Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 106 - 113 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.34108/eujhs.587616 İndeks Tarihi: 25-10-2021

KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Öz:
Kolorektal kanserler (KRK) tamamlayıcı alternatif tera-pi (TAT) kullanımının gittikçe arttıg ı bir kanser tu ru -du r.Bu çalışmanın amacı, cerrahi girişim uygulanmış kolorektal kanserli hastalarda, TAT kullanımı ile yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesidir.Tanımlayıcı ve ilişki arayıcı bu araştırma, 01 Ocak 2018-31 Eylu l 2018 tarihleri arasında kolorektal kansere ilişkin tedavi su reci devam eden 170 hasta ile yu ru tu lmu ştu r. Veriler, yu z yu ze ve telefonla go ru şme teknig iyle, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen anket formu ve WHOQOL-Bref Yaşam Kalitesi O lçeg i kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verile-rin deg erlendirilmesinde, tanımlayıcı istatistiksel yo n-temler, t-testi, korelasyon ve varyans analizi kullanıl-mıştır.Araştırmaya katılan hastaların, %25.9’unun has-talık belirtilerini giderme amaçlı TAT kullandıg ı ve en çok dua etme (%90.7) gibi manevi yo ntemlere başvur-dug u belirlenmiştir. Yaş ve ailede KRK o yku su ile yaşam kalitesi arasında ilişki bulundug u, gevşemeye ilişkin yo ntem kullanımının hastaların yaşam kalitesi alt para-metrelerinden fiziksel sag lık, psikolojik ve sosyal ilişki-leri olumlu etkiledig i saptanmıştır. O zellikle gevşemeyi sag layan, zihin-beden temelli TAT yaklaşımları KRK hastalarının yaşam kalitelerinde iyileşme sag lamakta-dır. KRK nedeniyle cerrahi girişim geçiren hastalara taburculuk o ncesi TAT uygulamaları ve etkilerine yo ne-lik bilgi verilmesi ve devam eden su reçte, hastaların uygun TAT yo ntemlerinin kullanımına yo nelik destek-lenmesinin yanısıra yaşam kalitesini arttırmaya yo nelik verilmesi o nerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USING COMPLEMENTARY-ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS

Öz:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a type of cancer in which the use of complementary alternative therapy (CAT) gradu-ally increased. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the use of CAT and the quality of life in patients who received colorectal intervention. This descriptive and correlation research was carried out with 70 patients whohad received treatment for colorectal cancer between January 1-September 31, 2018. Data were collected by face-to-face and telephone interview technique using a questionnaire developed by the researchers and WHOQOL-Bref Quality of Life Scale. Descriptive statistical methods, t-test, correlation, and variance analysis were used in data collection. It was determined that 25.9% of the patients used CAT to eliminate the symptoms of the disease and turned most-ly to spiritual methods such as prayer (90.7%). Age and family history of CRC was found to be correlated with quality of life.The use of relaxation method affected the quality of life sub-parameters, physical health, psycho-logical and social relations, positively.Mind-body based CAT approaches, which specifically provide relaxation, provide improvement in the quality of life of the CRC patients. It is recommended that patients who under-went surgery for CRC be informed about pre-discharge CAT applications and their effects, and in the following process patients should be given supporting nursing care to improve the quality of life as well as support for the use of appropriate CAT methods.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Muslu G, O ztu rk C. Tamamlayıcı ve alternatif te-daviler ve çocuklarda kullanımı. Çocuk Sag lıg ı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 2008; 51:62-67.
  • 2. Bahall M, Legall G. Knowledge, attitudes, and prac-tices among health care providers regarding com-plementary and alternative medicine in Trinidad and Tobago. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2017; 17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1654-y.
  • 3. Eardley S, Bishop FL, Prescott P, et al. A systematic literature review of complementary and alterna-tive medicine prevalence in EÜ. Complementary Medicine Research 2012; 19(Suppl. 2):18-28.
  • 4. Shumer G, Warber S, Motohara S, et al. Comple-mentary and alternative medicine use by visitors to rural Japanese family medicine clinics: results from the international complementary and alter-native medicine survey. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014; 25(14):360. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-360.
  • 5. Oyunchimeg B, Hwang JH, Ahmed M, Choi S, Han D. Complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with cancer in Mongolia: a nation-al hospital survey. BMC Complementary and Alter-native Medicine 2017; 17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1576-8.
  • 6. Üysal H. Current approaches to complementary and alternative medicine in cardiovascular diseas-es. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2016; 7(Sup 2):69-83.
  • 7. Kuo YH, Tsay SL, Chang CC, Liao YC, Tung HH. Can-cer impact, complementary / alternative medicine beliefs, and quality of life in cancer patients. Jour-nal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2018; 24(3):276-281. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0396.
  • 8. National Cancer Institute. Integrative PD. Prostate Cancer, Nutrition, and Dietary Supplements https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/hp/prostate-supplements-pdq Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2019.
  • 9. Mohd Mujar NM, Dahlui M, Emran NA, et al. Com-plementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and delays in presentation and diagnosis of breast cancer patients in public hospitals in Malaysia. PLoS One 2017; 12(4):e0176394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176394. e Collection 2017.
  • 10. Gentry-Maharaj A, Karpinskyj C, Glazer C, et al. Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine/non-pharmacological inter-ventions use for menopausal symptoms within the ÜK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screen-ing. Climacteric 2017; 20(3):240-247. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1301919.
  • 11. Lawsin C, Du Hamel K, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Demo-graphic, medical, and psychosocial correlates to CAM use among survivors of colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer 2007; 15(5):557-564.
  • 12. Nissen N, Lunde A, Pedersen CG, Johannessen H. The use of complementary and alternative medi-cine after the completion of hospital treatment for colorectal cancer: findings from a questionnaire study in Denmark. BMC Complementary and Al-ternative Medicine 2014; 14(388):1-8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-388.
  • 13. Sewitch MJ, Rajput Y. A literature review of com-plementary and alternative medicine use by colo-rectal cancer patients. Complementary Theraphies in Clinical Practice 2010; 16(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.10.001.
  • 14. Eser S, Saatli G, Eser E, Baydur H, Fidaner C. Yaşlılar için Du nya Sag lık O rgu tu Yaşam Kalitesi Modu lu WHOQOLOLD: Tu rkiye alan çalışması Tu rkçe su ru m geçerlilik ve gu venilirlik sonuçları. Tu rk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2010; 21:37-48.
  • 15. WHOQOL Group. WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration, Scoring, and Generic Version of the Assessment: Field Trial Version. 1996; World Health Organization, Geneva.
  • 16. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global can-cer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of inci-dence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018; 68(6):394-424.
  • 17. Ernst J, Mehnert A, Dietz A, Hornemann B, Esser P. Perceived stigmatization and its impact on quality of life-results from a large register-based study including breast, colon, prostate and lung cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2017; 17(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3742-2.
  • 18. Connell LC, Mota JM, Braghiroli MI, Hoff PM. The rising incidence of younger patients with colorec-tal cancer: questions about screening, biology, and treatment. Current Treatment Options in Oncolo-gy 2017; 18(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0463-3.
  • 19. Yoon H, Chatters L, Kao TS, Saint-Arnault D, Northouse L. Factors affecting quality of life for Korean American cancer survivors: An integrative review. Oncology Nursing Forum 2016; 438(3): E132). doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.E132-E142.
  • 20. Sodergren SC, Husson O, Rohde GE, et al. EORTC Quality of Life Group. Does age matter? A compari-son of health‐related quality of life issues of ado-lescents and young adults with cancer. European Journal Of Cancer Care 2018; 27(6):e12980. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12980.
  • 21. Geessink N, Schoon Y, van Goor H, Rikkert MO, Melis R. Frailty and quality of life among older people with and without a cancer diagnosis: Find-ings from TOPICS-MDS. PloS One 2017; 12(12): e0189648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189648.
  • 22. Maniragaba F, Nzabona A, Asiimwe JB, et al. Fac-tors associated with older persons’ physical health in rural Üganda. PloS One 2019; 14(1):e0209262.
  • 23. Ju YJ, Han KT, Lee TH, et al. Does relationship sat-isfaction and financial aid from offspring influence the quality of life of older parents?: A longitudinal study based on findings from the Korean longitu-dinal study of aging, 2006–2012. Health and Quali-ty of Life Outcomes 2016; 14(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0509-4.
  • 24. Rossi E, Di Stefano M, Firenzuoli F, Monechi M, Baccetti S. Add-on complementary medicine in cancer care: evidence in literature and experienc-es of integration. Medicines 2017; 4(1):5.
  • 25. Kav T. Üse of complementary and alternative med-icine: A survey in Turkish gastroenterology pa-tients. BMC Complementary And Alternative Medi-cine 2009; 9(1):41.
  • 26. Kuo YT, Chang TT, Muo CH, et al. Üse of comple-mentary traditional Chinese medicines by adult cancer patients in Taiwan: A nationwide popula-tion-based study. Integrative Cancer Therapies 2018; 17(2):531-541. doi: 10.1177/1534735417716302.
  • 27. Molassiotis A, Fernandez-Ortega P, Pud D, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in colorectal cancer patients in seven European countries. Complementary therapies in medicine 2005; 13(4):251-257.
  • 28. Bahall M. Prevalence, patterns, and perceived val-ue of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients: a cross-sectional, descrip-tive study. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2017; 17(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1853-6.
  • 29. Albabtain H, Alwhaibi M, Alburaikan K, Asiri Y. Quality of life and complementary and alternative medicine use among women with breast cancer. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2018; 26(3):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.12.020.
  • 30. Can G, Erol O, Aydiner A, Topuz E. Quality of life and complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients in Turkey. European Jour-nal of Oncology Nursing 2009; 13(4):287-94.
  • 31. Ko nig J, Geschwill K, Lang A, et al. Üse of comple-mentary and alternative medicine in cancer pa-tients: A prospective questionnaire-based study in an oncological outpatient clinic. Oncology Re-search and Treatment 2016; 39(5):260-5. doi: 10.1159/000446008
  • 32. Lin CY, Hwang JS, Wang WC, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF, Taiwan version, across five kinds of Taiwanese cancer survivors: Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 2019; 118(1):215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.03.018.
  • 33. Marco DJ, White VM. The impact of cancer type, treatment, and distress on health-related quality of life: cross-sectional findings from a study of Australian cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 2019; 19:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4625-z.
  • 34. Almont T, Bouhnik AD, Charif AB, et al. Sexual health problems and discussion in colorectal can-cer patients two years after diagnosis: a national cross-sectional study. The Journal of Sexual Medi-cine 2019; 16(1):96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.11.008.
  • 35. Sclafani F, Peckitt C, Cunningham D, et al. Short-and long-term quality of life and bowel function in patients with MRI-defined, high-risk, locally ad-vanced rectal cancer treated with an intensified neoadjuvant strategy in the randomized phase 2 EXPERT-C Trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2015; 93(2):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.038
  • 36. Wiltink LM, Marijnen CA, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Van de Velde CJ, Nout RA. A com-prehensive longitudinal overview of health-related quality of life and symptoms after treat-ment for rectal cancer in the TME trial. Acta Onco-logica 2016; 55(4):502-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X. 2015.1088171
  • 37. Banik A, Schwarzer R, Pawlowska I, et al. Women with family cancer history are at risk for poorer physical quality of life and lower self-efficacy: A longitudinal study among men and women with non-small cell lung cancer. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2017; 15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0645-5.
  • 38. Shin DW, Park HS, Lee SH, et al. Health-related quality of life, perceived social support, and de-pression in disease-free survivors who underwent curative surgery only for prostate, kidney and bladder cancer: comparison among survivors and with the general population. Cancer Research and Treatment 2019; 51(1):289. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.053.
  • 39. Sharp L, O’leary E, O’ceilleachair A, Skally M, Hanly P. Financial impact of colorectal cancer and its consequences: associations between cancer-related financial stress and strain and health-related quality of life. Diseases of the Colon & Rec-tum 2018; 61(1):27-35. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000923.
  • 40. Bauml JM, Chokshi S, Schapira MM, et al. Do atti-tudes and beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine impact its use among pa-tients with cancer? A cross‐sectional survey. Can-cer 2015; 121(14):2431-8.
  • 41. Jang A, Kang DH, Kim DÜ. Complementary and alternative medicine use and its association with emotional status and quality of life in patients with a solid tumor: a cross-sectional study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medi-cine 2017; 23(5):362-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0289
  • 42. Garland SN, Valentine D, Desai K, et al. Comple-mentary and alternative medicine use and benefit finding among cancer patients. The Journal of Al-ternative and Complementary Medicine 2013; 19(11):876-81. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0964.
  • 43. Fouladbakhsh JM, Stommel M. Gender, symptom experience, and use of complementary and alter- native medicine practices among cancer survivors in the ÜS cancer population. Oncology Nursing Forum 2010; 37(1):E7-E15.
  • 44. Davis MP, Goforth HW. Long-term and short-term effects of insomnia in cancer and effective inter-ventions. The Cancer Journal 2014; 20(5):330-44. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000071
  • 45. Akyol AD, O z B. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with cancer: in Turkey. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 2011; 17(4):230-4.
  • 46. Chen Q, Xun P, Tsinovoi CL, et al. Association of herbal/botanic supplement use with quality of life, recurrence, and survival in newly diagnosed stage II colon cancer patients: A 2-y follow-up study. Nutrition 2018; 54:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.02.002
  • 47. Üysal N, Kutlutu rkan S, Üg ur I. Effects of foot mas-sage applied in two different methods on symp-tom control in colorectal cancer patients: Ran-domised control trial. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2017; 23(3):e12532. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12532
APA AYDIN SAYILAN A, YILDIZELI TOPCU S (2020). KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. , 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
Chicago AYDIN SAYILAN Aylin,YILDIZELI TOPCU Sacide KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. (2020): 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
MLA AYDIN SAYILAN Aylin,YILDIZELI TOPCU Sacide KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. , 2020, ss.106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
AMA AYDIN SAYILAN A,YILDIZELI TOPCU S KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. . 2020; 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
Vancouver AYDIN SAYILAN A,YILDIZELI TOPCU S KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. . 2020; 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
IEEE AYDIN SAYILAN A,YILDIZELI TOPCU S "KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ." , ss.106 - 113, 2020. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
ISNAD AYDIN SAYILAN, Aylin - YILDIZELI TOPCU, Sacide. "KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ". (2020), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.587616
APA AYDIN SAYILAN A, YILDIZELI TOPCU S (2020). KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(2), 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
Chicago AYDIN SAYILAN Aylin,YILDIZELI TOPCU Sacide KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 29, no.2 (2020): 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
MLA AYDIN SAYILAN Aylin,YILDIZELI TOPCU Sacide KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.29, no.2, 2020, ss.106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
AMA AYDIN SAYILAN A,YILDIZELI TOPCU S KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 29(2): 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
Vancouver AYDIN SAYILAN A,YILDIZELI TOPCU S KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 29(2): 106 - 113. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
IEEE AYDIN SAYILAN A,YILDIZELI TOPCU S "KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ." Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 29, ss.106 - 113, 2020. 10.34108/eujhs.587616
ISNAD AYDIN SAYILAN, Aylin - YILDIZELI TOPCU, Sacide. "KOLOREKTAL KANSERLİ HASTALARDA TAMAMLAYICI-ALTERNATİF TERAPİ KULLANIMI İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ". Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 29/2 (2020), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.587616