Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform

Gardner, John; Muhammad, Shahid; Gardner, Vicky

doi:10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812

Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform

Shahid MUHAMMAD, (Department of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom)

John GARDNER, (The Renal Patient Support Group, Bristol, United Kingdom)

Vicky GARDNER (The Renal Patient Support Group, Bristol, United Kingdom)

Turkish journal of nephrology (Online)

1 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 141 - 152 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812 İndeks Tarihi: 16-06-2021

Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform

Öz:

Objective: Patient access to information support to supplement their understanding of laboratory and test parameters remains challenging because of medical and scientific terminology. These challenges have led to the exploration of new and efficient ways of approaching educational and information support for patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) such as chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to explore the perspectives on educational support surrounding CKD laboratory investigations from a sample of the Renal Patient Support Group (RPSG).Materials and Methods: The research team conducted five polls from January 2018 to July 2018 via the RPSGs “closed” social media platform to help understand the importance of healthcare scientist’s educational support for laboratory tests and investigations. The target of this study was to seek 1,000 responses from 8,000 members of this social media platform.Results: A total of 574 RPSG members participated in polls, representing a 7% response rate. Seventy-seven percent (mean: 23; SD: 5.48) of the respondents agreed that access to a healthcare scientist in primary care would be advantageous. When asked about what technology solutions are available via general practitioner (GP)/transplant unit, a portal allowing access to medical records and laboratory results scored highest with 26% (mean: 25.3; SD: 5.02) respondents selecting this choice. Assessing a remote healthcare scientist via a computer or application was selected by 33% (mean: 17.8; SD: 4.21) of the respondents. CKD patients get confused regarding laboratory investigations accessed by a mix of healthcare professionals. Healthcare scientists should educate patients about laboratory investigations.Conclusions: The polls conducted added value to an important topic of healthcare scientist involvement in educating CKD patients about laboratory investigations. Currently, there is more scope for healthcare scientists to provide support to CKD patients with smarter education regarding laboratory investigations and parameters.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 2000; 15: 259-67. [Crossref]
2. Nutbeam D, Levin-Zamir D, Rowlands G. Health literacy in context. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 2657. [Crossref]
3. Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 38: 33-42. [Crossref]
4. Williams, MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 166-72. [Crossref]
5. Wu H, Lu N. Online written consultation, telephone consultation and offline appointment: An examination of the channel effect in online health communities. Int J Med Inform 2017; 107: 107-19. [Crossref]
6. Muhammad S, Allan M, Ali F, Bonacina M, Adams M. The renal patient support group: Supporting patients with chronic kidney disease through social media. J Ren Care 2014; 40: 216-8. [Crossref]
7. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/liberating-the-nhs-white-paper.
8. Department of Health. NHS outcomes framework: At a glance. 2016. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/513157/NHSOF_at_a_glance.pdf.
9. Agrawal A. Medication errors: Prevention using information technology systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67: 681-6. [Crossref]
10. Edwards HB, Marques E, Hollingworth W, Horwood J, Farr M, Bernard E, et al. Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: Evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e016901. [Crossref]
11. Armfield NR, Bradford M, Bradford NK. The clinical use of Skype--For which patients, with which problems and in which settings? A snapshot review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84; 737-42. [Crossref]
12. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 742-52. [Crossref]
13. Department of Health. Review of Operational Productivity in NHS providers (interim report). 2015. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/productivity-in-nhs-hospitals.
14. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. New models of pharmacy: What is emerging and what is possible, a review of the literature. 2013. Available from: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/References/Now%20or%20Never/Now%20or%20Never%20-%20Literature%20review.pdf.
15. Roderick P, Jones C, Drey N, Blakeley S, Webster P, Goddard J, et al. Late referral for end-stage renal disease: A region-wide survey in the south west of England. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 1252-9. [Crossref]
16. Roderick P, Jones C, Tomson C, Mason J. Late referral for dialysis: Improving the management of chronic renal disease. QJM 2002; 95: 363-70. [Crossref]
17. Jain N, Farooqi A, Feehally J. Raising awareness of chronic kidney disease among South Asians and primary care: The ABLE project. J Ren Care 2008; 34: 173-8. [Crossref]
18. Jain N, Simoyi P. An overview of chronic kidney disease management and CAPD in the home. Br J Community Nurs 2008; 13: 213-8. [Crossref]
19. Fowler C, Baas LS. Illness representations in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs 2006; 33: 173-86.
20. Kerr M, Bray B, Medcalf J, O’Donoghue DJ, Matthews B. Estimating the financial cost of chronic kidney disease to the NHS in England. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27 Suppl 3: iii73-80. [Crossref]
21. Chronic Kidney Disease in England. The Human and Financial Costs. 2012. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/improvement-hub/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2017/11/Chronic-Kidney-Disease-in-England-The-Human-and-Financial-Cost.pdf.
22. NICE guidance, your care. 2013. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/about/nice-communities/public-involvement/your-care.
23. Anavekar NS, McMurray JJV, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau J-L, et al Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1285-95. [Crossref]
24. McIntyre NJ, Fluck R, McIntyre C, Taal M. Treatment needs and diagnosis awareness in primary care patients with chronic kidney disease. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62: e227-32. [Crossref]
25. Tonelli M, Muntner P, Lloyd A, Manns BJ, James MT, Klarenbach S, et al. Using proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate to classify risk in patients with chronic kidney disease: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 12-21. [Crossref]
26. Collins AJ, Chen S-C, Gilbertso DT, Foley RN. CKD surveillance using administrative data: Impact on the health care system. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: S27-S36. [Crossref]
27. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 137-47. [Crossref]
28. Mickan S, Tilson JK, Atherton H, Roberts NW, Heneghan C. Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: A scoping review of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e212. [Crossref]
29. Whaley-Connell A, Chaudhary K, Misra M, Khanna R. A case for early screening for diabetic kidney disease. Cardiorenal Med 2011; 1: 235-42. [Crossref]
30. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Chronic Kidney Disease: National Clinical Guideline for Early Identifi cation and Management in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care. Appendix C Health Economic Model-Cost Effectiveness of CKD Case Finding Among People at High Risk. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2008.
31. Cadamuro J, Ibarz M, Cornes M, Nybo M, Haschke-Becher E, von Meyer A, et al. Managing inappropriate utilization of laboratory resources. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019; 26: 5-13. [Crossref]
32. Fryer AA, Smellie WS. Managing demand for laboratory tests: A laboratory toolkit. J Clin Pathol 2013; 66: 62-72. [Crossref]
33. The Institute of Biomedical Sciences (IBMS), Point of Care Testing (Near-Patient Testing) Guidance on the Involvement of the Clinical Laboratory. Version 2. 2004; 1-8.
34. Mason P. Basic concepts of clinical testing. Pharm J 2004; 272: 384-6.
35. Mason P. Why, what’s, and when’s of blood tests. Pharm J 2004; 272: 419-21.
36. Mason P. Blood tests used to investigate liver, thyroid or kidney function and disease. Pharm J 2004; 272: 446-8.
37. Muhammad SN. A desperate need for good leaders. The Biomedical Scientist. 2017. Available from: https://www.thebiomedicalscientist.net/resources/desperate-need-good-leaders.
38. Muhammad S. Renal point-of-care testing: Collaboration between biomedical scientists and community pharmacists. Br J Biomed Sci 2015; 72: 42-6. [Crossref]
39. Crinson I, Gallagher H, Thomas N, de Lusignan S. How ready is general practice to improve quality in chronic kidney disease? A diagnostic analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2010; 60: 403-9. [Crossref]
40. Galbraith L, Jacobs C, Hemmelgarn BR, Donald M, Manns BJ, Jun M. Chronic disease management interventions for people with chronic kidney disease in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33: 112-21. [Crossref]
41. Giardina TD, Baldwin J, Nystrom DT, Sittig DF, Singh H. Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25: 440-6. [Crossref]
42. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Scherer AM, Witteman HO, Solomon JB, Exe NL, Tarini BA, et al. Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24: 520-8. [Crossref]
43. Mák G, Fowler HS, Leaver C, Hagens S, Zelmer J. The effects of web-based patient access to laboratory results in British Columbia: A patient survey on comprehension and anxiety. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17: e191. [Crossref]
44. Stoves J, Connolly J, Cheung CK, Grange A, Rhodes P, O’Donoghue D, et al. Electronic consultation as an alternative to hospital referral for patients with chronic kidney disease: A novel application for networked electronic health records to improve the accessibility and efficiency of healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: e54. [Crossref]
45. Fryer AA, Hanna FW. Managing demand for pathology tests: financial imperative or duty of care? Ann Clin Biochem 2009; 46: 435-7. [Crossref]
46. Smith J, Porter A, Shaw S, Rosen R, Blunt I, Mays N. Commissioning high quality care for people with long-term conditions. Final Report. 2013. Available from: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/commissioning-high-quality-care.
47. Petsoulas C, Peckham S, Smiddy J, Wilson P. Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the English National Health Service. Lessons from the past. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2015; 16: 289-303. [Crossref]
48. Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision-making a reality: No decision about me, without me. 2011. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/Making-shared-decision-making-a-reality-paper-Angela-Coulter-Alf-Collins-July-2011_0.pdf.
49. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002; 324: 573-7. [Crossref]
50. Greenhalgh T, Wood GW, Bratan T, Stramer K, Hinder S. Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: Qualitative study. BMJ 2008; 336: 1290-5. [Crossref]
51. Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 1-7. [Crossref]
52. Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: Employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 306-14. [Crossref]
53. Xie B. Older adults’ health information wants in the internet age: Implications for patient-provider relationships. J Health Commun 2009; 14: 510-24. [Crossref]
54. Beastall GH. The modernisation of pathology and laboratory medicine in the UK: Networking into the future. Clin Biochem Rev 2008; 29: 3-10.
55. Protheroe J, Nutbeam D, Rowlands G. Health literacy: A necessity for increasing participation in health care. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 59: 721-3. [Crossref]
56. NICE. Patient Group Directions. 2013. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mpg2.
57. NHS England. National Pathology Programme Digital First: Clinical Transformation through Pathology Innovation. 2014. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/pathol-dig-first.pdf.
58. Smith JD, O’Dea K, McDermott R, Schmidt B, Connors C. Educating to improve population health outcomes in chronic disease: An innovative workforce initiative across remote, rural and indigenous communities in northern Australia. Rural Remote Health 2006; 6: 606.
59. Soklaridis S, Oandasan I, Kimpton S. Family health teams: Can health professionals learn to work together? Can Fam Physician 2007; 53: 1198-9.
60. Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: Overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J 2014; 90: 149-54. [Crossref]
61. NHS England. General Practice: Forward View. 2016. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf.
62. Department of Health. Making the Change: A strategy for the professions in healthcare science. 2001. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4010607.
63. Department of Health. Long Term Conditions Compendium of Information. 3rd ed. 2012. Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_134486.pdf.
64. Rafi I, Morris L, Short P, Hassey A, Gower S, de Lusignan S. Patient Online: The Road Map. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2013.
65. Phelps RG, Taylor J, Simpson K, Samuel J, Turner AN. Patients’ continuing use of an online health record: A quantitative evaluation of 14,000 patient years of access data. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e241. [Crossref]
66. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ 2007; 335: 24-7. [Crossref]
67. Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2010; 3: 61-72. [Crossref]
68. O’Kane MJ. Direct patient access to test results: Implications for the laboratory. Ann Clin Biochem 2015; 52: 525-6. [Crossref]
69. Healthcare Business Intelligence Association. 2017. Available from: www.bhbia.org.uk.
70. Marks A, Macleod C, McAteer A, Murchie P, Fluck N, Smith WCS, et al. Chronic kidney disease, a useful trigger for proactive primary care? Mortality results from a large U.K. Fam Pract 2013; 30: 282-9. [Crossref]
71. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54: 38-43.
72. Pillemer F, Price RA, Paone S, Martich GD, Albert S, Haidari L, et al. Direct release of test results to patients increases patient engagement and utilization of care. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0154743. [Crossref]
73. Christensen K, Sue VM. Viewing laboratory test results online: Patients’ actions and reactions. J Particip Med 2013; 5: e38.
74. Bryan S, Davis J, Broesch J, Doyle-Waters MM, Lewis S, McGrail L, et al. Choosing your partner for the PROM: A review of evidence on patient-reported outcome measures for use in primary and community care. Healthc Policy 2014; 10: 38-51. [Crossref]
75. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, Lopez A, et al. The literacy divide: Health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun 2010; 15 Suppl 2: 183-96. [Crossref]
76. Lopez-Vargas PA, Tong A, Sureshkumar P, Johnson DW, Craig JC. Prevention, detection and management of early chronic kidney disease: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Nephrology (Carlton) 2013; 18: 592-604. [Crossref]
77. Nancarrow SA, Borthwick AM. Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociol Health Illn 2005; 27: 897-919. [Crossref]
78. Hsu J, Huang J, Kinsman J, Fireman B, Miller R, Selby J, et al. Use of e-Health services between 1999 and 2002: A growing digital divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 164-71. [Crossref]
79. Stevens PE, O’Donoghue DJ, de Lusignan S, Van Vlymen J, Klebe B, Middleton R, et al. Chronic kidney disease management in the United Kingdom: NEOERICA project results. Kidney Int 2007; 72: 92-9. [Crossref]
80. Stevens PE, Farmer CKT. Chronic kidney disease and life expectancy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 27: 3014-5. [Crossref]
81. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu C. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1296-305. [Crossref]
82. UK Renal Registry 18th Annual Report. 2016. Available from: https://www.renalreg.org/reports/2015-eighteenth-annual-report.
83. Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Marshall M, Elwyn G, Grol R. Developing a facilitation model to promote organisational development in primary care practices. BMC Fam Pract 2006; 7: 38. [Crossref]
84. The Renal Association. The UK eCKD Guide. 2015. Available from: http://www.renal.org/information-resources/the-uk-eckd-guide/ckd-stages#sthash.Xl8M0NRL.dpbs.
85. Roblin DW, Houston TK 2nd, Allison JJ, Joski PJ, Becker ER. Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 683-9. [Crossref]
86. Royal College of Physicians of London. The Changing Face of Renal Medicine in the UK: The Future of the Specialty; Report of a Working Party. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2007.
87. Shaw SE, Smith JA, Porter A, Rosen R, Mays N. The work of commissioning: A multisite case study of healthcare commissioning in England’s NHS. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003341. [Crossref]
88. Leyland R, Freedman DB. A survey of Lab Tests Online-UK users: A key resource for patients to empower and help them understand their laboratory test results. Ann Clin Biochem 53: 669-79. [Crossref]

APA	Muhammad S, Gardner J, Gardner V (2020). Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. , 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
Chicago	Muhammad Shahid,Gardner John,Gardner Vicky Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. (2020): 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
MLA	Muhammad Shahid,Gardner John,Gardner Vicky Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. , 2020, ss.141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
AMA	Muhammad S,Gardner J,Gardner V Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. . 2020; 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
Vancouver	Muhammad S,Gardner J,Gardner V Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. . 2020; 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
IEEE	Muhammad S,Gardner J,Gardner V "Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform." , ss.141 - 152, 2020. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
ISNAD	Muhammad, Shahid vd. "Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform". (2020), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812

APA	Muhammad S, Gardner J, Gardner V (2020). Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online), 29(2), 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
Chicago	Muhammad Shahid,Gardner John,Gardner Vicky Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online) 29, no.2 (2020): 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
MLA	Muhammad Shahid,Gardner John,Gardner Vicky Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online), vol.29, no.2, 2020, ss.141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
AMA	Muhammad S,Gardner J,Gardner V Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online). 2020; 29(2): 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
Vancouver	Muhammad S,Gardner J,Gardner V Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online). 2020; 29(2): 141 - 152. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
IEEE	Muhammad S,Gardner J,Gardner V "Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform." Turkish journal of nephrology (Online), 29, ss.141 - 152, 2020. 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812
ISNAD	Muhammad, Shahid vd. "Is There a Need for Healthcare Scientists and Educational Support Surrounding Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Laboratory Investigations and Tests? Summarizing Polls via a Patient Support Group Platform". Turkish journal of nephrology (Online) 29/2 (2020), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.5152/turkjnephrol.2020.3812