Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 76 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 523 - 546 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33630/ausbf.810698 İndeks Tarihi: 01-10-2021

DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

Öz:
Corruption has been an epidemic in Africa since the age of colonization. The average level ofcorruption in Sub-Saharan Africa has been on the rise since. The results support the theory of self-reinforcingcorruption in the sense that past corruption levels become an important determinant of current corruption levelsdue to strategic complementarity. The gap between more corrupt and less corrupt countries stays the same asmore corrupt countries stays as more corrupt and less corrupt countries stays as less corrupt, demonstrating thatcorruption is pervasive in Sub-Saharan Africa. For the institutional determinants, we found that increase inpolitical stability, better regulatory quality and higher level of democracy decreases the level of corruption inSub-Saharan Africa. For the economic determinants, we found that a higher level of development and highertrade integration decreases the level of corruption and higher government expenditure and higher level ofnatural resources increases the level of corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa. For the socio demographicdeterminants, we found that higher level of infrastructure decreases the level of corruption while higher shareof women in labor force, higher level of population and higher level of urbanization increases corruption inSub-Saharan Africa.
Anahtar Kelime:

Yozlaşmanın Belirleyicileri: Sahra Altı Afrika Üzerine

Öz:
Yozlaşma Afrika’da sömürgecilik çağından bu yana salgın halini almıştır. O zamandan beri Sahra Altı Afrika’sında ortalama yozlaşma seviyesi artıştadır. Sonuçlar stratejik tamamlayıcılığa dayalı geçmiş yozlaşma seviyesinin şu anki yozlaşma seviyesinin önemli bir belirleyicisi olması anlamında kendi kendini güçlendiren yozlaşma teorisini desteklemektedir. Daha çok ve daha az yozlaşmış ülkeler arasındaki açığın aynı kalması, yani daha çok yozlaşmış ülkelerin zaman içerisinde daha fazla yozlaşmış kalması ve daha az yozlaşmış ülkelerin zaman içerisinde daha az yozlaşmış kalması, Sahra Altı Afrika’da yozlaşmanın yaygın olduğunu göstermektedir. Kurumsal belirleyiciler için politik istikrardaki artışın, daha iyi düzenleyici kalitenin ve daha yüksek demokrasi seviyesinin Sahra Altı Afrika’sında yozlaşma seviyesini düşürdüğünü bulduk. Ekonomik belirleyiciler için daha yüksek gelişmişlik seviyesi ve daha yüksek ticari entegrasyonun Sahra Altı Afrika’sında yozlaşma seviyesini düşürürken, daha yüksek hükümet harcaması ve daha yüksek doğal kaynaklar seviyesinin yozlaşma seviyesini artırdığını bulduk. Sosyo-demografik belirleyiciler için daha yüksek altyapı seviyesinin Sahra Altı Afrika’sında yozlaşma seviyesini düşürürken, daha yüksek kadın iş gücü oranının, daha yüksek nüfus oranının ve daha yüksek şehirleşme seviyesinin yozlaşma seviyesini artırdığını bulduk.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aborisade, Richard A. ve Nurudeen B. Aliyyu (2018), “Corruption and Africa”, In The Development of Africa (pp. 227-254). Springer, Cham.
  • Aidt, Toke S. (2003), “Economic analysis of corruption: a survey”, The Economic Journal, 113(491): F632-F652.
  • Ali, Abdiweli M. ve Hodan Said Isse (2002), “Determinants of economic corruption: a cross-country comparison”, Cato J., 22, 449.
  • Arellano, Manuel ve Stephen Bond (1991), “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”, The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297.
  • Arellano, Manuel ve Olympia Bover (1995), “Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models”, Journal of Econometrics, 68(1): 29-51.
  • Ata, A. Yılmaz ve M. Akif Arvas (2011), “Determinants of economic corruption: a cross-country data analysis”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13): 161-169.
  • Ayittey, George (2012), “Defeating dictators”, Speech given at the Oslo Freedom Forum.
  • Blundell, Richard ve Stephen Bond (1998), “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models”, Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115-143.
  • Elbahnasawy, Nasr G. ve Charles F. Revier (2012), “The determinants of corruption: Cross‐countrypanel‐ data analysis”, The Developing Economies, 50(4): 311-333.
  • Frechette, Guillaume (2006), Panel data analysis of the time-varying determinants of corruption (No. 2006s-28), Cirano.
  • Ghaniy, Nafi ve Fithra Faisal Hastiadi (2017), “Political, social and economic determinants of corruption”, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4): 144-149.
  • Kimenyi, Mwangi S. ve John M. Mbaku (2011), “Africa’s war on corruption in foresight Africa: The Continent’s greatest challenges and opportunities for 2011, The Brookings Institution, 30.
  • Kraay, Aart ve Caroline Van Rijckeghem (1995), “Employment and wages in the public sector: a cross-country study”, 1-51.
  • Lederman, Daniel, Norman V. Loayza ve Rodrigo R. Soares (2005), “Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter”, Economics & Politics, 17(1): 1-35.
  • Park, Hoon (2003), “Determinants of corruption: A cross-national analysis”, Multinational Business Review, 11(2): 29-48.
  • Roodman, David (2009), “How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata”, The Stata Journal, 9(1): 86-136.
  • Seldadyo, Harry ve Jakob De Haan (2005), “The determinants of corruption”, The Economist, 66: 1-60.
  • Senturia, Joseph J. (1931), “Corruption, political”, Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 4: 1930- 1935.
  • Serra, Danila (2006), “Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis”, Public Choice, 126(1-2): 225-256.
  • Shabbir, Ghulam ve Mumtaz Anwar (2007), “Determinants of corruption in developing countries”, The Pakistan Development Review, 751-764.
  • Swamy, Anand, Stephen Knack ve Omar Azfar (2001), “Gender and corruption”, Journal of Development Economics, 64(1): 25-55.
  • Teksöz, S. Utku. (2006), Essays in development and transition economics (Doktora Tezi).
  • Treisman, Daniel (2000), “The causes of corruption: a cross-national study”, Journal of Public Economics, 76(3): 399-457.
  • WDI (2018). World Development Indicators, World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/reports. aspx?source=2&series=SI.POV.DDAY&country= WLD
  • WGI (2018). Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/ source/worldwide-governance-indicators/Type/TABLE/ preview/on
  • Windmeijer, Frank (2005), "A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators", Journal of Econometrics, 126(1): 25-51.
APA Gök A (2021). DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. , 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
Chicago Gök Adem DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. (2021): 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
MLA Gök Adem DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. , 2021, ss.523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
AMA Gök A DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. . 2021; 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
Vancouver Gök A DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. . 2021; 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
IEEE Gök A "DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA." , ss.523 - 546, 2021. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
ISNAD Gök, Adem. "DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA". (2021), 523-546. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.810698
APA Gök A (2021). DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 76(2), 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
Chicago Gök Adem DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 76, no.2 (2021): 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
MLA Gök Adem DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol.76, no.2, 2021, ss.523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
AMA Gök A DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2021; 76(2): 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
Vancouver Gök A DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi. 2021; 76(2): 523 - 546. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
IEEE Gök A "DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA." Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 76, ss.523 - 546, 2021. 10.33630/ausbf.810698
ISNAD Gök, Adem. "DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION: THE CASE OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA". Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 76/2 (2021), 523-546. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.810698