Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)

POLAT, Nazmi; bostancı, derya; Yilmaz, Savas

Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)

Nazmi POLAT, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ordu Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ordu, Türkiye)

Derya BOSTANCI, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ordu Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ordu, Türkiye)

Savaş YILMAZ (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ordu Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Ordu, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

0 0

Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 429 - 433 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)

Öz:

Karadeniz'den örneklenen 156 barbunya balığı (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927)'nın pul, omur, otolit, operkül ve suboperkül gibi farklı kemiksi yapıları yaş tayini için alınmıştır. Otolitler yaş belirlemede tecrübeli iki okuyucu tarafından bir kez okunmuştur. Ayrıca otolit kenar bölgesindeki annulusların yorumlanmasında zorluk çekilen 61 otolite kırma-yakma metodu uygulanmıştır. Kırılıp-yakılan otolitler de aynı iki okuyucu tarafından bir kez okunmuştur. Bütün otolit ile kırık otolit yaşları karşılaştırıldığında, yapı-içi uyumun yüksek, yapılar-arası uyumun ise düşük olduğu gözlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bütün otolitlerin balık yaşını en az l yaş düşük gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Bu nedenle, barbunya balığının yaş tayininde kırık otolit metodunun kullanılması önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelime: balık yaş saptanması barbunya balığı metodoloji denge taşı Karadeniz Samsun Mullus barbatus

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Karadeniz (Samsun, Türkiye)' den örneklenen barbunya balığı (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927)' nın bütün otolit ve kırık otolit yaşları arasındaki farklar

Öz:

Different bony structures as scales, vertebrae, otoliths, opercles and subopercles of 156 red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea were removed for age determination. Otoliths were read once by two experienced readers. However, due to the difficulty of interpretation of annul! on the otolith edge, the broken-burnt method was applied to the 61 otoliths. Broken-burnt otoliths were also read once by the same two experienced readers. When whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages were compared, high agreement within structures and low precision between structures were observed. Finally, it was found that the age of fish was underestimated by a minimum of one year by whole otolith. Therefore, we recommend that the broken-burnt otolith method should be used in the age determination of red mullet.

Anahtar Kelime: methodology otolith Black Sea Samsun Mullus barbatus fishes age determination red mullet

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Chalanchuk, S.M.: Ageing a population of the white sucker, Catostomus commersoni by the fin-ray method. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci.. 1984; 1321, IV.
2. Beamish, R.J., McFarlane, G.A.: The forgotten requirement for age validation in fisheries biology. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soci., 1983; 112:735-743.
3. Fowler, J.A.: Validation of annual growth increments in the otoliths of a small, tropical coral reef fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 1990; 64: 25-38.
4. Das, M.: Age determination and longevity in fishes. Gerontology, 1994:40:70-96.
5. Svedang, H., Wickstrom, H., Reizenstein, M., Holmgren, K., Florenius, P.: Accuracy and precision in eel estimation, using otoliths of known and unknown age. J. Fish Biol., 1998; 53:453-464.
6. Sharp, D., Bernard, D.R.: Precision of estimated ages of lake trout from five calcified structures. North Amer. J. Fish. Manage., 1988; 8: 367-372.
7. Baker, T.T., Timmons, L.S.: Precision of ages estimated from five bony structure of arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) from the wood river system, Alaska. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1991; 48: 1007-1014.
8. Polat, N., Işık, K., Kukul, A.: Bıyıklı balık (Barbus plebejus escherichi, Steindacheri 1897)'in yaş tayininde kemiksi yapı- okuyucu uyum değerlendirmesi. Doğa, Tr. J. Zool., 1993; 17: 503-509.
9. Polat, N., Gümüş, A.: Age determination and evaluation precision using five bony structures of the bround-snout (Chondrostoma regium Heckel, 1843). Tr. J. Zool., 1995; 19: 331-335.
10. Bostancı, D., Polat, N.: Karadeniz'de yaşayan Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810)'te yaş belirleme yöntemleri. Turk. J. Zool., 2000; 24:Suppl., 21-29.
11. Polat, N., Bostancı, D., Yılmaz, S.: Comparable age determination in different bony structures of Pleuronectes flesus luscus Pallas, 1811 inhabiting the Black Sea. Turk. J. Zool., 2001; 25: 441-446.
12. Yılmaz, S., Polat, N.: Age determination of shad (Alosa pontica Eichwald, 1838) inhabiting the Black Sea. Turk. J. Zool., 2002; 26: 393-398.
13. Samsun, 0., Erkoyuncu, L Orta Karadeniz'de trollerle avlanan barbunya balığının (Mullus barbatus ponticus ess. 1927) balıkçılık biyolojisi bakımından çeşitli özelliklerinin araştırılması. Fırat Üniversitesi, XI. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, Elazığ, 1992; 189-198.
14. Şahin, T., Akbulut, B.: Same biological characteristics of Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927 in the Eastern Black Sea coast of Turkey. Tr. J. Zool., 1997; 21: 179-185.
15. Çelik, Ö., Torcu, H.: Ege Denizi, Edremit Körfezi barbunya balığı (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758)'nın biyolojisi üzerine araştırmalar. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2000; 24: 287-295.
16. İsmen, A., Yıldırım, Y., İsmen, P.: Doğu Karadeniz'de barbunya (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) balığının büyüme özellikleri ve üreme biyolojisi. Su Ürünleri Sempozyumu, Sinop, 2000; 342-356.
17. Türeli, C, Erdem, Ü.: Adana ili kıyı bölgesinde ekonomik öneme sahip balık türlerinden barbunya (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) ve Iskarmoz (Saurida undosquamis (Richardson, 1848) balıklarının büyüme özellikleri (İskenderun Körfezi, Türkiye). Tr. J. Zool., 1997;21:329-334.
18. Chugunova, N.: Age and growth studies in fish. Nat. Sci. Found., Washington. 1963.
19. Demory, R.L., Pikitch, E.K.: A comparison of age determinations made by scales and broken and burnt otoliths for dover sole (Microstomus pacificus). Final Report.. NMFS, NOAA, US Deparment of Commerce, Commercial Fisheries Research and Development Act Contract No. 85-ABD-001001, 1986.
20. Astanin, L.P.: Ob. Opredeleii Vozrasta Ryb po Kostyum (Age determination in fish from bones). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 1974;26:3.
21. Beamish, R.J., Foumier, D.A.: A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1981:38:982-983.
22. Chang, W.Y.B.: A statistical method for evaluating the reproducibility of age determination. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1982; 39: 1208-1210.
23. Polat, N., Işık, K.: Altınkaya baraj gölündeki siraz balığının (Capoeta capoeta Guldenstaedt, 1773) yaş belirleme yöntemleri ile büyüme özellikleri. Tr. J. of Zool., 1995; 19: 265-271.
24. Sipe, A.M., Chittenden, M.EJR.: A comparison of calcified structures for aging bluefish in the Chesapeake bay region. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soci., 2002; 131: 783-790.
25. Campana, S.E.: Comparison of age determination methods for the starry flounder. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soci., 1984; 113: 365-369.
26. Skurdal, J., Vollestad, LA., Qvenild, T.: Comparison of scales and otoliths for age determination of whitefish Coregonus lavaretus. Fish. Res., 1985:3:237-243.
27. McFarlane, G.A., Beamish, R.J.: An examination of age determination structures of walleye pollock {Theragra chalcogramma) from five stocks in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. In L.L. Low (ed.). Proceedings of the symposium on application of stock assessment techniques to Gadids. INPFC, Vancouver, Canada, Bull. No: 50. 1990; pp. 37-56.
28. Polat, N., Gümüş, A.: Ageing of whiting (Merlangius merlangius euxinus, Nord., 1840) based on broken and burnt otolitti. Fish. Res., 1996:28:231-236.

APA	POLAT N, bostancı d, Yilmaz S (2005). Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). , 429 - 433.
Chicago	POLAT Nazmi,bostancı derya,Yilmaz Savas Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). (2005): 429 - 433.
MLA	POLAT Nazmi,bostancı derya,Yilmaz Savas Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). , 2005, ss.429 - 433.
AMA	POLAT N,bostancı d,Yilmaz S Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). . 2005; 429 - 433.
Vancouver	POLAT N,bostancı d,Yilmaz S Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). . 2005; 429 - 433.
IEEE	POLAT N,bostancı d,Yilmaz S "Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)." , ss.429 - 433, 2005.
ISNAD	POLAT, Nazmi vd. "Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)". (2005), 429-433.

APA	POLAT N, bostancı d, Yilmaz S (2005). Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29(2), 429 - 433.
Chicago	POLAT Nazmi,bostancı derya,Yilmaz Savas Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 29, no.2 (2005): 429 - 433.
MLA	POLAT Nazmi,bostancı derya,Yilmaz Savas Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.29, no.2, 2005, ss.429 - 433.
AMA	POLAT N,bostancı d,Yilmaz S Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2005; 29(2): 429 - 433.
Vancouver	POLAT N,bostancı d,Yilmaz S Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2005; 29(2): 429 - 433.
IEEE	POLAT N,bostancı d,Yilmaz S "Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29, ss.429 - 433, 2005.
ISNAD	POLAT, Nazmi vd. "Differences between whole otolith and broken-burnt otolith ages of red mullet (Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927) sampled from the Black Sea (Samsun, Turkey)". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 29/2 (2005), 429-433.