Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 6 - 11 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2022

The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis

Öz:
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% hyaluronic acid (HA), and 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) gel in reducing pain and improving clinical signs and symptoms of alveolar osteitis. Methodology: The clinical data of patients treated for alveolar osteitis between 01/01/2015 and 01/01/2019 were retrieved for this study. All patients were initially treated by curettage and physiological saline irrigation. Patients were then divided into 4 groups. Group 1 was considered the control group; no other biomaterials were administered after curettage and physiological saline irrigation. All other groups were administered an additional treatment in the socket after curettage and physiological saline irrigation (Group 1 – Alveogyl; Group 2 - 0.8% HA; Group 3 - 0.2% CHX). Patients were evaluated before surgery as well as days 3 and 7 after surgery. The postoperative evaluations included: Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, the presence of clinical signs and symptoms of exposed alveolar bone, disorganized blood clots, inflammation around the socket, and bad odor and taste. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in all control evaluations (p>0.05). There was significantly reduced inflammation around the extraction socket on postoperative day 7 in the CHX group compared to that in the control group (p<0.05). No other significant changes in clinical signs and symptoms were observed among groups. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between curettage with physiological saline irrigation alone and the addition of Alveogyl, 0.8% HA, or 0.2% CHX in the reduction of pain in alveolar osteitis. Nonetheless, CHX may reduce inflammation around the extraction sockets.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Daly B, Sharif MO, Newton T, Jones K, Worthington HV: Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD006968. (Crossref)
  • 2. Blum IR: Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:309-17. (Crossref)
  • 3. Kolokythas A, Olech E, Miloro M: Alveolar osteitis: a comprehensive review of concepts and controversies. Int J Dent 2010;2010:249073. (Crossref)
  • 4. Field EA, Speechley JA, Rotter E, Scott J: Dry socket incidence compared after a 12 year interval. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;23:419-27. (Crossref)
  • 5. Nusair YM, Younis MH: Prevalence, clinical picture, and risk factors of dry socket in a Jordanian dental teaching center. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:53-63. (Crossref)
  • 6. Kaya GŞ, Yapici G, Savaş Z, Güngörmüş M: Comparison of alvogyl, SaliCept patch, and low-level laser therapy in the management of alveolar osteitis J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1571-7. (Crossref)
  • 7. Torres-Lagares D, Infante-Cossio P, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Romero-Ruiz MM, Garcia-Calderon M, Serrera-Figallo MA: Intraalveolar chlorhexidine gel for the prevention of dry socket in mandibular third molar surgery. A pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E179-84.
  • 8. Trieger N, Schlagel GD: Preventing dry socket. A simple procedure that works. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:67-8. (Crossref)
  • 9. Alissa R, Esposito M, Horner K, Oliver R: The influence of platelet-rich plasma on the healing of extraction sockets: an explorative randomised clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010;3:121-34.
  • 10. Burgoyne CC, Giglio JA, Reese SE, Sima AP, Laskin DM: The efficacy of a topical anesthetic gel in the relief of pain associated with localized alveolar osteitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:144-8. (Crossref)
  • 11. Hita-Iglesias P, Torres-Lagares D, Flores-Ruiz R, MagallanesAbad N, Basallote-Gonzalez M, Gutierrez-Perez JL: Effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel versus chlorhexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:441-5. (Crossref)
  • 12. Caso A, Hung LK, Beirne OR: Prevention of alveolar osteitis with chlorhexidine: a meta-analytic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):155-9. (Crossref)
  • 13. Chen WY, Abatangelo G: Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen 1999;7:79-89. (Crossref)
  • 14. Soldati D, Rahm F, Pasche P: Mucosal wound healing after nasal surgery. A controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of hyaluronic acid containing cream. Drugs Exp Clin Res 1999;25:253-61.
  • 15. Bergeret-Galley C, Latouche X, Illouz YG: The value of a new filler material in corrective and cosmetic surgery: DermaLive and DermaDeep. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2001;25:249-55. (Crossref)
  • 16. Liguori V, Guillemin C, Pesce GF, Mirimanoff RO, Bernier J: Double-blind, randomized clinical study comparing hyaluronic acid cream to placebo in patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1997;42:155-61. (Crossref)
  • 17. Nolan A, Baillie C, Badminton J, Rudralingham M, Seymour RA: The efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid in the management of recurrent aphthous ulceration. J Oral Pathol Med 2006;35:461- 5. (Crossref)
  • 18. Dubovina D, Mihailović B, Bukumirić Z, Vlahović Z, Miladinović M, Miković N, Lazić Z: The use of hyaluronic and aminocaproic acid in the treatment of alveolar osteitis. Vojnosanit Pregl 2016;73:1010-5. (Crossref)
  • 19. Afat IM, Akdoğan ET, Gönül O: Effects of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin alone and combined with hyaluronic acid on early soft tissue healing after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A prospective clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:280-286. (Crossref)
  • 20. Bayoumi AM, Jan A, Amoudi WA, Shakir M: The Effects of Using Hyaluronic Acid on the Extraction Sockets. Int J Dent Oral Health 2015;2:1-5(Crossref)
  • 21. Guazzo R, Perissinotto E, Mazzoleni S, Ricci S, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Sivolella S: Effect on wound healing of a topical gel containing amino acid and sodium hyaluronate applied to the alveolar socket after mandibular third molar extraction: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int 2018;49:831-840.
  • 22. Birn H: Fibrinolytic activity of alveolar bone in "dry socket". Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30:23-32. (Crossref)
  • 23. Faizel S, Thomas S, Yuvaraj V, Prabhu S, Tripathi G: Comparison between neocone, alvogyl and zinc oxide eugenol packing for the treatment of dry socket: a double blind randomised control trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015;14:312- 20. (Crossref)
  • 24. Dutt M: Comparison of efficacy of chlorhexidine digluconate gel and combination of iodoform & butyl paraaminobenzoate in management of dry socket- a clinical study. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res 2018;6:20-22.
  • 25. Chaurasia NK, Upadhyaya C, Dixit S: Comparative Study to Determine the efficacy of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Alveogyl in Treatment of Dry Socket. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2017;15:203-206.
APA Dereci Ö, TEKIN G, KOŞAR Y (2021). The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. , 6 - 11.
Chicago Dereci Ömür,TEKIN GORKEM,KOŞAR Yasin Çağlar The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. (2021): 6 - 11.
MLA Dereci Ömür,TEKIN GORKEM,KOŞAR Yasin Çağlar The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. , 2021, ss.6 - 11.
AMA Dereci Ö,TEKIN G,KOŞAR Y The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. . 2021; 6 - 11.
Vancouver Dereci Ö,TEKIN G,KOŞAR Y The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. . 2021; 6 - 11.
IEEE Dereci Ö,TEKIN G,KOŞAR Y "The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis." , ss.6 - 11, 2021.
ISNAD Dereci, Ömür vd. "The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis". (2021), 6-11.
APA Dereci Ö, TEKIN G, KOŞAR Y (2021). The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research, 11(1), 6 - 11.
Chicago Dereci Ömür,TEKIN GORKEM,KOŞAR Yasin Çağlar The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research 11, no.1 (2021): 6 - 11.
MLA Dereci Ömür,TEKIN GORKEM,KOŞAR Yasin Çağlar The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research, vol.11, no.1, 2021, ss.6 - 11.
AMA Dereci Ö,TEKIN G,KOŞAR Y The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(1): 6 - 11.
Vancouver Dereci Ö,TEKIN G,KOŞAR Y The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(1): 6 - 11.
IEEE Dereci Ö,TEKIN G,KOŞAR Y "The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis." International Dental Research, 11, ss.6 - 11, 2021.
ISNAD Dereci, Ömür vd. "The comparison of the efficacy of Alveogyl, 0.8% Hyaluronic acid, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Digluconate in alveolar osteitis". International Dental Research 11/1 (2021), 6-11.