Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 195 - 200 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.35440/hutfd.730440 İndeks Tarihi: 08-10-2021

Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018

Öz:
Background: Bladder cancer is one of the major health problems studied over the years. Emergingtechnologies on follow-up and treatment of bladder cancer increased scientific literature worldwide.Despite this, there is limited data about the bibliometric analysis of bladder cancer.Materials and Methods: The bibliometric analysis of bladder cancer publications between 1975-2018was performed by using the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database. The VOSviewer softwaretool was used for arranging and setting bibliometric networks.Results: The United States of America ranked first in this field with 7963 publications and 28.3% ofthe world generation, followed by the Peoples Republic of China and Germany. The University ofTexas System is the leading institute in published documents with 1081 papers and 3.8% of the totalliterature. 15.9% of the papers were printed in The Journal of Urology with 4483 manuscripts, followedby European Urology (n=867, 3.0%) and Urology (n=810, 2.8%).Conclusions: There are relatively few articles on bibliometric analysis of urologic disorders andbladder cancer. Advanced evaluation parameters have to be defined for a more confident assessmentof scientific work. Bibliometric analyses can guide young clinicians in investigating new studies.
Anahtar Kelime:

1975-2018 Yılları Arasındaki Mesane Kanseri Yayınlarının Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz:
Amaç: Mesane kanseri, yıllardır üzerinde çalışılan en önemli sağlık sorunlarından biridir. Mesane kanserinin takibi ve tedavisi ile ilgili gelişen teknolojiler dünya çapında bilimsel literatürü artırmıştır. Buna rağmen, mesane kanserinin bibliyometrik analizi ile ilgili veriler sınırlıdır. Materyal ve Metod: 1975-2018 yılları arasında mesane kanseri yayınlarının bibliyometrik analizi, Thomson Reuters Web of Science veri tabanını kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Bibliyometrik ağların düzenleme ve ayarlanması için de VOSviewer yazılımı kullanıldı. Bulgular: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, 7963 yayın ve toplam yayınların % 28.3'ü ile bu alanda ilk sıradayken, onu Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti ve Almanya izlemiştir. The University of Texas System 1081 makale ve toplam literatürün %3.8’i ile yayınlanan dökümanlarda üst sıradaki kurumdur. Makalelerin %15.9'u The Journal of Urology'de 4483 makale olarak basılmıştır, bunu European Urology (n = 867, %3.0) ve Urology (n = 810, %2.8) izlemiştir. Sonuç: Ürolojik hastalıklar ve mesane kanserinin bibliyometrik analizi hakkında nispeten az yayın vardır. Bilimsel çalışmaların daha güvenilir bir şekilde değerlendirmesi için gelişmiş değerlendirme parametreleri tanımlanmalıdır. Bibliyometrik analizler genç klinisyenlere yeni çalışmaların ortaya çıkartılmasında rehberlik edebilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Egghe L, Rousseau R. Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers,1990:292.
  • 2. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809–31.
  • 3. Bar-Ilan J. Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century-A review. Journal of Informetrics. 2008;2(1):1–52.
  • 4. Bar-Ilan J. Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics. 2010;82(3):495– 506.
  • 5. Pritchard A. Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation. 1969;25(4):348-9.
  • 6. Li J, Burnham JF, Lemley T, Britton RM. Citation analysis: Comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, SciFinder, and Google Scholar. Journal of electronic resources in medical libraries. 2010;7(3):196–217.
  • 7. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.
  • 8. Turkoglu AR, Demirci H, Coban S, Guzelsoy M, Toprak E, Aydos MM, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between compliance with the followup and treatment protocol and health literacy in bladder tumor patients, The Aging Male. 2019;22(4):266-71.
  • 9. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. Sources, methods and major patterns inGLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-86.
  • 10. Marcos-Gragera R, Mallone S, Kiemeney LA, Vilardell L, Malats N, Allory Y, et al. Urinary tract cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: Results of the population-based study EUROCARE-5. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(15):2217–30.
  • 11. Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Sullivan R, Witjes JA. Economic Burden of Bladder Cancer Across the European Union. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):438–47.
  • 12. Wong MCS, Fung FDH, Leung C, Cheung, WWL., Goggins WB, Ng CF., et al. The global epidemiology of bladder cancer: a joinpoint regression analysis of its incidence and mortality trends and projection. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1129.
  • 13. Patel SR, Moran ME, Nakada SY. The History of Technologic Advancements in Urology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018:59.
  • 14. Parkin DM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2008;(218):12-20.
  • 15. Halachmi S, Katz Y, Meretyk S, Barak M. Perioperative morbidity and mortality in 80 years and older undergoing elective urology surgery – A prospective study. The Aging Male. 2008;11(4):162-6.
  • 16. Amuran GG, Eyuboglu IP, Tinay I, Akkiprik M. New Insights in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis: Urinary miRNAs and Proteins. Med. Sci. 2018;6(4):113.
  • 17. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809-31.
  • 18. Schöffel N, Domnitz F, Brüggmann D, Klingelhöfer D, Bendels MH, Groneberg DA. A critical perspective on the global research activity in the field of bladder cancer. Urologe A. 2016;55(11):1470-80.
  • 19. Száva-Kováts E. Unfounded attribution of the “half-life” index-number of literature obsolescence to Burton and Kebler: A literature science study. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2002;53(13):1098–105.
  • 20. Umstatter W, Rehm M, Dorogi Z. The Half Life in ScientificLiterature.Nachr Dok. 1982;33(2):50–2.
  • 21. Sevinc A. Web of science: a unique method of cited reference searching. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(7):980–3.
  • 22. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, Van den Berg J. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;61(12): 2405-16.
  • 23. Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics. 2010;4(4): 629-35.
APA Sungur M, ÇALIŞKAN S, Lokman U, Kaya C, senturk a, aydin c (2020). Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. , 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
Chicago Sungur Mustafa,ÇALIŞKAN Selahattin,Lokman Utku,Kaya Coskun,senturk aykut bugra,aydin cemil Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. (2020): 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
MLA Sungur Mustafa,ÇALIŞKAN Selahattin,Lokman Utku,Kaya Coskun,senturk aykut bugra,aydin cemil Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. , 2020, ss.195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
AMA Sungur M,ÇALIŞKAN S,Lokman U,Kaya C,senturk a,aydin c Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. . 2020; 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
Vancouver Sungur M,ÇALIŞKAN S,Lokman U,Kaya C,senturk a,aydin c Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. . 2020; 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
IEEE Sungur M,ÇALIŞKAN S,Lokman U,Kaya C,senturk a,aydin c "Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018." , ss.195 - 200, 2020. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
ISNAD Sungur, Mustafa vd. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018". (2020), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.730440
APA Sungur M, ÇALIŞKAN S, Lokman U, Kaya C, senturk a, aydin c (2020). Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
Chicago Sungur Mustafa,ÇALIŞKAN Selahattin,Lokman Utku,Kaya Coskun,senturk aykut bugra,aydin cemil Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 17, no.2 (2020): 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
MLA Sungur Mustafa,ÇALIŞKAN Selahattin,Lokman Utku,Kaya Coskun,senturk aykut bugra,aydin cemil Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.17, no.2, 2020, ss.195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
AMA Sungur M,ÇALIŞKAN S,Lokman U,Kaya C,senturk a,aydin c Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 17(2): 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
Vancouver Sungur M,ÇALIŞKAN S,Lokman U,Kaya C,senturk a,aydin c Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 17(2): 195 - 200. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
IEEE Sungur M,ÇALIŞKAN S,Lokman U,Kaya C,senturk a,aydin c "Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018." Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.195 - 200, 2020. 10.35440/hutfd.730440
ISNAD Sungur, Mustafa vd. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Bladder Cancer Publications Between 1975-2018". Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 17/2 (2020), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.730440