Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 30 - 38 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.33409/tbbbd.881352 İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri

Öz:
Organik materyaller toprakların sürdürülebilir olmasında önemli yer tutmaktadır. Toprağa organik madde kaynağı olarak ilaveedilen birçok materyal, karbonun toprakta tutulması ve depolanması gibi doğrudan olumlu etkisinin yanında toprağın fiziksel,kimyasal ve biyolojik özelliklerini iyileştirici etkiye sahiptir. Organik toprak düzenleyici olarak en çok tercih edilen materyallerdenbiri olan leonardit; organik maddelerin kömürleşme süreçlerinden etkilenmeyerek oksitlenmesiyle oluşan ve humik asitçe zengindoğal bir materyaldir. Humik asitçe zengin olması ve yüksek karbon içeriği, toprak ıslahı ve bitkisel üretim açısından önemli bir yertutmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Kayseri-Develi (DL) ve Çanakkale-Yenice (YL) olmak üzere iki farklı bölgeden temin edilen leonarditinkumlu tın (SL) bünyeye sahip toprağın bazı özeliklerine kısa süreli etkilerini tespit etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla leonarditçeşitleri beş farklı dozda (%4, %8, %12, %16, %20) kumlu tın (SL) bünyeye sahip toprak ile karıştırılarak üç ay inkübe edilmiştir.İnkübasyon süresi sonunda tüm uygulamalar için toprağın organik maddesi (OM), toprak reaksiyonu (pH), elektriksel iletkenliği(EC), kireç içeriği (CaCO3), kuru hacim ağırlığı (dB), hidrolik iletkenliği (Ks), agregat stabilitesi (AS) ve boşluk hacmi (P) gibiözellikleri belirlenerek leonarditlerin etkisi araştırılmıştır. Uygulanan dozlara bakılmaksızın her iki leonardit uygulamasıylakontrole göre EC (%236), OM (%213), AS (%50), P (%11) artarken, dB (%10) azalmıştır (p≤0.05). Buna rağmen diğerparametrelerdeki değişimler (pH, CaCO3, Ks) istatistiksel olarak önemsiz bulunmuştur (p≥0.05). Genel olarak leonardit çeşidininincelenen parametreler üzerine etkisinin önemsiz (p≥0.05) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Organik Madde Leonardit Porozite Toprak Agregat Stabilitesi

The effects of organic materials obtained from different sources on some properties of sandy loam soil

Öz:
The addition of organic materials to the soil is important due to the sustainability of soil resources and their positive contribution to soil properties. Many materials that are added to the soil as a source of organic matter have direct positive effects, such as storing and storing carbon in the soil, as well as improving the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil. Leonardite is one of the most preferred organic soil conditioner, which is rich in humic acid and formed by oxidizing organic materials without being affected by carbonization processes. Due to having high humic acid and carbon content, it has an important place in terms of soil improvement and vegetative production. This study was carried out to determine the short-term effects of leonardite obtained from two different sources ((Kayseri-Develi (DL) and Çanakkale-Yenice (YL)) on some properties of the soil with sandy loam (SL). For this purpose, each leonardite type was mixed with sandy loam (SL) soil at the rate of five different doses (4%, 8%, 12%, 16%, 20%) and they were incubated for three months. Soil organic matter (OM), soil reaction (pH), electrical conductivity (EC), lime content (CaCO3), bulk density (dB), saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), aggregate stability (AS) and total porosity (P) of mixtures were determined at the end of the incubation period to investigate the effects of leonardite. Leonardite applications increased EC (236%), OM (213%), AS (50%) and P (11%) while decreased dB (10%) compared to control (p≤0.05). However, changes in other parameters (pH, CaCO3, Ks) were not found significant statistically (p≥ 0.05). In general, it was determined that the effect of the leonardite type on the parameters investigated was not significant (p≥ 0.05).
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acosta-Martínez V, Zobeck TM, Gill TE, Kennedy AC, 2003. Enzyme activities and microbial community structure in semiarid agricultural soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 38:216–227.
  • Ahmad I, Ali S, Khan KS, Hassan F, Bashir K, 2015. Use of coal derived humic acid as soil conditioner to improve soil physical properties and wheat yield. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 5: 268-275.
  • Allison LE, Richards LA, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (No. 60). Soil and Water Conservative Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
  • Amoozegar A, Warrick AW, 1986. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils: field methods. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods 5: 735–770.
  • Arshad MA, Martin S, 2002. Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 88:153–160.
  • Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Masiello CA, Liu Z, Dugan B, 2014. Biochar-Induced Changes in Soil Hydraulic Conductivity and Dissolved Nutrient Fluxes Constrained by Laboratory Experiments. PLOS ONE 9:e108340.
  • Barral MT, Arias M, Guerif J, 1998. Effects of iron and organic matter on the porosity and structural stability of soil aggregates. Soil and Tillage Research 46:261–272.
  • Blair N, Faulkner RD, Till AR, Korschens M, Schulz, E, 2006a. Long-term management impacts on soil C, N and physical fertility: Part II: Bad Lauchstadt static and extreme FYM experiments. Soil and Tillage Research 91(1-2),39–47.
  • Blair N, Faulkner RD, Till AR, Poulton PR, 2006b. Long-term management impacts on soil C, N and physical fertility: Part I: Broadbalk experiment. Soil and Tillage Research 91(1-2): 30–38.
  • Blake GR, 1965. Bulk density. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling 9:374–390.
  • Bouyoucos GJ, 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils 1. Agronomy Journal 43:434–438.
  • Chaney K, Swift RS, 1984. The influence of organic matter on aggregate stability in some British soils. Journal of Soil Science 35:223–230.
  • Ciarkowska K, Sołek-Podwika K, Filipek-Mazur B, Tabak M, 2017. Comparative effects of lignite-derived humic acids and FYM on soil properties and vegetable yield. Geoderma 303:85–92.
  • Ece A, Saltali K, Eryiǧit N, Uysal F, 2007. The effects of leonardite applications on climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield and the some soil properties. Journal of Agronomy 6:480–483.
  • Guo L, Wu G, Li Y, Li C, Liu W, Meng J, Liu H, Yu X, Jiang G, 2016. Effects of cattle manure compost combined with chemical fertilizer on topsoil organic matter, bulk density and earthworm activity in a wheat–maize rotation system in Eastern China. Soil and Tillage Research 156:140–147.
  • Hemmat A, Aghilinategh N, Rezainejad Y, Sadeghi M, 2010. Long-term impacts of municipal solid waste compost, sewage sludge and farmyard manure application on organic carbon, bulk density and consistency limits of a calcareous soil in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research 108:43–50.
  • Herath HMSK, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M, 2013. Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: An Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma 209–210:188–197.
  • İlay R, Erarslan G, Kavdır Y, 2019. Co-composting of olive pomace and fish wastes and use in soil improvement. Anadolu Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 34:201–209.
  • İlay R, Kavdır Y, 2018. Impact of land cover types on soil aggregate stability and erodibility. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 525.
  • Kavdır Y, Killi D, 2008. Influence of olive oil solid waste applications on soil pH, electrical conductivity, soil nitrogen transformations, carbon content and aggregate stability. Bioresource Technology 99:2326–2332.
  • Kavdır Y, Ekinci H, Yüksel O, Mermut AR, 2005. Soil aggregate stability and 13C CP/MAS-NMR assessment of organic matter in soils influenced by forest wildfires in Canakkale, Turkey. Geoderma 129:219–229.
  • Kemper WD, Rosenau RC, 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods 5:425–442.
  • Lado M, Paz A, Ben-Hur M, 2004. Organic Matter and Aggregate-Size Interactions in Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:234–242.
  • Li Y, Fang F, Wei J, et al, 2019. Humic Acid Fertilizer Improved Soil Properties and Soil Microbial Diversity of Continuous Cropping Peanut: A Three-Year Experiment. Scientific Reports 9:1–9.
  • Marinari S, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Grego S, 2000. Influence of organic and mineral fertilisers on soil biological and physical properties. Bioresource Technology 72:9–17.
  • Nemes A, Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA, 2005. Influence of Organic Matter on the Estimation of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:1330–1337.
  • Obi ME, Ebo PO, 1995. The effects of organic and inorganic amendments on soil physical properties and maize production in a severely degraded sandy soil in southern Nigeria. Bioresource Technology 51:117–123.
  • Pekcan T, Esetlili BÇ, Turan HS, Aydoğdu E, 2018. Leonardit kökenli organik materyallerin bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 32(1): 31-41
  • Pritchett K, Kennedy AC, Cogger CG, 2011. Management effects on soil quality in organic vegetable systems in western Washington. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75:605–615.
  • Rasool R, Kukal SS, Hira GS, 2008. Soil organic carbon and physical properties as affected by long-term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizers in maize–wheat system. Soil and Tillage Research 101:31–36.
  • Schlichting E, Blume HP, 1966. Bodenkundliches Praktikum: Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.
  • Schumacher BA, 2002. Methods for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in soils and sediments.
  • Smith HW, Weldon MD, 1941. A Comparison of Some Methods for the Determination of Soil Organic Matter 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal 5:177–182.
  • Toková L, Igaz D, Horák J, Aydin E, 2020. Effect of Biochar Application and Re-Application on Soil Bulk Density, Porosity, Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Water Content and Soil Water Availability in a Silty Loam Haplic Luvisol. Agronomy 10 (7):1005.
  • Whitbread AM, Blair GJ, Lefroy RDB, 2000. Managing legume leys, residues and fertilisers to enhance the sustainability of wheat cropping systems in Australia: 2. Soil physical fertility and carbon. Soil and Tillage Research 54:77–89.
APA ilay R, Aktaş M, Aslantekin N, Özcan H (2021). Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. , 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
Chicago ilay Remzi,Aktaş Meltem,Aslantekin Nuri Burak,Özcan Hasan Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. (2021): 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
MLA ilay Remzi,Aktaş Meltem,Aslantekin Nuri Burak,Özcan Hasan Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. , 2021, ss.30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
AMA ilay R,Aktaş M,Aslantekin N,Özcan H Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. . 2021; 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
Vancouver ilay R,Aktaş M,Aslantekin N,Özcan H Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. . 2021; 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
IEEE ilay R,Aktaş M,Aslantekin N,Özcan H "Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri." , ss.30 - 38, 2021. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
ISNAD ilay, Remzi vd. "Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri". (2021), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.33409/tbbbd.881352
APA ilay R, Aktaş M, Aslantekin N, Özcan H (2021). Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 9(1), 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
Chicago ilay Remzi,Aktaş Meltem,Aslantekin Nuri Burak,Özcan Hasan Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi 9, no.1 (2021): 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
MLA ilay Remzi,Aktaş Meltem,Aslantekin Nuri Burak,Özcan Hasan Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, vol.9, no.1, 2021, ss.30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
AMA ilay R,Aktaş M,Aslantekin N,Özcan H Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi. 2021; 9(1): 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
Vancouver ilay R,Aktaş M,Aslantekin N,Özcan H Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi. 2021; 9(1): 30 - 38. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
IEEE ilay R,Aktaş M,Aslantekin N,Özcan H "Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri." Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 9, ss.30 - 38, 2021. 10.33409/tbbbd.881352
ISNAD ilay, Remzi vd. "Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen organik materyalin kumlu tın bünyeli toprağın bazı özellikleri üzerine etkileri". Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi 9/1 (2021), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.33409/tbbbd.881352