Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 62 - 66 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2022

Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment

Öz:
Aim: The present study aims to evaluate the pain experienced by individuals during the first days of fixed orthodontic treatment. Methodology: One hundred and twenty patients (65 female; mean age: 18 ± 21 years) were given fixed orthodontic treatment, including the placement of a 0.014 Ni-Ti conventional arch wire (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA) after the bonding procedure with maxillary and mandibular rear 0.022” slot Roth brackets (Mini Master Series, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the level of pain the patients experienced on the first, second, and seventh days of the treatment. The mean VAS scores of the male and female patients were compared using the student’s t-test, ANOVA, and the chi-square test. Results: Males were found to have higher mean VAS scores on the first and second days of the treatment compared to the females (p = 0.001 and p = 0.038, respectively). A greater proportion of the patients (33.33%) experienced pain on the first day of the treatment compared to the second and seventh days (p <0.05). Conclusion: It was determined that the patients experienced the highest level of pain on the first day of fixed orthodontic treatment. The male patients experienced a higher level of pain than the females on the first and second days of the treatment.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Henriques B, Fabris D, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Sousa AC, Hammes N, Souza JCM, Silva FS, Fredel MC. Influence of laser structuring of PEEK, PEEK-GF30 and PEEK-CF30 surfaces on the shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.2018;84:225-34. (Crossref)
  • 2. Papathanasiou I, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ferrari M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health.2020;20:217. (Crossref)
  • 3. Mishra S, Chowdhary R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:208-22. (Crossref)
  • 4. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-69. (Crossref)
  • 5. Niem T, Youssef N, Wöstmann B. Energy dissipation capacities of CAD-CAM restorative materials: A comparative evaluation of resilience and toughness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:101-9. (Crossref)
  • 6. Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1044- 52. (Crossref)
  • 7. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.2013;101:1209-16. (Crossref)
  • 8. Cabello-Domínguez G, Pérez-López J, Veiga-López B, González D, Revilla-León M. Maxillary zirconia and mandibular composite resin-lithium disilicate-modified PEEK fixed implant-supported restorations for a completely edentulous patient with an atrophic maxilla and mandible: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent.2020;124:403-10. (Crossref)
  • 9. Kanzow P, Wiegand A, Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair. J Dent.2019;86:1-16. (Crossref)
  • 10. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:441-8. (Crossref)
  • 11. Gama LT, Duque TM, Özcan M, Philippi AG, Mezzomo LAM, Gonçalves TMSV. Adhesion to high-performance polymers applied in dentistry: A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2020;36:e93-e108. (Crossref)
  • 12. Caglar I, Ates SM, Yesil Duymus Z. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e342-e349. (Crossref)
  • 13. Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning.2014;36:64-75. (Crossref)
  • 14. Silthampitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J.2016;35:668-74. (Crossref)
  • 15. Stawarczyk B, Taufall S, Roos M, Schmidlin PR, Lümkemann N. Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):763-71. (Crossref)
  • 16. Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34(9):e246-e254. (Crossref)
  • 17. Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Sereno N, Kolbeck C. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(3):739-44. (Crossref)
  • 18. Jin HY, Teng MH, Wang ZJ, Li X, Liang JY, Wang WX, Jiang S, Zhao BD. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implantsupported fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(4):383-8. (Crossref)
  • 19. Younis M, Unkovskiy A, ElAyouti A, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Spintzyk S. The Effect of Various Plasma Gases on the Shear Bond Strength between Unfilled Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Veneering Composite Following Artificial Aging. Materials (Basel). 2019 May 4;12(9):1447. doi: 10.3390/ma12091447. (Crossref)
  • 20. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Keul C. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1278-8. (Crossref)
  • 21. Bunz O, Benz CI, Arnold WH, Piwowarczyk A. Shear bond strength of veneering composite to high performance polymers. Dent Mater J. 2020 Oct 20. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-300. (Crossref)
  • 22. Ates SM, Caglar I, Duymus ZY. The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone, J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(20):2220- 31. (Crossref)
  • 23. Behr M, Proff P, Kolbeck C, Langrieger S, Kunze J, Handel G, Rosentritt M. The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(1):2-8. (Crossref)
  • 24. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Gröger G, Handel G. Adhesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surfaces using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers. J Dent. 2003;31(1):33-42. (Crossref)
  • 25. Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RH. Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effect of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci.2010;18:591-8. (Crossref)
  • 26. Eren D, Bektas ÖÖ, Siso SH. Three different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methods. Acta Odontol Scan. 2013;71:978–83. (Crossref)
  • 27. Escobar M, Henriques B, Fredel MC, Silva FS, Özcan M, Souza JCM. Adhesion of PEEK to resin-matrix composites used in dentistry: a short review on surface modification and bond strength, J Adhes Sci Technol. 2020;34(11):1241-52.
  • 28. Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Oct 7;27:e20180678. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0678. (Crossref)
  • 29. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(4):383-92.
APA Topal R (2021). Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. , 62 - 66.
Chicago Topal Refika Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. (2021): 62 - 66.
MLA Topal Refika Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. , 2021, ss.62 - 66.
AMA Topal R Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. . 2021; 62 - 66.
Vancouver Topal R Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. . 2021; 62 - 66.
IEEE Topal R "Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment." , ss.62 - 66, 2021.
ISNAD Topal, Refika. "Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment". (2021), 62-66.
APA Topal R (2021). Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. International Dental Research, 11(2), 62 - 66.
Chicago Topal Refika Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. International Dental Research 11, no.2 (2021): 62 - 66.
MLA Topal Refika Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. International Dental Research, vol.11, no.2, 2021, ss.62 - 66.
AMA Topal R Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(2): 62 - 66.
Vancouver Topal R Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(2): 62 - 66.
IEEE Topal R "Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment." International Dental Research, 11, ss.62 - 66, 2021.
ISNAD Topal, Refika. "Perception of pain during initial fixed orthodontic treatment". International Dental Research 11/2 (2021), 62-66.