The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations

ünal, mehmet; ATAKUL, Fatma

The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations

Mehmet Ünal, (Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye)

Fatma Atakul (Dicle Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı'ndan Emekli, Diyarbakır, Türkiye)

International Dental Research

2 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 83 - 92 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2022

The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations

Öz:

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different adhesive systems in amalgam restorations and their effects on microleakage. Methodology: In this study, 105 caries-free extracted human permanent molar teeth were used. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups (n=21), and class I cavities were created on the surface of each tooth. The first was a control group to which no adhesive system was applied. Amalgam Liner (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven Germany) was applied to Group II, Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group III, Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group IV, Amalgambond Plus (Parkell Inc.Edgewood, NY USA) was applied to Group V, and then amalgam (Tytin, Kerr, California USA) restorations were placed. After the polishing process, samples were subjected to thermocycling 1,000 times. Teeth were sectioned buccopalatinally/lingually, and microleakage scores of the occlusal walls were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 15X magnification by a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 4. One tooth was selected randomly from each group for SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), and SEM LEO EVO 40 (LEO Ltd., Cambridge UK) photographs of amalgam-tooth hard tissue interfaces were also taken at different magnifications. The results of the microleakage tests were statistically analyzed by both the Kruskal-Wallis Test and the Mann Whitney U Test. Results: In terms of microleakage among groups, the differences that were determined were significant (p<0.05). Microleakage within the control group was determined to be the highest, and statistically important differences were observed between the other groups. Group V (Amalgambond Plus) was determined to have the lowest microleakage scores. Conclusion: In prepared class I cavities, amalgam adhesive systems are effective in preventing occlusal microleakage but do not completely blocked it.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Heymann H, Swift, Jr. E, Ritter A. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 6th ed. Mosby; 2013.
2. Lombard R, Du Preez IC, Oberholzer TG. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements. SADJ 2007;62(2):056, 058-61.
3. Saba K, Maxood A, Abdullah S, Riaz A, Din SU. Comparison of frequency of post-operative sensitivity in amalgam restorations using copal varnish and dentin adhesive liner. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30(2):163-6.
4. Özok AR, de Gee AJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The influence of resin composite and bonded amalgam restorations on dentine permeability in Class II cavities in vitro. Dent Mater 2001;17(6):477-84. (Crossref)
5. Moazzami SM, Moosavi H, Moddaber M, et al. Effect of self-etch adhesives on self-sealing ability of high-copper amalgams. J Dent (Shiraz) 2016;17(4):326-33.
6. Harris NO, Garcia-Godoy F, Nielsen Nathe C. The developing carious lesion. In: Primary preventive dentistry. 6th ed. Pearson; 2004.
7. Pinkham J R , Casamassimo PS, Tulunoğlu Ö, Tortop T. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence 4th ed. Atlas Kitapçılık. ANKARA 2009
8. Brian HC, Lam OL, Jagannathan N, Botelho MG. A systematic review of amalgam bonded restorations: in vitro and clinical findings. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(8):1013-24. (Crossref)
9. Bashar AK, Alam MS, Hussain MA, Islam MM, Hossain MM. An in vitro microleakage study of different filling materials using dye penetration method. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2006 Apr;32(1):1-9.
10. Kemaloglu H, Pamir T, Tezel H. A 3-year randomized clinical trial evaluating two different bonded posterior restorations: amalgam versus resin composite. Eur J Dent 2016;10(1):16–22. (Crossref)
11. Cianconi L, Conte G, Mancini M. Shear bond strength, failure modes, and confocal microscopy of bonded amalgam restorations. Dent Mater J 2011;30(2):216-21. (Crossref)
12. Şengün A, Karakaya Ş, Özer F, Kuşdemir M. The investigation of bond strength of amalgam to dentin by using different resin meterials. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry 2002;26(2):26.
13. Pop M, Sitaru A, Monea A. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Acta Medica Marisiensis 2010;56(6):584-6.
14. Moosavi H, Sadeghi S. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 Mar 1;9(3):32-9. (Crossref)
15. Altun C. Microleakage in Restorative Dentistry. Gülhane Med J. 2004;46:264-9.
16. Yadav SS, Sukhabogi JR, Kumar VB, Raju MS, Giri VV, Pulivarthi G. Comparison of patient sensitivity using dentin bonding agent versus zinc phosphate base beneath the amalgam restorations: an in vivo comparative study. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci 2016;4(4):236-40. (Crossref)
17. Li HP, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding systems. J Adhes Dent 2000;57-66.
18. Dunn JR. iBond: The seventh generation, one-bottle dentin bonding agent. J Contemp Contin Educ Dent.2003;24:14-8.
19. Bonsor SJ. Bonded amalgams and their use in clinical practice. Dent Update 2011 May;38(4):222-4, 226-8, 230(Crossref)
20. Eren D, Bektaş ÖÖ. Dental adhesives. Cumhuriyet Dent J.2006;9:63-7.
21. Larson TD. Amalgam restorations: to bond or not. Northwest Dent 2015;94(5):35-7.
22. Bembi S, Bembi Narula N, Sood A, Gambhir A. To evaluate the effect of different adhesive materials on the microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013 May;6(2):95-9. (Crossref)
23. Popoff DA, Gonçalves FS, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mjör IA. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study. Indian J Dent Res 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):799-803. (Crossref)
24. Hürmüzlü F, Siso Hergüner Ş, Işın D. The effect of new generatıon dentın bondıng agents on margınal leakage in amalgam restoratıons. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2004;7(1):22-6.
25. Swift EJ. Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent.2002;24:456-61.
26. Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tekçe N, Pashaev D, Uysal Ö. Effect of different dentin adhesives and application modes on sealing ability of amalgam restorations. J Adhes Sci Technol 2014;28(22/23):2269-88. (Crossref)
27. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent.2003;16:329-34.
28. Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A. Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage. Dent Mater 2019;35(9):1205-13. (Crossref)
29. Soares Nascimento A, de Lima EA, de Carvalho Souza Y, Canto JD, de Almeida Durão M, Braz R. Universal adhesive systems in class II amalgam restorations. Rev. Odonto Ciênc. 2016;31(3):126-30. (Crossref)
30. Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Investig.2002;6:244-8. (Crossref)
31. Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Reis A, Grande RH. In vitro microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:29-34.
32. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1992;17(3):112- 9.
33. Vanishree HS, Shanthala BM, Bobby W. The comparative evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage in bonded amalgam, amalgam, and composite resins in primary molars. Indian J Dent Res 2015;(5):446-50. (Crossref)
34. Parolia A, Kundabala M, Gupta V, et al. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2011;(2):252-5. (Crossref)
35. Kanzow P, Baxter S, Rizk M, Wassmann T, Wiegand A. Effectiveness of a universal adhesive for repair bonding to composite and amalgam. J Oral Sci 2019;61(2):343-35 (Crossref)
36. Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinaga PW. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: Influence of cavity volume. Oper Dent.2006;31:377-83. (Crossref)
37. Bengtsson UG, Hylander LD. Increased mercury emissions from modern dental amalgams. Bio Metals. 2017;30(2):277-83. (Crossref)

APA	ünal m, ATAKUL F (2021). The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. , 83 - 92.
Chicago	ünal mehmet,ATAKUL Fatma The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. (2021): 83 - 92.
MLA	ünal mehmet,ATAKUL Fatma The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. , 2021, ss.83 - 92.
AMA	ünal m,ATAKUL F The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. . 2021; 83 - 92.
Vancouver	ünal m,ATAKUL F The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. . 2021; 83 - 92.
IEEE	ünal m,ATAKUL F "The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations." , ss.83 - 92, 2021.
ISNAD	ünal, mehmet - ATAKUL, Fatma. "The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations". (2021), 83-92.

APA	ünal m, ATAKUL F (2021). The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. International Dental Research, 11(2), 83 - 92.
Chicago	ünal mehmet,ATAKUL Fatma The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. International Dental Research 11, no.2 (2021): 83 - 92.
MLA	ünal mehmet,ATAKUL Fatma The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. International Dental Research, vol.11, no.2, 2021, ss.83 - 92.
AMA	ünal m,ATAKUL F The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(2): 83 - 92.
Vancouver	ünal m,ATAKUL F The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. International Dental Research. 2021; 11(2): 83 - 92.
IEEE	ünal m,ATAKUL F "The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations." International Dental Research, 11, ss.83 - 92, 2021.
ISNAD	ünal, mehmet - ATAKUL, Fatma. "The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations". International Dental Research 11/2 (2021), 83-92.