Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 43 - 61 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565 İndeks Tarihi: 24-12-2021

TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU

Öz:
yatırım giriş ve çıkışlarındaki değişiklikleri analiz etmektir. Analiz, bir ülkenin doğrudan yabancı yatırım giriş ve çıkış pozisyonunun ekonomik gelişmeye bağlı olduğu Dunning’in yatırım-gelişme yolu teorisine dayanmaktadır. Bu teoriye göre net dış yatırım pozisyonu ve ekonomik gelişme arasında dinamik bir ilişki vardır. Ayrıca teori, ülkelerin ekonomik gelişme seviyeleri arttıkça net dış yatırım pozisyonlarının beş aşamadan geçtiğini savunmaktadır. Yapılan analiz sonucuna göre Türkiye, yatırım-gelişme yolunda üçüncü aşamanın başlarındadır ve teorinin aşamaları ile uyumlu bir ülkedir.Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Girişleri, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Çıkışları, Yatırım-Gelişme Yolu, Türkiye.
Anahtar Kelime:

INVESTMENT-DEVELOPMENT PATH OF TURKEY

Öz:
The aim of this study is to analyze the changes of inward and outward foreign direct investment in Turkey between the years of 1980-2019. The analysis is based on Dunning's investment-development path theory, in which a country's inward and outward foreign direct investment position depends on economic development. According to this theory, there is a dynamic relationship between net outward investment position and economic development. In addition, the theory argues that as countries' economic development levels increase, net outward foreign investment positions go through five stages. According to analysis result, Turkey is at the beginning of third-stage in investment-development path and it is a country consistent with the stages of theory.Keywords: Inward Foreign Direct Investment, Outward Foreign Direct Investment, Investment-Development Path, Turkey.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aybar, S. (2016), Determinants of Turkish Outward Foreign Direct Investment, Transnational Corporations Review, 8(1), s.79-92.
  • Bellak, C. (2000), The Investment Development Path of Austria, Department of Economics Working Paper Series 75, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
  • Bellak, C. (2001), The Austrian Investment Development Path, Transnational Corporations, 10(2), s.107-134.
  • Boudier, Bensebaa, F. (2008), FDI-Assisted Development in the Light of The Investment Development Path Paradigm: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries, Transnational Corporations, 17(1), s.37-67.
  • Buckley, P. J. ve Castro, F. B. (1998), The Investment Development Path: The Case of Portugal, Transnational Corporations, 7(1), s.1-15.
  • Divarcı A., Hisarcıklılar M., Kayalıca O. M. ve Kayam S. S. (2005), Foreign Direct Investment and Development in MENA Countries, Discussion Papers in ITU Management Engineering, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1980), Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 11, s.9-31.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1981), Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic and Development Approach, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117, s.30-64.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1986), The Investment Development Cycle Revisited, Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 122, s.667-677
  • Dunning, J. H. (1988), The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), s.1-31.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1993), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (1th ed.), Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Dunning, J. H. ve Narula, R. (1996), The Investment Development Path Revisited: Some Emerging Issues, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1998), Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor?, Journal of International Business Studies, 29, s.45-66.
  • Dunning, J. H. (2001), The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), s.173-190.
  • Ferencikova, S. ve Pappova, A. (2010), Foreign Direct Investment as a Determinant of Investment Development Path of Slovakia, Economic Review, 39(4), s.459-472.
  • Ferencikova, S. ve Ferencikova, S. (2012), Outward Investment Flows and The Development Path, Eastern European Economics, 50(2), s.85- 111.
  • Fonseca, M., Mendonça, A. ve Passos, J. (2007), The Investment Development Path Hypothesis: Evidence from the Portuguese CaseA Panel Data Analysis, Lisbon: ISEG Working Papers No. WP 021/2007, s.1-29.
  • Fonseca, M., Mendonça, A. ve Passos, J. (2016), The Paradigm of the Investment Development Path: Does it Holds for Portugal? Evidence for the Period 1990-2011, Working Paper CEsA CSG, 139.
  • Galan, J. I., Gonzalez-Benito, J. ve Zuniga-Vincente, J. A. (2007), Factors Determining the Location Decisions of Spanish MNEs: an Analysis Based on the Investment Development Path, Journal of International Business Studies, 38, s.975-997.
  • Gorynia, M., Nowak, J. ve Wolniak, R. (2007), Poland and its Investment Development Path, Eastern European Economics, 45(2), s.52-74.
  • Gorynia, M., Nowak, J. ve Wolniak, R. (2008), Poland's Investment Development Path and Industry Structure of FDI Inflows and Outflows, Journal of East-West Business, 14(2), s.189-212.
  • Gorynia, M., Nowak, J. ve Wolniak, R. (2010), Foreign Direct Investment of Central and Eastern European Countries, and the Investment Development Path Revisited, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(2), s.21-36.
  • Iacovoiu, V. B. ve Panait, M. (2014), The Limitation of Investment Development Path Theory, European Union Case, Economic Insights-Trends and Challenges, 3(66), 4, s.33-40.
  • Kayam, S. S. ve Hisarcıklılar, M. (2009), Revisiting the Investment Development Path (IDP): A Non Linear Fluctuation Approach, International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 6(2), s.63-82.
  • Khayat, S. (2016), Developing Countries’ Foreign Direct Investment and Portfolio Investment, Doctoral Thesis, Leicester University, Britain.
  • Kosztowniak, A. (2018), Changes of Inward and Outward FDI Stocks in Poland and the Stage of the Investment Development Path, Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, 13(35), s.41-60.
  • Kula, F. (2003), Yatırım-Gelişme Yolu Yaklaşımı: Teori ve Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Gözlemler, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(3-4), s.57-78.
  • Kun, M. (2012), An Empirical Analysis on Chinese Outward FDI Development Path Based on IDP and IPI Models, Contemporary Logistics, 06, s.81-85.
  • Kuzel, M. (2017), The Investment Development Path: Evidence from Poland and Other Countries of the Visegrád Group, Journal of EastWest Business, s.1-40.
  • Liu, Z. (2018), The Investment Development Path in China, 2018 4th International Conference on Social Science and Development (ICSSD 2018), s.341-345.
  • Majewska, M. ve Buskowska, E. (2014), The Changes in the Position of Poland on its Investment Development Path: The Results of the Empirical Analysis, Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne Nr, 5(71), s.159- 171.
  • Marton, K. ve McCarthy, C. (2007), Is China on the Investment Development Path, Journal of Asia Business Studies, s.1-9.
  • Masca, S. G. ve Vaidean, V. L. (2010), Outward FDI and the Investment Development Path in Romania, Revista Romana De Economie, 31(2), s.49-64.
  • Narula, R. (1996), Multinational Investment and Economic Structure: Globalization and Competitiveness, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Narula, R. ve Dunning, J. H. (2000), Industrial Development, Globalization and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries, Oxford Development Studies, 28(2), s.141-167.
  • Narula, R. ve Guimón, J. (2010), The Investment Development Path in a Globalised World: Implications for Eastern Europe, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(2), s.5-19.
  • Sangder, M. (2009), The Investment Development Path and Small Developed Economies- The Case of Finland. NorgesHandelshoyskole Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Satoğlu, E. B. (2017), "Emerging" through Foreign Investment: Investment Development Path Estimation of "MINT" Economies, Advances in Economics and Business, 5(5), s.256-264.
  • Serafim, T. O. (2011), The Investment Development Path- Literatüre Review, Annals of the “Ovidius” University, Economic Sciences Series, 11(1), s.1-5.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development-UNCTAD (2020), Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Çıkışları- Girişleri (Milyon Dolar), https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?Rep ortId=96740, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2020).
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development-UNCTAD (2020), Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Giriş ve Çıkışlarının Küresel Ekonomi ve GSYH İçindeki Payları (Yüzde), https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?Rep ortId=96740 (Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2020).
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development-UNCTAD (2020), Gayrisafi Yurt içi Hasıla (Milyon Dolar), https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?Rep ortId=96, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2020).
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development-UNCTAD (2020), Kişi Başına Gayrisafi Yurt İçi Hasıla, https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?Rep ortId=96, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2020).
  • Verma, R. ve Brennan, L. (2011), The Investment Development Path Theory: Evidence from India, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(1), s.74.89.
  • White, H. (1980), A Heteroskedasticity- Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48(4), s.817-830.
  • Yavan, N. (2006), Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Lokasyon Seçimi Üzerine Uygulamalı Bir Araştırma, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Żak, K. (2018), Poland’s Position on the Investment Development Path, Problems of World Agriculture/ Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 18(33(4)), s.515-524.
APA AYDIN N (2021). TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. , 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
Chicago AYDIN Nur TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. (2021): 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
MLA AYDIN Nur TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. , 2021, ss.43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
AMA AYDIN N TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. . 2021; 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
Vancouver AYDIN N TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. . 2021; 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
IEEE AYDIN N "TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU." , ss.43 - 61, 2021. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
ISNAD AYDIN, Nur. "TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU". (2021), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
APA AYDIN N (2021). TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
Chicago AYDIN Nur TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21, no.1 (2021): 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
MLA AYDIN Nur TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.21, no.1, 2021, ss.43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
AMA AYDIN N TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021; 21(1): 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
Vancouver AYDIN N TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021; 21(1): 43 - 61. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
IEEE AYDIN N "TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU." Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21, ss.43 - 61, 2021. 10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565
ISNAD AYDIN, Nur. "TÜRKİYE’NİN YATIRIM-GELİŞME YOLU". Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21/1 (2021), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v21i60671.855565