.
  • Neumann, Iver B. (1996), “Self and Other in International Relations”, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (2): 139-174.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (2002), “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism”, Nussbaum, Martha ve Joshua Cohen (Der.), For Love of Country? (Boston: Beacon Press): 3-17.
  • Nuttall, Jon (1997), Ahlak Üzerine Tartışmalar: Etiğe Giriş (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları) (Çev. Abdullah Yılmaz).
  • Odysseos, Louiza (2003), “On the Way to Global Ethics? Cosmopolitanism, ‘Ethical’ Selfhood and Otherness”, European Journal of Political Theory, 2 (2): 183-207.
  • Pin-Fat, Véronique (2010), Universality, Ethics and International Relations: A Grammatical Reading (London: Routhledge).
  • Pogge, Thomas W. (2002), “Human Rights and Responsibilities”, De Greiff, Pablo ve Ciaran Cronin (Der.), Global Justice and Transnational Politics (Cambridge: MIT Press): 151-195.
  • Popke, E. Jeffrey (2003), “Poststructuralist Ethics: Subjectivity, Responsibility and the Space of Community”, Progress in Human Geography, 27 (3): 298-316.
  • Roach, Steven C. (2009), “Critical Theory, Marxism and International Ethics”, Hayden, Patrick (Der.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Ethics and International Relations (Cornwall: Ashgate Publishing Limited): 63-77.
  • Shapcott, Richard (2010), International Ethics: A Critical Introduction (Cornwall: Polity Press).
  • Tan, Kok-Chor (2005), “The Demands of Justice and National Allegiances”, Brock, Gillian ve Harry Brighouse (Der.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (New York: Cambridge University Press): 164-179.
  • Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (2003), “Theology and The Condition of Postmodernity: A Report on Knowledge (of God)”, Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (Der.), The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology (New York: Cambridge University Press): 3-25.
  • Vincent, Andrew (2007), The Nature of Political Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Walzer, Michael (2004), Arguing About War (New Haven: Yale University Press).
  • Walzer, Michael (1994), Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press).
  • Wendt, Alexander (1992), “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics”, International Organization, 46 (2): 391-425.
  • Williams, Michael C. (2004), “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics”, International Organization, 58 (4): 633-665.
  • Yalvaç, Faruk (2009), “Hegel, Dünya Tarihi ve Özgürlük Mücadelesi Olarak Uluslararası İlişkiler”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6 (21): 3-37.
APA Atatorun M (2020). ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. , 487 - 515.
Chicago Atatorun Mustafa ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. (2020): 487 - 515.
MLA Atatorun Mustafa ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. , 2020, ss.487 - 515.
AMA Atatorun M ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. . 2020; 487 - 515.
Vancouver Atatorun M ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. . 2020; 487 - 515.
IEEE Atatorun M "ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK." , ss.487 - 515, 2020.
ISNAD Atatorun, Mustafa. "ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK". (2020), 487-515.
APA Atatorun M (2020). ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. Alternatif Politika, 12(3), 487 - 515.
Chicago Atatorun Mustafa ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. Alternatif Politika 12, no.3 (2020): 487 - 515.
MLA Atatorun Mustafa ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. Alternatif Politika, vol.12, no.3, 2020, ss.487 - 515.
AMA Atatorun M ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. Alternatif Politika. 2020; 12(3): 487 - 515.
Vancouver Atatorun M ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK. Alternatif Politika. 2020; 12(3): 487 - 515.
IEEE Atatorun M "ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK." Alternatif Politika, 12, ss.487 - 515, 2020.
ISNAD Atatorun, Mustafa. "ULUSLARARASI ETİK TEORİLERİN AÇMAZLARI:RASYONALİTE, KİMLİK VE EVRENSELLEŞTİRİLEBİLİRLİK". Alternatif Politika 12/3 (2020), 487-515.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 20:9

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları