Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 169 - 179 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17350/HJSE19030000186 İndeks Tarihi: 29-12-2021

Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines

Öz:
Developments in engineering techniques have concentrated on how to build better solu- tions for engineering structures in order to main the integrity and to reduce the costs in operations. Since the last two decades, advances in computational power have allowed machine learning algorithms to be applied as a powerful tool in anomaly detection problems, classification as well as in regression analysis. The objective of this study is to detect the damage using the vector auto regression model (VAR) coupled with support vector machines (SVM). A base excited three storey manufactured from an aluminium is investigated in a lab medium for various structural states. Accelerometers are fastened to the each corner of structure's f loor to collect time series data. Damage simulation scenarios in structure are per- formed by releasing the bolt load which cause the nonlinear effects. Once the sensors' meas- urements are collected for each state and organized to represent the appropriate scenario's label, they are processed in VAR model to obtain feature vectors such as residuals and VAR parameters. Then, SVM with optimal kernels are implemented on those features to classify and locate the damage. The results demonstrate that the VAR residuals shows a significant performance over VAR parameters once they are used as features in SVM technique. Moreo- ver, it is also found that detection performance rises as the number of damage increases.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Gopalakrishnan S, Ruzzene M. and Hanagad S. Computational Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring, Springer, London, UK, 2011.
  • 2. Pekedis M, Mascarenas D, Turan G, Ercan E., Farrar CR and Yildiz H. Structural health monitoring for bolt loosening via a non-invasive vibro-haptics human-machine cooperative interface. Smart Materials and Structures, 24, 085018, 2015.
  • 3. Pekedis M, Yildiz H. Damage diagnosis of a laminated composite beam and plate via model based structural health monitoring techniques. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 31(4), 813-831, 2016.
  • 4. Avendaño Valencia L.D, Fassois SD. Damage/fault diagnosis in an operating wind turbine under uncertainty via a vibration response Gaussian mixture random coefficient model based framework. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 91, 326–353, 2017.
  • 5. Doebling S, Farrar C., Prime M. and Shevitz D. A review of damage identification methods that examine changes in dynamic properties. Shock Vib. Dig., 30, 91-105, 1998.
  • 6. Farrar C, Doebling S. and Nix D. Vibration based structural damage identification. Philos Trans R Soc A., 356(1778), 131-149, 2001.
  • 7. Farrar CR and Worden K. Structural Health Monitoring a Machine Learning Perspective, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2013.
  • 8. Worden K. and Lane AJ. Damage identification using support vector machines. Smart Materials and Structures, 10, 540–547, 2001.
  • 9. Bornn L, Farrar CR, Park G, Farinholt K., Sructural health monitoring with autoregressive support vector machines. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 131(2), 021004, 2009.
  • 10. Figueiredo E, Park G, Farrar CR, Worden K., Figueiras J. Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability. Structural Health Monitoring, 10(6), 559-72, 2011.
  • 11. Sohn H, Farrar CR. Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals. Smart Materials and Structures, 10, 446-451, 2001.
  • 12. Sohn H, Robertson AN. and Farrar CR. Holder exponent analysis for discontinuity detection. Structural Engineering and Mechanics An Int'l Journal, 17(3), 409-428, 2004.
  • 13. Allen D, Sohn H, Worden K. and Farrar C. Utilizing the sequential probability ratio test for building joint monitoring. Proc SPIE, 4704, 2002. 14. Ma J, Perkins S. Online novelty detection on temporal sequences. Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington DC, 613-618, 2003.
  • 15. Johansen S. Likelihood -based inference in co integration vector auto-regressive models, Oxford University Press Inc, Newyork, USA, 1995.
  • 16. Krolzig H.M. Markov-Switching vector auto regressions, Modelling, Statistical Inference, and Application to Business Cycle Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberrg, Newyork, USA, 1997.
  • 17. Ljung L, System identification -theory for the use, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1987.
  • 18. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of a statiscs, 6(2), 461-464, 1978.
  • 19. Vapnik VN. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer- Verlag, New York, USA, 1998.
  • 20. Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning, Springer- Verlag, New York NY, USA, 2006,
  • 21. Osuna EE, Freund R. and Girosi F. Support vector machines: training and applications, A,I. Memo No: 1602, C.B, C.L, 144, Massachusetts, 1997.
  • 22. Haykin S. Neural Networks, A comprehensive Foundation, Macmillan, London, UK, 1995.
  • 23. Osabe K and Kato T. Estimation of standards compliance uncertainty for radiated emission measurement in the PT program, inProc. IEEE Int.Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Long Beach, CA, USA, Aug. 14–19, pp. 994–998, 2011.
  • 24. Carobbi C.F.M, Lalléchère S. and Arnaut L.R. Review of Uncertainty Quantification of Measurement and Computational Modeling in EMC Part I: Measurement Uncertainty," in IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 61(6), 1690-1698, 2019.
  • 25. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27, 861–874, 2006.
  • 26. Raczko E and Zagajewski B. Comparison of support vectormachine, random forest and neural network classifiers for tree species classification on airbornehyperspectral APEX images, European Journal of Remote Sensing, 50(1), 144-154, 2017.
APA Pekedis M (2020). Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. , 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
Chicago Pekedis Mahmut Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. (2020): 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
MLA Pekedis Mahmut Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. , 2020, ss.169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
AMA Pekedis M Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. . 2020; 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
Vancouver Pekedis M Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. . 2020; 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
IEEE Pekedis M "Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines." , ss.169 - 179, 2020. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
ISNAD Pekedis, Mahmut. "Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines". (2020), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000186
APA Pekedis M (2020). Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(3), 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
Chicago Pekedis Mahmut Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 7, no.3 (2020): 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
MLA Pekedis Mahmut Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, vol.7, no.3, 2020, ss.169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
AMA Pekedis M Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering. 2020; 7(3): 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
Vancouver Pekedis M Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering. 2020; 7(3): 169 - 179. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
IEEE Pekedis M "Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines." Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering, 7, ss.169 - 179, 2020. 10.17350/HJSE19030000186
ISNAD Pekedis, Mahmut. "Damage Diagnosis of Bolt Loosening via Vector Autoregressive - Support Vector Machines". Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 7/3 (2020), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000186