Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 49 - 57 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2021

Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams

Öz:
Dispose of waste rubberized tires become a dangerous problem around the world, represented a big serious risk to the sur-rounded environment. Many studies show that over 1000 million tires reach their expired date yearly and this figure is anticipated to be 5000 million tires by reaching 2030. A minor part of them is employed as recycled materials and the residual amount is stockpiled or buried. This paper aimed to successfully utilize the vast amounts of tire rubber waste existing currently in landfills. This paper represents a practical investigation of the ductility performance of the reinforced rubberized concrete beams. Thirteen reinforced concrete beams simply supported, with waste rubber tires mixtures vary from 0 to 8 percentage as aggregates replacements, were tested by mid-span load. Therefore, to examine the ductility performance of reinforced rubberized concrete beams, three sets of samples were made. In the first group, coarse aggregates in the concrete mix were replaced by different percentages of the waste rubber partials, while for the second group, crumb rubber was replaced for the fine aggregates, and for the third one, a mix of waste and crumbed rubber were replaced for both types of aggregates. Experimental results of rubberized specimens were also compared with that of the reference beam (without rubber replacement), the comparison results declare that concrete contains rubber particles is less ductile than conventional concrete.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ASTM E8/E8M-16 (2001). Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Annual book of ASTM standards ASTM, USA.
  • Bompa D, Elghazouli A, Xu B, Stafford P, Ruiz-Teran A (2017). Experimental assessment and constitutive modelling of rubberized. Construction and Building Materials, 137, 246-260.
  • Boudaoud Z, Beddar M (2012). Effects of recycled tires rubber aggregates on the characteristics of cement concrete. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2, 193-197.
  • Guo YC, Zhang JH, Chen GM, Xie ZH (2014). Compressive behaviour of concrete structures incorporating recycled concrete aggregates, rubber crumb and reinforced with steel fibre, subjected to elevated temperatures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 193-203.
  • Hernandez-Olivares F, Barluenga G, Bollati M, Witoszek B (2002). Static and dynamic behavior of recycled tyre rubber-filled concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 1587-1596.
  • Khatib ZK, Bayomy FM (1999). Rubberized Portland cement concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 236, 206-213.
  • Khusru S, Fawzia S, Thambiratnam DP, Elchalakani M (2020). A parametric study: High performance double skin tubular column using rubberised concrete. Composite Structures, 235, 111741.
  • Pham TM, Elchalakani M, Hao H, Lai J, Ameduri S, Tran TM (2019). Durability characteristics of lightweight rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 224, 584-599.
  • Pham TM, Elchalakani M, Karrech A, Hao H (2019). Axial impact resistance of rubberized concrete with/without FRP confinement. International Journal of Protective Structures, 10(2), 154-173.
  • Pham TM, Chen W, Elchalakani M, Karrech A, Hao H (2020). Experimental investigation on lightweight rubberized concrete beams strengthened with BERP sheets subjected to impact loads. Engineering Structures, 205, 110095.
  • Raffoul S, Garcia R, Escolano-Margarit D, Guadagnini M, Hajirasouliha I, Pilakoutas K (2017). Behaviour of unconfined and FRP-confined rubberised concrete in axial compression. Construction and Building Materials, 147, 388-397.
  • Sharaky IA, Mohamed HA, Torres L, Emara M (2020). Flexural behavior of rubberized concrete beams strengthened in shear using welded wire mesh. Composite Structures, 247, 112485.
  • Shwani M, Tawadrous R, Maguire M (2019). Ductility of concrete members reinforced with welded wire reinforcement (WWR). Engineering Structures, 191, 711-723.
  • Sienkiewicz M, Janik H, Borze˛dowska-Labuda K, Kucin´ska-Lipka J (2017). Environmentally friendly polymer-rubber composites obtained from waste tyres: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 560-571.
  • Wang Z, Hu H, Hajiras I (2020). Tensile stress-strain characteristics of rubberised concrete from flexural tests. Construction and Building Materials, 236, 117591.
  • Youssf O, Hassanli R, Mills JE (2017). Mechanical performance of FRPconfined and unconfined crumb rubber concrete containing high rubber content. Journal of Building Engineering, 11, 115-126.
  • Zhu H, Rong B, Xie R, Yang Z (2018). Experimental investigation on the floating of rubber particles of crumb rubber concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 164, 644-654.
APA KAMAL A (2021). Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. , 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
Chicago KAMAL AHMED Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. (2021): 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
MLA KAMAL AHMED Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. , 2021, ss.49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
AMA KAMAL A Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. . 2021; 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
Vancouver KAMAL A Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. . 2021; 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
IEEE KAMAL A "Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams." , ss.49 - 57, 2021. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
ISNAD KAMAL, AHMED. "Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams". (2021), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
APA KAMAL A (2021). Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 12(2), 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
Chicago KAMAL AHMED Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters 12, no.2 (2021): 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
MLA KAMAL AHMED Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, vol.12, no.2, 2021, ss.49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
AMA KAMAL A Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters. 2021; 12(2): 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
Vancouver KAMAL A Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters. 2021; 12(2): 49 - 57. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
IEEE KAMAL A "Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams." Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 12, ss.49 - 57, 2021. 10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002
ISNAD KAMAL, AHMED. "Ductility of simply supported rubberized concrete beams". Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters 12/2 (2021), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2021.02.002