It can be said that, the way of handling being in the history of philosophy in general, espically between the time period after ancient Greek philosophy and 19th century never goes beyond abstract presuppositions and is jammed into the conceptual frameworks. In this article, we have questioned whether anti-metaphysical discourse as it was put forward by the positivist theory does actually provide a robust ontological structure or not, and how the effort to understand existance may go beyond this fictional structure. It has been shown that ground revealed by using the method of natural sciences to understand existence is inadequate for providing an ontological structure. Considering that while criticizing metaphysics and fictional approaches, this reflex itself falls into the same situation it criticizes, it was advocated that life based interpretations of entities will be valid for ontology. We have tried to show that the relationship between entity and life gives rise to possibility for each to expose the other.