Hanife Nuray YILMAZ
(Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, TÜRKİYE)
Elvan ÖNEM ÖZBİLEN
(Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, TÜRKİYE)
Gülden KARABİBER
(Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, TÜRKİYE)
Yıl: 2021Cilt: 34Sayı: 3ISSN: 2528-9659 / 2148-9505Sayfa Aralığı: 189 - 198İngilizce

0 0
Assessment of the Diagnostic Skills of General Dentists in Different Types of Orthodontic Malocclusions
Objective: One of the biggest problems in publicly funded dental clinics is the patient waiting list. The appropriate referral plays a key role in avoiding an increase in the number of patients on this waiting list. This study aimed to assess general dentists’ diagnostic skills and approaches for different malocclusions. Methods: A questionnaire was prepared using photos of 8 patients previously treated for different malocclusions. One hundred twenty general dentists (83 female, mean age: 24 ± 1.18 years; 37 male, mean age: 24 ± 1.95 years) participated in the survey and were asked to decide whether the patient needed orthodontic treatment or orthognathic surgery, and to provide the reason for sur gery (irregular teeth, or both unesthetic profile and irregular teeth), and the cause of the unesthetic profile (mandibular protrusion, mandibular retrusion, maxillary protrusion, maxillary retrusion). Results: The answers suggesting the need for orthodontic treatment were significantly higher for all malocclusions except for the Class II camouflage case. Of the Class III cases, the general dentists chose orthognathic surgery for both surgery and facemask cases (93.1%, 66.4% respectively). For the severe open bite case, orthognathic surgery was chosen with a ratio of 81.2%, and orthognathic surgery was decided as not necessary for the mild open bite case (74.8%). Among the surgery cases, mandibular retrusion for the Class II case (94.6%), mandibular protrusion for Class III case (95.4%), and maxillary retrusion for the severe open bite case (44.6%) were the maximum reported reasons. Conclusion: The distinction between camouflage and surgical treatment was better made by dentists in Class II and open bite cases than in Class III cases.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • 1. Eisenthal Y, Dror G, Ruppin E. Facial attractiveness: beauty and the machine. Neural Comput. 2006;18(1):119-142. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Kiyak HA. Does orthodontic treatment affect patients’ quality of life? J Dent Educ. 2008;72(8):886-894. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Nobile CGA, Pavia M, Fortunato L, Angelillo IF. Prevalence and factors related to malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Italy. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(6):637- 641. [CrossRef]
  • 4. O’Brien K, McComb JL, Fox N, Bearn D, Wright J. Do dentists refer orthodontic patients inappropriately? Br Dent J. 1996;181(4):132- 136. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Koochek AR., Yeh MS, Rolfe B, Richmond S. The relationship between Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need, and patients' perceptions of malocclusion: a study in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2001;191(6):325-329. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of Orthodontic Treatment Priority. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11(3):309-320. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD et al. The relationship between the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and consensus opinion of a panel of 74 dentists. Br Dent J. 1995;178(10):370-374. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Oshagh M, Salehi P, Pakshir H, Bazyar L, Rakhshan V. Associations between normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment needs in young-adult dental patients. Korean J Orthod. 2011;41(6):440-446. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Otuyemi OD, Kolawole KA. Perception of orthodontic treatment need: opinion comparisons of patients, parents and orthodontists. Afr J Oral Health. 2005;2(1-2):42-51. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Hunt O, Hepper P, Johnston C, Stevenson M, Burden D. The aesthetic component of the index of orthodontic treatment need validated against lay opinion. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(1):53-59. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Grzywacz I. The value of the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in the assessment of subjective orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25(1):57-63. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Stephen ID, McKeegan AM. Lip color affects perceived sex typicality and attractiveness of human faces. Perception. 2010;39(8):1104- 1110. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Wuerpel EH. A classic revisited. Ideals and idealism by Edmund H. Wuerpel, 1931. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(1):6-23. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Ferguson JW, Langford JW, Davenport PJ. Making the best use of consultant orthodontic services. Part 1: Determining which patients require referral. Dent Update. 1997;24(1):15-17.
  • 15. O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F et al. The effect of orthodontic referral guidelines: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2000;188(7):392- 397. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Christensen GJ. Orthodontics and the general practitioner. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(3):369-371. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Ngan P, Fields H. Orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning in the primary dentition. ASDC J Dent Child. 1995;62(1):25-33.
  • 18. Jackson OA, Cunningham SJ, Moles DR, Clark JR. Orthodontic referral behaviour of West Sussex dentists. Br Dent J. 2009;207(9):E18. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Chew MT, Aw AKL. Appropriateness of orthodontic referrals: self‐ perceived and normative treatment needs of patients referred for orthodontic consultation. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30(6):449-454. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Aldrees AM, Tashkandi NE, AlWanis AA, AlSanouni MS, AlHamlan NH. Orthodontic treatment and referral patterns: A survey of pediatric dentists, general practitioners, and orthodontists. Saudi Dent J. 2015;27(1):30-39. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Berk NW, Bush HD, Cavalier J et al. Perception of orthodontic treatment need: opinion comparisons of orthodontists, pediatric dentists, and general practitioners. J Orthod. 2002;29(4):287-291. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Pietilä T, Pietilä I, Väätäjä P. Early screening for orthodontic treatment. Differences in assessments made by a consultant orthodontist and three public health dentists. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992;20(4):208-213. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Petersen B, Dahlström L . Perception of treatment need among orthodontic patients compared with professionals. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56(5):299-302. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Rock WP, O’Brien KD, Stephens CD. Orthodontic teaching practice and undergraduate knowledge in British dental schools. Br Dent J. 2002;192(6):347-351. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Tufekci E, Jahangiri A, Lindauer SJ. Perception of profile among laypeople, dental students and orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):983-987. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Heath EM, English JD, Johnson CD, Swearingen EB, Akyalcin S. Perceptions of orthodontic case complexity among orthodontists, general practitioners, orthodontic residents, and dental students. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(2):335-341. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Kuroda S, Fuji A, Sugie M, et al. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of treatment needs for maxillary protrusion: comparison of dental students, residents, and orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(3):340-345. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Imani MM, Sanei E, Niaki EA, Shahroudi AS. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(3):412-420. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Kuroda S, Sugahara T, Takabatake S et al. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(1):73-78. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Soh J, Chew MT, Chan YH. Perceptions of dental esthetics of Asian orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(2):170-176. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Hamdan AM, Singh V, Rock W. Perceptions of dental aesthetics of Class III and anterior open bite malocclusions: a comparison between 10-to 11-year-old schoolchildren and orthodontists. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):202-208. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Abu Alhaija ES, Al-Khateeb SN. Attractiveness ratings of anterior open bites and reverse overjets using the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(2):134-139. [CrossRef]

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.