Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception

Seçil TAŞTAN, (Marmara Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme (İng) Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Serin İŞİAÇIK (Işık Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
9 2
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 537 - 555 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31592/aeusbed.736610 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception

Öz:
Recent literature has shown the contributions of positivity in organizations, but less is known about the impact of spirituality and safety feelings as an extension of positive psychology on individuals’ innovative work behaviors. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, it is suggested that the conditions encouraging employees’ perceptions and attitudes as well as their innovative work behaviors (IWBs) have been changed. Based on the positive psychology approach, workplace spirituality and psychological safety are seen as important factors on employees’ IWBs. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the relationships among perceived workplace spirituality, psychological safety, and employees’ IWBs within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Employees working in different private sectors in Istanbul (N= 251) participated in the current research. The statistical analyses revealed that workplace spirituality contributed to employees’ innovative behaviors, and psychological safety fully mediated this relationship. Based on the findings, practical and conceptual implications of this study are discussed and future directions are presented.
Anahtar Kelime: psychological safety perception Innovative work behaviors workplace spirituality

COVID-19 Salgını Döneminde Yenilikçi İç Davranışlarına Yeniden Bakış: Algılanan İşyeri Maneviyatının ve Psikolojik Güvenliğin Etkileri

Öz:
Alanyazında yer alan çalışmalarda, pozitifliğin örgütlerdeki olumlu yansımalarına işaret edilmiş, ancak pozitif psikolojinin bir uzantısı olarak maneviyatın ve güvenlik hissinin yenilikçi iş davranışları (Yid) üzerindeki etkisi hakkında yeterli sayıda bulguya ulaşılmamıştır. Buradan hareketle, bu araştırmada, işyeri maneviyatı, psikolojik güvenlik ve çalışanların yenilikçi iş davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Ayrıca, COVID-19 salgının gündeme geldiği örgütsel koşullarda, Yid’i oluşturan koşulların ve süreç esnasında çalışanların işyerine ilişkin tutum ve algılarının da farklılık gösterebileceği öngörülmüştür. Bu nedenle, çalışmada ele alınan değişkenlerin günümüz çevresel koşullarında çalışanların algı, tutum ve davranışları açısından incelenmesinin alanyazına önemli katkılar sunabileceği düşünülmüştür. Bu bağlamda gerçekleştirilen araştırmaya, İstanbul'da farklı özel sektörlerde çalışan bireyler (N= 251) katılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler neticesinde, işyeri maneviyatının çalışanların yenilikçi davranışlarına katkıda bulunduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Psikolojik güvenliğin, işyeri maneviyatı ve yenilikçi iş davranışları arasındaki pozitif yöndeki bu ilişkide tam aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda elde edilen bulguların uygulamaya ve alanyazına yönelik katkıları değerlendirilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agarwal, P. and Farndale, E. (2017). High‐performance work systems and creativity implementation: The role of psychological capital and psychological safety. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(3), 440-458.
  • Afsar, B. and Badir, Y. (2017). Workplace spirituality perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of person-organization fit. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(2), 95-109.
  • Alas, R. and Mousa, M. (2016). Organizational culture and workplace spirituality. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, 5(3), 285-314.
  • Arslan, A. ve Yener, S. (2015). Temel benlik değerlendirmeleri-girişimci kişilik ilişkisinde ençoklamacı karar verme yaklaşımının aracı değişken rolü: Konya örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(3), 283-310.
  • Alex Linley, P., Joseph, S., Harrington, S. and Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 3-16.
  • Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Buller, P. F. and McEvoy, G. M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human Resource Management Review, 22(1), 43-56.
  • Cameron, K. S. and Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J. and Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 28(1), 1-6.
  • Carmeli, A., Brueller, D. and Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 26(1), 81-98.
  • Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R. and Gefen, D. (2010). The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 339-349.
  • Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter‐Palmon, R. and Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem‐solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115-135.
  • Chen, S., Jiang, W., Zhang, G. and Chu, F. (2019). Spiritual Leadership on Proactive Workplace Behavior: Identification and Psychological Safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1206.
  • Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ. and Turunç, Ö. (2011). Örgütsel Performansın arttırılmasında motivasyonel davranışların rolü: Yenilikçiliğin ve girişimciliğin aracılık rolü. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 363-401.
  • Çetinkaya, F. F. and Gülbahar, H. O. (2019). Stratejik yönetim ve inovasyon ilişkisi: KOBİ’ler üzerine bir araştırma. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 349-367.
  • Çimen, İ. and Yücel, C. (2017). Yenilikçi Davranış Ölçeği (YDÖ): Türk kültürüne uyarlama çalışması. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 6(3), 365-381.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (Vol. 2). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P. and Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580.
  • De Jong, J. P. and Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27.
  • Delizonna, L. (2017). High-performing teams need psychological safety: Here is how to create it. Harvard Business Review, 8, 2017.
  • Duan, L. and Zhu, G. (2020). Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(4), 300-302.
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
  • Edmondson, A. C. and Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behaviour, 1(1), 23-43.
  • Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Farr, J. L. and West, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley.
  • Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C. J. C. and Wah, W. X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter?.Resources,Conservation and Recycling,141,8- 20.
  • Fox, C., Webster, B. D. and Casper, W. C. (2018). Spirituality, psychological capital and employee performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Managerial Issues, 30(2), 194-153.
  • Gupta, M., Kumar, V. and Singh, M. (2014). Creating satisfied employees through workplace spirituality: A study of the private insurance sector in Punjab (India). Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 79-88
  • Gupta, A. A. K. (2017). Workplace Spirituality-A New Paradigm in Management. Ushus-Journal of Business Management, 16(2), 45-52.
  • Hackman J.R. and Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  • Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A. and Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107-117.
  • Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGrawHill.
  • Howard, S. and Welbourn, D. (2004). The spirit at work phenomenon. Landon: Azure.
  • İşiaçık, S. (2019). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility and workplace spirituality on innovative work behaviors: The role of psychological safety perception. (Unpublished master's thesis). Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
  • Jung, D. I., Chow, C. and Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 525-544.
  • Kanbur, E. and Ay, A. (2020). Psikolojik sözleşme algısının işe adanmışlık üzerindeki etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 531-549.
  • King, N. and Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations. Cengage Learning EMEA.
  • King-Kauanui, S., Thomas, K. D. and Waters, G. R. (2005). Entrepreneurship and spirituality: integration of spirituality into the workplace. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 2(2), 255-274.
  • Kinjerski, V. M. and Skrypnek, B. J. (2004). Defining spirit at work: Finding common ground. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(1), 26-42.
  • Kinjerski, V. and Skrypnek, B. J. (2006). Measuring the Intangible: Development of the Spirit at Work Scale. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1-6.
  • Kostopoulos, K. C. and Bozionelos, N. (2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 385-415.
  • Kumar, M. (2016). Workplace Spirituality and Employee Work Attitudes: Exploring Gender as a Moderator. Journal of Business and Management, 18(5), 1-10.
  • Low, J. G. and Wilder-Smith, A. (2005). Infectious respiratory illnesses and their impact on healthcare workers: a review. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34(1), 105-110.
  • Luthans, F. (2002b). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695-706.
  • McKibbin, W. J. and Fernando, R. (2020). The global macroeconomic impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. CAMA Working Paper No. 19/2020.
  • Milliman, J., Czaplewski, A. J. and Ferguson, J. (2003). Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: An exploratory empirical assessment. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(4), 426-447.
  • Mitroff, I. I. and Denton, E. A. (1999). A study of spirituality in the workplace. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 83-103.
  • Mónico, L. S., Mellão, N., Nobre-Lima, L., Parreira, P. and Carvalho, C. (2016). Emotional intelligence and psychological capital: What is the role of workplace spirituality. Review of Portugual Port. Enferm. Saúde Mental, 3, 45-50.
  • Nembhard, I. M. and Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966.
  • Newman, A., Donohue, R. and Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535.
  • Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Validity. Psychometric Theory, 3, 99-132.
  • Oldham, G. R. and Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
  • O'Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J. and Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3),487-516.
  • Pandey, A., Gupta, V. and Gupta, R. K. (2019). Spirituality and Innovative Behavior in Teams: Examining the Mediating Role of Team Learning. IIMB Management Review, 4(2), 1-23.
  • Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L. and Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based selfesteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648.
  • Qiu, J., Shen, B., Zhao, M., Wang, Z., Xie, B. and Xu, Y. (2020). A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. General Psychiatry, 33(2), 1-24.
  • Rego, A. and Cunha, M. P. (2008). Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment: an empirical study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(1), 53-75.
  • Riggio, R. E. (2012). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: Pearson Higher Edcation.
  • Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T. (2012). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Saks, A. M. (2011). Workplace spirituality and employee engagement. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(4), 317–340.
  • Schumacker, R. E. and Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology press, New York: Routletge, Taylor & Francis.
  • Scott, S. G. and Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Seligman, M. E. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14
  • Sethia, N. (1991). The evocation of creativity through collaboration. In annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami.
  • Seyyar, A. and Evkaya, C. (2015). Batıda “İşyeri Maneviyatı” Üzerine Yapılan Bilimsel Çalışmaların Türk Bilim Camiasına Etkileri. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 1-20.
  • Shinde, U. and Fleck, E. (2015). What spirituality can bring to leaders and managers:Enabling creativity, empathy and a stress free workplace. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 101-120.
  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., Balasubramanian, S. and Anand, G. (2009). The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(3), 429-447.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş:(temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları). İstanbul: Ekinoks Publishing.
  • Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M. and Landis, B. (2018). Personality change: implications for organizational behavior. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 467-493.
  • Taştan, S. B. (2013). The influences of participative organizational climate and self-leadership on innovative behavior and the roles of job involvement and proactive personality: A survey in the context of SMEs in Izmir. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 407-419.
  • Taştan, S. B. and Davoudi, S. M. M. (2015). An examination of the relationship between leadermember exchange and innovative work behavior with the moderating role of trust in leader: A study in the Turkish context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 23-32.
  • Taştan, S. B., Güçel, C. and İşçi, E. (2015). Dünyaya ilişkin varsayımlar ve özerklik algısının çalışanlarda olumlu sosyal davranışlar ve saldırganlık ile ilişkilerinin incelenmesi: Özbelirleme ve pozitif yanılsamalar kuramları bağlamında bir değerlendirme. İş'te Davranış Dergisi, 2(2), 1-10.
  • Taştan, S. B. (2016). Predicting job strain with psychological hardiness, organizational support, job control and work overload: an evaluation of Karasek’s DCS model. Postmodern Openings, 7(1), 107-130.
  • Turner, J. (1999). Spirituality in the workplace. CA Magazine, 132(10), 41-52. Unnikrishnan, N. K. (2001). Adaptation to creation: Progress of organizational learning and increasing complexity of learning systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18(6), 505-521.
  • Üçler, Ç. and Taştan, S. B. (2017). Investigating the relations of psychological contract, organizational transparency and leader-member exchange with employee performance behaviors. Journal of Behavior at Work, 2(2), 89-107.
  • Üçok, D. T. and Torun, A. A. (2016). The relationship of group cohesiveness, psychological safety, control over work, and competitive work environment with organizational silence: The mediating role of motives of silence. Uluslararası İşletme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Perspektifleri Dergisi, 4, 62-80.
  • Ünal, Z. M. ve Turgut, T. (2015). Örgüt kültürünün iş yerinde maneviyat üzerindeki katkısı. 3. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Tokat.
  • Walumbwa, F. O. and Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275.
  • West, M.A. and Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at Work: Psychological Perspectives. Social Behavior,4,15,30.
  • Weiss, H.M. and Cropanzano. R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.
  • Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W. and Voordeckers, W. (2018). Socio‐emotional wealth separation and decision‐making quality in family firm TMTs: The moderating role of psychological safety. Journal of Management Studies, 55(4), 648-676.
  • Yener, S. (2015). Psikolojik Rahatlık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(13), 280-305.
APA TAŞTAN S, İşiaçık S (2021). Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. , 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
Chicago TAŞTAN Seçil,İşiaçık Serin Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. (2021): 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
MLA TAŞTAN Seçil,İşiaçık Serin Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. , 2021, ss.537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
AMA TAŞTAN S,İşiaçık S Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. . 2021; 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
Vancouver TAŞTAN S,İşiaçık S Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. . 2021; 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
IEEE TAŞTAN S,İşiaçık S "Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception." , ss.537 - 555, 2021. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
ISNAD TAŞTAN, Seçil - İşiaçık, Serin. "Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception". (2021), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.736610
APA TAŞTAN S, İşiaçık S (2021). Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(2), 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
Chicago TAŞTAN Seçil,İşiaçık Serin Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 7, no.2 (2021): 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
MLA TAŞTAN Seçil,İşiaçık Serin Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol.7, no.2, 2021, ss.537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
AMA TAŞTAN S,İşiaçık S Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2021; 7(2): 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
Vancouver TAŞTAN S,İşiaçık S Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2021; 7(2): 537 - 555. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
IEEE TAŞTAN S,İşiaçık S "Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception." Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7, ss.537 - 555, 2021. 10.31592/aeusbed.736610
ISNAD TAŞTAN, Seçil - İşiaçık, Serin. "Reassessing Innovative Work Behaviors during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impacts of Workplace Spirituality and Psychological Safety Perception". Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 7/2 (2021), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.736610
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 19:7

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları