Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 457 - 464 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879 İndeks Tarihi: 18-05-2022

Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly

Öz:
BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are quite common, constituting 5% of all fractures. Plate osteosynthesis of comminuted fractures in the elderly with osteoporotic bones is prone to complications, including loss of reduction, intraarticular protrusion of screws, avascular necrosis and non-union. Hemiarthroplasty may be preferred to achieve a stable fixation, which permits early shoulder motion. Prerequisites for the successful functional outcome of this surgical technique are to have an intact rotator cuff, which is often torn, and achieve proper soft tissue balance, which is technically demanding. In RSA design, deltoid muscle replaces the function of the supraspinatus, compensating for a dysfunctional rotator cuff or a displaced tuberculum. We designed a retrospective study to evaluate the results of proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty using Humelock II reversible prosthesis in elderly patients. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (25 females, six males) above 65 years old who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2014 and 2019 for Neer 3-4 part fractures or head split injuries were included in this study. Patients with a previous internal fixation attempt, cases with neurological deficit or previous upper extremity fractures, patients who presented later than three weeks after the trauma, cases with less than six months follow-up and patients with additional fractures were excluded. Twenty-eight patients were available for final analysis. Fracture mechanism, time from trauma till surgery, hospital stay and preoperative ASA scores were noted. Humelock II Reversible (FX Solutions) implants were used in all cases. Patients’ shoulder range of motion and functional outcome using UCLA, DASH and Constant scores at minimum six months follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 72.2 (65–95) years, and mean follow-up time was 15.5 (6–48) months. The mean UCLA, Constant and Dash scores at the last follow-up were 27.6 (14–35), 67.9 (38–80) and 30.8 (9.9–79.2), respectively. Mean shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation were 130 (110–160), 100 (70–140), 40 (15–60) and 39 (15–75) degrees, respectively. CONCLUSION: RSA is a very reliable treatment for proximal humerus fractures in patients over 65 years old. Early active and passive shoulder exercises can be started postoperatively, and good functional outcome and wide ROM can be achieved with this age group. Although stable fixation of the tuberculum is not required for shoulder abduction, it facilitates external rotation and should be attempted in all cases. Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RSA due to proximal humerus fracture are as good as the outcomes of patients with different etiologies.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Boons HW, Goosen JH, van Grinsven S, van Susante JL, van Loon CJ. Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:3483–91.
  • 2. Passaretti D, Candela V, Sessa P, Gumina S. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures: a detailed survey of 711 patients in a metropolitan area. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:2117–24.
  • 3. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:587–95.
  • 4. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:1077–89.
  • 5. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:42–54.
  • 6. Cai M, Tao K, Yang C, Li S. Internal fixation versus shoulder hemiarthroplasty for displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Orthopedics 2012;35:e1340–6.
  • 7. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:365–71.
  • 8. Bell JE, Leung BC, Spratt KF, Koval KJ, Weinstein JD, Goodman DC, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:121–31.
  • 9. Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ, Rollins KE. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD000434.
  • 10. Maugendre E, Gadisseux B, Chantelot C, Clavert P, Ramdane N, Werthel JD, et al; SOFCOT. Epidemiology and mortality in older patients treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:1509–13.
  • 11. Roux A, Decroocq L, El Batti S, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Trojani C, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98:715–9.
  • 12. Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell JE. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1737–48.
  • 13. Giardella A, Ascione F, Mocchi M, Berlusconi M, Romano AM, Oliva F, et al. Reverse total shoulder versus angular stable plate treatment for proximal humeral fractures in over 65 years old patients. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2017;7:271–8.
  • 14. Çelik C, Gümüştaş SA, Çeçen GS, Bulut G, Bekler Hİ. Mid-term follow-up evaluation of plate osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty results in multipart fractures of the proximal humerus. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2016;22:379–85.
  • 15. Özkayın N, Aktuğlu K. Treatment of the four-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients with hemiarthroplasty. Joint Dis Rel Surg 2008;19:101–5.
  • 16. Sakurai G, Ozaki J, Tomita Y, Kondo T, Tamai S. Incomplete tears of the subscapularis tendon associated with tears of the supraspinatus tendon: cadaveric and clinical studies. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998;7:510–5.
  • 17. Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, Windley J, Emery RJ. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:116–21.
  • 18. Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Hróbjartsson A. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: A systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 2013;7:70–8.
  • 19. Atalar AC, Salduz A, Cil H, Sungur M, Celik D, Demirhan M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: radiological and clinical short-term results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48:25–31.
  • 20. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I. Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15:527–40.
  • 21. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009;95:48–55.
  • 22. Savin DD, Zamfirova I, Iannotti J, Goldberg BA, Youderian AR. Survey study suggests that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming the treatment of choice for four-part fractures of the humeral head in the elderly. Int Orthop 2016;40:1919–25.
  • 23. Obert L, Saadnia R, Tournier C, Bonnevialle N, Saragaglia D, Sirveaux F; La SOFCOT. Four-part fractures treated with a reversed total shoulder prosthesis: Prospective and retrospective multicenter study. Results and complications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102:279–85.
  • 24. Mattiassich G, Marcovici LL, Krifter RM, Ortmaier R, Wegerer P, Kroepfl A. Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of complex 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: 6 to 42 months of follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:231.
  • 25. Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B, Scherger B, Ostermann PA. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:698–704.
  • 26. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:516–20.
  • 27. Kaisidis A, Pantos PG, Heger H, Bochlos D, Selimas S, Oikonomoulas V. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients older than 75 years old. Acta Orthop Belg 2014;80:99–105.
  • 28. Boyer E, Menu G, Loisel F, Saadnia R, Uhring J, Adam A, et al. Cementless and locked prosthesis for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: prospective clinical evaluation of hemi- and reverse arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017;27:301–8.
  • 29. Sebastiá-Forcada E, Cebrián-Gómez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillén V. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1419–26.
  • 30. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:2050–5.
APA ATICI T, Ermutlu C, Yerebakan S, ÖZYALÇIN A, Durak K (2021). Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. , 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
Chicago ATICI Teoman,Ermutlu Cenk,Yerebakan Selcan,ÖZYALÇIN Ali,Durak Kemal Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. (2021): 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
MLA ATICI Teoman,Ermutlu Cenk,Yerebakan Selcan,ÖZYALÇIN Ali,Durak Kemal Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. , 2021, ss.457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
AMA ATICI T,Ermutlu C,Yerebakan S,ÖZYALÇIN A,Durak K Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. . 2021; 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
Vancouver ATICI T,Ermutlu C,Yerebakan S,ÖZYALÇIN A,Durak K Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. . 2021; 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
IEEE ATICI T,Ermutlu C,Yerebakan S,ÖZYALÇIN A,Durak K "Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly." , ss.457 - 464, 2021. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
ISNAD ATICI, Teoman vd. "Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly". (2021), 457-464. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
APA ATICI T, Ermutlu C, Yerebakan S, ÖZYALÇIN A, Durak K (2021). Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 27(4), 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
Chicago ATICI Teoman,Ermutlu Cenk,Yerebakan Selcan,ÖZYALÇIN Ali,Durak Kemal Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 27, no.4 (2021): 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
MLA ATICI Teoman,Ermutlu Cenk,Yerebakan Selcan,ÖZYALÇIN Ali,Durak Kemal Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.27, no.4, 2021, ss.457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
AMA ATICI T,Ermutlu C,Yerebakan S,ÖZYALÇIN A,Durak K Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2021; 27(4): 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
Vancouver ATICI T,Ermutlu C,Yerebakan S,ÖZYALÇIN A,Durak K Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2021; 27(4): 457 - 464. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
IEEE ATICI T,Ermutlu C,Yerebakan S,ÖZYALÇIN A,Durak K "Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 27, ss.457 - 464, 2021. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879
ISNAD ATICI, Teoman vd. "Primary treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures using Humelock cementless reversible shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 27/4 (2021), 457-464. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.46879