COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF WEB-BASED AND FACE-TO-FACE TRAINING ON THE SELF-EFFICACY AND HEALTH LITERACY OF PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL TRIAL

TÜRKOĞLU ,Nihan; KILIC ,Dilek

doi:10.35232/estudamhsd.920588

Nihan TÜRKOĞLU

(Atatürk Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Dilek KILIC

(Atatürk Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Eskişehir Türk dünyası uygulama ve araştırma merkezi halk sağlığı dergisi (Online)

Yıl: 2022Cilt: 7Sayı: 1ISSN: 2564-6311Sayfa Aralığı: 15 - 25Metin Dili: İngilizce

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.920588

0 0

İngilizce
Türkçe

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF WEB-BASED AND FACE-TO-FACE TRAINING ON THE SELF-EFFICACY AND HEALTH LITERACY OF PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL TRIAL

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the effects of web-based and face-to-face patient education on the self-efficacy and health literacy of patients with hypertension. A prospective, quasi-experimental trial was conducted in Eastern Turkey. Hypertension patients were into two groups: a web-based group (n=70) and a face-to-face group (n=66). The participants’ demographics were collected with the Descriptive Characteristics Form, and the participants’ scores on the Health Literacy Scale and the Hypertension Self-Efficacy Scale were measured before and after the training. The mean Health Literacy Scale and Hypertension Self-Efficacy Scale scores of the participants in the web training group and those in the face-to-face training group both increased in the posttests compared to the pretests (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to the type of education (p>0.05). Both web-based and face-to-face training for patients with hypertension had a positive effect on health literacy and self-efficacy levels, with no difference between the two training methods.

Keywords:

Subject Area:

Hipertansiyon hastalarına verilen web tabanlı ve yüz yüze eğitimin özetkililik ve sağlık okuryazarlığına etkisinin karşılaştırılması-yarı deneysel bir çalışma

Öz:Bu çalışma; hipertansiyon hastalarına verilen web tabanlı ve yüz yüze eğitimin öz-etkililik ve sağlık okuryazarlığına etkisinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Türkiye’nin doğusunda bir bölgede yapılan çalışma, yarı deneysel düzende yapılmıştır. Hipertansiyon hastaları web tabanlı ve yüz yüze eğitim grubu olmak üzere ikiye ayrılmıştır. Katılımcıların demografik özellikleri Tanımlayıcı Özellikler Formu kullanılarak toplandı. Ayrıca eğitim öncesi ve sonrasında katılımcılara Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ve Hipertansiyon Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği uygulanarak puan ortalamalarına bakıldı. Web eğitim grubundaki ve yüz yüze eğitim grubundaki katılımcıların Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ve Hipertansiyon Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği puan ortalamaları ön testlere göre son testlerde artmıştır (p<0,001). Eğitim türüne göre gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmamıştır (p>0,05). Hipertansiyonlu hastalara verilen web tabanlı ve yüz yüze eğitim arasında bir fark bulunmazken, her iki eğitim yönteminin sağlık okuryazarlığı ve öz-yeterlik düzeyleri üzerinde olumlu bir etkiye sahip olduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Konu Alanı:

Belge Türü: DergiMakale Türü: Araştırma MakalesiErişim Formatı: Erişime Açık

1. World Health Organization. Hypertension, 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/hypert ension/#tab=tab_1
2. Turkish Cardiology Association, PatenT. Available from: http://www.tkd.org.tr/pages.asp?pg=406
3. Rader S, Dorner TE, Schoberberger R, Wolf H. Effects of a web-based follow-up intervention on self-efficacy in obesity treatment for women. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017;129:472-81.
4. Bahari G, Scafide K, Krall J, Mallinson RK, Weinstein AA. Mediating role of self‐efficacy in the relationship between family social support and hypertension self‐care behaviours: A cross‐sectional study of Saudi men with hypertension. International journal of nursing practice. 2019;25(6):1-8.
5. Mert K, Kadıoğlu H, Aksayan S. Validity and Reliability of The Self-Efficacy Scale-Child's Form. Kocaeli Medical Journal. 2018;7:135-9.
6. Çopurlar KC, Kartal M. What is Health Literacy? How to measure it? Why is it important? TJFMPC. 2016;10(1):42-7.
7. Kim MT, Song HJ, Han HR, Song Y, Nam S, Nguyen TH, et al. Development and validation of the high blood pressure-focused health literacy scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.09.005.
8. Parker RM, Wolf MS, Kirsch I. Preparing for an epidemic of limited health literacy: weathering the perfect storm. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008;23:1273-6.
9. Demir Y, Gözüm S. New Approaches In Health Educatıon; Web Based Health Educatıon. DEUHYO ED, 2011;4(4):196-203.
10. O’Neil CA, Fisher CA, Newbold SK. Devoloping Online Learning Enviroments in Nursing Education. 2. Baskı. New York Springer Publishing Company. 2009;1-15:83-97.
11. Suka M, Odajima T, Kasai M, Igarashi A, Ishikawa H, Kusama M. The 14-item health literacy scale for Japanese adults (HLS-14). Environ Health Prev Med. 2013. doi:10.1007/s12199-013-0340-z.
12. Türkoğlu N, Kılıç D. Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2021;24(1):25-33. doi:10.17049/ataunihem.662054.
13. Han HR, Lee H, Commodore-Mensah Y, Kim M. Development and validation of the Hypertension Self-care Profile: a practical tool to measure hypertension self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2 0 1 4 ; 2 9 ( 3 ) : E 1 1 - 2 0 . doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182a3fd46.
14. Türkoğlu N, Kılıç D. Turkish Reliability and Validity Study of the Hypertension Self-Efficacy Scale. Paper presented at the 18. ISPOG Congress, 2016b, Malaga, İspanya.
15. Lenth R. Java applets for power andsample size. 2014. Available from: http://home-page.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/ Power/
16. Hacıalialioğlu, N. Teaching, Learning and Education in Nursing. 2011, Ankara: Nobel Medical Publishing
17. Julie M, Cooper BS, Marguerite R, Davenport BA, Kriya K, Gaillard BS. Health Literacy in Practice Program Evaluation. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University; 2011. pp. 1-156.
18. Kandula NR, Nsiah-Kumi PA., Makoul G., Sager J., Zei CP., Glass S., et al. The relationship between health literacy and knowledge improvement after a multimedia type 2 diabetes education program. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75:321-7.
19. Bayati T, Dehghan A, Bonyadi F, Bazrafkan L. Investigating the effect of education on health literacy and its relation to health-promoting behaviors in health center. Journal of education and health promotion. 2018;7:127. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_65_18.
20. Altsitsiadis E, Undheim T, De Vries E, Hinrichs B, Stockfleth E, Trakatelli M. Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(Suppl 2):14-21.
21. Cho Y, Lee SY, Arozullah AM, Crittenden KS. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:1809-16.
22. Pagan JA, Brown CJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K, Bastida E, Guerra C. Health literacy and breast cancer screening among Mexican American women in South Texas. J Cancer Educ. 2012;27(1):132-7.
23. McCleary-Jones V. Health Literacy and Its Association with Diabetes Knowledge, Self-Efficacy and Disease Self-Management Among African Americans with Diabetes Mellitus. The ABNF Journal. 2011:25-32.
24. Olgun N, Altun ZA. Effects of Education Based on Health Belief Model on Nursing Implication in Patients with Diabetes. University of Health Sciences Journal of Nursing. 2012;19(2):46-57.
25. Gleeson-Kreig JM. Self-monitoring of physical activity: effects on self-efficacy and behavior in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32(1):69-77. doi: 10.1177/0145721705284285.
26. Kim CG, Park HA. Development and evaluation of a web-based education program to prevent secondary stroke. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011;41(1):47-60. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.47.
27. Cingil D, Delen S, Aksuoğlu A. Evaluation of compliance and level of knowledge of patients with hypertension living in Karaman city center, Turkey. Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology. 2009;37(8):551-6.
28. Wei MH, Chen XZ, Zhan XX, Zhang ZX, Yu SJ, Yan WR. The effect of a web-based training for improving primary health care providers’ knowledge about diabetes mellitus management in rural China: A pre-post intervention study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0222930. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0222930
29. Horiuchi S, Yaju Y, Koyo M, Sakyo Y, Nakayama K. Evaluation of a web-based graduate continuing nursing education program in Japan: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse education today. 2009;29(2):140-9.
30. Salim N.A., Tuffah M.G., Brant J.M. Impact a pain management program on nurses' knowledge and attitude toward pain in United Arab Emirates: Experimental-four Solomon group design. Applied Nursing Research. 2020;15:13-14.
31. Khatony A, Nayery ND, Ahmadi F, Haghani H, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. The effectiveness of web-based and face-to-face continuing education methods on nurses' knowledge about AIDS: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 10;9:41. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-41.
32. Chan AW, Chair S, Wing-Hung Sit J, Wong EM, Lee DT, Fung OW. Case-Based Web Learning Versus Face-to-Face Learning: A Mixed-Method Study on University Nursing Students. The Journal of Nursing Research. 2016;24(1):31-40.
33. Avcı IA, Gozum S. Comparison of two different educational methods on teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and behaviors regarding breast cancer screening. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2009;13(2):94-10.