Although the main sources of Islamic law are the Qurʾān and Sunna, there are methodological differences among the scholars regarding the rulings of the words mentioned in these sources. This point which also shows the difference between the two main methods that exist in the fiqh method is particularly evident between Ḥanafīs and others. One of the differences in this method is the issue related to the declaration of sensitive statements. According to the Ḥanafī method understanding, which is also called the method of exemption, it is accepted that even if the hadiths are used for in forming absolute words as evidence, they cannot be able to confiscate the verbal signs of meaning. According to the method known as the method of the trustee, it is accepted that the news will be conquered by the news revelation, whose position is lower than him. This method influenced the difference in jurisprudence and was effective in making different provisions. In this study, it is trying to explain the reflection of these two different methods to the jurisprudence on the subject of the word of truth.