Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 23 - 31 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task

Öz:
Objective: Reversing learned associations interferes with previously acquired learning, a form of retroactive interference for the previous association and proactive interference on the new learning. We examined associations involving emotional content and how they might impact interference. The current study aims to discover the role positive, negative, and non-emotional stimuli play during acquisition and reversal learning in a probabilistic go/no-go task.Method: The task consisted of separate conditions of happy, sad, angry, fearful emotional stimuli and non-emotional stimuli during separate acquisition and reversal training periods. Ninety-seven participants aged 18-35 (49 females) took part in the study.Results: The results revealed that overall, participants were more accurate during acquisition than reversal. Further, happy stimuli were learned with greater accuracy during acquisition but were no easier to learn in reversal, effectively accompanied by a greater reversal cost.Conclusion: There is evidence that happy emotional stimuli act like stimuli with a stronger learning rate much like learning of other high salience stimuli. Emotion valanced stimuli like other types of stimuli and can be described mechanistically by varying learning rate parameters of associative models.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Byrom NC, Murphy RA. Individual differences are more than a gene × environment interaction: The role of learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn 2018; 44:36-55.
  • 2. Aisbitt GM, Murphy RA. An Application of a Theory of Attention (Mackintosh, 1975) to Psychopathy: Variability in the Associability of Stimuli: In Trobalon JB, Chamizo VD, editors. Associative learning and cognition : homage to professor N. J. Mackintosh. In Memoriam (1935-2015). Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat Barcelona 2016; 89-108. (Spanish)
  • 3. Msetfi RM, Byrom N, Murphy RA. To neglect or integrate contingency information from outside the task frame, that is the question! Effects of depressed mood. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2017; 178:1-11.
  • 4. Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET. Neural correlates of rapid reversal learning in a simple model of human social interaction. Neuroimage 2003; 20:1371-1383.
  • 5. Cools R, Clark L, Owen AM, Robbins TW. Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2002; 22:4563-4567.
  • 6. Brazil IA, Maes JH, Scheper I, Bulten BH, Kessels RP, Verkes RJ, et al. Reversal deficits in individuals with psychopathy in explicit but not implicit learning conditions. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2013; 38:E13-20.
  • 7. Tortosa MI, Strizhko T, Capizzi M, Ruz M. Interpersonal effects of emotion in a multi-round Trust Game. Psicológica 2013; 34:179-198.
  • 8. Nashiro K, Mather M, Gorlick MA, Nga L. Negative emotional outcomes impair older adults' reversal learning. Cogn Emot 2011; 25:1014-1028.
  • 9. Willis ML, Palermo R, Burke D, Atkinson CM, McArthur G. Switching associations between facial identity and emotional expression: a behavioural and ERP study. Neuroimage 2010; 50:329-339.
  • 10. Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ, Luque D, Most SB, Fernández-Berrocal P, Le Pelley ME. Reward and emotion influence attentional bias in rapid serial visual presentation. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2019; 72:2155-2167.
  • 11. Osborne-Crowley K, McDonald S, Rushby JA. role of reversal learning ımpairment in social disinhibition following severe traumatic brain ınjury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2016; 22:303- 313.
  • 12. Baker AG, Murphy RA, Vallée-Tourangeau F. Associative and normative models of causal induction: Reacting to versus understanding cause. In Shanks DR, Holyoak, Medin DL, editors. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation San Diego: Academic Press, 1996; 1-45.
  • 13. Ward RD, Gallistel CR, Balsam PD. It's the information! Behav Processes 2013; 95:3-7.
  • 14. Murphy RA, Schmeer S, Vallée-Tourangeau F, Mondragón E, Hilton D. Making the illusory correlation effect appear and then disappear: the effects of increased learning. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2011; 64:24-40.
  • 15. Spiers HJ, Love BC, Le Pelley ME, Gibb CE, Murphy RA. Anterior temporal lobe tracks the formation of prejudice. J Cogn Neurosci 2017; 29:530-544.
  • 16. Le Pelley ME, Reimers SJ, Calvini G, Spears R, Beesley T, Murphy RA. Stereotype formation: biased by association. J Exp Psychol Gen 2010; 139:138-161.
  • 17. Schulz KP, Fan J, Magidina O, Marks DJ, Hahn B, Halperin JM. Does the emotional go/no-go task really measure behavioral inhibition? Convergence with measures on a non-emotional analog. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 22:151-160.
  • 18. Budhani S, Marsh AA, Pine DS, Blair RJ. Neural correlates of response reversal: considering acquisition. Neuroimage 2007; 34:1754-1765.
  • 19. Carretié L, Hinojosa JA, Martín-Loeches M, Mercado F, Tapia M. Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 22:290-299.
  • 20. Sergerie K, Lepage M, Armony JL. A face to remember: emotional expression modulates prefrontal activity during memory formation. Neuroimage 2005; 24:580-585.
  • 21. Averbeck BB, Duchaine B. Integration of social and utilitarian factors in decision making. Emotion 2009; 9:599-608.
  • 22. Evans S, Shergill SS, Averbeck BB. Oxytocin decreases aversion to angry faces in an associative learning task. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010; 35:2502-2509.
  • 23. Hare TA, Tottenham N, Davidson MC, Glover GH, Casey BJ. Contributions of amygdala and striatal activity in emotion regulation. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:624-632.
  • 24. Anwyl-Irvine AL, Massonnié J, Flitton A, Kirkham N, Evershed JK. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behav Res Methods 2020; 52:388-407.
  • 25. Fillmore MT, Rush CR. Polydrug abusers display impaired discrimination-reversal learning in a model of behavioural control. J Psychopharmacol 2006; 20:24-32.
  • 26. Langner O, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DHJ, Hawk ST, van Knippenberg A. Presentation and validation of the radboud faces database. Cogn Emot 2010; 24:1377-1388.
  • 27. Sahin MD, Aybek EC. Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. Int J Assess Tools Educ 2019; 6:670-692
APA SAYLIK R, Castiello de Obeso S, Murphy R (2021). The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. , 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
Chicago SAYLIK RAHMI,Castiello de Obeso Santiago,Murphy Robin The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. (2021): 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
MLA SAYLIK RAHMI,Castiello de Obeso Santiago,Murphy Robin The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. , 2021, ss.23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
AMA SAYLIK R,Castiello de Obeso S,Murphy R The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. . 2021; 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
Vancouver SAYLIK R,Castiello de Obeso S,Murphy R The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. . 2021; 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
IEEE SAYLIK R,Castiello de Obeso S,Murphy R "The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task." , ss.23 - 31, 2021. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
ISNAD SAYLIK, RAHMI vd. "The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task". (2021), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
APA SAYLIK R, Castiello de Obeso S, Murphy R (2021). The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 34(1), 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
Chicago SAYLIK RAHMI,Castiello de Obeso Santiago,Murphy Robin The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi 34, no.1 (2021): 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
MLA SAYLIK RAHMI,Castiello de Obeso Santiago,Murphy Robin The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, vol.34, no.1, 2021, ss.23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
AMA SAYLIK R,Castiello de Obeso S,Murphy R The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi. 2021; 34(1): 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
Vancouver SAYLIK R,Castiello de Obeso S,Murphy R The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi. 2021; 34(1): 23 - 31. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
IEEE SAYLIK R,Castiello de Obeso S,Murphy R "The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task." Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 34, ss.23 - 31, 2021. 10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117
ISNAD SAYLIK, RAHMI vd. "The role of emotional interference on learning in anemotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task". Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi 34/1 (2021), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2021.00117