Jacques Derrida was closely interested in the parable of Hz. İbrahim, especially in the context of Kierkegaard. This context is based on the Old Testament version of the story. The incident in the story makes it possible for Derrida to debate within the framework of important concepts such as religion, sacrifice, ethics, and responsibility. Derrida reads the story, thinking that his inferences from it may also apply to the religion of Islam. But in doing so, it does so without considering the obvious differences in the Qur’an that would lead to significant changes in Derrida’s conclusions. Moreover, it is understood from his own expressions that Derrida knew that the story is also repeated in the Qur’an. Derrida does not observe differences but also generalizes his conclusions as if these differences were not in question. This indifference will lead to a contradiction in terms of the general structure of Derrida’s thought. Thus Derrida appears to be doing something he often condemns: Ignoring the other’s differences, fusing him with the same. The subject of this article is not the issue of what changes will occur when the story is read based on the differences in the Qur’an. This article primarily tries to make visible Derrida’s sensitivities towards the other category. Then, based on the indifference determined for the differences in Derrida’s reading, it tends to develop a Derridaian criticism. Ultimately, it concludes that Derrida, as a thinker who cares about the idea of difference, compromises this sensitivity in his thought in particular in his reading of this parable.