Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 54 - 61 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2022

Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength

Öz:
Aim: In this in vitro study, the effect of two adhesive systems applied to surfaces of different polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a composite resin was compared. Methodology: Eighty PEEK specimens were divided into four groups (n=20): Unfilled PEEK (UF), carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR), glassfiber-reinforced PEEK (GFR), and ceramic-reinforced PEEK (CR). Each group was further divided into two subgroups (n=10): Visio.link (VL) and Single Bond Universal (SB). The specimens with 8-mm diameter and 5-mm thickness were prepared. SBS was examined using a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. Surface properties were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The surface properties of the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Effect of different PEEK and adhesive systems on SBS was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). SBS values for CFR-VL and UF-VL groups were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and UF-SB groups. SBS values for the GFR-VL group were statistically more significant than that for the UF-VL group. SBS values for the CF-SB group were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and CFR-SB groups. Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification, and adhesive and mixed failure modes were observed. Conclusion: PEEK composites with different contents and properties can be used in fixed prosthetic restorations. However, additional experimental and clinical studies are required to investigate different PEEK frameworks and composite veneers.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Henriques B, Fabris D, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Sousa AC, Hammes N, Souza JCM, Silva FS, Fredel MC. Influence of laser structuring of PEEK, PEEK-GF30 and PEEK-CF30 surfaces on the shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.2018;84:225-34. (Crossref)
  • 2. Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ferrari M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health.2020;20:217. (Crossref)
  • 3. Mishra S, Chowdhary R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:208-22. (Crossref)
  • 4. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69. (Crossref)
  • 5. Niem T, Youssef N, Wöstmann B. Energy dissipation capacities of CAD-CAM restorative materials: A comparative evaluation of resilience and toughness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:101-9. (Crossref)
  • 6. Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1044- 52. (Crossref)
  • 7. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.2013;101:1209-16. (Crossref)
  • 8. Cabello-Domínguez G, Pérez-López J, Veiga-López B, González D, Revilla-León M. Maxillary zirconia and mandibular composite resin-lithium disilicate-modified PEEK fixed implant-supported restorations for a completely edentulous patient with an atrophic maxilla and mandible: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent.2020;124:403-10. (Crossref)
  • 9. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair. J Dent.2019;86:1-16. (Crossref)
  • 10. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:441-8. (Crossref)
  • 11. Gama LT, Duque TM, Özcan M, Philippi AG, Mezzomo LAM, Gonçalves TMSV. Adhesion to high-performance polymers applied in dentistry: A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2020;36:e93-e108. (Crossref)
  • 12. Caglar I, Ates SM, Yesil Duymus Z. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e342-e349. (Crossref)
  • 13. Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning.2014;36:64-75. (Crossref)
  • 14. Silthampitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J.2016;35:668-74. (Crossref)
  • 15. Stawarczyk B, Taufall S, Roos M, Schmidlin PR, Lümkemann N. Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):763-71. (Crossref)
  • 16. Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34(9):e246-e254. (Crossref)
  • 17. Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Sereno N, Kolbeck C. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(3):739-44. (Crossref)
  • 18. Jin HY, Teng MH, Wang ZJ, Li X, Liang JY, Wang WX, Jiang S, Zhao BD. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implantsupported fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(4):383-8. (Crossref)
  • 19. Younis M, Unkovskiy A, ElAyouti A, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Spintzyk S. The Effect of Various Plasma Gases on the Shear Bond Strength between Unfilled Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Veneering Composite Following Artificial Aging. Materials (Basel). 2019 May 4;12(9):1447. doi: 10.3390/ma12091447. (Crossref)
  • 20. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Keul C. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1278-8. (Crossref)
  • 21. Bunz O, Benz CI, Arnold WH, Piwowarczyk A. Shear bond strength of veneering composite to high performance polymers. Dent Mater J. 2020 Oct 20. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-300. (Crossref)
  • 22. Ates SM, Caglar I, Duymus ZY. The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone, J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(20):2220- 31. (Crossref)
  • 23. Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C, Langrieger S, Kunze J, Handel G, Rosentritt M. The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(1):2-8. (Crossref)
  • 24. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Gröger G, Handel G. Adhesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surfaces using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers. J Dent. 2003;31(1):33-42. (Crossref)
  • 25. Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RH. Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effect of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci.2010;18:591-8. (Crossref)
  • 26. Eren D, Bektas ÖÖ, Siso SH. Three different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methods. Acta Odontol Scan. 2013;71:978–83. (Crossref)
  • 27. Escobar M, Henriques B, Fredel MC, Silva FS, Özcan M, Souza JCM. Adhesion of PEEK to resin-matrix composites used in dentistry: a short review on surface modification and bond strength, J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(11):1241-52.
  • 28. Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Oct 7;27:e20180678. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0678. (Crossref)
  • 29. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(4):383-92.
APA DEMIRCI F, Tekin S (2021). Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. , 54 - 61.
Chicago DEMIRCI FATIH,Tekin Samet Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. (2021): 54 - 61.
MLA DEMIRCI FATIH,Tekin Samet Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. , 2021, ss.54 - 61.
AMA DEMIRCI F,Tekin S Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. . 2021; 54 - 61.
Vancouver DEMIRCI F,Tekin S Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. . 2021; 54 - 61.
IEEE DEMIRCI F,Tekin S "Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength." , ss.54 - 61, 2021.
ISNAD DEMIRCI, FATIH - Tekin, Samet. "Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength". (2021), 54-61.
APA DEMIRCI F, Tekin S (2021). Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research, 11(2), 54 - 61.
Chicago DEMIRCI FATIH,Tekin Samet Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research 11, no.2 (2021): 54 - 61.
MLA DEMIRCI FATIH,Tekin Samet Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research, vol.11, no.2, 2021, ss.54 - 61.
AMA DEMIRCI F,Tekin S Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(2): 54 - 61.
Vancouver DEMIRCI F,Tekin S Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(2): 54 - 61.
IEEE DEMIRCI F,Tekin S "Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength." International Dental Research, 11, ss.54 - 61, 2021.
ISNAD DEMIRCI, FATIH - Tekin, Samet. "Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength". International Dental Research 11/2 (2021), 54-61.