Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions

KIR, HAKAN

doi:10.3906/vet-2005-45

Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions

Hakan KIR (Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kırşehir, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

2 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 419 - 426 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/vet-2005-45 İndeks Tarihi: 31-01-2022

Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions

Öz:

Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the appropriate mixture rates of Hungarian vetch and oat varieties in Kırşehir province of Turkey for two years 2017–2019. In this study, the yield and quality characteristics of single and mixed cultivations of three oat (Avena sativa L.) varieties and Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannoica Crantz) were determined. Yield characteristics such as green forage and dry matter, crude protein and digestible dry matter yields and quality characteristics such as crude protein ratio, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, digestible dry matter, total digestible nutrient, dry matter intake and relative feed value were examined in the single and mixed cultivations. The result of the two-year research indicated that the highest green forage, dry matter, crude protein and digestible dry matter yields were obtained from the mixture of 25% HV + 75% O mixture of Saia oat variety (18.3, 5.7, 0.76, 3.6 t ha–1, respectively). The highest crude protein, total digestible nutrients, relative feed value and the lowest ADF, NDF ratio were obtained from the single cultivation of Hungarian vetch (18.1%, 65.6%, 163.1 and 27.7%, 38.4%, respectively). In conclusion, with respect to the investigated quality parameters with forage yield, 50% HV + 50% O mixtures can be suggested.Key words: Crude protein, dry matter yield, acid detergent fiber, relative feed value

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Anil L, Park J, Phipps RH, Miller FA. Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Science 1998; 53 (4): 301-317. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2494.1998.00144.x
2. Ofori F, Stern WR. Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 1987; 41: 41-90. doi: 10.1016/S0065- 2113(08)60802-0
3. Formelová Z, Chrenková M, Mlyneková Z, Pozdíšek J, Látal O et al. Protein quality of legume-cereal mixtures in ruminants’nutrition. Slovak Journal of Animal Science 2019; 52 (04): 171-177.
4. Francis CA, Smith ME. Variety development for multiple cropping systems. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 1985; 3 (2): 133-168. doi 10.1080/07352688509382207
5. Baumann DT, Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J, Van Laar HH, Kropff MJ. Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition. Agricultural Systems 2002; 73 (2): 173-203. doi 10.1016/S0308- 521x(01)00084-1
6. Seydosoglu S, Bengisu G. Effects of different mixture ratios and harvest periods on grass quality of triticale (xTriticosecale wittmack) - forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) intercrop. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2019; 17 (6): 13263-13271. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1706_1326313271
7. Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 2006; 24 (4): 325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.010
8. Çınar S. Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some cultivars and populations of tall fescue (Festuca arundinaceaeSchreb.) in Çukurova Region. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University 2012; 2012 (1): 29-33.
9. Ay İ, Mut H. Determination of suitable mixture ratio of common vetch and pea with oats and barley. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 2017; 5 (2): 55-62.
10. Aksoy İ, Nursoy H. Determination of the varying of vegetation harvested hungarian vetch and wheat mixture on nutrient content, degradation kinetics, in vitro digestibility and relative feed value. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2009; 16 (6): 925-931.
11. Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research 2006; 99 (2-3): 106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008.
12. Yolcu H, Polat M, Aksakal V. Morphologic, yield and quality parameters of some annual forages as sole crops and intercropping mixtures in dry conditions for livestock. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment 2009; 7 (3-4): 594-599.
13. Dhima KV, Vasilakoglou IB, Keco RX, Dima AK, Paschalidis KA et al. Forage yield and competition indices of faba bean intercropped with oat. Grass and Forage Science 2014; 69 (2): 376-383. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12084
14. Yavuz T. The effects of different cutting stages on forage yield and quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) mixtures. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 2017; 26 (1): 67-74. doi: 10.21597/jist.2016624167
15. Kaçar B, Katkat AV. Fertilizers and Fertilization Technique. Printing. Nobel Publication No. 1119. Science and Biology Publishing Series: 34. 6th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Publication; 2018 (in Turkish).
16. Sayar MS, Anlarsal AE, Başbağ M. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) Analysis for biological yield in Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz) genotypes. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 2016; 25 (special issue-2): 235-240.
17. Sleugh B, Moore KJ, George JR, Brummer EC. Binary legumegrass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution. Agronomy Journal 2000; 92 (1): 24-29. doi: 10.2134/agronj2000.92124x
18. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74 (10): 3583-3597.
19. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International (AOAC). AOAC Official Methods of Analysis. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW(editors). 18th ed. Maryland, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International; 2005.
20. Horrocks RD, Valentine JF. Harvested Forages. London, UK: Academic Press; 1999.
21. Sheaffer CC, Peterson MA, McCaslin M, Volenec JJ, Cherney JH et al. Acide detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber concentration and relative feed value, in North American. In: Alfalfa Improvement Conference; Beltsville, MD, USA; 1995 pp. A-6.
22. Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science 1978; 47 (3): 747-759.
23. Jeranyama P, Garcia AD. Understanding relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). Extension Extra. Paper 352. Brookings, SD, USA: South Dakota State University; 2004.
24. Lacefield GD. Alfalfa hay quality makes the difference. USA: Agriculture and Natural Resources Publications; 1988.
25. Petersen RG. Agricultural Field Experiments: Design and Analysis. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker; 1994.
26. Lithourgidis AS, Dordas CA, Damalas CA, Vlachostergios DN. Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2011; 5 (4): 396-410.
27. Mahapatra SC. Study of grass-legume intercropping system in terms of competition indices and monetary advantage index under acid lateritic soil of India. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2011; 1 (1): 1-6.
28. Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dordas CA. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research 2007; 100 (2-3): 249- 256. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008
29. Andrzejewska J, Contreras-Govea FE, Pastuszka A, Kotwica K, Albrecht KA. Performance of oat (Avena sativa L.) sown in late summer for autumn forage production in Central Europe. Grass and Forage Science 2019; 74 (1): 97-103. doi: 10.1111/ gfs.12400
30. Barsila SR. The fodder oat (Avena sativa) mixed legume forages farming: Nutritional and ecological benefits. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 2018; 1 (1): 206-222.
31. Aşcı ÖÖ, Eğritaş Ö. Determination of forage yield, some quality properties and competition in common vetch-cereal mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2017; 23 (2017): 242-252.
32. Sturludóttir E, Brophy C, Belanger G, Gustavsson AM, Jørgensen M et al. Benefits of mixing grasses and legumes for herbage yield and nutritive value in n orthern Europe and Canada. Grass and Forage Science 2014; 69 (2): 229-240.
33. Marten GC, Buxton DR, Barnes RF. Feeding value (forage quality). Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement 1988; 29: 463-491. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr29.c14
34. Güney M, Bingöl NT, Taylan A. Relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ) used in the classification of forage quality. Atatürk University Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2016; 11 (2): 254-258.
35. Rivera D, Parish J. Interpreting forage and feed analysis report. Mississippi, USA: Mississippi State University Extension Service; 2010.
36. Carr PM, Horsley RD, Poland WW. Barley, oat, and cerealpea mixtures as dryland forages in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 2004; 96 (3): 677-684. doi 10.2134/ agronj2004.0677.
37. Linn JG, Martin NP. Forage Quality Tests and Interpretation. Minnesota, USA: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Extension Service; 1989.
38. Cinar S, Ozkurt M, Cetin R. Effects of nitrogen fertilization rates on forage yield and quality of annual ryegrass (Lolium Multiflorum L.) in Central Black Sea Climatic Zone in Turkey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2019; 18 (1): 417-432.
39. Pinkerton BW, Cross DL, Forage Quality. Forage Leaflet 16. Clemson, SC, USA: Clemson University Publishing; 1991.

APA	KIR H (2021). Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. , 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
Chicago	KIR HAKAN Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. (2021): 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
MLA	KIR HAKAN Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. , 2021, ss.419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
AMA	KIR H Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. . 2021; 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
Vancouver	KIR H Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. . 2021; 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
IEEE	KIR H "Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions." , ss.419 - 426, 2021. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
ISNAD	KIR, HAKAN. "Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions". (2021), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2005-45

APA	KIR H (2021). Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45(3), 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
Chicago	KIR HAKAN Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 45, no.3 (2021): 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
MLA	KIR HAKAN Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.45, no.3, 2021, ss.419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
AMA	KIR H Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021; 45(3): 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
Vancouver	KIR H Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021; 45(3): 419 - 426. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
IEEE	KIR H "Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45, ss.419 - 426, 2021. 10.3906/vet-2005-45
ISNAD	KIR, HAKAN. "Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 45/3 (2021), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2005-45