Aim: We aimed to assess the viewpoints and information levels of gynecologists and obstetricians about vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Material and method: Questions on a survey form were directed to assistant and specialist clinicians employed in gynecology and obstetrics within Ankara City Hospital, who volunteered and had 1 year or more specialization duration. To clinicians were asked 6 questions apart from demographic data. In our form, the clinician's opinion on VBAC, whether their have VBAC experience, whether they would recommend it to their patients, as well as four items containing advantages and three items containing risks were asked. Results: A total of 217 clinicians, including 157 assistant and 60 specialist doctors, participated in our research. The ages were 24-52 years (mean 30.66 ± 5.70) and mean professional experience duration was 1-25 years (median 3). Among participants, 168 (77.4%) were women and 49 (22.6%) were men. In answer to the question “is VBAC possible?”, 200 doctors (99.2%) said yes, while 10 (4.6%) said no and 5 (4.2%) said they did not know. The most frequent response about advantages was ‘no repeated abdominal surgery’ according to 194 people (89.4%). Rupture risk was the risk that most people were informed of with 208 responses (95.9%). When doctors were asked would they recommend VBAC to their patients, 96 (44.2%) said they were ‘undecided’, 92 (42.4%) said they ‘would not recommend’ and 29 (13.4%) said they ‘would recommend’. Doctors responding that they were undecided or would not recommend were asked about their greatest hesitation in an open-ended question. It was observed that 179 doctors (82.48%) gave the answer ‘medicolegal concerns’ to this question. Conclusion: Based on the findings in our survey results, it appears more than half of obstetricians cannot be persuaded about VBAC due to medicolegal concerns.