Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 59 - 70 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547 İndeks Tarihi: 20-12-2021

Poiesis of objects: Theory of making

Öz:
The aim of this study is to discuss the basic state of object production. Essentially, objects exist as a result of the act of making. Making occurs through the processes of cognition, conceptualization, and representation. Cognition and conceptualization are dealt with the notion of noesis, which occurs on the foundation of four concepts: the self, matter, form, and aim. A design is formed by the cohesion of these four components. Some practical acts are required to represent this design. However, these practical acts continue the conceptual state of making because they require the knowledge of making. All stages that create objects are developed depending on mental productions; this features the process of poiesis. Poiesis is an act of creating objects simply as a product of our integrative comprehensions. This study involves the redefinition of the concept of making in the context of the intuitional, undefined, and unlimited states of poiesis.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aristotle. (1961). Aristotle’s Physics. (R. Hope, Trans.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Aristotle. (1985). Metaphysic: Books VII-X. (M. Furth, Trans.) Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Aristotle. (1999). Posterior Analytics. (J. Barnes, Trans.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bergson, H. (1988). Matter and Memory. New York: Zone Books.
  • Cevizci, A. (2015). Felsefe Tarihi. İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Childers, D. (1992). Absence Seeks Contingency: Architecture After Ideology. In On Making, (edited by Z. Bjorgvinsson, D. Childers, A. Cooney, and A. Ioannides) 1-5. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Churchland, P. M. (2012). Madde ve Bilinç. İstanbul: Alfa.
  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly Ways Of Knowing. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.
  • Ditfurth, H. V. (2007). Bilinç Gökten Düşmedi; Bilincimizin Evrimi. (V. Atayman, Trans.) İstanbul: Cumhuriyet Kitapları.
  • Faulkner, N. (2014). Marksist Dünya Tarihi: Neandertallerden Neoliberallere. (T. Öncel, Trans.) İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. Franklin, U. M. (1990). The Real World of Technology. Canada: CBC Enterprises / Ies Enterprises Radio.
  • Gasset, J. O. (1941). Toward A Philosophy Of History. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Haviland, W., D. Walrath, H. Prins, and B. McBride. (2011). Evolution and Prehistory: The Human Challenge. Canada: Cengage Learning.
  • Heidegger, Martin. (2007). Sanat Eserinin Kökeni. Ankara: De Ki Basım Yayım.
  • Heidegger, Martin. (2015). Teknik Ve Dönüş & Özdeşlik Ve Ayrım. (N. Aca, Trans.) Ankara: Pharmakon.
  • Kart, B. (2015). Aristoteles ve Heide gger’in Sanat Kuramlarında “Poiesis” ve “Phronesis”. Kaygı Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi (25), 77-88.
  • Knesl, J. (1992). “Symposium-On Making.” In On Making, (edited by Z. Bjorgvinsson, D. Childers, A. Cooney, and A. Ioannides) 6–17. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Malo, A. (1992). “The Hand: Organ of Knowledge.” In On Making, (edited by Z. Bjorgvinsson, D. Childers, A. Cooney, and A. Ioannides) 46–51. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Plato. (2015). Timaios. (F. Akderin, Çev.) İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Plato. (1993). Symposium and Phaedrus. (B. Jowett, Trans.) New York: Dover Publications.
  • Sartre, Jean Paul. (2017). İmgelem. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
  • Smith, D. W. and R. McIntyre. (1982). Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reildel Publishing Company.
  • Tanzer, K. (1992). “Releasing the Form To the Making: Womenswork is Never Done.” In On Making, (edited by Z. Bjorgvinsson, D. Childers, A. Cooney, and A. Ioannides). 33–45. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Tattersall, I. (2007). “How Did Modern Human Cognition Evolve?” in Consciousness and Cognition: Fragments Of Mind And Brain, (edited by Henri Cohen). 3–17. California: Academic Press.
  • Ural, M. N. (2015). Antik Yunan’da “Teknik”: Teknoloji Felsefesi Tarihine Genel Bir Bakış. Mavi Atlas, 136-144.
APA SÖNMEZ M, BATI B (2019). Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. , 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
Chicago SÖNMEZ Murat,BATI Beyza Nur Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. (2019): 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
MLA SÖNMEZ Murat,BATI Beyza Nur Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. , 2019, ss.59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
AMA SÖNMEZ M,BATI B Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. . 2019; 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
Vancouver SÖNMEZ M,BATI B Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. . 2019; 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
IEEE SÖNMEZ M,BATI B "Poiesis of objects: Theory of making." , ss.59 - 70, 2019. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
ISNAD SÖNMEZ, Murat - BATI, Beyza Nur. "Poiesis of objects: Theory of making". (2019), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
APA SÖNMEZ M, BATI B (2019). Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
Chicago SÖNMEZ Murat,BATI Beyza Nur Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no.3 (2019): 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
MLA SÖNMEZ Murat,BATI Beyza Nur Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.16, no.3, 2019, ss.59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
AMA SÖNMEZ M,BATI B Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 16(3): 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
Vancouver SÖNMEZ M,BATI B Poiesis of objects: Theory of making. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 16(3): 59 - 70. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
IEEE SÖNMEZ M,BATI B "Poiesis of objects: Theory of making." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, ss.59 - 70, 2019. 10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547
ISNAD SÖNMEZ, Murat - BATI, Beyza Nur. "Poiesis of objects: Theory of making". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 16/3 (2019), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2019.94547