Sertaç ÖZGÜN
(Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
GÜLÇİN IŞIK
(Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2021Cilt: 14Sayı: 2ISSN: 1308-5301 / 1308-8084Sayfa Aralığı: 286 - 291İngilizce

32 0
Ecophysiological responses of Zea mays L. against thermal power plant fly ash applications
Thermal power plant fly ash is one of the most important concerns of this form of energy generation, as it isthe most important waste generated by burning coal in a thermal power plant. This kind of fly ash contains elementslike Fe, Al, Si, Ca, Na, and K which can be beneficial or harmful to plants depending on the concentration. To evaluatethe effect of thermal power plant fly ash on the ecological system, it is necessary to analyze the ecophysiologicalresponses of plants. Zea mays L. (corn) is a worldwide consumed plant species that has been cultivated for 10000 yearsand it is an important model organism for genetics and biology. In this study, it was aimed that to observeecophysiological responses of corn against thermal power plant fly ash applications. For the experimental period,control (0 ppm), 500, 1000, 2500, 5000, and 7500 ppm of fly ash applications were set. The experiments took 14 days,and at the end of the experimental period % germination, hypocotyl and radicle lengths, seedling vigor index werecalculated. It was observed that 500 to 5000 ppm fly ash applications were stimulated the seed germination, stem androot development, and also seedling vigor index (SVI), but 7500 ppm fly ash applications were inhibited by allecophysiological parameters. We can say that lower than 5000 ppm fly ash can be useful for agricultural practices,however above 5000 ppm level it is harmful to plant development.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • [1]. Yao, Z. T., Ji, X. S., Sarker, P. K., Tang, J. H., Ge, L. Q., Xia, M. S., & Xi, Y. Q. (2015). A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth-Science Reviews, 141, 105-121.
  • [2]. Ferreira, C., Ribeiro, A., & Ottosen, L. (2003). Possible Applications for Municipal Solid Waste Fly Ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 96(2-3), 201-216.
  • [3]. Khan, I., & Umar, R. (2019). Environmental risk assessment of coal fly ash on soil and groundwater quality, Aligarh, India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 8, 346–357.
  • [4]. Blissett, R.S., & Rowson, N.A. (2012). A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel, 97, 1– 23.
  • [5]. Isik, G., & Leblebici, S. (2016). Seed Germination Behavior of some Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) Varieties According to Habitat Conditions Containing Different Concentrations of Boric Acid. Pakistan Journal of Botany 48(6):2211-2214.
  • [6]. Abdulbaki, A. A., & Anderson, J. D. (1973). Relationship between decarboxylation of glutamic acid and vigor in soybean seeds. Crop Science, 13, 222-226.
  • [7]. Jala, S., & Goyal, D. (2006). Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production – a review. Bioresour Technol, 97(9):1136–47.
  • [8]. Kosnar, Z., Mercl, F., & Tlustos, P. (2018). Ability of natural attenuation and phytoremediation using maize (Zea mays L.) to decrease soil contents of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) derived from biomass fly ash in comparison with PAHs–spiked soil. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 153, 16–22.
  • [9]. Fu, Z. J., Li, W. H., Zhang, Q. B. (2014). Quantitative trait loci for mercury accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) identified using a RIL population. Plos one, 9(9):1–9.
  • [10]. Dash, A. K., Pradhan, A., Das, S., & Mohanty, S. S. (2015). Fly ash as a potentıal source of soıl amendment ın agrıculture and a component of ıntegrated plant nutrıent supply system. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 31(2): 251-259.
  • [11]. Akın, S. S., Magalhães, D., & Kazanc, F. (2020). A study on the effects of various combustion parameters on the mineral composition of Tunçbilek fly ash. Fuel, 275, 117881.
  • [12]. Usmani, Z., Kumar, V., Gupta, P., Gupta, G., Ran, R., & Chandra, A. (2019). Enhanced soil fertility, plant growth promotion and microbial enzymatic activities of vermicomposted fly ash. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10455
  • [13]. Geetanjali, K., Ravi, M. V., Gaddi, A. K., Shyamarao, M., & Shyamarao, K. (2017). Effect of flyash and organic manures application on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Agriculture Update, 12(TECHSEAR-5), 1233- 1236.
  • [14]. Meij, R., (1995). The distribution of trace elements during the combustion of coal. In: Swaine, D.J., Goodarzi, F. (Eds.), Environmental Aspects of Trace Elements in Coal. Kluwer Academic Publication, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 111–127.
  • [15]. Singh, L. P., & Siddiqui, Z. A. (2003). Effects of fly ash and Helminthosporium oryzae on growth and yield of three cultivars of rice. Bioresource Technology, 86, 73–78.
  • [16]. Singh, A., Sharma, K. R., & Agrawal B. S. (2008). Effects of fly ash incorporation on heavy metal accumulation, growth and yield responses of Beta vulgaris plants. Bioresource Technology, 99(15), 7200–7207.
  • [17]. Muduli, S. D., Chaturvedi, N., Mohapatra, P., Dhal, N. K., & Nayak, B. D. (2014). Growth and Physiological Activities of Selected Leguminous Crops Grown in Carbonated Fly Ash Amended Soil. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 083-090.
  • [18]. Singh, L., & Sukul, P. (2019). Impact Ofvermıcompost, Farm Yard Manure, Flyash And Inorganıc Fertılızers On Growth And Yıeld Attrıbutıng Characters Of Maıze (Zea mays L.). Plant Archives, 19(2), 2193-2200.
  • [19]. Coe, E. H. Jr. (2001). The origins of maize genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, 898–905
  • [20]. Rhoades, M. M. (1984). The early years of maize genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 18, 1–29
  • [21]. Strable, J., & Scanlon, j. M. (2009). Maize (Zea mays): a model organism for basic and applied research in plant biology. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 4(10). https://doi:10.1101/pdb.emo132
  • [22]. Ahmaruzzaman, M. (2010). A review on the utilization of fly ash. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(3), 327– 363.
  • [23]. Baba, A., Gurdal, G., & Sanliyuksel Yucel, D. (2016). Enrichment of trace element concentrations in coal and its combustion residues and their potential environmental and human health impact: Can Coal Basin, NW Turkey as a case study. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 19(5–6), 455–478.
  • [24]. Ileri, B., & Yucel, S. D. (2020). Metal removal from acid mine lake using ultrasound-assisted modified fly ash at different frequencies. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(3), 185. https://doi:10.1007/s10661-020- 8150-4
  • [25]. Demir, I., Sevım, O., Ozel, G., & Dogan, O. (2020). Mıcrostructural, Physıcal And Mechanıcal Propertıes Of Aerated Concrete Contaınıng Fly Ash Under Hıgh Temperature And Pressure. Romanian Journal of Materials, 50(2), 240 – 249.
  • [26]. Panigrahi, T., Das, K. K., Das, M., Panda, K. S., & Panda, R. B. (2014). Fly ash and treated waste water effect on improving soil properties and rice productivity: A way for sustainable agriculture practice. Discovery Nature, 7(17), 30-38.
  • [27]. Yücel, E. (2000). Ecological Properties of Pinus nigra ssp. pallasiana var. şeneriana. Silvae Genetica: 49(6), 264-277.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.