Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia

Duygu Özge, (Orta doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Bölümü, Ankara)
Müzeyyen Çiyiltepe, (İstinye Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Dil ve Konuşma Terapisi Bölümü, İstanbul)
Hasan Gürkan Tekman (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara)
Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi
0 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 33 - 53 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18492/dad.696304 İndeks Tarihi: 14-09-2021

Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia

Öz:
The present study addresses whether adults with Broca’s aphasia who have damage in their Posterior Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus (PLIFG) show similar performance to typically developing children in their processing of complex syntax. We tested comprehension of Turkish relative clauses using a sentence-picture matching task in Broca’s patients and children with typical development (aged: 3;04-4;03). Both groups showed better performance in subject relative clauses compared to object relative clauses. Children's similar performance to Broca's patients might be due to the fact that PLIFG is a late-maturing neural region. Our participants had more errors in object relative clauses despite the first referent was the agent so there was no evidence for the agent-first strategy. Poor performance in object relative clauses was linked to the morphosyntactic complexity in these structures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Son Edinilen İlk Unutulur Prensibi: Tipik Gelişim Gösteren Çocuklar ve Broka Afazili Bireylerin Türkçe İlgi Tümcelerini Anlamlandırma Süreçleri

Öz:
Bu çalışma, Broka afazisi olan bireyler ile tipik gelişim gösteren çocukların karmaşık tümce yapıları içeren ifadeleri anlama yetilerinde benzerlik olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada, ifade-cümle eşleştirme testi kullanılarak Broka afazili bireylerin ve 3;04-4;03 yaşlarındaki çocukların Türkçe ilgi tümcelerini anlama yetileri test edilmiştir. Çocuklar da afazili bireyler de nesne ilgi tümcelerinde özne ilgi tümcelerine göre daha iyi bir anlama performansı sergilemişlerdir. Bu bulgular, Sol Posteriyor Inferiyor Prefrontal Girus’un sözdizimsel olarak daha karmaşık yapı sergileyen ifadeleri işlemede etkisi olduğunu varsayan kuramlarla uyum göstermektedir. Çocukların Broka afazili bireylerle benzer bir performans sergilemeleri bahsi geçen beyin bölgesinin geç gelişmesine bağlanabilmektedir. Çalışmaya katılan katılımcılar, nesne ilgi tümcelerinde tümcenin öznesi tümce başında yer almasına rağmen bu yapıları anlamakta güçlük çekmişlerdir. Bu bulgu alanyazında önerilmiş ‘ilk öge özne olur’ stratejisi ile uyumsuzluk göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, özne ilgi tümcelerindeki anlama güçlüğünü bu yapılardaki biçimbirimsel birimlerin karmaşıklığına bağlanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Aydın, Ö. (2007). The comprehension of Turkish relative clauses in second language acquisition and agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 295-315.
  • Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child development, 341-354.
  • Braak H & Braak E. (1996). Evolution of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 94 (S165), 3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb05866.x.
  • Brass, M. & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(40), 8847-8852, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-04.2004.
  • Brauer, J. Anwander, A., Perani, D., & Friederici A.D. (2013). Dorsal and ventral pathways in language development. Brain and Language, 127(2), 289-295. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.001.
  • Brauer, J., Anwander, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 459-466, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq108.
  • Choi, Y. & Trueswell, J. (2010). Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41-61.
 doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.003.
  • Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152-1167. 
 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x.
  • Duman, T. Y., Aygen, G., Özgirgin, N., & Bastiaanse, R. (2007). Object scrambling and finiteness in Turkish agrammatic production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(4), 306-331.
  • Duman, T. Y., Aygen, G., & Bastiaanse, R. (2008). The production of Turkish relative clauses in agrammatism: Verb inflection and constituent order. Brain and language, 105(3), 149-160.
  • Duman, T. Y., Altınok, N., Özgirgin, N., & Bastiaanse, R. (2011). Sentence comprehension in Turkish Broca's aphasia: An integration problem. Aphasiology, 25(8), 908-926.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2011). Brain basis of language processing: From processing to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357-1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2012). Language development and the ontogeny of the dorsal pathway.
  • Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4(3), doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00003.
  • Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: Fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 175-181, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001.
  • Friederici, A. D, Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel I. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1709-1717, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj106.
  • Friederici, A. D., Oberecker, R., & Brauer, J. (2012). Neurophysiological preconditions of syntax acquisition. Psychological Research, 76 (2), 204-211, doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0357-0.
  • Friedmann, N., & Shapiro, L. P. (2003). Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
  • Friedmann, N., Reznick, J., Dolinski-Nuger, D., & Soboleva, K. (2010). Comprehension and production of movement-derived sentences by Russian speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23(1), 44-65.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1-7, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00002399.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. Wexler, K., Chien, Y. C., Marakovits, S. & Solomon, J. The breakdown of binding relations. Brain and Language 45(3), 396–422, doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1052.
  • Grodzinsky, Y. & Reinhart, T. (1993) The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1), 69-102, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178802.
  • Hagiwara, H., & Caplan, D. (1990). Syntactic comprehension in Japanese aphasics: Effects of category and thematic role order. Brain and Language, 38(1), 159-170.
  • Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387(2), 167–178, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-Z.
  • Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
  • January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca’s Area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2434-2444. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21179.
  • Ketrez, F. N. (2004). Children’s accusative case and indefinite objects. Dilbilim Arastırmaları, 2004, 63-74.
  • Ketrez, F. N., & Aksu-Koç, A. (2009). Early nominal morphology in Turkish: Emergence of case and number. Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Study on language acquisition. U. Stephany–MD Voeĭkova (eds.), 30, 15-48.
  • Knoll, L. J. Obleser, J., Schipke, C. S., Friederici A. D., & Brauer, J., (2012). Left prefrontal cortex activation during sentence comprehension covaries with grammatical knowledge in children. Neuroimage, 62(1), 207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.014.
  • Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Disorders of syntax in aphasia: Linguistic-descriptive and processing approaches. In: Handbook of Neurolinguistics, ed. B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker. Academic Press.
  • Kükürt, D. (2004). Comprehension of Turkish relative clauses in Broca’s aphasics and children. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological review, 126(1), 1.
  • MacDonald, A.W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control, Science, 288 (5472), 1835-1838, doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835.
  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.
  • Mason, R. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain Imaging Reveals About the Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1319-1338, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1319.
  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive Control and Parsing: Reexamining the Role of Broca's Area in Sentence Comprehension. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263-281, doi: 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263.
  • Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Broca’s area and language processing: Evidence for the cognitive control connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(10), 906-924, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x.
  • Özge, D., Marinis, T., & Zeyrek, D. (2009). Comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in monolingual Turkish children. In 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 341-350).
  • Özge, D., Marinis, T., & Zeyrek, D. (2015). Incremental processing in head-final child language: on-line comprehension of relative clauses in Turkish-speaking children and adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (formerly titled Language and Cognitive Processes), 27. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.995108.
  • Özge, D., Kornfilt, J., Münster, K., Knoeferle, P., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2016). Predictive use of case markers in German children. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 291-303).
  • Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183, 152-180.
  • Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Anwander, A., Spada, D., Baldoli, C., Poloniato, A., Lohmann, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of U.S.A., 108 (38), 16056-16061, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102991108.
  • Pujol, J., Soriano-Mas, C., Ortiz, H., Sebastian-Galles, N., Losilla, J. M., & Deus, J. (2006). Myelination of language-related areas in the developing brain. Neurology, 66(3), 339-343, doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201049.66073.8d.
  • Reisberg, B., Franssen, E., Hasan, S., Monteiro, I., Boksay, I., Sourcen, L., Kenowsky, S., Auer, S. R., Elahi, S., & Kluger, A. (1999). Retrogenesis: Clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer’s, and other dementing processes. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 249(S3), 28-36, doi: 10.1007/PL00014170.
  • Ribot, T. (bot, 2012, originally published 1881). Diseases of the memory: An essay in the positive psychology. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
  • Ruigendijk, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2002). Two characteristics of agrammatic speech: Omission of verbs and omission of determiners, is there a relation?. Aphasiology, 16(4-6), 383-395.
  • Schipke CS, Knoll LJ, Friederici AD, Oberecker R. 2012. Preschool children’s interpretation of object-initial sentences: Neural correlates of their behavioral performance. Developmental Science, 15(6), 762-774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01167.x.
  • Skeide, M. A., Brauer, J. & Friederici, A. D. (2015). Brain functional and structural predictors of language performance. Cerebral Cortex, 1-13, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv042.
  • Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229-265.
  • Smith, S. D., & Mimica, I. (1984). Agrammatism in a case-inflected language: Comprehension of agent-object relations. Brain and language, 21(2), 274-290.
  • Swinney, D., Zurif, E. B. & Nicol, J. (1989) The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing. An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1(1), 25-37, doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.1.25.
  • Thomson-Schill, S. L., Jonides, J., Marschuetz, C., Smith, E. E., D’esposito, M., Kan, I. P., Knight, R. T., & Scick, T. (2002). Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 109-120, doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.2.109.
  • Trueswell, J., Sekerina, I. A., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89- 134. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3.
  • Wexler, K. & Chien, Y.C. (1985). The Development of Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 24, 138-49, ERIC Number: ED261549.
  • Yokoyama, S., Watanabe, J., Iwata, K., Ikuta, N., Haji, T., Usui, N., ... & Horie, K. (2007). Is Broca's area involved in the processing of passive sentences? An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 989-996.
APA Ozge D, CİYİLTEPE M, Tekman H (2020). Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. , 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
Chicago Ozge Duygu,CİYİLTEPE MUGE MUZEYYEN,Tekman Hasan Gürkan Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. (2020): 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
MLA Ozge Duygu,CİYİLTEPE MUGE MUZEYYEN,Tekman Hasan Gürkan Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. , 2020, ss.33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
AMA Ozge D,CİYİLTEPE M,Tekman H Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. . 2020; 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
Vancouver Ozge D,CİYİLTEPE M,Tekman H Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. . 2020; 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
IEEE Ozge D,CİYİLTEPE M,Tekman H "Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia." , ss.33 - 53, 2020. 10.18492/dad.696304
ISNAD Ozge, Duygu vd. "Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia". (2020), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.696304
APA Ozge D, CİYİLTEPE M, Tekman H (2020). Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31(1), 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
Chicago Ozge Duygu,CİYİLTEPE MUGE MUZEYYEN,Tekman Hasan Gürkan Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31, no.1 (2020): 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
MLA Ozge Duygu,CİYİLTEPE MUGE MUZEYYEN,Tekman Hasan Gürkan Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.31, no.1, 2020, ss.33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
AMA Ozge D,CİYİLTEPE M,Tekman H Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020; 31(1): 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
Vancouver Ozge D,CİYİLTEPE M,Tekman H Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020; 31(1): 33 - 53. 10.18492/dad.696304
IEEE Ozge D,CİYİLTEPE M,Tekman H "Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia." Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31, ss.33 - 53, 2020. 10.18492/dad.696304
ISNAD Ozge, Duygu vd. "Last-Acquired-First-Forgotten: Interpretation of Turkish Relative Clauses in Typically Developing Children and Adults with Broca’s Aphasia". Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31/1 (2020), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.18492/dad.696304
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 21:11

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları