Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 193 - 219 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 İndeks Tarihi: 04-10-2021
Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara
Öz: This study aimed to reveal the evaluations of teachers who work in Science and Art Centers (BİLSEM) about being ateacher there. This qualitative study is structured according to the phenomenology design. A total of 18 teachers workingin BİLSEMs located in Ankara constituted the study group. Qualitative data were collected with a structured interviewform. Content analysis method was used in the analysis of data. The teachers stated that they were pleased to workwith gifted and talented students, and working in BİLSEM increased their motivation to improve themselves. However,they criticized the parents’ expectations, the managers’ attitudes, working hours, and insufficient technical equipment.However, despite the problems, most participants stated that they would recommend other teachers to come work inBİLSEM. Multiple suggestions were presented according to the problems raised in the study
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Altun, T., & Vural, S. (2012). Evaluation of the views of teachers and administrators of a science and art center (sac) about professional development and school improvement. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11 (42), 152-177.
- Anghel, I. O. (2016). Valorizations of theoretical models of giftedness and talent in defining of artistic talent. Review of Artistic Education, 12(2), 231-239. [Crossref] Anadolu Ajansı (2019, October 22). BİLSEM’lere yerleştirme sonuçları açıklandı. https://www. aa.com.tr/tr/egitim/bilsemlere-yerlestirme-sonuclari-aciklandi/1561553.
- Arastaman, G., Öztürk Fidan, İ., & Fidan, T. (2018). Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A theoretical analysis. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 37-75. [Crossref]
- Baykoç, N. (2014). Üstün akıl, zekâ, deha, yetenek, dâhiler, savantlar gelişimleri ve eğitimleri. Vize Yayıncılık.
- BİLSEM (2016). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi, 79(2710). http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_ iys_dosyalar/2017_01/02031535_tebligler_dergisi.pdf
- Chan, D. W. (2001). Learning styles of gifted and nongifted secondary students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(1), 35-44. [Crossref]
- Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted (7th Ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Creswell, J. W., Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. [Crossref]
- Croopley, A. (2002). Qualitative research methods: An introduction for students of psychology and education. University of Latvia.
- Çekmez, E., Yıldız, C., & Bütüner, S.Ö (2012). Phenomenographic research method. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 77-102.
- Çelik, H., & Hotaman, D. (2018). Examining the expectactions for classroom teachers in the school system. YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 59-75.
- Çetin, A., & Doğan, A. (2018). The problems of mathematics teachers working in science and art centers. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(4), 615641.
- Demirel, Ö., Başbay, A., & Erdem, E. (2006). Eğitimde çoklu zekâ kuram ve uygulama [Multiple intelligence theory and application in education]. Pegem Akademi. https://www.turcademy.com/ en/ara?index=&s=E%C4%9Fitimde+%C3%87oklu+Zeka+Kuram+ve+Uygulama+&submit=
- Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social science. Routledge. [Crossref]
- Dolu, G., & Ürek, H. (2017). Variables differentiating multiple intelligence areas of gifted / talented students and a model proposal. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 32-71.
- Dönmez, N. B. (2004). Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri’nin kuruluşu ve işleyişinde yapılması gereken düzenlemeler. Üstün zekâlıların eğitimi projesi [Arrangements for establishment and operation of Science and Art Centers. Education project for gifted people]. I. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. Çocuk Vakfı.
- Dönmez, B.N. (2009). Gifted and talented children and their education. Özel Gereksinimli Çocuklar ve Özel Eğitim, 284-305.
- Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Center for Creative Learning.
- Gagné, F. (1985). Gifted and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112. [Crossref]
- Greasley, K., Ashworth, P. (2007). The phenomenology of “approach to studying”: the university student’s studies within the lifework. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 819-843. [Crossref]
- Gökdere, M., & Küçük, M. (2003). Science education of gifted students at intellectual area: a case for science art centers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 118-124.
- Gökdere, M., & Çepni, S. (2005). Reflections of an in-service training prepared for science teachers of gifted students on the learning environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 204-217.
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1985). Introduction to theories of personality. John Wiley and Sons.
- Hewson, C., Vogel, C., & Laurent, D. (2015). Internet research methods. (2nd Ed.). Sage [Crossref]
- Hopkins, D., & Stern, D. (1996). Quality teachers, quality schools: international perspectives and policy implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(5), 501-517. [Crossref] İdil Biret ve Suna Kan’ın Yabancı Memleketlere Müzik Tahsiline Gönderilmesine Dair Kanun (1948, 12 Temmuz). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 6955). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/6955.pdf
- Kaplan Sayı, A. (2013). The effect of differentiated foreign language instruction on gifted students’ achievement, critical thinking and creativity [Doctoral dissertation, İstanbul University]. https://tez. yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
- Kaya, N. G. (2013). Education of gifted students and BİLSEMs. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 115-122.
- Keskin, M. Ö., Samancı N. K., & Aydın S. (2013). Science and art centers: Current status, problems, and solution proposals. Üstün Yetenekli Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 78-96.
- Kılıç, V. C. (2015). An evaluation over unavailable education programme policy for gifted and talented children in Turkey. 21. Yüzyılda Eğitim ve Toplum Eğitim Bilimleri ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(12), 145-154.
- McAlpine, D. (2004). What do we mean by gifted and talented?. In D. McAlpine & R. Moltzen (Eds.), Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives (2nd ed., 33-66). Kanuka Grove Press.
- MEB (2015, September 18). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi [Science and art centers directive]. Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_ dosyalar/2015_09/18101802_bilimvesanatmerkezleriynergesi.pdf
- MEB (2015b). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi ile bilim ve sanat merkezlerine öğretmen seçme ve atama kılavuzu. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi, 78(2698), 1273-1297. MEB (2019, October 8). Bilim ve sanat merkezlerine öğretmen seçme ve atama kılavuzu [Guide for teacher selection and appointment to science and art centers]. Https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/ meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_11/20115406_2020_Bilim_ve_Sanat_Merkezlerine_OYgYretmen_ SecYme_ve_Atama_KYlavuzu.pdf
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: a source book of new methods. SAGE Publications.
- Özdemir, M. (2010). Qualitative data analysis: a study on methodology problem in social sciences. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 323-343.
- Özkan, D. (2009). The organisational effectiveness of science and art centers in accordance with the opinions of managers, teachers, parents and students [Master’s thesis, Ankara University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
- Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
- Renzulli, J. S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4), 148-156. [Crossref]
- Renzulli, J. (1985). Are teacher of gifted specialist? A land mark decision on employment practices in special education for gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 24-29. [Crossref]
- Sak, U. (2009). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları [Gifted education programs] (1st ed). Maya Akademi Yayınevi.
- Sarıtaş, E., Şahin, Ü., & Çatalbaş, G. (2019). Science and Art Centers (SAC) according to the parents. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 114-133. [Crossref]
- Semerci, N., & Kaya, E. (2007). The views of teachers of Science and Art Centres about the institution. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2, 230-242
- Sezginsoy, B. (2007). An evaluation on science-art center implementation [Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
- Sıcak, A. (2014). Investigation of predictive power of gifted students’ teacher observation scores TKT 7-11 and WISC-R scores in the nomination process. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 1(1), 7-12. [Crossref]
- Smith, J. A., Eatough, V. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In E. Lyons and A. Coyle (Eds.). Analysing qualitative data in psychology, 35-50. SAGE Publications. [Crossref]
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/basics-of-qualitativeresearch/book235578
- Şeker, B. S. (2012). An evaluation on science-art center implementation through the Bilsem teachers’ opinion. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1628-1632. [Crossref]
- Şenol, C. (2011). Views of teachers about gifted curriculum (case of BİLSEM) [Master’s thesis, Fırat University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
- Tang, S. Y. F., & Choi, P. L. (2009) Teachers’ professional lives and continuing professional development in changing times. Educational Review, 61(1), 1-18. [Crossref]
- Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In: Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 27–42).
- Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (1990). Psychology. (2nd Eds.). Harper and Row Publishing Com.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (11th ed.). Seçkin Akademik ve Mesleki Yayınları.
- Yıldız, H. (2010). A case study on the arts and science centers (bilsems) which are a model for the education of gifted and talented children [Master’s thesis, Gazi University]. https://tez.yok.gov. tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
- Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). Elsevier Science Ltd. [Crossref]
| APA | Kır S, Akbaşlı S (2021). Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. , 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| Chicago | Kır Sevda,Akbaşlı Sait Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. (2021): 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| MLA | Kır Sevda,Akbaşlı Sait Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. , 2021, ss.193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| AMA | Kır S,Akbaşlı S Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. . 2021; 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| Vancouver | Kır S,Akbaşlı S Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. . 2021; 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| IEEE | Kır S,Akbaşlı S "Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara." , ss.193 - 219, 2021. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| ISNAD | Kır, Sevda - Akbaşlı, Sait. "Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara". (2021), 193-219. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| APA | Kır S, Akbaşlı S (2021). Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. Hayef:journal of education (Online), 18(2), 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| Chicago | Kır Sevda,Akbaşlı Sait Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. Hayef:journal of education (Online) 18, no.2 (2021): 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| MLA | Kır Sevda,Akbaşlı Sait Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. Hayef:journal of education (Online), vol.18, no.2, 2021, ss.193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| AMA | Kır S,Akbaşlı S Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2021; 18(2): 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| Vancouver | Kır S,Akbaşlı S Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2021; 18(2): 193 - 219. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| IEEE | Kır S,Akbaşlı S "Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara." Hayef:journal of education (Online), 18, ss.193 - 219, 2021. 10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
| ISNAD | Kır, Sevda - Akbaşlı, Sait. "Being a Teacher in BİLSEM: A Sample from Ankara". Hayef:journal of education (Online) 18/2 (2021), 193-219. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2021.20030 |
