Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 224 - 229 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 İndeks Tarihi: 01-01-2022
Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?
Öz: Objective: Ultrasonography (US) is a useful, easy, and accurate screening method for the diagnosis of neonatal developmental dyspla- sia of the hip. The purpose of this prospective and cross-sectional study is to determine the optimal timing of US for the evaluation of the hip joints in newborns. Methods: We enrolled consecutive 27 [18 girls (66.7%) and nine boys (33.3%)] newborns in this study. Two experienced radiologists (S .T. and M.O ̈ .) performed standard hip US examinations at the 1st and 5th weeks of age according to the method described by Graf. We assessed the relationship between femur head and acetabulum and compared the results of evaluation obtained between the 1st and 5th weeks. Additionally, we evaluated the agreement between the two radiologists. Results: None of the babies were found to have subluxation or dislocation by clinical examination. The US measurements regarding the ossification and the diameter of femur head, bony, and cartilaginous roof at the 1st and 5th weeks were similar (for all infants, P > .05). In our series, no hip was defined as Graf’s type IIb or higher. In total, four (14.8%) right hips and six (22.2%) left hips (total 10 hips) were classified as Graf’s type IIa (physiologically immature) at the 1st week of evaluation. A total of seven hips spontaneously returned to their normal positions during the following 4 weeks. However, two (7.4%) right and one (3.7%) left hip joints were still classified as type IIa at the 5th week of evaluation. Graf type of hips was reported as similar in all the infants by the 1st and 5th week of measure- ments (n ¼ 54, P > .05, for each). There was no interobserver variability between the two radiologists with respect to Graf’s classifica- tion (j > 0.81). The blunt/round shape of acetabular rim defined in 10 hips at the 1st week was improved to an angular shape in the eight hips at the 5th week (P ¼ .008). Conclusion: Early US screening along with normal physical examination can diagnose some hip disorders in babies. Most of the abnor- mal findings detected at the 1st week of US screening recovered spontaneously at the 5th week. Infants with normal US measurements at the 1st week may be excluded from the follow-up, and those with suboptimal findings may be monitored by physical examination and repeated US scans.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Alsaleem M, Set KK, Saadeh L. Developmental dysplasia of hip: A review. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015;54(10):921-928. [CrossRef]
- 2. Starr V, Ha BY. Imaging update on developmental dysplasia of the hip with the role of MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(6):1324- 1335. [CrossRef]
- 3. Paton RW. Neonatal foot deformities and their relationship to developmental dysplasia of the hip: An 11-year prospective, longitudinal observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B(5):655- 658. [CrossRef]
- 4. Figueroa-Ferrari RC, Padilla-Raygoza N. Congenital dislocation of the hip in neonates macrosomic. Ultrasonographic aspects. Rev Med IMSS. 1994;32(3):277-279 (in Spanish).
- 5. Staheli LT. Fundamentals of Pediatric Orthopedics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998.
- 6. Cady RB. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: Definition, recognition, and prevention of late sequelae. Pediatr Ann. 2006;35(2):92- 101. [CrossRef]
- 7. Gibson CS, von Essen PB, Scott H, Baghurst P, Chan A, Scheil W. Annual Report of the South Australian Birth Defects Register, Incorporating the 2007 Annual Report of Perinatal Diagnosis in South Australia. Adelaide: Child, Youth andWomen’s Health Service 2010, 2007.
- 8. Stevenson DA, Mineau G, Kerber RA, Viskochil DH, Schaefer C, Roach JW. Familial predisposition to developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(5):463-466. [CrossRef]
- 9. Atalar H, Sayli U, Yavuz OY, Uras I, Dogruel H. Indicators of successful use of the Pavlik harness in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthopaed (SICOT). 2007;31(2):145-150. [CrossRef]
- 10. Olsen SF, Blom HC, Rosendahl K. Introducing universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip doubled the treatment rate. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(2):255-261. [CrossRef]
- 11. Ferna´ndez E. Congenital dislocation of the hip: Reduction with pavlik harness modified in children one year old. Rev Mex Ortop Traumatol. 1989;3:30-34 (in Spanish).
- 12. Cymet-Ramı´rez J, Alvarez-Martı´nez MM, Garcı´a-Pinto G, et al. Early diagnosis of hip dysplasia. Crippling disease for life. Consensus of the Mexican College of Orthopedics and Traumatology. Acta Ortop Mex. 2011;25(5):313-322.
- 13. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guideline: Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4):896-905. [CrossRef]
- 14. Padilla N, Figueroa RC. Diagnosis of congenital hip dislocation through comparative sound transmission. Rev Mex de Pediatr. 1992;59:149-151.
- 15. Padilla N, Figueroa RC. Sound transmission tests in the diagnosis of congenital hip dislocation in the newborn. Rev Mex de Pediatr. 1996;63:265-268 (in Spanish).
- 16. Rosenberg N, Bialik V, Norman D, Blazer S. The importance of combined clinical and sonographic examination of instability of the neonatal hip. Int Orthop. 1998;22(3):185-188. [CrossRef]
- 17. Graf R. New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3(3):354- 359. [CrossRef]
- 18. Graf R. Fundamentals of sonographic diagnosis of infant hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;4(6):735-740. [CrossRef] 19. Dahlstro¨m H, Oberg L, Friberg S. Sonography in congenital dislocation of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57(5):402-406. [Cross- Ref]
- 20. Harcke HT, Grissom LE. Performing dynamic sonography of the infant hip. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(4):837-844. [Cross- Ref]
- 21. Charlton SL, Schoo A, Walter SL. Early dynamic ultrasound for neonatal hip instability: Implications for rural Australia. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):82. [CrossRef]
- 22. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: The effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. Pediatrics. 1994;94(1):47- 52.
- 23. Noordin S, Umer M, Hafeez K, Nawaz H. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010;2(2):e19. [CrossRef]
- 24. Roovers EA, Boere-Boonekamp MM, Castelein RM, Zielhuis GA, Kerkhoff TH. Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(1):F25-F30. [CrossRef]
- 25. Committee on Quality Improvement (American Academy of Pediatrics), Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Clinical practice guideline: Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4):896-905. [CrossRef]
- 26. Rawlings E, Burnett M, Reddan T. An audit of referral timeframes for ultrasound screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in neonates with a normal clinical examination. Children’s Health Queensl Sonogr. 2017;4(S1):32-32.
- 27. http://www.who.int/features/qa/preterm_babies/en/.
- 28. http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat2006NewbornsLowBirthWeight. pdf.
- 29. Government of Western Australia. Neonatology, Women and Newborn Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline; Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips (DDH). Government of Western Australia, 2011.
- 30. Wilf-Miron R, Kuint J, Peled R, Cohen A, Porath A. Utilization of ultrasonography to detect developmental dysplasia of the hip: When reality turns selective screening into universal use. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):136. [CrossRef]
- 31. Hansson G, Jacobsen S. Ultrasonography screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip joint. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86(9):913- 915. [CrossRef]
| APA | Turcan S, özdemir m, Edis Özdemir F (2021). Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. , 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| Chicago | Turcan Sima,özdemir mustafa,Edis Özdemir Fatma Ayça Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. (2021): 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| MLA | Turcan Sima,özdemir mustafa,Edis Özdemir Fatma Ayça Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. , 2021, ss.224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| AMA | Turcan S,özdemir m,Edis Özdemir F Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. . 2021; 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| Vancouver | Turcan S,özdemir m,Edis Özdemir F Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. . 2021; 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| IEEE | Turcan S,özdemir m,Edis Özdemir F "Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?." , ss.224 - 229, 2021. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| ISNAD | Turcan, Sima vd. "Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?". (2021), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| APA | Turcan S, özdemir m, Edis Özdemir F (2021). Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. European Journal of Therapeutics, 27(3), 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| Chicago | Turcan Sima,özdemir mustafa,Edis Özdemir Fatma Ayça Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. European Journal of Therapeutics 27, no.3 (2021): 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| MLA | Turcan Sima,özdemir mustafa,Edis Özdemir Fatma Ayça Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. European Journal of Therapeutics, vol.27, no.3, 2021, ss.224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| AMA | Turcan S,özdemir m,Edis Özdemir F Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. European Journal of Therapeutics. 2021; 27(3): 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| Vancouver | Turcan S,özdemir m,Edis Özdemir F Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?. European Journal of Therapeutics. 2021; 27(3): 224 - 229. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| IEEE | Turcan S,özdemir m,Edis Özdemir F "Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?." European Journal of Therapeutics, 27, ss.224 - 229, 2021. 10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
| ISNAD | Turcan, Sima vd. "Optimal Timing of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Infants: 1st or 5th Week?". European Journal of Therapeutics 27/3 (2021), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.5152/10.5152/eurjther.2021.19075 |
