(Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Clinic of Urology, New Delhi, India)
Aditya JHA
(Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Clinic of Urology, New Delhi, India)
Govindaiah MADHU
(Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Clinic of Urology, New Delhi, India)
(Army College of Medical Sciences, Community Medicine, New Delhi, India)
Gagandeep SINGH
(Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Clinic of Urology, New Delhi, India)
Yıl: 2021Cilt: 8Sayı: 1ISSN: 2148-9580Sayfa Aralığı: 40 - 45İngilizce

16 0
Comparative Study of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion at a Tertiary Care Centre
Objective: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is a common treatment mode in patients with end-stage renal disease. Various insertiontechniques of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters have been described in the literature, including percutaneous, open andlaparoscopic techniques, with no consensus about the preferred operative technique.Materials and Methods: Between August 2016 and March 2018, 50 patients undergoing catheter insertion were randomised to insertion by eitherthe open technique or laparoscopy. The demographic, preoperative and postoperative profiles of these patients were recorded and patients werefollowed up for six weeks postoperatively. The Pearson chi-square test was used to compare the results with historical controls. Fisher’s Exact testwas used to assess the incidence of surgical complications. The significance level was set at 0.05.Results: A comparison between the two groups indicated that the only significant difference was in postoperative pain on postoperative evening,lower in the laparoscopic group and statistically significant (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in catheter tip migration,catheter exit-site infection, catheter-associated peritonitis or catheter functional status between the two techniques.Conclusion: The laparoscopic technique does not provide any additional advantage than the open technique in patients undergoing continuousambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter placement
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • 1. Hagen SM, Lafranca JA, Steyerberg EW, IJzermans JN, Dor FJ. Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e56351.
  • 2. Dinç B, Dinçkan A, Çiyiltepe H, Mesci A, Erdoğan O, Çolak T. Comparison of Laparoscopic and Conventional Methods for Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Terms of Complications. Turk Neph Dial Transpl 2012;21:156-160.
  • 3. Soontrapornchai P, Simapatanapong T. Comparison of open and laparoscopic secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Endosc 2005;19:137-139.
  • 4. Sakurada T, Ueda A, Komukai D, Uchiyama K, Tsujimoto Y, Yuasa H, Ryuzaki M, Ito Y, Tomo M, Nakamato H. Outcomes after peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Replace Ther 5, 37 (2019).
  • 5. van Laanen JHH, Cornelis T, Mees BM, Litjens EJ, van Loon MM, Tordoir JHM, Peppelenbosch AG. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Placement of a Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter and Outcomes: The CAPD I Trial. Perit Dial Int 2018;38:104-112.
  • 6. Wright MJ, Bel’eed K, Johnson BF, Eadington DW, Sellars L, Farr MJ. Randomized prospective comparison of laparoscopic and open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Perit Dial Int 1999;19:372-375.
  • 7. Jwo S, Chen K, Lee C, Chen H. Prospective randomized study for comparison of open surgery with laparoscopic-assisted placement of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter--a single center experience and literature review. J Surg Res 2010;159:489-496.
  • 8. Leblanc M, Ouimet D, Pichette V. Dialysate leaks in peritoneal dialysis. Semin Dial 2001;14:50-54.
  • 9. Schmidt SC, Pohle C, Langrehr JM, Schumacher G, Jacob D, Neuhaus P. Laparoscopic-assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: implantation technique and results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007;17:596-599.
  • 10. Yun EJ, Meng MV, Brennan TV, McAninch JW, Santucci RA, Rogers SJ. Novel microlaparoscopic technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Urology 2003;61:1026-1028.
  • 11. Strippoli GF, Tong A, Johnson D, Schena FP, Craig JC. Antimicrobial agents to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;44:591-603.
  • 12. Figueiredo A, Goh B-L, Jenkins S, Johnson DW, Mactier R, Ramalakshmi S, Shrestha B, Struijk D, Wilkie M; International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 2010;30:424- 429.
  • 13. Gadallah MF, Ramdeen G, Torres C, Mignore J, Patel D, Mitchell L, Tatro S. Preoperative vancomycin prophylaxis for newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters prevents postoperative peritonitis. Adı Peri Dial 2000;16:199-203.
  • 14. Öğünç G, Tuncer M, Oğünç D, Yardimsever M, Ersoy F. Laparoscopic omental fixation technique vs open surgical placement or peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1749-1755.
  • 15. Harissis HV, Katsios CS, Koliousi EL, Ikonomou MG, Siamopoulos KC, Fatouros M, Kappas AM. A new simplified one port laparoscopic technique of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement with intra-abdominal fixation. Am J Surg 2006;192:125-129.
  • 16. Gadallah MF, Pervez A, El-Shahawy MA, Sorrells D, Zibari G, McDonald J, Work J. Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;33:118-122.
  • 17. Gajjar AH, Rhoden DH, Kathuria P, Kaul R, Udupa AD, Jennings WC. Peritoneal dialysis catheters: Laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes. Am J Surg 2007;194:872-875.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.