The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 61 - 66 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/apd.96949 İndeks Tarihi: 14-06-2021
The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25
Öz: Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of anger and family functions on bullying behavior in adolescents and young adults who are followed up with the diagno-sis of substance use disorder.Methods: A total of 100 patients, whose ages were between 15 and 25 years and who were diagnosed as having substance use disorder, were included as study participants. All participants were subjected to the Sociodemographic Data Form, Family Assessment Device, Trait Anger-Anger Expression Scale, and Bullying Tendency Scale.Results: It was found that there was a positive relationship between bullying tendency scores and trait anger and anger expression outward scores and a negative relationship with anger control scores. It was observed that there was a positive correlation between subdimension scores of problem solving, roles, and showing necessary attention with respect to family function dimensions and bullying tendency scores. In the multivariate regression model evaluating the predictive power of independent factors associated with bullying tendency, it was observed that anger control from anger subdimensions and problem solving from family function subdimensions had a predictive effect on bullying tendency, and the combination of these 2 factors explained 26% of bullying tendency scores.Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that most of the anger and family function di-mensions were related to bullying tendency; in particular, the anger control difficulties and the problem-solving skills in the family were the factors that predicted bullying be-havior. We think that addressing these factors that have an impact on bullying behavior in the treatment process will be important to regulate the relations with the outside world in this age group.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Olweus D. Bullying or peer abuse at school: facts and intervention. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1995;4(6):196-200. [Crossref]
- 2. Laskowski C. Psychological Implications of Childhood Bullying as Seen in Adult Survivors: A Qualitative Analysis. Unpublished Dissertation. Alliant International University; 2016.
- 3. Jiang Y, Yu C, Zhang W, et al. Peer victimization and substance use in early adolescence: influences of deviant peer affiliation and parental knowledge. J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(7):2130-2140. [Crossref]
- 4. Kelly EV, Newton NC, Stapinski LA, et al. Concurrent and prospective associations between bullying victimization and substance use among Australian adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;154:63-68. [Crossref]
- 5. Sangalang CC, Tran AGTT, Ayers SL, et al. Bullying among urban Mexican-heritage youth: exploring risk for substance use by status as a bully, victim, and bully-victim. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;61:216-221. [Crossref]
- 6. Sigfusdottir ID, Gudjonsson GH, Sigurdsson JF. Bullying and delinquency. The mediating role of anger. Pers Individ Dif. 2010;48(4):391-396. [Crossref]
- 7. Bosworth K, Espelage DL, Simon TR. Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students. J Early Adolesc. 1999;19(3):341-362. [Crossref]
- 8. Crick NR, Dodge KA. Social information‐processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Dev. 1996;67(3):993-1002. [Crossref]
- 9. Farrington DP. Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice 1993;17:381-458. [Crossref]
- 10. Juvonen J, Graham S, Schuster MA. Bullying among young adolescents: the strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics. 2003;112(6):1231- 1237. [Crossref]
- 11. Cross D, Barnes A. Using systems theory to understand and respond to family influences on children’s bullying behavior: Friendly Schools Friendly Families Program. Theory Pract. 2014;53(4):293-299. [Crossref]
- 12. Espelage DL, Bosworth K, Simon TR. Examining the social context of bullying behaviors in early adolescence. J Couns Dev. 2000;78(3):326-333. [Crossref]
- 13. Bulut I. Aile Değerlendirme Ölçeği El Kitabı. 1st ed. Özgüzeliş Matbaası; 1990.
- 14. Spielberger CD, Jacobs G, Russell S, et al. Assessment of anger: the statetrait anger scale. Adv Personal Assess. 1983;2:161-189.
- 15. Özer AK. Sürekli Öfke ve Öfke İfade Tarzı Ölçekleri Ön Çalışması. Türk Psikol Derg. 1994;9:26-35.
- 16. Dölek N. İlk ve Ortaöğretim Okullarındaki Öğrenciler Arasında Zorbaca Davranışların Incelenmesi ve Zorbalığı Önleme Tutumu Geliştirilmesi Programının Etkisinin Araştırılması. Unpublished Dissertation. Marmara University; 2002.
- 17. Carlyle KE, Steinman KJ. Demographic differences in the prevalence, co‐ occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. J Sch Health. 2007;77(9):623-629. [Crossref]
- 18. Himmer RP. The Effect of Target Demographics and Emotional Intelligence on Workplace Bullying. Unpublished Dissertation. Walden University; 2016.
- 19. Feldhusen JF, Thurston JR, Benning JJ. A longitudinal study of delinquency and other aspects of children’s behaviour. Int J Criminol Penol. 1973;1(4):341-351.
- 20. Tanrikulu I, Campbell M. Correlates of traditional bullying and cyberbullying perpetration among Australian students. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2015;55:138-146. [Crossref]
- 21. Espelage DL, Bosworth K, Simon TR. Short-term stability and prospective correlates of bullying in middle-school students: an examination of potential demographic, psychosocial, and environmental influences. Violence Vict. 2001;16(4):411-426. [Crossref]
- 22. Stockdale MS, Hangaduambo S, Duys D, et al. Rural elementary students’, parents’, and teachers’ perceptions of bullying. Am J Health Behav. 2002;26(4):266-277. [Crossref]
- 23. Graham S, Hoehn S. Children’s understanding of aggression and withdrawal as social stigmas: an attributional analysis. Child Dev. 1995;66(4):1143-1161. [Crossref]
- 24. Weiner B. Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct. 1st ed. Guilford Press; 1995.
- 25. Pakaslahti L. Children’s and adolescents’ aggressive behavior in context: the development and application of aggressive problem-solving strategies. Aggress Violent Behav. 2000;5(5):467-490. [Crossref]
- 26. Pettit GS, Polaha JA, Mize J. Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. In: Hill J, Maughan B, eds. Perceptual and Attributional Processes in Aggression and Conduct Problems. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 2001:292-319. [Crossref]
- 27. Karatzias A, Power KG, Swanson V. Bullying and victimisation in Scottish secondary schools: same or separate entities? Aggress Behav Off J Int Soc Res Aggress. 2002;28(1):45-61. [Crossref]
- 28. Öngel Atar A, Yalçin Ö, Uygun E, et al. Madde Kullanım Bozukluğu Olan Ergenlerde Aile Işlevlerinin, Çift Uyumunun ve Anne Baba Tutumunun Degerlendirilmesi. Noro-Psikyatri Ars. 2016;53(1):38.
- 29. Olweus D. Aggression in the Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys. Hemisphere; 1978.
- 30. Olweus D. Aggressors and their victims: bullying at school. Disruptive Behav Sch. 1984;57:76.
- 31. Bowes L, Maughan B, Caspi A, et al. Families promote emotional and behavioural resilience to bullying: evidence of an environmental effect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51(7):809-817. [Crossref]
- 32. Georgiou SN, Stavrinides P. Parenting at home and bullying at school. Soc Psychol Educ. 2013;16(2):165-179. [Crossref]
- 33. Lereya ST, Samara M, Wolke D. Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: a meta-analysis study. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37(12):1091-1108. [Crossref]
- 34. Barker P, Chang J. Basic Family Therapy. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. [Crossref]
- 35. Kılıçaslan A. Aile Fonksiyonlarının ve Algılanan Farklılaşmış Anne-Baba Yaklaşımının Kardeş İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkisi. Unpublished Master Thesis. İstanbul University; 2001.
- 36. Koç Z. Lise Öğrencilerinin Zorbalık Düzeylerinin Yordanması. Unpiblished Dissertation. Gazi University; 2006.
- 37. Johnson T, Fendrich M. Modeling sources of self-report bias in a survey of drug use epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(5):381-389.[Crossref]
| APA | HİSAR T, KIZILKURT O, DİLBAZ N (2021). The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. , 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| Chicago | HİSAR Türkan,KIZILKURT OZLEM,DİLBAZ Nesrin The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. (2021): 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| MLA | HİSAR Türkan,KIZILKURT OZLEM,DİLBAZ Nesrin The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. , 2021, ss.61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| AMA | HİSAR T,KIZILKURT O,DİLBAZ N The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. . 2021; 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| Vancouver | HİSAR T,KIZILKURT O,DİLBAZ N The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. . 2021; 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| IEEE | HİSAR T,KIZILKURT O,DİLBAZ N "The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25." , ss.61 - 66, 2021. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| ISNAD | HİSAR, Türkan vd. "The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25". (2021), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.96949 |
| APA | HİSAR T, KIZILKURT O, DİLBAZ N (2021). The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. Alpha psychiatry (Online), 22(1), 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| Chicago | HİSAR Türkan,KIZILKURT OZLEM,DİLBAZ Nesrin The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. Alpha psychiatry (Online) 22, no.1 (2021): 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| MLA | HİSAR Türkan,KIZILKURT OZLEM,DİLBAZ Nesrin The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. Alpha psychiatry (Online), vol.22, no.1, 2021, ss.61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| AMA | HİSAR T,KIZILKURT O,DİLBAZ N The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. Alpha psychiatry (Online). 2021; 22(1): 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| Vancouver | HİSAR T,KIZILKURT O,DİLBAZ N The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25. Alpha psychiatry (Online). 2021; 22(1): 61 - 66. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| IEEE | HİSAR T,KIZILKURT O,DİLBAZ N "The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25." Alpha psychiatry (Online), 22, ss.61 - 66, 2021. 10.5455/apd.96949 |
| ISNAD | HİSAR, Türkan vd. "The Effect of Anger and Family Functions on Bullying Behavior in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder between the Ages of 15 and 25". Alpha psychiatry (Online) 22/1 (2021), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.96949 |
