Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin)
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 152 - 168 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 İndeks Tarihi: 15-10-2021
Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin)
Öz: Purpose: Comparison studies are necessary not just for the preparation but also for the successful implementation and revisionof the curriculum. Comparing English language teaching in Germany, which is more successful than Turkey based on theInternational exam results, with English language teaching in Turkey, which has on-going problems for many years, may showthe share of the curriculum in these problems. Therefore, this study aims to take an in-depth look at the primary school Englishlanguage curriculum in Turkey and Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-Wurttemberg, Berlin) to reveal the similaritiesand differences.Design/Methodology/Approach: Bereday model was used as a comparative education model, and document analysis wasapplied for analysis in this qualitative study.Findings: As a result, it was observed that language learning strategies and intercultural education do not take place in theprimary school English language curriculum in Turkey; whereas, in the states of Germany, these topics are emphasized; Englishcurricula in the states of Germany have a general framework but the content is structured in units in Turkey.Conclusions: Program design should be revised to increase teacher autonomy. Intercultural and language learning strategiesshould be emphasized in the primary school English language curriculum in Turkey.
Anahtar Kelime: Türkiye ve Almanya (North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin) İlkokul İngilizce Dersi Programlarının Karşılaştırılması
Öz: Çalışmanın amacı: Karşılaştırma çalışmaları sadece programların hazırlanması esnasında değil bu programların başarılı bir şekilde uygulanmasını ve revize edilmesini sağlamak açısından da gerekli ve önemlidir. Uluslararası sınavlarda Türkiye’ye göre daha başarılı olan Almanya'daki İngilizce eğitimini, uzun yıllardır sorunlarla devam eden Türkiye'deki İngilizce eğitimi ile karşılaştırmak, bu sorunlarda programın payının ne olduğunu gösterebilir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye ve Almanya (North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin) ilkokul İngilizce dersi programlarını derinlemesine incelemek ve aralarındaki benzerlik ve farklılıkları ortaya koymaktır. Materyal ve Yöntem: Nitel çalışma yöntemlerinden doküman analizi uygulanarak yapılan bu karşılaştırmalı eğitim çalışmasında Bereday Modeli kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye ilkokul İngilizce dersi programında, Almanya ilkokul İngilizce dersi programlarından farklı olarak dil stratejileri ve kültürler arası eğitim gibi hedeflere yer verilmediği; ilkokul İngilizce dersi programlarının Almanya eyaletlerinde genel çerçeve olarak hazırlandığı ancak Türkiye’de içeriğin ünitelere ayrıldığı saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Öğretmen özerkliğini artırmak için program tasarımı revize edilmeli, Türkiye'deki ilkokul İngilizce programlarında kültürlerarası ve dil öğrenme stratejilerine ağırlık verilmelidir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Acar, A. (2019). Türkiye’deki 2013 ve 2018 İlkokullar ve ortaokullar İngilizce dersi öğretim programlarının karşılaştırılması: 7. sınıf izlencelerinin analizi [A Comparison of the 2013 and 2018 primary and secondary schools ELT curricula in Turkey: An analysis of 7th-grade syllabi]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 48 (224), 299 - 325
- Adick, C. (2018). Bereday and Hilker: Origins of the ‘four steps of comparison’ model. Comparative Education, 54 (1), 35-48, doi: 10.1080/03050068.2017.1396088
- Aksoy, E. (2020). Evaluation of the 2017 updated secondary school English curriculum of Turkey by means of theory-practice link. Turkish Journal of Education, 9 (1), 1-21.
- Aldım, Ü. F. (2018). İlkokul İngilizce öğretim programlarının karşılaştırılması (Finlandiya, Polonya ve Turkey örneği) [Comparison of primary school English curriculum (Finland, Poland and Turkey sample)]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Malatya.
- Alkan, M. F. & Arslan, M. (2014). İkinci sınıf ingilizce öğretim programının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the 2nd grade English language curriculum]. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4 (7), 87-99.
- Allemann-Ghionda, C. (2011). Comments on intercultural education in German guideliness and curricula. C. A. Grant, A. Portera (Edt.). In Intercultural and multicultural education: enhancing global interconnectedness. New York: Routledge
- Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56 (1), 57-64.
- Arnove, R. F. (2013). Arnove, R.F. (2003). Introduction: Reframing comparative education. R. F. Arnove, C. Alberto & A. Torres (Edt.) In Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp.1-24). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Atabey, E. & Bulut, İ. (2016). İlkokul ikinci sınıf ingilizce dersi öğretim programının uygulamadaki etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the effectiveness of the primary school 2nd grade English language curriculum in practice] İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 257-280. doi: 10.17679/inuefd.17366404
- Aybek, B., (2015). İlkokul ikinci sınıf İngilizce dersinin İngilizce öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine dayalı olarak değerlendirilmesi An evaluation of primary education second grade English course based upon the views of English teachers] Turkish Studies, 10 (15), 67-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8765
- Baden-Württemberg Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport (2004). Bildungsplan 2004-Grundschule. <http://www.bildungsplaenebw.de/site/bildungsplan/get/documents_E1204433591/lsbw/Bildungsplaene/Bildungsplaene2004/Bildun gsstandards/Grundschule_Bildungsplan_Gesamt.pdf> (2015, 10 June)
- Baş, G. (2011). Öğrenme stratejileri öğretiminin öğrencilerin İngilizce dersindeki akademik başarılarına, tutumlarına ve bilişötesi farkındalık düzeylerine etkisi [The effect of teaching learning strategies in an English lesson on students’ achievement, attitudes, and metacognitive awareness] Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5 (1), 49-71.
- Berlin Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Sport (2006). Rahmenlehrplan für die grundschule und die sekundarstufe i-jahrgangsstufe 3-6- grundschule-jahrgangsstufe 7-10-hauptschule, realschule, gesamtschule, gymnasium-Englisch 1./2. Fremdsprache. <https://www.berlin.de/sen/bildung/unterricht/faecher-rahmenlehrplaene/rahmenlehrplaene/mdb-sen-bildung-schulorganisationlehrplaene- gr_englisch.pdf> (2015, 10 June)
- Bliesener, U., (1998). Foreign language teaching in Germany. I. Tapia, G. M. Blochmann (Edt.) In Education and science (pp.2-32). Collected works serials (022) Reports – descriptive, 141.
- Brumfit, C. (2002). Global English and language teaching in the twenty-first century. Occasional paper. Centre for Language in Education, Research & Graduate School of Education, University of Southhampton.
- Buttjes, D. (1991). Mediating languages and cultures: The social and intercultural dimension restored. D. Buttjes, M. Byram (Edt.) In Mediating languages and cultures: Towards an Intercultural theory of foreign language education (pp.17-32). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Büyükduman, F. İ. (2005). İlköğretim okulları İngilizce öğretmenlerinin birinci kademe İngilizce öğretim programına ilişkin görüşleri [The opinions of elementary school English teachers on the English curriculum for elementary schools] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 55–64.
- Byram, M. Esarte-Sarries, V. & Taylor, S. (1990). Cultural studies and language learning: A Research Report. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
- CEFR (2001). The CEFR Levels. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions
- Creswell, J.W. (2009). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3. Ed.). London: Sage.
- Crossley, M. (2012). Comparative education and research capacity building: Reflections on international transfer and the significance of context. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 1 (1), 4-12.
- Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Demir, O. & Duruhan, K. (2015). İlkokul 2. sınıf İngilizce dersi programı uygulamalarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views on primary school 2nd grade English lesson program Practices] International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 4 (3). ISSN: 2146 – 9466.
- Demir, Y. & Yavuz, M. (2014). Finlandiya, Japonya, Kore, Çin (Şangay) ve Türkiye’deki İngilizce dersi öğretim programlarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi [A comparative analysis of the English language curricula in Finland, Japan, Korea, China (Shanghai) and Turkey] Mediterrean Journal of Humanities, 4 (1), 115-128. doi:10.13114/MJH.201416428
- Dovring, K. (1997). English as lingua franca: double talk in globalized persuasion. London: Praeger.
- Doye, P. & Hurrell, A. (Edt.). (1997). Foreign language learning in primary schools (age 5/6 to 10/11). Germany: Council of Europe.
- Edelenbos, P., Johnstone, R. & Kubanek, A. (2006). The main pedagogical principles underlying the teaching of languages to very young learners. Languages for the children of Europe. European Commission. Final report of the EAC 89/04, Lot 1 study.
- Ekuş, B. & Babayiğit, Ö. (2013). İlkokul 2. sınıftan itibaren yabancı dil eğitimi verilmesine ilişkin sınıf ve ingilizce öğretmenlerinin görüşlerinin incelenmesi [investigation of primary school teachers’ and English teachers' views about second grade primary school foreign language education] Researcher: Social Science Studies, 1, 40-49. doi: 10.18301/rss.3
- Enever, J. & Moon, J., (2009). New global contexts for teaching primary ELT: Change and challenge. J. Enever, J. Moon, U. Raman (Eds.) In Young learner English language policy and implementation: International Perspectives (pp.5-20). Reading, UK: Garnet Publishing.
- Enever, J. & Moon, J. (2010). A global revolution? Teaching English at primary school. <https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/events/seminars> (2016, 1 October)
- EF (2014). English proficiency index for companies <http://media.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/v4/downloads/epi-c/ef-epi-cenglish- 191114.pdf > (2015, 17 April)
- EF (2015). English proficiency index for companies < http://media2.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v5/efepi- 2015-english.pdf> (2016, 17 January)
- EF (2017). English proficiency index for companies <https://www.ef.com.tr/epi/> (2018, 17 July)
- EF (2019). English proficiency index for companies <https://www.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v9/ef-epi- 2019-english.pdf> (2019, 17 February)
- Eurostat (2015). More than 80% of primary school pupils in the EU were studying a foreign language in 2013. Newsletter. 164/2015 – (2015, 24 September).
- European Commission, (2011). European strategic framework for education and training (ET 2020) Language learning at pre-primary school level: Making it efficient and sustainable. A policy handbook. <http://ec.europa.eu/languages/policy/language-policy/documents/earlylanguage- learning-handbook_en.pdf > (2015, 23 April)
- European Commission, (2014). Languages in education and training: Final country comparative analysis. <https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/experts-groups/2011-2013/languages/lang-eat_en.pdf> (2015, 10 April)
- Eurydice (2012). Avrupa’da okullarda dil öğretimi üzerine önemli veriler. <http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/143TR_HI.pdf> (2015, 10 April)
- Eurydice (2015a). Germany: Primary education. <https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/index.php/Germany:Teaching_and_Learning_in_Primary_Education#Foreign_la nguage_teaching> (2016, 6 July)
- Eurydice (2015b). Initial education for teachers working in early childhood and school education. <https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/index.php/Germany:Initial_Education_for_Teachers_Working_in_Early_Childho od_and_School_Education#First_stage_of_teacher_training:_Studies_at_a_higher_education_institution> (2016, 22 September)
- Fişne, F. N., Güngör, M. N., Guerra, L. & Gonçalves, O. (2018). A CEFR-based comparison of ELT curriculum and course books used in Turkish and Portuguese primary schools. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12 (2), 129-151.
- Fretwell, D. H. & Wheeler, A. (2001). Turkey: Secondary education and training. Washington DC: The World Bank.
- Gnutzmann, C. (2011). English language teaching in Germany: A reflection of the national and universal importance of English. G. Braine (Edt.) In Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum and practice. (ss.23-35). Routledge: New York. doi: 10.4324/9781410612861
- Göbel, K. & Helmke, A. (2010). Intercultural learning in English as foreign language instruction: The importance of teachers’ intercultural experience and the usefulness of precise instructional directives. Teaching and teacher education, 26, 1571-1582.
- Günday, R. & Aycan, A. (2018). The acquisition of intercultural communication skill in foreign language learning. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 6 (3), 533-545.
- İyitoğlu, O. & Alcı, B. (2015). A qualitative research on 2nd grade teachers’ opinions about 2nd grade English language teaching curriculum. İlköğretim Online, 14 (2), 682-696. doi: 10.17051/io.2015.73998.
- Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Florian, M. & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67 (3), 631–664. doi: 10.1111/lang.12242
- Johnstone, R. (2009). An early start: What are the key conditions for generalized success? J. Enever, J. Moon, U. Raman (Eds.) In Young Learner English language policy and implementation: International Perspectives (pp.31-43). Reading, UK: Garnet Publishing.
- Kaya, S. & Ok, A. (2016). The second grade English language curriculum: Theory-practice congruence. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6 (4), 491-512, doi: 10.14527/pegegog.2016.024.
- Kırkgöz Y. (2008). Curriculum Innovation in Turkish primary education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (4), 309–322.
- Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy at primary education in Turkey. English as an International Language Journal, 5, 176- 181.
- Kırkgöz, Y., Çelik, S. & Arıkan, A. (2016). Laying the theoretical and practical foundations for a new elementary English curriculum in Turkey: A procedural analysis, Kastamonu Education Journal, 24 (3), 1199-1212.
- Kızıldağ, A. (2009). Teaching English in Turkey: Dialogues with teachers about the challenges in public primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1 (3), 188-201.
- KMK (Kultus Minister Konferenz) (2013). Bericht “Fremdsprachen in der grundschule – Sachstand und konzeptionen. 2013”. <https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2013/2013_10_17-Fremdsprachen-in-der- Grundschule.pdf> (2015, 10 June)
- Küçüktepe, S. E., Küçüktepe, Ç. & Baykın, Y. (2014). İkinci sınıf İngilizce dersi ve öğretim programına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi [An Investigation of teachers’ views on the second grade English course and curriculum] Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (22), 55- 78.
- Merter, F., Şekerci, H. & Bozkurt, E. (2014). İngilizce öğretmenlerinin ikinci sınıf ingilizce dersine ilişkin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Assessment of the English teachers’ opinions on the second grade english classes] Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2 (5), 199-210.
- Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein – Westfalen (2008). Lehrplan Englisch für die Grundschulen des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. <https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/upload/klp_gs/GS_LP_E.pdf> (2015, 10 June)
- Neuner, G. (2002). Policy approaches to English. Council of Europe, Strasbourg. https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/NeunerEN.pdf. (2015, 20 Ağustos)
- Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues. (4. Ed.). USA: Pearson Education Inc.
- Özüdoğru, F. & Adıgüzel, O. C. (2016). The Analysis of the views of English teachers about 2nd grade English language teaching curriculum, EInternational Journal of Educational Research, 7 (2), 16-35. doi: 10.19160/e-ijer.12341.
- Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative education: Method. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1 (4), 304-319.
- Solak, E. & Semerci, H. (2015). İkinci sınıfta İngilizce öğretimine yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşleri [The views of English teachers and students towards learning English at the second grade of elementary schools] Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi, 16, 1-23.
- Şad, S. N. & Karaova, M. (2015). İlkokul ikinci sınıf İngilizce dersi bağlamında dinleme becerisi öğretimi: Bir durum çalışması [Teaching listening skill within the context of primary school 2nd grade English course: A case study] Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3 (2), 66-95. doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.3c2s4m.
- TEDMEM (2013). Aynı şeyi Yapıp Farklı Sonuç Beklemek (!).<https://tedmem.org/mem-notlari/gorus/einsteinin-turkiyedeki-yabanci-dil-egitimihakkindaki- gorusu> (2018, 8 August)
- TELC & MEB (2013). Diller için Avrupa Ortak Öneriler Çerçevesi Öğrenim, Öğretim ve Değerlendirme [Common European Framework of Reference for Languages Learning, Teaching and Assessment] <http://www.telc.net/fileadmin/user_upload/Publikationen/Diller_iain_Avrupa_Ortak_oneriler_AEeraevesi.pdf> (2015, 15 April)
- Temizyürek, F. & Birinci, F. G. (2016). Yabancı dil öğretiminde otantik materyal kullanımı [Using authentic materials in foreign language teaching] Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (1), 54-62.
- TEPAV (2014). Türkiye’deki devlet okullarında İngilizce dilinin öğretimine ilişkin ulusal ihtiyaç analizi [National Needs Analysis on the Teaching of English Language in Public Schools in Turkey] <http://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/13993885191.Turkiyedeki_Devlet_Okullarinda_Ingilizce_Dilinin_Ogrenimine_Iliskin_Ulusal_Ihti yac_Analizi.pdf> (2015, 15 April)
- Theisen, G. & Adams, D. (1990). Comparative education research. R. Murray Thomas (Ed.) In International comparative education, practices, issues and prospects (pp.277-301). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Topkaya, E. Z. & Küçük, Ö. (2010). An evaluation of the 4th and 5th grade English language teaching program. Elementary Education Online, 9 (1), 52-65.
- TTKB (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (İlkokullar ve ortaokullar) İngilizce dersi (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. <http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72> (2015, 15 February)
- Wojniak, J. (2018) George Z. F. Bereday (Zygmunt Fijałkowski) and his comparative method in educational research. SHS Web of Conferences, 48, 01050, 1-13. ERPA International Congresses on Education 2018. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20184801050
- Yaşar, Ö. (2015). İlkokul 2. sınıf Fun with Teddy İngilizce ders kitabının öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of Fun With Teddy 2nd grade English textbook in accordance with the teachers’ views] Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 19 (1), 329-348.
- Yıldıran, Ç. & Tanrıseven, I. (2015). İngilizce öğretmenlerinin ilkokul 2. sınıf İngilizce dersi öğretim programı hakkındaki görüşleri. International Journal of Language Academy, 3 (1), 210/223.
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (5.ed.) Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
- Yurdabakan, İ. (2011). Yapılandırmacı kuramın değerlendirmeye bakışı: Eğitimde alternatif değerlendirme yöntemleri [The view of constructivist theory on assessment: Alternative assessment methods in education] Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44 (1), 51-77.
| APA | inci s (2021). Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). , 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| Chicago | inci sibel Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). (2021): 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| MLA | inci sibel Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). , 2021, ss.152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| AMA | inci s Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). . 2021; 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| Vancouver | inci s Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). . 2021; 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| IEEE | inci s "Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin)." , ss.152 - 168, 2021. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| ISNAD | inci, sibel. "Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin)". (2021), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| APA | inci s (2021). Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(1), 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| Chicago | inci sibel Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 29, no.1 (2021): 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| MLA | inci sibel Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, vol.29, no.1, 2021, ss.152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| AMA | inci s Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2021; 29(1): 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| Vancouver | inci s Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2021; 29(1): 152 - 168. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| IEEE | inci s "Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin)." Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29, ss.152 - 168, 2021. 10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
| ISNAD | inci, sibel. "Comparison of Primary School English Language Curricula of Turkey and Germany (North Rhine- Westphalia, Baden Württemberg, Berlin)". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 29/1 (2021), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.739898 |
