Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 7 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103 İndeks Tarihi: 21-11-2021

Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale

Öz:
Objective: Osteoporosis is a bone disease that increases the risk of fractures. One out of every two women and one out of every five men are at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures during their lifetime. Bone loss can be prevented by taking precautions in every phase of life. To avoid the serious consequences of osteoporosis, healthy behaviours should be supported using theories of health behaviour as a framework.This study aimed to develop protection against osteoporotic fractures (PROF) scale and to test its validity and reliability.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted among >55-year-old female outpatients who were admitted to the orthopaedic clinics of Zonguldak Atatürk Public Hospital. Test-retest was applied via face-to-face interviews. The sample size was calculated to be 10 times the number of scale items, resulting in a sample of 400 participants. The theory of planned behaviour provided the theoretical framework for the PROF scale development. Four strategies have been selected for PROF: (1) Bone mineral density measurement, (2) adherence to treatment, (3) physical exercise and (4) regulations to prevent falls at home.Results: Factor and matrix correlations of the scale ranged from 0.68 to 0.130. Test-retest reliability of the whole scale was 0.95. Cronbach’s α value was found to be 0.95. A strong and statistically significant positive correlation was noted between attitudes and subjective norms pertaining to PROF (r=0.520; 0.525; p=0.01, respectively). A moderate and statistically significant positive correlation was noted between intention and behaviour control (r=0.462; p=0.01).Conclusion: The PROF scale was found to be highly valid and reliable. It can be a part of the public health model aimed at preventing osteoporotic fractures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Osteoporotik Kırıktan Korunma Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Osteoporoz kırık oluşma olasılığının arttığı bir kemik hastalığıdır. Her iki kadından biri, her beş erkekten biri hayatlarının bir döneminde osteoporoz ile ilgili kırık riski altındadır. Her dönemde önlemler alarak kemik kaybı önlenebilir. Osteoporozun ciddi sonuçlarından korunmak için sağlık davranış teorileri ile sağlık davranışı desteklenmesi gerekir. Bu çalışmada amaç osteoporotik kırıktan korunma (PROF) ölçeğini geliştirmek, geçerlilik ve güvenirliliği göstermektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma Zonguldak Atatürk Devlet Hastanesi’nin Ortopedi Polikliniği’ne ayaktan başvuran 55 yaş üstündeki kadınlarda yürütülmüştür. Yüz yüze görüşme tekniği kullanılarak test re-test yapılmıştır. Örneklem seçilmeden, örneklem sayısı madde sayısının on katı olarak 400 hesaplanmıştır. Planlı davranış teorisi model olarak alınmıştır. Niyet ve davranış bağımlı değişkenlerdir. Tutum, öznel norm ve davranış kontrolü bağımsız değişkenlerdir. PROF’de dört strateji: 1) Kemik mineral yoğunluğu ölçümü, 2) tedaviye uyum, 3) fiziksel egzersiz ve 4) evde düşmeyi önleyecek düzenlemeler seçilmiştir. Bulgular: PROF niyeti ile tutum ve öznel norm arasında istatistiksel olarak pozitif yönde, güçlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır (sırasıyla r=0,520; 0,525; p=0,01). Davranış kontrolü ile niyet arasında istatistiksel olarak pozitif yönde, orta güçte ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır (r=0,462; p=0,01). Güvenirlilik Cronbach α değeri 0,95’dir. Sonuç: PROF için geliştirilen ölçek yüksek güvenirlilik ve geçerliliğe sahiptir. Osteoporotik kırıklarla mücadelede halk sağlığı modellerinin bir parçası olabilir
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. WHO Scientific group on the assessment of osteoporosis at primary health care level. Summary Meeting Report. Brussels, Belgium, 5-7 May 2004. http://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.
  • 2. Elffors I, Allander E, Kanis JA, Gullberg B, Johnell O, Dequeker J, et al. The variable incidence of hip fracture in southern Europe: the MEDOS Study. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:253-63.
  • 3. Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA, Allander E, Elffors L, Dequeker J, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1802-15.
  • 4. O’Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, Bernaards C, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18-65 years: a socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health 2016;16:163.
  • 5. Mark S, Link H. Reducing osteoporosis: prevention during childhood and adolescence. Bull World Health Organ 1999;77:423- 4.
  • 6. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991:50;179-211.
  • 7. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, et al. Constructing Questionnaires Based On The Theory Of Planned Behaviour: A Manual For Health Services Researchers. Newcastle: Centre for Health Services Research University press; 2004.
  • 8. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Milton-Keynes, England Open University Press: McGraw-Hill International; 2005.
  • 9. Cialdini RB. Influence: Science and practice. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
  • 10. Kallgren CA, Reno RR, Cialdini RB. A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000;26:1002-12.
  • 11. Büyüköztürk S. Scientific Research Methods. Series of Educational Classics. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing; 2013.
  • 12. Büyüköztürk S, Çokluk O, Köklü N. Statistics for Social Sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing / Publishing House General Series; 2010.
  • 13. Eser E, Fidaner H, Fidaner C, Yalçin Eser S, Elbi H, Göker E. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-100 and WHOOOLBREF.3P Psychiatry Psychology Psychopharmacology Journal 1999;7:23-40.
  • 14. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Reliability and validity in the scales. Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine 2004;30:211-6 .
  • 15. Czerwiński E, Badurski JE, Marcinowska-Suchowierska E, Osieleniec J. Current understanding of osteoporosis according to the position of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Osteoporosis Foundation. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007;9:337- 56.
  • 16. Recommendation-Summary/Osteoporosis-Screening. USPSTF U.S Preventive Services Task Force. Original Release Date: January 2011. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Last Access date: 27.12.2018
  • 17. Valois P, Desharnais R, Godin G. A comparison of the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitudinal models for the prediction of exercise intention and behavior. J Behav Med 1988;11:459-72.
  • 18. NOF’s Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. https://my.nof.org/bone-source/education/ clinicians-guide-to-the-prevention-and-treatment-of-osteoporosis List of Updates: 2015.11.11. Last Access date: 27.12.2018.
APA AYDIN S, KURÇER M, erdoğan z (2021). Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. , 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
Chicago AYDIN Sultan,KURÇER Mehmet Ali,erdoğan zeynep Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. (2021): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
MLA AYDIN Sultan,KURÇER Mehmet Ali,erdoğan zeynep Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. , 2021, ss.1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
AMA AYDIN S,KURÇER M,erdoğan z Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. . 2021; 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
Vancouver AYDIN S,KURÇER M,erdoğan z Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. . 2021; 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
IEEE AYDIN S,KURÇER M,erdoğan z "Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale." , ss.1 - 7, 2021. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
ISNAD AYDIN, Sultan vd. "Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale". (2021), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
APA AYDIN S, KURÇER M, erdoğan z (2021). Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, 27(1), 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
Chicago AYDIN Sultan,KURÇER Mehmet Ali,erdoğan zeynep Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 27, no.1 (2021): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
MLA AYDIN Sultan,KURÇER Mehmet Ali,erdoğan zeynep Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, vol.27, no.1, 2021, ss.1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
AMA AYDIN S,KURÇER M,erdoğan z Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi. 2021; 27(1): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
Vancouver AYDIN S,KURÇER M,erdoğan z Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi. 2021; 27(1): 1 - 7. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
IEEE AYDIN S,KURÇER M,erdoğan z "Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale." Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, 27, ss.1 - 7, 2021. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103
ISNAD AYDIN, Sultan vd. "Development of the Protection Against Osteoporotic Fractures Scale". Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 27/1 (2021), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4274/tod.galenos.2020.42103