A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 10 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/vet-2006-10 İndeks Tarihi: 28-01-2022
A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers
Öz: Abstract: Many local breeds belonging to different livestock species such as cattle are in danger of extinction, since farmers prefer high-yielding breeds as well as intensive selection pressure. This fact leads to conduct suitable breeding and conservation programs in worldwide. Revealing genetic diversity is the first step for applying breeding and conservation programs. In this respect, this is the first comprehensive study aimed to review current genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on previous microsatellite marker studies. Compared to other local cattle breeds reared in different regions of the world, native Turkish cattle breeds hold a huge genetic diversity. On the other hand, the population size of native Turkish cattle breeds has been decreasing since 1991, and local breeds are crossed with exotic ones. It is thought that crossbreeding practices are leading to genetic erosion of native Turkish cattle breeds, while decreasing in population size will negatively affect genetic diversity in the future. Local cattle herds may be raised separately from exotic ones by smallholder farmers who are financially supported by the government. This kind of application may prevent genetic erosion and let the local herds to be raised in naturally adapted regions.Key words: Anatolian cattle, genetic variability, simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Toro MA, Caballero A. Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2005; 360 (1459): 1367-1378. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1680
- 2. Verrier E, Audiot A, Bertrand C, Chapuis H, Charvolin E et al. Assessing the risk status of livestock breeds: a multi-indicator method applied to 178 French local breeds belonging to ten species. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources Génétiques Animales/Recursos Genéticos Animales 2015; 57 (1): 105-118. doi:10.1017/S2078633615000260
- 3. Turkish Statistical Institute. Statistics by topics, agriculture, animal statistics. Ankara, Turkey: TÜİK; 2019.
- 4. Demir E, Balcioğlu MS. Genetic diversity and population structure of four cattle breeds raised in Turkey using microsatellite markers. Czech Journal of Animal Science 2019; 64 (10): 411-419. doi: 10.17221/62/2019-CJAS
- 5. Ertuğrul M, Dellal G, Elmacı C, Akın AO, Pehlivan E et al. Çiftlik hayvanları genetik kaynaklarının korunması ve sürdürülebilir kullanımı. In: VIII Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği Teknik Kongresi; Ankara, Turkey; 2015, pp. 212-236. (in Turkish).
- 6. Akbay C, Boz I. Turkey’s livestock sector: Production, consumption and policies. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2005; 17 (9): 1-11.
- 7. Hartono B, Rohaeni ES. Contribution to income of traditional beef cattle farmer households in Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2014; 26 (8): 141.
- 8. Villagra ES, Easdale MH, Giraudo CG, Bonvissuto GL. Productive and income contributions of sheep, goat, and cattle, and different diversification schemes in smallholder production systems of Northern Patagonia, Argentina. Trophical Animal Health and Production 2015; 47 (7): 1373-1380. doi: 10.1007/ S11250-015-0873-9
- 9. Unalan A. Estimation of genetic parameters and correlations among some body measurements of Holstein calves and effects of these measurements on calving difficulty. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2009; 8 (8): 1589-1594.
- 10. General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies. Türkiye Evcil Hayvan Genetik Kaynakları Tanıtım Kataloğu. Ankara, Turkey: TAGEM; 2009.
- 11. Çolak C, Orman MN, Ertuğrul O. Simple linear and logistic growth model for the body measurements of Simmental x Southern Anatolian Red crossbred cattle. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2006; 53 (3): 195-199. (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 12. Aksel EG, Arslan K, Özdemir F, Akyüz B. Investigation of MBL-1 gene polymorphism in some cattle breeds raised in Turkey. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences 2019; 32 (1): 25- 30.. doi: 10.29136/Mediterranean.457231(in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 13. Özkan E. An investigation on genetic structure pf native and cultural cattle breeds in Turkey by using microsatellite markers. PhD, Tekirdağ University, Tekirdağ, Turkey, 2005. (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 14. Özşensoy Y. Genetic characterization of some Turkish cattle breeds. PhD, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey, 2011. (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 15. Akış Akad I, Mengi A, Öztabak KO. A determination of growth hormone receptor gene polymorphisms in East Anatolian Red cattle, South Anatolian Red cattle, and Turkish Grey cattle. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2012; 36 (1): 27-33. doi:10.3906/vet-1102-756
- 16. Ünalan A. Comparison of some body measurements of South Anatolian Red and Native Southern Yellow Cattle. Journal of Agriculture and Nature 2016; 19 (1): 112-116.
- 17. Öner Y, Yılmaz O, Eriş C., Ata N, Ünal C et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish native cattle breeds. South African Journal of Animal Science 2019; 49 (4): 628-635. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v49i4.4
- 18. Özşensoy Y, Kurar E, Doğan M, Bulut Z, Nizamlıoğlu M et al. Phylogenetic relationships of native Turkish cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2019; 43 (1): 23-29. doi:10.3906/vet-1805-10
- 19. Uçuk MÇ, Bıkmaz AÇ, Sevilmiş U, Hızlı H, Işık A. The development status of native Southern Yellow Cattle breed in the province and districts of Adana. International Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research 2018; 1 (2): 91- 103. (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 20. Akyüz B, Bayram D, Ertuğrul O, İscan KM. The Detection of citrullinemia allele in Holstein and some native Turkish cattle breeds. Journal of The Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Erciyes University 2008; 5 (1): 17-21 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 21. Semen Z, Karakaş V, Çökülgen T, Ünal I, Yılmaz O. Bottleneck analysis of Anatolian Black Cattle (Bos taurus) using microsatellite markers. AGROFOR International Journal 2019; 4 (1): 161-168. 10.7251/AGRENG1901161S
- 22. Güneren G, Akyüz B., Ertuğrul O. Use of RAPD-PCR for genetic analyses on the native cattle breeds in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2010; 57 (3): 167-172.
- 23. Kök S, Atalay S, Savaçı M, Eken HS. Characterization of calpastatin gene in purebred and crossbred Turkish Grey Steppe cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2013; 19 (2): 203-206. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2012.7470
- 24. Ardıçlı S. Analysis of IGF1 C472T and TG C422T polymorphisms in Turkish Grey Steppe and Holstein Crossbred Bulls. Journal of Research in Veterinary Medicine 2018; 37 (1) 21-28. doi: 10.30782/uluvfd.392081
- 25. Boettcher PJ, Tixier‐Boichard M, Toro MA, Simianer H., Eding H et al. Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources. Animal Genetics 2010; 41 (1) 64-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02050.x
- 26. Reist‐Marti SB, Simianer H, Gibson J, Hanotte O, Rege JEO. Weitzman’s approach and conservation of breed diversity: an application to African cattle breeds. Conservation Biology 2003; 17 (5): 1299-1311. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01587.x
- 27. Karsli T, Fidan HG. Assessment of genetic diversity and conservation priorities among five White Leghorn Lines based on SSR markers. Animal Science Papers and Reports 2019; 37 (3): 311-322.
- 28. Yang W, Kang X, Yang Q, Lin Y, Fang M. Review on the development of genotyping methods for assessing farm animal diversity. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2013; 4 (1): 1-6. doi: 10.1186/2049
- 29. Bruford MW, Wayne RK. Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 1993; 3 (6): 939-943. doi: 10.1016/0959-437X(93)9017-J
- 30. Sawicka-Zugaj W. The polymorphism of 24 microsatelite loci in 4 Polish cattle breeds. Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego 2011; 7 (4): 21-31.
- 31. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Molecular Genetic Characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 9. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2011
- 32. Acosta AC, Uffo O, Sanz A, Ronda R, Osta R et al. Genetic diversity and differentiation of five Cuban cattle breeds using 30 microsatellite loci. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2013; 130 (1): 79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.00988.x
- 33. Agung PP, Saputra F, Zein MSA, Wulandari AS, Putra WPB et al. Genetic diversity of Indonesian cattle breeds on microsatellite markers. Asian- Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2019; 32 (4): 467–476. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0283
- 34. Amigues Y, Boitard S, Bertrand C, Sancristobal M, Rocha D. Genetic characterization of the Blonde d’Aquitaine cattle breed using microsatellite markers and relationship with three other French cattle populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2011; 128 (3): 201-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1439- 0388.2010.00890.x
- 35. Cervini M, Henrique-Silva F, Mortari N, Matheucci JR E. Genetic variability of 10 microsatellite markers in the characterization of Brazilian Nellore cattle (Bos indicus). Genetics and Molecular Biology 2006; 29 (3): 486-490. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572006000300015
- 36. Egito AA, Paiva SR, Albuquerque MDSM, Mariante AS, Almeida LD et al. Microsatellite based genetic diversity and relationships among ten Creole and commercial cattle breeds raised in Brazil. BMC Genetics 2007; 8 (1): 83. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-8-83
- 37. Changadeya W, Ambali AJ, Nyirenda JC, Chagunda MG, Kaunda E. Genetic diversity and population structure of Malawi Zebu cattle. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences 2012; 2 (9): 59-81.
- 38. Tu PA, Lin DY, Li GF, Huang JC, Wang DC et al. Characterization of the genetic diversity and population structure for the yellow cattle in Taiwan based on microsatellite markers. Animal Biotechnology 2014; 25 (4): 234-249. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2013.865641
- 39. Mukesh M, Sodhi M, Bhatia S, Mishra BP. Genetic diversity of Indian native cattle breeds as analysed with 20 microsatellite loci. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 2004; 121 (6): 416-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2004.00468.x
- 40. Chaudhari MV, Parmar SNS, Joshi CG, Bhong CD, Fatima S et al. Molecular characterization of Kenkatha and Gaolao (Bos indicus) cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 2009; 32 (2): 71-76. doi: https:// doi.org/144327
- 41. Devi KS, Gupta BR, Vani S. Genetic diversity and bottleneck studies in Punganur cattle through microsatellite markers. International Journal of Science 2017; 6 (1): 303–307.
- 42. Dadi H, Tibbo M, Takahashi Y, Nomura K, Hanada H et al. Microsatellite analysis reveals high genetic diversity but low genetic structure in Ethiopian indigenous cattle populations. Animal Genetics 2008; 39 (4): 425-431. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2052.2008.01748.x
- 43. El-Sayed MA, Al-Sudy A, Teleb DF. Assessment of genetic diversity among two Egyptian cattle populations (Bos taurus) based on autosomal microsatellite markers. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production 2016; 53 (2): 65-73.
- 44. Ngono Ema PJ, Manjeli Y, Meutchieyié F, Keambou C, Wanjala B et al. Genetic diversity of four Cameroonian indigenous cattle using microsatellite markers. Journal of Livestock Science 2014; 5: 9-17.
- 45. Rehman MS, Khan MS. Genetic diversity of Hariana and Hissar cattle from Pakistan using microsatellite analysis. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 2009; 29 (2): 67-71.
- 46. Hussain T, Babar ME, Peters SO, Wajid A, Ali A et al. Microsatellite markers based genetic evaluation of Pakistani cattle breeds. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 2016; 48 (6): 1633- 1641.
- 47. Icalia PJC, Salces AJ, Sevilla CC, Mendioro MS, Ludan G. Genetic structure of four bovine populations in the Philippines using microsatellites. Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2016; 42 (1): 16-20.
- 48. Mateus JC, Penedo MCT, Alves VC, Ramos M, Rangel‐Figueiredo T. Genetic diversity and differentiation in Portuguese cattle breeds using microsatellites. Animal Genetics 2004; 35 (2): 106- 113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01089.x
- 49. Nagamine Y, Nirasawa K, Takahashi H, Sasaki O, Ishii K et al. Estimation of the time of divergence between Japanese Mishima Island cattle and other cattle populations using microsatellite DNA markers. Journal of Heredity 2008; 99 (2): 202-207. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esm129
- 50. Nishimaki T, Ibi T, Tanabe Y, Miyazaki Y, Kobayashi N et al. The assessment of genetic diversity within and among the eight subpopulations of Japanese Black cattle using 52 microsatellite markers. Animal Science Journal 2013; 84 (8): 585-591. doi: 10.1111/asj.12045
- 51. Suh S, Kim YS, Cho CY, Byun MJ, Choi SB et al. Assessment of genetic diversity, relationships and structure among Korean native cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. AsianAustralasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2014; 27 (11): 1548- 1553. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14435
- 52. Cemal İ, Yılmaz O, Karaca O, Binbaş P, Ata N. Analysis of genetic diversity in indigenous Çine Çaparı sheep under conservation by microsatellite markers. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2013; 19 (3): 383-390. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2012.7857
- 53. Yilmaz O, Cemal I, Karaca O. Genetic diversity in nine Turkish sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis. Animal Genetics 2014; 45 (4): 604-608. doi: 10.1111/age.12173
- 54. Karsli BA, Demir E, Fidan HG, Karsli T. Assesment of genetic diversity and differentiation among four indigenous Turkish sheep breeds using microsatellites. Archives Animal Breeding 2020; 63 (1): 165-172. doi: 10.5194/aab-63-165-2020
- 55. Kirikci K, Cam MA, Mercan L. Genetic diversity and relationship among indigenous Turkish Karayaka sheep subpopulations. Archives Animal Breeding 2020; 63 (2): 269-275. doi: 10/.5194/ aab-63-269-2020
- 56. Gürler Ş, Bozkaya F. Genetic diversity of three native goat populations raised in the South-Eastern region of Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2013; 19 (2): 207-213. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2012.7475
- 57. Bulut Z, Kurar E, Ozsensoy Y, Altunok V, Nizamlioglu M. Genetic diversity of eight domestic goat populations raised in Turkey. Biomed Research International 2016; 2830394. doi: 10.1155/2016/2830394
- 58. Gül S, Yilmaz O, Gündüz Z, Keskin M, Cemal I et al. The genetic structure of the goat breeds belonging to Northwest part of Fertile Crescent. Small Ruminant Research 2020; 182 (1): 22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.09.009
- 59. Karsli T, Demir E, Fidan HG, Aslan M, Karsli BA et al. Determination of genetic variability, population structure and genetic differentiation of indigenous Turkish goat breeds based on SSR loci. Small Ruminant Research 2020; 190 (1): 106147. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106147
- 60. Kaya M, Yıldız MA. Genetic diversityamong Turkish native chickens, Denizli and Gerze, estimated by microsatellite markers. Biochemical Genetics 2008; 46 (1): 480-491. doi: 10.1007/s10528-008-9164-8
- 61. Mercan L, Okumuş A. Genetic diversity of village chickens in Central Black Sea region and commercial chickens in Turkey by using microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2015; 39 (2): 134-140. doi: 10/3906/vet-1308- 44
- 62. Karsli T, Balcıoğlu M.S. Genetic characterization and population structure of six brown layer pure lines using microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2019; 32 (1): 49-57. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0870
- 63. Touma S, Arakawa A, Oikawa T. Evaluation of the genetic structure of indigenous Okinawa Agu pigs using microsatellite markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2020; 33 (2): 212-218. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0034
- 64. Koban E, Denizci M, Aslan O, Aktoprakligil D, Aksu S et al. High microsatellite and mitochondrial diversity in Anatolian native horse breeds shows Anatolia as a genetic conduit between Europe and Asia. Animal Genetics 2011; 42 (4): 401-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02285.x
- 65. Yatkın S, Özdil F, Özkan Ünal E, Genç S, Kaplan S et al. Genetic characterization of native donkey (Equus asinus) populations of Turkey using microsatellite markers. Animals 2020; 10 (6): 1093. doi: 10.3390/ani10061093
- 66. Hariyono DNH, Maharani D, Cho S, Manjula P, Seo D et al. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship analyzed by microsatellite markers in eight Indonesian local duck populations. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2019; 32 (1): 31-37. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0055
- 67. Badr OAM, El-Shawaf IIS, Khalil MHA, Refaat MH, Ramadan SIA. Molecular genetic diversity and conservation priorities of Egyptian rabbit breeds. World Rabbit Science 2019; 27 (3): 135-141. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2019.8923
- 68. Altınalan A. Türkiye’deki yerli sıgır ırklarının mikrosatellit DNA markırlarla genetik karakterizasyonu. PhD, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana, Turkey, 2005. (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 69. Özşensoy Y, Kurar E, Doğan M, Bulut Z, Altunok V et al. Genetic characterization of some native cattle breeds in Turkey by using STR markers. Research Journal of Biology Sciences 2010; 3 (1): 155-163 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 70. Özşensoy Y, Kurar E, Doğan M., Bulut Z, Nizamlıoğlu M et al. Genetic characterization of Turkish cattle breeds by microsatellite markers: Usefulness for parentage testing. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 20 (4): 521-526. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2013.10454
- 71. Martín‐Burriel I, García‐Muro E, Zaragoza P. Genetic diversity analysis of six Spanish native cattle breeds using microsatellites. Animal Genetics 1999; 30 (3): 177-182. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2052.1999.00437.x
- 72. Edwards CJ, Loftus RT, Bradley DG, Dolf G, Looft C. Relationships between the endangered Pustertaler–Sprinzen and three related European cattle breeds as analysed with 20 microsatellite loci. Animal Genetics 2000; 31 (5): 329-332. doi: 10.1046/j1365-2052.2000.00651.x
- 73. Hansen C, Shrestha JNB, Parker RJ, Crow GH, Mcalpine PJ et al. Genetic diversity among Canadienne, Brown Swiss, Holstein, and Jersey cattle of Canada based on 15 bovine microsatellite markers. Genome 2002; 45 (5): 897-904. doi: 10.1139/g02-063
- 74. Kim KS, Yeo JS, Choi CB. Genetic diversity of north‐east Asian cattle based on microsatellite data. Animal Genetics 2002; 33 (3): 201-204. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00848.x
- 75. Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Jann OC, Weimann C, Erhardt G. Genetic diversity, introgression and relationships among West/ Central African cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution 2004; 36 (6): 673. doi: 10.1051/gse:2004024
- 76. Pandey AK, Sharma R, Singh Y, Prakashi BB, Ahlawat SPS. Genetic diversity studies of Kherigarh cattle based on microsatellite markers. Journal of Genetics 2006; 85 (2): 117- 122. doi: 10.1007/BF02729017
- 77. Mao Y, Chang H, Yang Z, Zhang L, Xu M et al. The analysis of genetic diversity and differentiation of six Chinese cattle populations using microsatellite markers. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 2008; 35 (1): 25-32. doi: 10.1016/S1673- 8527(08)60004-1
- 78. Sharma R, Kishore A, Mukesh M, Ahlawat S, Maitra A et al. Genetic diversity and relationship of Indian cattle inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. BMC Genetics 2015; 16 (1): 73. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0221-0
- 79. Sanarana Y, Visser C, Bosman L, Nephawe K, Maiwashe A et al. Genetic diversity in South African Nguni cattle ecotypes based on microsatellite markers. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2016; 48 (2): 379-385. doi: 10.1007/s11250-015- 0962-9
- 80. Scheu A, Powell A, Bollongino R, Vigne JD, Tresset A et al. The genetic prehistory of domesticated cattle from their origin to the spread across Europe. BMC Genetics 2015; 16 (1): 54. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0203-2
- 81. Di Lorenzo P, Lancioni H, Ceccobelli S, Colli L, Cardinali I et al. Mitochondrial DNA variants of Podolian cattle breeds testify for a dual maternal origin. PlosOne 2018; 13 (2): e0192567. doi: 10.1371./journal.pone.0192567
- 82. Ceccobelli S, Lasagna E, Demir E, Rovelli G, Albertini E et al. Molecular identification of the “Facciuta Della Valnerina” local goat population reared in the Umbria Region, Italy. Animals 2020; 10 (4): 601. doi: 10.3390/ani10040601
| APA | DEMİR E, Karslı T, Balcıoğlu M (2021). A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. , 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| Chicago | DEMİR Eymen,Karslı Taki,Balcıoğlu Murat Soner A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. (2021): 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| MLA | DEMİR Eymen,Karslı Taki,Balcıoğlu Murat Soner A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. , 2021, ss.1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| AMA | DEMİR E,Karslı T,Balcıoğlu M A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. . 2021; 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| Vancouver | DEMİR E,Karslı T,Balcıoğlu M A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. . 2021; 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| IEEE | DEMİR E,Karslı T,Balcıoğlu M "A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers." , ss.1 - 10, 2021. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| ISNAD | DEMİR, Eymen vd. "A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers". (2021), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| APA | DEMİR E, Karslı T, Balcıoğlu M (2021). A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45(1), 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| Chicago | DEMİR Eymen,Karslı Taki,Balcıoğlu Murat Soner A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 45, no.1 (2021): 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| MLA | DEMİR Eymen,Karslı Taki,Balcıoğlu Murat Soner A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.45, no.1, 2021, ss.1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| AMA | DEMİR E,Karslı T,Balcıoğlu M A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021; 45(1): 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| Vancouver | DEMİR E,Karslı T,Balcıoğlu M A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021; 45(1): 1 - 10. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| IEEE | DEMİR E,Karslı T,Balcıoğlu M "A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45, ss.1 - 10, 2021. 10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
| ISNAD | DEMİR, Eymen vd. "A comprehensive review on genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among native Turkish cattle breeds based on microsatellite markers". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 45/1 (2021), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2006-10 |
