Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 98 - 105 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.2399/prn.21.0292001 İndeks Tarihi: 06-06-2022

Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?

Öz:
Amaç: ‹n vitro fertilizasyon (IVF) sonras› gebelikler, çeflitli çal›flmalarda tutarl› flekilde gösterildi¤i üzere do¤al konsepsiyona k›- yasla daha az olumlu sonuç ile iliflkilidir. Ancak bu sorunun ard›ndaki etiyolojik faktörler henüz aç›klanamam›flt›r. Çal›flmam›zda, infertilite etiyolojisinin IVF gebeliklerdeki kötü gebelik sonuçlar› üzerinde bir rolü olup olmad›¤›n› göstermeyi amaçlad›k. Yöntem: Bu retrospektif olgu kontrol çal›flmas›nda IVF ve spontane tekil gebelikler incelendi. ‹nfertil hastalar, infertilite etiyolojisine göre alt› gruba ayr›ld› (anovülasyon, erkek faktörü, tubal faktör, endometriyoz, aç›klanamayan infertilite ve düflük over rezervi). Preeklampsi, gestasyonel diabetes mellitus, gebeli¤in intrahepatik kolestaz›, preterm do¤um ve do¤um a¤›rl›¤› uyuflmazl›klar›- n›n insidans› gruplar ve alt gruplar aras›nda incelendi. Her infertilite alt grubu için demografik veriler, transferde embriyo aflamas› (blastokiste karfl› klevaj aflamas›) ve taze dondurulmufl embriyo transfer durumu gibi kar›fl›kl›¤a neden olan de¤iflkenler düzeltildikten sonra, multinomiyal lojistik regresyon analizi kullan›larak gebelik sonuçlar› üzerindeki etki araflt›r›ld›. Bulgular: Çal›flmaya IVF grubunda 934 hasta ve kontrol grubunda 1009 hasta dahil edildi. Advers gebelik sonuçlar› kontrol grubuna k›yasla genel infertilite grubunda daha s›kken, kar›flt›r›c› de¤iflkenlerin ç›kar›lmas› sonras›nda infertilite etiyolojisinin bu sonuçlar üzerindeki do¤rudan etkisi gösterilememifltir. Sonuç: IVF gebeliklerde, artm›fl kötü gebelik sonucu risklerinin ço¤unun maternal özelliklerle (örne¤in yafl ve vücut kitle indeksi) ve infertilite etiyolojisinden ziyade tedavi protokolleriyle aç›klanabildi¤ i görülmektedir. Hekimler hastalara dan›flmanl›k verirken bu riskleri dikkate almal›d›r.
Anahtar Kelime:

Does the etiology of infertility have any effect on perinatal outcomes?

Öz:
Objective: Pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF) are associated with a less favorable outcome compared to natural conception as consistently shown in various studies. However, etiologic factors behind this issue remain to be elucidated. We aimed to demonstrate whether the etiology of infertility has a role on poor pregnancy outcomes in IVF pregnancies. Methods: In this retrospective case control study; IVF and spontaneous singleton pregnancies were investigated. The infertile patients were divided into six groups according to the etiology of their infertility (anovulation, male factor, tubal factor, endometriosis, unexplained infertility and poor ovarian reserve). The incidence of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, preterm birth and birth weight discrepancies was examined between the groups and subgroups. After adjusting the confounding variables for each infertility subgroup such as demographic data, embryo stage in transfer (blastocyst against cleavage stage) and fresh and frozen embryo transfer status, the effect on pregnancy outcomes was investigated using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Results: The study included 934 patients in the IVF group and 1009 patients in the control group. While adverse pregnancy outcomes were more frequent in the general infertility group in comparison to the control group, after elimination of the confounding variables, the direct effect of the etiology of infertility on these outcomes could not be shown. Conclusion: In the IVF pregnancies, most of the increased risk of poor pregnancy outcomes appeared to be explained by maternal characteristics (such as age, body mass index) and by treatment protocols rather than infertility etiology. Physicians should consider these risks while counselling patients.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. De Geyter C, Wyns C, Calhaz-Jorge C, de Mouzon J, Ferraretti AP, Kupka M, et al. 20 years of the European IVFmonitoring Consortium registry: what have we learned? A comparison with registries from two other regions. Hum Reprod 2020;35:2832–49. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 2. Qin J-B, Sheng X-Q , Wu D, Gao S-Y, You Y-P, Yang TB, et al., Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295:285–301. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 3. Qin J, Sheng X, Wu D, Gao S, You Y, Yang T, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization in singleton pregnancies: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Sci 2017;24:595–608. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 4. Pinheiro RL, Areia AL, Pinto AM, Donato H. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Med Port 2019;32:219–26. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 5. Cheney K, Farber R, Barratt AL, McGeechan K, de Vries B, Ogle R, et al. Population attributable fractions of perinatal outcomes for nulliparous women associated with overweight and obesity, 1990–2014. Med J Aust 2018;208:119–25. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 6. Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Boulet S, Jamieson DJ. Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121: 1263–71. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 7. Kondapalli LA, Perales-Puchalt A. Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility? Fertil Steril 2013;99:303–10. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 8. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Raja EA, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update 2018;24:35–58. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 9. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia CR, Racowsky C. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2016;31: 2561–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 10. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004;81:19–25. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  • 12. Collins JA, van Steirteghem A. Overall prognosis with current treatment of infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:309–16. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 13. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1616–24. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 14. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel; Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, et al. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676–82. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 15. Palomba S, Homburg R, Santagni S, La Sala GB, Orvieto R. Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016;14:76. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 16. Tobias DK, Gaskins AJ, Missmer SA, Hu FB, Manson JE, Buck Louis GM, et al. History of infertility and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetologia 2015;58:707–15. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 17. Vannuccini S, Clifton VL, Fraser IS, Taylor HS, Critchley H, Giudice LC, et al., Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:104–15. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 18. Inoue S, Naruse H, Yorifuji T, Kato T, Murakoshi T, Doi H, et al. Impact of maternal and paternal smoking on birth outcomes. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017;39:1–10. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 19. Amouyal M, Boucekine M, Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Agostini A, Bretelle F, Courbiere B. No specific adverse pregnancy outcome in singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology (ART) for unexplained infertility. J Gynecol Obstetrics Hum Reprod 2020;49:101623. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 20. Thomson F, Shanbhag S, Templeton A, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility. BJOG 2005;112:632–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 21. Messerlian C, Platt RW, Ata B, Tan S-L, Basso O. Do the causes of infertility play a direct role in the aetiology of preterm birth? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29:101–12. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 22. Stern JE, Brown MB, Wantman E, Kalra SK, Luke B.Live birth rates and birth outcomes by diagnosis using linked cycles from the SART CORS database. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30:1445–50. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 23. Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, Matsuda Y. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril 2012;98:922–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 24. Declercq E, Luke B, Belanoff C, Cabral H, Diop H, Gopal D, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Fertil Steril 2015;103:88–95. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 25. Berntsen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm U-B, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, et al. The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’ Hum Reprod Update 2019;25:137–58. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 26. Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttila V, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:87–104. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 27. Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, Diop H, Stern JE. Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:1203–13. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 28. Woo I, Hindoyan R, Landay M, Ho J, Ingles SA, McGinnis LK, et al. Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects. Fertil Steril 2017;108:993–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 29. Kaser DJ, Bormann CL, Myers DE, Missmer SA, Walsh BW, Racowsky C, et al. Cryopreserved embryo transfer is an independent risk factor for placenta accreta. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1176–84. e2. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 30. Palomba S, de Wilde MA, Falbo A, Koster MPH, La Sala GB, Fauser BCJM. Pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21: 575–92. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  • 31. Lessey BA, Kim JJ. Endometrial receptivity in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis: it is affected, and let me show you why. Fertil Steril 2017;108:19–27. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
APA Alemdaroglu S, Doğan Durdağ G, Yılmaz Baran Ş, Coban Serbetcioglu G, simsek e, Yetkinel S, TARIM E (2021). Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. , 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
Chicago Alemdaroglu Songul,Doğan Durdağ Gülşen,Yılmaz Baran Şafak,Coban Serbetcioglu Gonca,simsek erhan,Yetkinel Selçuk,TARIM Ebru Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. (2021): 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
MLA Alemdaroglu Songul,Doğan Durdağ Gülşen,Yılmaz Baran Şafak,Coban Serbetcioglu Gonca,simsek erhan,Yetkinel Selçuk,TARIM Ebru Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. , 2021, ss.98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
AMA Alemdaroglu S,Doğan Durdağ G,Yılmaz Baran Ş,Coban Serbetcioglu G,simsek e,Yetkinel S,TARIM E Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. . 2021; 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
Vancouver Alemdaroglu S,Doğan Durdağ G,Yılmaz Baran Ş,Coban Serbetcioglu G,simsek e,Yetkinel S,TARIM E Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. . 2021; 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
IEEE Alemdaroglu S,Doğan Durdağ G,Yılmaz Baran Ş,Coban Serbetcioglu G,simsek e,Yetkinel S,TARIM E "Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?." , ss.98 - 105, 2021. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
ISNAD Alemdaroglu, Songul vd. "Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?". (2021), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.2399/prn.21.0292001
APA Alemdaroglu S, Doğan Durdağ G, Yılmaz Baran Ş, Coban Serbetcioglu G, simsek e, Yetkinel S, TARIM E (2021). Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. Perinatoloji Dergisi, 29(2), 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
Chicago Alemdaroglu Songul,Doğan Durdağ Gülşen,Yılmaz Baran Şafak,Coban Serbetcioglu Gonca,simsek erhan,Yetkinel Selçuk,TARIM Ebru Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. Perinatoloji Dergisi 29, no.2 (2021): 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
MLA Alemdaroglu Songul,Doğan Durdağ Gülşen,Yılmaz Baran Şafak,Coban Serbetcioglu Gonca,simsek erhan,Yetkinel Selçuk,TARIM Ebru Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. Perinatoloji Dergisi, vol.29, no.2, 2021, ss.98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
AMA Alemdaroglu S,Doğan Durdağ G,Yılmaz Baran Ş,Coban Serbetcioglu G,simsek e,Yetkinel S,TARIM E Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. Perinatoloji Dergisi. 2021; 29(2): 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
Vancouver Alemdaroglu S,Doğan Durdağ G,Yılmaz Baran Ş,Coban Serbetcioglu G,simsek e,Yetkinel S,TARIM E Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?. Perinatoloji Dergisi. 2021; 29(2): 98 - 105. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
IEEE Alemdaroglu S,Doğan Durdağ G,Yılmaz Baran Ş,Coban Serbetcioglu G,simsek e,Yetkinel S,TARIM E "Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?." Perinatoloji Dergisi, 29, ss.98 - 105, 2021. 10.2399/prn.21.0292001
ISNAD Alemdaroglu, Songul vd. "Infertilite etiyolojisinin perinatal sonuçlar üzerinde bir etkisi var mıdır?". Perinatoloji Dergisi 29/2 (2021), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.2399/prn.21.0292001