SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ

Sema YİĞİT (Ordu Üniversitesi, Ordu, Türkiye)
Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
15 2
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 641 - 658 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448 İndeks Tarihi: 15-11-2021

SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ

Öz:
Bu çalışma, sosyal girişimcilik aktivitesi ile ülkelerin ulusal kültürü arasındakiilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. 2015 Küresel Girişimcilik İzleme (GEM)çalışmasından elde edilen Sosyal Girişimcilik Etkinliği (SEA) endeksleri, ikiboyutta (Başlangıç aşamasında yeni başlayan girişimciler arasında genel sosyalgirişimcilik aktivitesinin ortalama yaygınlık oranı (SEA-SU-BRD) ve halenfaaliyet göstermekte olan bir sosyal girişimcilik faaliyetine liderlik eden bireylerinortalama yaygınlık oranı (SEA-OP-BRD)) ülkelerin sosyal girişimcilikfaaliyetinin bir göstergesi olarak kullanılmıştır. Ülkeler arası kültürel karşılaştırmayapmak için Hofstede, GLOBE projesi ve Schwartz’ın oluşturduğu üç kültürelçerçeveden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırılmak istenen ilişkileri ortaya çıkarmak içinkorelasyon analizlerinden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre elde edilen en önemlisonuç üç kültürel çerçevenin boyutları ile SEA-SU-BRD’nin ilişkisininbulunamamasıdır. Yine az sayıda alt boyutun SEA-OP-BRD ile ilişkisibulunmuştur. Bu bağlamda girişimcilik kültüründen bahsedildiği gibi bir sosyalgirişimcilik kültüründen bahsetmenin oldukça zor olduğu söylenebilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

THE ROLE OF NATIONAL CULTURE IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Öz:
This paper aims to investigate the relationship between social entrepreneurship activity and the national culture of a country. The Social Entrepreneurship Effectiveness (SEA) indices from the 2015 Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring (GEM) study have been used as indicators of a country’s social entrepreneurship activity in two dimensions (The average prevalence rate of broad social entrepreneurial activity among nascent entrepreneurs in the start-up phase (SEASU-BRD) and the average prevalence rate of individuals who are currently leading an operating social entrepreneurial activity (SEA-OP-BRD)). The three cultural frameworks created by Hofstede, the GLOBE project, and Schwartz have been used to make cultural comparisons between countries. Correlation analyses have been utilized to reveal the relationships that were desired to be investigated. The most important result obtained according to the findings is that the relationship between the dimensions of the three cultural frameworks and the SEA-SU-BRD is not found. Again, a small number of sub-dimensions were found to be associated with SEA-OP-BRD. In this context, it can be said that it is difficult to talk about “social entrepreneurship culture” like entrepreneurship culture.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei–Skillern, J. (2006), Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), s.1-22.
  • Bercovitch, J., & Elgström, O. (2011), Culture and International Mediation. J. Bercovitch içinde, Theory and Practice of International Mediation: Selected Essays (s. 228-246). New York: Routledge.
  • Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018), Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), s.1469–1505.
  • Bosma, N., Schøtt, T., Terjesen, S., & Kew, P. (2016), Special Topic Report Social entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2015- report-on-social-entrepreneurship, (Erişim tarihi:01.09.2019).
  • Calza, F., Cannavale, C., & Nadali, I. Z. (2020). How Do Cultural Values Influence Entrepreneurial Behavior of Nations? A Behavioral Reasoning Approach. International Business Review, 29(5),1-13.
  • Coker, K. K., Flight, R. L., & Valle, K. N. (2017), Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of National Leadership Culture, Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 19(2), s.125-139.
  • Cronk, L. (2017), Culture’s Influence on Behavior: Steps Toward a Theory. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), s.36-52.
  • Davidsson, P. (1995), Culture, Structure and Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(1), s.41-62.
  • Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1997), Values, Beliefs and Regional Variations in New Firm Formation Rates, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2-3), s.179-199.
  • Dees, J. G. (1998, Ekim 31), The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEnt repreneurship_2001.pdf, (Erişim tarihi:05.09.2019).
  • Gampelaere, C. V. (2016), The Role Of Culture in Cross-Border M&A. S. C. Whitaker içinde, Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions (s. 139- 164), New Jersey: Wiley.
  • GLOBE. (2019, Ekim 15), About the Studies. Global Leadership & Organizational Behaviour Effectiveness: https://globeproject.com/studies, (Erişim tarihi:01.08.2019).
  • Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002), National Culture and Entrepreneurship: A Review of Behavioral Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), s.33-52.
  • Hechavarría, D. M. (2015), The Impact of Culture on National Prevalence Rates of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), s.1025-1052.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (2011), Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&co ntext=orpc, (Erişim tarihi:04.09.2019).
  • House, R. J., & Javidan, M. (2004), Overview of GLOBE. R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta içinde, Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (s. 9-28), Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2014), Culture, Entrepreneurship and Uneven Development: A Spatial Analysis, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(9-10), s.726–752.
  • Jaén, I., Fernández-Serrano, J., Santos, F. J., & Liñán, F. (2017), Cultural Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Cross-Country Efficiency Analysis. M. Peris-Ortiz, F. Teulon, & D. Bonet-Fernandez içinde, Social Entrepreneurship in Non-Profit and Profit Sectors (s. 31-51), Valencia: Springer.
  • Jones, G., Chace, B. C., & Wright, J. (2020). Impact of Diversity on Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(3),323- 343.
  • Kedmenec, I., & Strašek, S. (2017), Are Some Cultures More Favourable For Social Entrepreneurship Than Others? Economic Research, 30(1),s.1461-1476.
  • Kickul, J., & Lyons, T. S. (2012), Understanding Social Entrepreneurship, New York: Routledge.
  • Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000), Culture, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Global Competitiveness, Journal of World Business, 35(4),s.401-416.
  • Liñán, F., & Fernández-Serrano, J. (2014), National Culture, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: Different Patterns Across The European Union, Small Business Economics, 42(4),s.685-701.
  • Liñán, F., Jaén, I., & Ortega, F. J. (2015), Understanding the Role of Culture and Economic Conditions in Entrepreneurship. M. PerisOrtiz, & J. M. Merigó-Lindahl içinde, Entrepreneurship, Regional Develeopment and Culture (s. 53-74), New York: Springer.
  • Mair, J. (2010), Social Entrepreneurship: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead . A. Fayolle, & H. Matlay içinde, Handbook of Research on Social Entrepreneurship (s. 15-28), Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006), Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight, Journal of World Business, 41(1), s.36-44.
  • Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007), Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, s.29-39.
  • McGrath, A. R., MacMillan, I. C., Yang, E. A.-Y., & Tsai, W. (1992), Does Culture Endure, or Is It Malleable? Issues for Entrepreneurial Economic Development, Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6),s.441- 458.
  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992), More Like Each Other Than Anyone Else? A Cross-Cultural Study of Entrepreneurial Perception, Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), s.419-429.
  • McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., & Scheinberg, S. (1992), Elitists, riskTakers, and Rugged Individualists? An Exploratory Analysis of Cultural Differences Between Entrepreneurs and NonEntrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), s.115-135.
  • Minkov, M. (2013), Cross-Cultural Analysis: The Science and Art of Comparing the World's Modern Socities and Their Culture, London: Sage.
  • Mitchell, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., & Morse, E. A. (2000), Cross-Cultural Cognitions and the Venture Creation Decision, The Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), s.974-993.
  • Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994), Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Importance of Individualism versus Collectivism, Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), s.65-89.
  • Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001), Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), s.51-75.
  • Nicholls, A. (2006), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nicholls, A., & Cho, A. H. (2006), Social Entrepreneurship: The Structuration of a Field. A. Nicholls içinde, Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change (s. 99- 118). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2014), Collectivism and Trust: Influence On Socıal And Commerical Entrpreneurship, Babsons College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, (s. 1-24). London.
  • Puumalainen, K., Syrjä, P., Sjögrén, H., & Barraket, J. (2015), Comparing Social Entrepreneurship Across Nations: An Exploratory Study of İnstitutional Effects, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(4),s.276–287.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994), Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Y. içinde, Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (Cross Cultural Research and Methodology) (s. 85-119). California: Sage.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1999), A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work . Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), s.23-47 .
  • Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009), Research In Social Entrepreneurship: Past Contrıbutıons and Future Opportunities, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), s.161-194.
  • Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010), Performance-based vs Socially Supportive Culture: A Cross-national Study of Descriptive Norms and Entrepreneurship, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), s.1347–1364.
  • Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000), A Case for Comparative Entrepreneurship: Assessing the Relevance of Culture, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), s.287-301.
  • Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002), Cultural Influences on Personality, Annual Reviews of Psychology, 53(1), s.133-60.
  • Waddock, S. A., & Post, J. E. (1991), Social Entepreneurs and Catalytic Change, Public Administration Review, 51(5), s.393-401.
  • Zahra, A. S., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009), A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes and Ethical Challenges, Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), s.519- 532.
  • Zhao, X., Li, H., & Rauch, A. (2012), Cross-Country Differences in Entrepreneurial Activity: The Role of Cultural Practice and National Wealth, Frontiers of Business Research in China, 6(4), s.447–474 .
APA Yiğit S (2020). SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. , 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
Chicago Yiğit Sema SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. (2020): 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
MLA Yiğit Sema SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. , 2020, ss.641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
AMA Yiğit S SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. . 2020; 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
Vancouver Yiğit S SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. . 2020; 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
IEEE Yiğit S "SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ." , ss.641 - 658, 2020. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
ISNAD Yiğit, Sema. "SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ". (2020), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
APA Yiğit S (2020). SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(3), 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
Chicago Yiğit Sema SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 20, no.3 (2020): 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
MLA Yiğit Sema SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol.20, no.3, 2020, ss.641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
AMA Yiğit S SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020; 20(3): 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
Vancouver Yiğit S SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020; 20(3): 641 - 658. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
IEEE Yiğit S "SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ." Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, ss.641 - 658, 2020. 10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
ISNAD Yiğit, Sema. "SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİKTE ULUSAL KÜLTÜRÜN ROLÜ". Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 20/3 (2020), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i56819.638448
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 20:6

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları