Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 623 - 642 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.19126/suje.794213 İndeks Tarihi: 15-06-2021

Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent

Öz:
Organizational dissent constitutes the base of democratic processes ineducational organizations. Empoylees who are affected negatively by themanagerial decisions may display adversary behaviors. In the study, it was aimedto present the perceptions of the teachers working at public and private schoolslocated in Adapazarı, Serdivan and Erenler districts of Sakarya on causes oforganizational dissent. 573 teachers who worked at schools in Adapazarı,Serdivan and Erenler districts participated in the study. As the data collectiontool, “Causes of Dissent Scale”, a subscale of “Organizational Dissent Scale” wasutilized. In the data analysis, means and standard deviations of the responses tothe scale items were calculated. t-test and One-Way ANOVA were utilized todemonstrate whether the teachers’ perceptions on causes of organizationaldissent showed any significant difference in accordance with different variables.The results of the study indicated that there is no significant difference in theteachers’ percepions on causes of organiational dissent according to gender, age,education level, work experience, marital status, union membership, school size,and managerial experience. On the other hand, it was found out that there is asignificant difference in teachers’ perceptions on causes of organizational dissentin accordance with the perceived management style of school principals. Theresults of the study showed significant difference in teachers’ dissent reasonsaccording to the perceived management style.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ataç, L. O., & Köse, S. (2017). Örgütsel demokrasi ve örgütsel muhalefet ilişkisi: Beyaz yakalılar üzerine bir araştırma [Organizational democracy and organizational dissent relationship: A research on white collar workers]. Istanbul Üniversitesi Isletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1), 117- 132.
  • Balcı, A. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. [Research methods, techniques and principles in social sciences.] Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
  • Benkhoff, B. (1997), Disentangling organizational commitment: The dangers of the OCQ for research and policy, Personnel Review, 26(1), 114-131.
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2015). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. [New structure and behavior in school management ] Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Ergün, H. (2017). Örgütsel muhalefete etki eden başlatıcı ve aracı değişkenler. [Initiating and mediating variables affecting organizational dissent.] (Doctoral Thesis). Accessed from YÖK Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 495711).
  • Garner, J. T. (2009). When things go wrong at work: An exploration of organizational dissent messages. Communication Studies, 60(2), 197-218. Goodboy, A. K., Chory, R. M., & Dunleavy, K. N. (2008). Organizational dissent as a function of organizational justice. Communication Research Reports, 25(4), 255-265.
  • Gorden, W. I. (1988). Range of employee voice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1(4), 283-299.
  • Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 77-94.
  • Kara, S. B. K. (2015). Relationship between political discrimination and dissent behaviour displayed by teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(7), 933-940.
  • Kassing, J. W. (1997). Articulating, antagonizing, and displacing: A model of employee dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311-332.
  • Kassing, J. W. (1998). Development and validation of the organizational dissent scale. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
  • Kassing, J. W., & Avtgis, T. A. (1999). Examining the relationship between organizational dissent and aggressive communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(1), 100-115.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2000). Exploring the relationship between workplace freedom of speech, organizational identification, and employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 17(4), 387-396.
  • Kassing, J. W., & Avtgis, T. A. (2001). Dissension in the organization as it relates to control expectancies. Communication Research Reports, 18(2), 118-127.
  • Kassing, J. W., & Armstrong, T. A. (2001). Examining the association of job tenure, employment history, and organizational status with employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 18(3), 264-273.
  • Kassing, J. W. (2002). Speaking up: Identifying employees’ upward dissent strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 187-209.
  • Kassing, J. W., & Armstrong, T. A. (2002). Someone’s going to hear about this: Examining the association between dissent-triggering events and employees’ dissent expression. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 39-65.
  • Kassing, J. (2011). Dissent in organizations (Vol. 4). Polity Press.
  • Kassing, J. W., & DiCioccio, R. L. (2004). Testing a workplace experience explanation of displaced dissent. Communication Reports, 17(2), 113-120.
  • Kassing, J. W., & McDowell, Z. J. (2008). Disagreeing about what's fair: Exploring the relationship between perceptions of justice and employee dissent. Communication research reports, 25(1), 34-43.
  • Kavak, O., & Kaygın, E. (2018). Örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel muhalefet davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. [The impact of organizational justice perception on organizational dissent behavior] Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 33-51.
  • Korucuoğlu, T. (2016). Örgütsel güç oyunları ve örgütsel muhalefet arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between organizational power games and organizational dissent] (Master's thesis, ESOGÜ, Educational Sciences Institution).
  • Özdemir, M. (2010). Genel liselerde görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütsel muhalefete ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of teachers working in public high schools on organizational dissent] (Sample of Ankara). (Doctoral Thesis). Accessed from YÖK Thesis Center database (Thesis No: 279917).
  • Püsküllüoğlu, E. I., & Altınkurt, Y. (2018). Öğretmenlerin eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ile örgütsel muhalefet davranışları arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between teachers' critical thinking dispositions and organizational dissent behavior.] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 897-914.
  • Redding, W. C. (1985). Rocking boats, blowing whistles, and teaching speech communication. Communication Education, 34(3), 245-258.
  • Shahinpoor, N., & Matt, B. F. (2007). The power of one: Dissent and organizational life. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 37-48.
  • Sprague, J., & Ruud, G. L. (1988). Boat-rocking in the high-technology culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(2), 169-193.
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). BG Tabachnick. LS fidell using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.). Boston: Pearson
  • Titrek, O. (2009). Okul türüne göre okullardaki örgütsel adalet düzeyi. [The level of organizational justice in schools by school type.] Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 551-573.
  • Tutar, H., &Sadykova, G. (2014). Örgütsel demokrasi ve örgütsel muhalefet arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir inceleme. [A review on the relationship between organizational democracy and organizational dissent] İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 2(1), 1-16.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). (2019) Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK.
  • Yıldız, K. (2014). Örgütsel muhalefet. [Organizational Dissent] Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi, 43, 173-193.
APA ÖZTÜRK O, Titrek O (2020). Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. , 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
Chicago ÖZTÜRK ORKUN,Titrek Osman Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. (2020): 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
MLA ÖZTÜRK ORKUN,Titrek Osman Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. , 2020, ss.623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
AMA ÖZTÜRK O,Titrek O Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. . 2020; 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
Vancouver ÖZTÜRK O,Titrek O Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. . 2020; 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
IEEE ÖZTÜRK O,Titrek O "Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent." , ss.623 - 642, 2020. 10.19126/suje.794213
ISNAD ÖZTÜRK, ORKUN - Titrek, Osman. "Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent". (2020), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.794213
APA ÖZTÜRK O, Titrek O (2020). Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(3), 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
Chicago ÖZTÜRK ORKUN,Titrek Osman Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. Sakarya University Journal of Education 10, no.3 (2020): 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
MLA ÖZTÜRK ORKUN,Titrek Osman Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. Sakarya University Journal of Education, vol.10, no.3, 2020, ss.623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
AMA ÖZTÜRK O,Titrek O Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2020; 10(3): 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
Vancouver ÖZTÜRK O,Titrek O Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2020; 10(3): 623 - 642. 10.19126/suje.794213
IEEE ÖZTÜRK O,Titrek O "Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent." Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10, ss.623 - 642, 2020. 10.19126/suje.794213
ISNAD ÖZTÜRK, ORKUN - Titrek, Osman. "Teachers’ Perceptions on Causes of Organizational Dissent". Sakarya University Journal of Education 10/3 (2020), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.794213