Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 65 - 73 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204 İndeks Tarihi: 23-11-2021

The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements

Öz:
Aim: This study aims to research the association of metabolic syndrome components with anthropometric measurements like arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waisthip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, which are applied rarely. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 patients in November-December 2019. The arm circumference, neck circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, and body mass index measurements of the patients were made. Glucose, highdensity lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure measurements were also recorded. The association between metabolic syndrome components and anthropometric measurements was analyzed. Results: Metabolic syndrome is diagnosed in 32.8% of the participants. According to body mass index, 18.6% of the patients were normal, 34.2% were overweight, and 47.2% were obese. There was a significant difference between the patients with and without metabolic syndrome in terms of laboratory parameters, blood pressure values, and anthropometric measurements. In the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, optimal cut-off values for arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waisthip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio were determined as 31.75 (AUC=0.703), 34.85 (AUC=0.763), 113.75 (AUC=0.757), 0.90 (AUC=0.701), 0.61 (AUC=0.769) for females while they were 35.75 (AUC=0.573), 39.75 (AUC=0.795), 111.5 (AUC=0.607), 0.96 (AUC=0.888), 0.61 (AUC=0.888) for males respectively. Conclusion: A significant correlation was detected between arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, and metabolic syndrome components. However, low-density lipoprotein was not correlated with neck circumference and high-density lipoprotein with waist-to-height ratio.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Forsén B, Lahti K, Nissén M, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2001;24(4):683-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.683.
  • 2. Tasan E. Identification, evaluation and epidemiology of obesity. Turkiye Klinikleri J Int Med Sci 2005;1(37):1- 4.
  • 3. Tezcan S, Altintaş H, Sönmez R, Akinci A, Doğan B, Cakir B, et al Cardiovascular risk factor levels in a lower middle-class community in Ankara, Turkey. Trop Med Int Health 2003;8(7):660-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 3156.2003.01057.x.
  • 4. Schneider HJ, Glaesmer H, Klotsche J, Böhler S, Lehnert H, Zeiher AM, et al. Accuracy of anthropometric indicators of obesity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92(2):589-94. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0254.
  • 5. Luo Y, Ma X, Shen Y, Xu Y, Xiong Q, Zhang X, et al. Neck circumference as an effective measure for identifying cardio-metabolic syndrome: a comparison with waist circumference. Endocrine 2017;55(3):822- 830. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1151-y.
  • 6. Altuntas Y, Gunbey KS, Bayazit AD, Argon A, Kozok K, Karaca C, et al. Evaluation of body anthropometry and secretion of early phase insulin in obesity. HaVHNL TÕS BOWHQL 1999;37(2):95-101.
  • 7. Huang BX, Zhu MF, Wu T, Zhou JY, Liu Y, Chen XL, et al. Neck circumference, along with other anthropometric indices, has an independent and additional contribution in predicting fatty liver disease. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0118071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118071.
  • 8. Shi J, Yang Z, Niu Y, Zhang W, Li X, Zhang H, et al. Large mid-upper arm circumference is associated with metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and elderly individuals: a community-based study. BMC Endocr Disord 2020;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00559-8.
  • 9. Ogbera AO. Prevalence and gender distribution of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2010;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-1.
  • 10.Kozan O, Oguz A, Abaci A, Erol C, Ongen Z, Temizhan A, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Turkish adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007;61(4):548-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602554.
  • 11.Day C. Metabolic syndrome, or what you will: definitions and epidemiology. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2007;4(1):32- 8. doi: 10.3132/dvdr.2007.003.
  • 12.Oğuz A, Altuntaş Y, Karsidağ K, Güleç S, Temizhan A, Akalın AA, et al. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Turkey. Obesity Reviews 2010;11:486.
  • 13.Lumeng CN, Saltiel AR. Inflammatory links between obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest 2011;121(6):2111-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI57132.
  • 14.Dai Y, Wan X, Li X, Jin E, Li X. Neck circumference and future cardiovascular events in a high-risk population--A prospective cohort study. Lipids Health Dis 2016;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12944-016-0218-3.
  • 15.Stabe C, Vasques AC, Lima MM, Tambascia MA, Pareja JC, Yamanaka A, et al. Neck circumference as a simple tool for identifying the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: results from the Brazilian Metabolic Syndrome Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013;78(6):874-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04487.x.
  • 16.Ozkaya I, Yardimci B, Tunckale A. Appropriate neck circumference cut-off points for metabolic syndrome in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr 2017;64(10):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2017.07.006.
  • 17.Preis SR, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, D'Agostino RB Sr, Levy D, Robins SJ, et al. Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95(8):3701-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1779.
  • 18.Zhang C, Rexrode KM, Van Dam RM, Li TY, Hu FB. Abdominal obesity and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: sixteen years of follow-up in US women. Circulation 2008;117(13):1658- 67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.739714.
  • 19.Caprio S, Hyman LD, McCarthy S, Lange R, Bronson M, Tamborlane WV. Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: importance of the intraabdominal fat depot. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64(1):12-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/64.1.12.
  • 20.Okereke CE, Anyaehie UB, Dim CC, Iyare EE, Nwagha UI. Evaluation of some anthropometric indices for the diagnosis of obesity in pregnancy in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci 2013;13(4):1034-40. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i4.25.
  • 21.Pouliot MC, Després JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, et al. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994;73(7):460-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90676-9.
  • 22.Madden AM, Smith S. Body composition and morphological assessment of nutritional status in adults: a review of anthropometric variables. J Hum Nutr Diet 2016;29(1):7-25. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12278.
  • 23.Fakier A, Petro G, Fawcus S. Mid-upper arm circumference: A surrogate for body mass index in pregnant women. S Afr Med J 2017;107(7):606-10. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i7.12255.
  • 24.Sagun G, Oguz A, Karagoz E, Filizer AT, Tamer G, Mesci B. Application of alternative anthropometric measurements to predict metabolic syndrome. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2014;69(5):347-53. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(05)09.
  • 25.Han L, You D, Ma W, Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Duan S, et al. National trends in American Heart Association Revised Life's Simple 7 Metrics associated with risk of mortality among US adults. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2(10):e1913131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13131.
  • 26.Patel S, Unwin N, Bhopal R, White M, Harland J, Ayis SA, et al. A comparison of proxy measures of abdominal obesity in Chinese, European and South Asian adults. Diabet Med 1999;16(10):853-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1464- 5491.1999.00163.x.
  • 27.Lemos T, Gallagher D. Current body composition measurement techniques. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2017;24(5):310-4. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000360.
APA özdemir ç, Aypak C, Gorpelioglu S (2021). The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. , 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
Chicago özdemir çağla,Aypak Cenk,Gorpelioglu Suleyman The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. (2021): 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
MLA özdemir çağla,Aypak Cenk,Gorpelioglu Suleyman The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. , 2021, ss.65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
AMA özdemir ç,Aypak C,Gorpelioglu S The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. . 2021; 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
Vancouver özdemir ç,Aypak C,Gorpelioglu S The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. . 2021; 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
IEEE özdemir ç,Aypak C,Gorpelioglu S "The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements." , ss.65 - 73, 2021. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
ISNAD özdemir, çağla vd. "The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements". (2021), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
APA özdemir ç, Aypak C, Gorpelioglu S (2021). The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, 10(2), 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
Chicago özdemir çağla,Aypak Cenk,Gorpelioglu Suleyman The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine 10, no.2 (2021): 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
MLA özdemir çağla,Aypak Cenk,Gorpelioglu Suleyman The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, vol.10, no.2, 2021, ss.65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
AMA özdemir ç,Aypak C,Gorpelioglu S The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine. 2021; 10(2): 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
Vancouver özdemir ç,Aypak C,Gorpelioglu S The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine. 2021; 10(2): 65 - 73. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
IEEE özdemir ç,Aypak C,Gorpelioglu S "The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements." Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, 10, ss.65 - 73, 2021. 10.33880/ejfm.2021100204
ISNAD özdemir, çağla vd. "The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements". Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine 10/2 (2021), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2021100204