The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*

Selman ÇUTUK, (Nişantaşı Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Zülbiye KAÇAY, (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale, Türkiye)
Zeynep ÇUTUK (Trakya Üniversitesi, Trakya, Türkiye)
Sakarya University Journal of Education
4 0
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 182 - 194 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.19126/suje.840070 İndeks Tarihi: 07-10-2021

The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*

Öz:
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships betweenpersonality traits and prosocial and antisocial behaviors displayed in team athletes.In this respect, the data was collected from a total of 445 (61 females and 384males) participants engaged in team sports. The relational screening model wasused in the study. The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sports Scale, Five FactorPersonality Inventory and Personal Information Form prepared by the researcherwere used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, and Pearson Correlation Coefficientwere used in the analysis. As a result of the analysis it was determined that therewas a positive and a significant relationship between prosocial behavior-team (PT),prosocial behavior-opponent (PO) and extroversion, responsibility and opennesssub-dimensions. However, significant negative difference was determined betweenprosocial behavior-team, prosocial behavior-opponent (PO) and neuroticism.Accordingly, as prosocial behaviors of team athletes increase, the neuroticism levelof the athletes decreases. A negative significant relationship was determinedbetween the scores obtained from the antisocial behavior-team (AT) and antisocialbehavior-opponent (AO) and the sub-dimensions of consistency and responsibility.There was a significant positive correlation between the neuroticism subdimension. There was no statistically significant relationship between the subdimensions of extraversion and openness.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aktaş, V., & Güvenç, G. B. (2006). Kız ve erkek ergenlerde saldırgan ve olumlu sosyal davranışlar ile yaş, ilişkisel bağlam ve kişiler arası duyarlılık arasındaki ilişkiler [Relationships between aggressive and positive social behaviors and age, relational context, and interpersonal sensitivity in male and female adolescents]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 233-264.
  • Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 544- 555.
  • Balcikanli, G.S. (2013). The Turkish Adaptation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 271-276.
  • Basım, H.N, Çetin, F., & Tabak, A. (2009). Beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin kişilerarası çatışma çözme yaklaşımlarıyla ilişkisi [The relationship between five factor personality traits and interpersonal conflict resolution approaches]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20-34.
  • Başer, E. (1986). Uygulamalı spor psikolojisi [Applied sports psychology]. Ankara: B.T.G.M. Yayınları.
  • Baumeister, R.F., & Bushman, B.J. (2007). Social psychology and human nature. Cengage Learning. p. 254. ISBN 9780495116332.
  • Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. American Psychological Association, 75(3), 729–750.
  • Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134.
  • Clarke, J. (2004). The sociology of childhood. In D. Wyse (Ed.), Childhood studies and introduction. Chapter 12. USA: Blackwell Publishing LTD Council of Europe.
  • Demirel, H., & Buğdaycı, S. (2019). Spor yapan ve yapmayan üniversite öğrencilerinin olumlu sosyal davranış eğilimlerinin incelenmesi [Examining the positive social behavior tendencies of university students who do sports and those who do not]. Türk Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 55-59.
  • Dervent, F. (2007). Lise öğrencilerinin saldırganlık düzeyleri ve sportif aktivitelere katılma ilişkisi [The aggression levels of high school students and their relationship to participating in sports activities] (Masters’ Thesis). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Dorak, F., & Vurgun, N. (2006). Takım sporları açısından empati ve takım birlikteliği ilişkisi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 73-77.
  • Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T., & Knafo, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In: Lamb ME, Lerner RM, editors. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional and Personality Development (7th edition, pp. XXX) New York: Wiley.
  • Erdoğan, İ. (1997). İşletmelerde davranış [Business behavior] (2. Baskı). İstanbul: İ.Ü İşletme Fakültesi Yayını.
  • Eren, E. (2000). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi [Organizational behavior and management psychology] (6. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In Hancock, G. R., & Mueller R. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course, (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing, U.S.A.
  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.
  • Gözün-Kahraman, Ö., & Kurt, G. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının olumlu sosyal ve saldırgan davranış eğilimlerinin incelenmesi [Examining prospective teachers' tendencies of positive social and aggressive behavior]. Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 3(3), 236-243.
  • Grusec, J. E. (2002). Children’s social and moral reasoning. P. Smith (Edt.), Childhood social development. 457-470. USA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Hastings, P. D., Zahn-Waxler, C., Robinson, J., Usher, B., & Bridges, D. (2000). The development of concern for others in children with behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 36, 531–546.
  • Hay, D. F. (2009). The roots and branches of human altruism. British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 473-479.
  • Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research (6th ed). Boston: Pearson.
  • İkizler, H. C., & Karagözoğlu, C. (1994). Sporda başarının psikolojisi [Psychology of success in sports] (3. Baskı). İstanbul: Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Jackson, M., & Tisak, M. S. (2001). Is prosocial behaviour a good thing? Developmental changes in children's evaluations of helping, sharing, cooperating, and comforting. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 349–367.
  • Kaçay, Z. (2019). İşyeri yılmazlığının yordayıcıları: Örgütsel güven, lider-üye etkileşimi ve işyeri maneviyatı (Spor Genel Müdürlüğü örneği) [Predictors of workplace resilience: Organizational trust, leader-member interaction, and workplace spirituality (General Directorate of Sports example)] (Doctoral Dissertation) Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2006). Yeni insan ve insanlar [New person and people] (10. Basım). İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kapan, S. (2001). Elit artistik cimnastikçilerin kişilik özelliklerinin araştırılması [Investigation of the personality traits of elite artistic gymnasts] (Masters’ Thesis). Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Manisa.
  • Karasar, N. (1995). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler [Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques]. Ankara: Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd.
  • Kavussanu, M., & Boardley, I.D. (2009). The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 97-117.
  • Kızmaz, M. (2004). Bireysel ve takım sporu yapan sporcuların kişilik özelliklerinin araştırılması [Investigation of personality traits of athletes doing individual and team sports] (Masters’ Thesis). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54.
  • Koruç, Z., & Bayar, P. (1989). Sporun Kişilik Üzerine Etkileri Araştırma Raporu [Research Report on the Effects of Sports on Personality]. Gençlik ve Spor Genel Müdürlüğü, SESAM, Ankara,
  • Krahé, B. (2013). Social psychology: A modular course. The social psychology of aggression (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
  • Kumru, A., Carlo, G., & Edwards, C.P. (2004) Olumlu sosyal davranışların ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyuşsal bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi [The relationship of positive social behaviors with some relational, cultural, cognitive and affective variables]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 109-125.
  • Kuru, E., & Baştuğ, G. (2008). Futbolcuların kişilik özellikleri ve bedenlerini algıama düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examining the personality traits and body perception levels of football players]. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 95-101.
  • Ma, H. K. (2005). The relation of gender-role classifications to the prosocial and antisocial behavior of Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(2), 189–202.
  • Morris, C. G. (2002). Psikolojiyi anlamak [Understanding psychology]. (Çev. Nedret Öztan), 1. Baskı s. 456-481. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
  • Nergiz, S. (2018). Spor yapan ve yapmayan lise öğrencilerinin olumlu sosyal ve saldırgan davranışları ile okula yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi [Investigation of positive social and aggressive behaviors and attitudes towards school of high school students who do sports and those who do not]. (Masters’ Thesis). Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya.
  • Özen, G., Özsoy, A., & Yıldız, N. O. (2018). The impact of artificial wall climbing as a recreational activity on children’s locus of control. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(4), 2462-2467.
  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of big five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self description across 56 Nations. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 38, 173-212.
  • Scott, N., & Seglow, J. (2007). Altruism. New York: Open University Press Selçuk, E., & Aydos, L. (1998). Ankara Polis Akademisi sporcu olan ve sporcu olmayan öğrencilerinin bazı kişilik ve davranış özelliklerinin araştırılması [Investigation of some personality and behavioral characteristics of athletes and non-athletes students of Ankara Police Academy]. Gazi Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 28-41.
  • Sönmez, K. (1995). Elit atletlerde kişilik özellikleri ve duygu durumlarının araştırılması [Investigation of personality traits and moods in elite athletes] (Masters’ Thesis). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Türkay, H., (2019). Futbolcularda sosyal kimlik bağlamında prososyal ve antisosyal davranışlar [Prosocial and antisocial behaviors in football players in the context of social identity] (Doctoral Dissertation). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Wentzel, K. R., & McNamara, C. C. (1999). Interpersonal relationships, emotional distress, and prosocial behavior in middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(1), 114 125.
  • Wispe, L. G. (1972). Positive forms of social behavior: An overview. Journal of Social Issues, 28(3), 1-19.
  • Yıldız, N. O., & Bostancı, T. G. (2016). Bireylerin iş yaşamlarına ilişkin motivasyon düzeylerine dağcılık sporunun etkisi [The effect of mountaineering sport on the motivation levels of individuals regarding their work life]. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3), 65-77.
  • Yılmaz, E. (1989). Gazi üniversitesi elit voleybolcularının şahsiyet boyutları ile bazı davranış özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of personal dimensions and some behavioral characteristics of Gazi University elite volleyball players] (Masters’ Thesis). Marmara Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
APA çutuk s, KAÇAY Z, akkuş çutuk z (2021). The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. , 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
Chicago çutuk selman,KAÇAY ZÜLBİYE,akkuş çutuk zeynep The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. (2021): 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
MLA çutuk selman,KAÇAY ZÜLBİYE,akkuş çutuk zeynep The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. , 2021, ss.182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
AMA çutuk s,KAÇAY Z,akkuş çutuk z The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. . 2021; 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
Vancouver çutuk s,KAÇAY Z,akkuş çutuk z The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. . 2021; 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
IEEE çutuk s,KAÇAY Z,akkuş çutuk z "The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*." , ss.182 - 194, 2021. 10.19126/suje.840070
ISNAD çutuk, selman vd. "The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*". (2021), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.840070
APA çutuk s, KAÇAY Z, akkuş çutuk z (2021). The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 11(1), 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
Chicago çutuk selman,KAÇAY ZÜLBİYE,akkuş çutuk zeynep The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. Sakarya University Journal of Education 11, no.1 (2021): 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
MLA çutuk selman,KAÇAY ZÜLBİYE,akkuş çutuk zeynep The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. Sakarya University Journal of Education, vol.11, no.1, 2021, ss.182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
AMA çutuk s,KAÇAY Z,akkuş çutuk z The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2021; 11(1): 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
Vancouver çutuk s,KAÇAY Z,akkuş çutuk z The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. Sakarya University Journal of Education. 2021; 11(1): 182 - 194. 10.19126/suje.840070
IEEE çutuk s,KAÇAY Z,akkuş çutuk z "The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*." Sakarya University Journal of Education, 11, ss.182 - 194, 2021. 10.19126/suje.840070
ISNAD çutuk, selman vd. "The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*". Sakarya University Journal of Education 11/1 (2021), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.840070
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 19:34

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları