Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 13 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 22-12-2021

THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Öz:
I argue that the advent of artificial intelligence poses a new problem forthe fine-tuning argument and design arguments for God in general, since animpersonal supreme designer, conceptually based on artificial intelligence, is arelevant alternative to God as the designer of the universe (or the designer ofallegedly irreducibly complex biological structures, etc.) There are of coursedifferences between a personal designer, like a human being, and an impersonaldesigner, like a narrow-AI system, but, as I argue, only if humans have souls wouldit be more reasonable to regard God as the supreme designer rather than animpersonal designer modeled on soulless artificial intelligence. In other words, thefine-tuning argument for God can only be successful if something like substancedualism is demonstrated to be true. Dialectically speaking, this makes thefine-tuning argument considerably less effective.
Anahtar Kelime:

HASSAS AYAR ARGÜMANI VE YAPAY ZEKA İTİRAZI

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, yapay zekanın ortaya çıkışının hassas ayar argümanı ve genel olarak Tanrı’nın varlığına dair tasarım argümanları için yeni bir sorun oluşturduğu görüşünü savunuyorum. Hassas ayar argümanına karşı yapay zeka itirazı olarak adlandırabileceğimiz bu itiraz, kısaca şu şekilde ifade edilebilir: Bilinçsiz yapay zeka sistemlerinden modellenerek kavramsallaştırılabilecek, şahıs olmayan mükemmel bir tasarımcı, evrenin tasarımcısı olarak mükemmel bir şahıs olan Tanrı’ya bir alternatif teşkil eder ve bu yüzden de evrenin bir tasarımcısı olduğu iddiasından Tanrı’nın varlığına dair geçerli bir çıkarım yapmamıza izin vermez. Bu itirazın bertaraf edilmesi ancak töz ikiciliği doğru ise, yani insanların ruhları var ise mümkündür, ve bu da hassas ayar argümanının sonucunu ruhun varlığına koşullu kılacağından argümanın etkisini önemli ölçüde zedeler.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Behe, Michael J. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press, 1996.
  • Bostrom, Nick. “Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?” Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243-255, 2003
  • Bourget, David & Chalmers, David J. “What do philosophers Believe?” Philosophical Studies,170 (3), 465-500, 2014
  • Collins, R. “The teleological argument: an exploration of the fine-tuning of the cosmos.” In W. L. Craig and J.P. Moreland (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to NaturalTheology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 202–281, 2009
  • Hartree, Douglas R. Calculating instruments and machines. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1949
  • Hawking, S. W. The illustrated a brief history of time. Random House, 1996 Kıymaz, Tufan. “Phenomenal Concepts and Physical Facts: A Dialogue with Mary”. Filozofia: Journal for Philosophy, 74 (10): 797-807, 2019
  • Kıymaz, Tufan. “A Priori Physicalism and the Knowledge Argument.” Teorema, 39 (2): 87-103, 2020a
  • Kıymaz, Tufan. “Hassas Ayar Argümanı: Bilim Tanrı’yı Mı İşaret Ediyor?” Beytülhikme, 10/4: 1367-1381, 2020b
  • Manson, Neil A. “The fine-tuning argument.” Philosophy Compass 4 (1), 271-286, 2009
  • Paley, W. Natural Theology: or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. 12th edition, London: Printed for J. Faulder by Wilks and Taylor, 1809
  • Plantinga, A. Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980 Quick, Donya. “Kulitta.” <http://www.donyaquick.com/kulitta>, 2018
  • Swinburne, Richard. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991
  • Turing, Alan M. “Computing machinery and intelligence.” Mind, 59, 433-460, 1950
  • Weinberg, S. “Life in the Universe.” Scientific American, Oct., 1994
  • Montag, Ali. “A portrait created by A.I. is being auctioned for the first time at Christie's — here's how much it's worth”, 2018 <https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/24/obvious-ai-created-portrait-being-au ctioned-at-christies.html>
  • Wainwright, William. "Concepts of God", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2017 https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/concepts-god/
APA Kiymaz T (2021). THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. , 1 - 13.
Chicago Kiymaz Tufan THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. (2021): 1 - 13.
MLA Kiymaz Tufan THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. , 2021, ss.1 - 13.
AMA Kiymaz T THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. . 2021; 1 - 13.
Vancouver Kiymaz T THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. . 2021; 1 - 13.
IEEE Kiymaz T "THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE." , ss.1 - 13, 2021.
ISNAD Kiymaz, Tufan. "THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE". (2021), 1-13.
APA Kiymaz T (2021). THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), 16(31), 1 - 13.
Chicago Kiymaz Tufan THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 16, no.31 (2021): 1 - 13.
MLA Kiymaz Tufan THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), vol.16, no.31, 2021, ss.1 - 13.
AMA Kiymaz T THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi). 2021; 16(31): 1 - 13.
Vancouver Kiymaz T THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi). 2021; 16(31): 1 - 13.
IEEE Kiymaz T "THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE." FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), 16, ss.1 - 13, 2021.
ISNAD Kiymaz, Tufan. "THE FINE-TUNING ARGUMENT AND THE OBJECTION FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE". FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 16/31 (2021), 1-13.