Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 79 Sayfa Aralığı: 1079 - 1089 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS

Öz:
The aim of the research is to determine whether the critical leadership styles perceived by teachers are predictive of school effectiveness. In the study, the predictive research pattern, one of the quantitative research patterns, was used. The study group of the research consists of 305 volunteer teachers working in public schools in Üsküdar district of Istanbul Province. Participant Information Form, School Activity Scale and The Critical Leadershıp Style Scale were used in the study. The data were analyzed by conducting parametric tests. As a result of the research, it was revealed that teachers' perceptions of school effectiveness did not have a significant difference according to their gender, educational status, seniority, and school level. Also, it was determined that teachers' critical leadership style perceptions did not have a significant difference according to their gender, educational status, seniority, and school level. Critical leadership style of school principals perceived by teachers significantly predicts school effectiveness. Another important result of the study is that there is a moderate and positive significant relationship between school principals' critical leadership style perceived by teachers and school effectiveness. Critical leadership style explains 27% of the total variance in school effectiveness.
Anahtar Kelime: School effectiveness Leadership Critical leadership Effective school

OKUL ETKĠLĠLĠĞĠNDE OKUL MÜDÜRLERĠNĠN ELEġTĠREL LĠDERLĠK STĠLĠNĠN ROLÜ

Öz:
Bu araĢtırmanın amacı, öğretmenler tarafından algılanan eleĢtirel liderlik stillerinin okul etkililiğini yordayıp yordamadığını belirlemektir. AraĢtırmada nicel araĢtırma modellerinden biri olan yordayıcı araĢtırma modeli kullanılmıĢtır. AraĢtırmanın çalıĢma grubu, Ġstanbul'un Üsküdar ilçesinde devlet okullarında görev yapan 305 gönüllü öğretmenden oluĢmaktadır. AraĢtırmada Katılımcı Bilgi Formu, Okul Etkililiği Ölçeği ve EleĢtirel Liderlik Ölçeği kullanılmıĢtır. Veriler parametrik testler yapılarak analiz edildi. AraĢtırma sonucunda öğretmenlerin okul etkililiği konusundaki algılarının cinsiyet, eğitim durumu, kıdem yılı ve okul düzeyine göre anlamlı bir farklılık oluĢturmadığı ortaya çıkmıĢtır. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin eleĢtirel liderlik tarzı algılarının cinsiyet, eğitim durumu, kıdem yılı ve okul düzeyine göre anlamlı bir farklılık yaratmadığı belirlenmiĢtir. AraĢtırmanın bir diğer önemli sonucu, okul müdürlerinin öğretmenler tarafından algılanan eleĢtirel liderlik stili ile okul etkililiği arasında orta düzeyde ve pozitif yönde anlamlı bir iliĢkinin olmasıdır. EleĢtirel liderlik stili, okul etkililiğindeki toplam varyansın %27’sini açıklamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akan. D. (2007). Değişim sürecinde ı̇lköğretim okullarının etkili okul özelliklerine sahip olma düzeyleri (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi)- The levels of primary schools having effective school characteristics in the process of change-. Atatürk University Erzurum.
  • Aygün, C. (2018). Eleştirel liderlik stili ile liderlik uygulamaları arasındaki ilişki (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi)- The relationship between critical leadership style and leadership practices-. İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, İstanbul.
  • Aygün, C., & Özgenel, M. (2019). Eleştirel liderlik stili ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması- Critical Leadership Style Scale: Validity and Reliability Study-. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 13(19), 1806-1835.
  • Ayık, A. (2007). İlköğretim okullarında oluşturulan okul kültürü ı̇le okulların etkililiği arasındaki ı̇lişki (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi) -The relationship between the school culture created in primary schools and the effectiveness of the schools. Atatürk University-, Erzurum.
  • Bauer, H. (1997). High poverty, high performing: High hope! IDRA Newsletter, 24(6). http://www.idra.org/Newslttr/ 1997/Jun/Hilaria.htm
  • Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw G. J., & Norby M. M. (2014). Bilişsel psikoloji ve öğretim (Z. N. Ersözlü ve R. Ülker, Çev. Ed.) -Cognitive psychology and teaching-. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Çiftçi, K. (2019). Ortaokul retmenlerinin pozitif psikolojik sermaye düzeyleri ile okul et ilili i düzeyleri arasindaki iliş i (YayınlanmamıĢ yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). Eğitim araştırmaları. nicel ve nitel araştırmanın planlanması yürütülmesi ve değerlendirilmesi (H. Ekşi, Çev. Ed.) -Educational research. planning, execution and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative research-. İstanbul: EDAM.
  • Çobanoğlu, F. & Badavan, Y. (2017). Başarılı okulların anahtarı: Etkili okul değişkenleri -The key to successful schools: Effective school variables-. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 26, 115-134.
  • Collinson, D. (2011). Critical leadership studies. In A. Bryman et al. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership (pp. 179–192). London: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). E itim araştırmaları. nicel ve nitel araştırmanın planlanma ı yürütülme i ve de erlendirilme i [Educational research. planning, execution, and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative research] (H. EkĢi, Çev. Ed.). Ġstanbul: EDAM.
  • Gökmen, A. (2011). l retim retmenlerinin rgüt el vatandaşlı davranışları ve bu davranışların okul et ilili i üzerinde i etkisine iliş in algıları (YayımlanmamıĢ yülsek lisans tezi) [The perceptıons of teachers workıng for niğde prımary schools toward organızatıonal cıtızenshıp behaviors and ıts ımportances (Master’s thesis)]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Denizli.
  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(20), 95-110.
  • Hofman, W. H. A. & Hofman, R. H. (2011). Smart management in effective schools: effective management configurations in general and vocational education in the Netherlands. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(4), 620-645.
  • Hoy, W. K. (2019). School Effectiveness Index (SE-Index). https://www.waynekhoy.com/school-effectiveness/ adresinden 09.10.2019 tarihinde eriĢilmiĢtir.
  • Jenkins, D. (2012). Global critical leadership: Educating global leaders with critical leadership competencies. Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(2), 95-101.
  • Jenkins, D. M., & Cutchens, A. B. (2011). Leading critically: A grounded theory of applied critical thinking in leadership studies. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 1-21.
  • Kanmaz, A. & Uyar, L. (2016). The Effect of school efficiency on student achievement. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 3(2), 123-136. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.239551
  • Kazancıoğlu, M. M. (2008). Özel okullarda ü t düzey y neticilerin liderlik tarzları ve okul et ilili i üzerine bir çalışma tanbul rne i (YayımlanmamıĢ yüksek lisans tezi) [A study on the leadership styles of senior managers in private schools and school effectiveness (Example of Istanbul) (Master’s thesis)]. Yeditepe University, Ġstanbul.
  • Kirk, D. J., & Jones, T. L. (2004). Effective schools (Assessment Report). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
  • KuĢaksız, N. (2010). Ö retmen g rüşlerine g re ı l retim o ullarının et ili o ul zelli lerine ahip olma düzeyleri üdar ı lçe i rne i (YayınlanmamıĢ yüksek lisans tezi) [According to the opinions of the teachers, the levels of primary schools having effective school characteristics (Example of Üsküdar District) (Master’s thesis)]. Selçuk University, Konya.
  • Lashway, L. (2003). Transforming principal preparation. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research, and Improvement.
  • Lezotte, L. (2001). Revolutionary and evolutionary: The effective chool’ movement. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products.
  • Lyle, S. (2018). The relative contribution of transformational leadership, socioeconomic status, and years of principal experience on overall school effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Marsden, D. B. (2005). Relations between teacher perceptions of safe and orderly environment and student achievement among ten better performing, high-poverty schools in one Southern California elementary school district (Doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University.
  • Marzano, R., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Musungu, L. L. & Nasongo, J. W. (2008). The head-teacher’s instructional role in academic achievement in secondary schools in Vihiga district, Kenya. Educational Research and Review, 3(10), 316-323. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR
  • Nosich, M. G. (2012). Eleştirel düşünme ve di iplinlerara ı eleştirel düşünme rehberi (B. Aybek, Çev.). Ankara: Anı
  • Ontai-Machado, D. O. M. (2016). Teachers' perceptions of elementary school principals' leadership attributes and their relationship to school effectiveness (Doctoral dissertion). Walden University.
  • Özgenel, M. & Koç. M. H. (2020). An investigation on the relationship between teachers' occupational commitment and school effectiveness. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 8, 494-530.
  • Özgenel, M. & Mert, P. (2019). The role of teacher performance in school effectiveness. International Journal of Education Technolog yand Scientific Researches, 4(10), 417- 434. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.42
  • Özgenel, M. & Topal, M. (2019). Okul etkililiğini etkileyen bir faktör: öğretmenlerin iĢ doyum düzeyleri. EJERCongress 2019 Conference Proceedings, Ankara.
  • Özgenel, M. (2018). Modeling the relationships between school administrators’ creative and critical thinking dispositions with decision making styles and problem-solving skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 673–700.
  • Pashiardis, P. & Johansson, O. (2016). Introduction: What is successful and effective school leadership? In P. Pashiardis and O. Johansson (Eds), Successful school leadership: International perspectives (pp. 1–12). London: Bloomsbury.
  • Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique. Sonoma State University.
  • Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2013). Eleştirel düşünme (A. E. Aslan ve G. Sart, Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel. review of the empirical research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
  • Sailer, N. M. (1985). The Connecticut school effectiveness project: An analysis of the impact after three years (Doctorate dissertion). Bridgeport University.
  • Steinberg, L. (2006). Parenting adolescents. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Toprak, M. (2011). l retim o ullarında g rev yapan retmenlerin o ul et ilili ine ı liş in g rüşleri Adıyaman ı li rne i (Yüksek lisans tezi) [Opinions of teachers working in primary schools about school effectiveness: Example of Adıyaman (Master’s thesis) . Fırat University, Elazığ.
  • Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (2008). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal short form manual. USA: NCS Pearson.
  • Yıldırım, Ġ. (2015). Okul y neticilerinin işili ve denetim oda ı zelli lerinin retmenlerin iş doyumu ve okul et ilili i açı ından incelenmesi (YayınlanmamıĢ doktora tezi) [Examining the personality and locus of control characteristics of school administrators in terms of teachers' job satisfaction and school effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation)]. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Yılmaz, E. (2010). l retim o ulu müdürlerinin retim el liderli rolleri ile et ili o ul ara ında i iliş inin de erlendirilmesi (YayımlanmamıĢ yüksek lisans tezi) [Evaluation of the relationship between instructional leadership roles of primary school principals and effective school (Master’s thesis)]. Gazi University, Ankara.
APA mert p, Parlar H, özgenel m (2021). THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. , 1079 - 1089.
Chicago mert pınar,Parlar Hanifi,özgenel mustafa THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. (2021): 1079 - 1089.
MLA mert pınar,Parlar Hanifi,özgenel mustafa THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. , 2021, ss.1079 - 1089.
AMA mert p,Parlar H,özgenel m THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. . 2021; 1079 - 1089.
Vancouver mert p,Parlar H,özgenel m THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. . 2021; 1079 - 1089.
IEEE mert p,Parlar H,özgenel m "THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS." , ss.1079 - 1089, 2021.
ISNAD mert, pınar vd. "THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS". (2021), 1079-1089.
APA mert p, Parlar H, özgenel m (2021). THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 20(79), 1079 - 1089.
Chicago mert pınar,Parlar Hanifi,özgenel mustafa THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 20, no.79 (2021): 1079 - 1089.
MLA mert pınar,Parlar Hanifi,özgenel mustafa THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), vol.20, no.79, 2021, ss.1079 - 1089.
AMA mert p,Parlar H,özgenel m THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2021; 20(79): 1079 - 1089.
Vancouver mert p,Parlar H,özgenel m THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2021; 20(79): 1079 - 1089.
IEEE mert p,Parlar H,özgenel m "THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS." Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 20, ss.1079 - 1089, 2021.
ISNAD mert, pınar vd. "THE ROLE OF THE CRITICAL LEADERSHIP STYLE OF SCHOOL PRINCIPALS IN SCHOOL EFFECTİVENESS". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 20/79 (2021), 1079-1089.