Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 67 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 322 - 327 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918 İndeks Tarihi: 09-06-2022

Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients

Öz:
Objectives: This study aims to compare the fracture risk calculated with Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) in patients with natural and surgical menopause. Patients and methods: Between April 2019 and July 2019, 285 postmenopausal patients (mean age 57.3 years; range, 40 to 78 years) who were admitted to the menopause clinic were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. Of these, 220 were in natural menopause and 65 were in surgical menopause. Demographic data, medical history, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire scores were collected through face-to-face interviews with the patients. Femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) T-scores were evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Fragility fracture risk was assessed using FRAX®. Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, duration of menopause, smoking, alcohol use, and history of fracture (p>0.05). The risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture calculated without adding bone mineral density (BMD) was similar between groups (p=0.417 and p=0.234). The risk of hip fracture calculated with the addition of BMD was higher in natural menopause patients (p=0.023). Lumbar vertebrae T-scores were similar between two groups regardless of age; femoral neck T-scores were higher in surgical menopause (T-score=-0.8) than natural menopause group (T-score=-1.25) aged under 60 years, whereas this difference disappeared after 60 years of age. Conclusion: In our study, the fracture risk and the severity of osteoporosis were not different in surgical menopausal patients compared to the natural menopausal patients. Hip fracture risk calculated using BMD was lower in patients under 50 years of age in surgical menopausal patients. However, the fracture risks were similar in both groups after 50 years of age.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Rodriguez M, Shoupe D. Surgical Menopause. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2015;44:531-42.
  • 2. Parker WH. Ovarian conservation versus bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Menopause 2014;21:192-4.
  • 3. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Johansson H, Odén A, Leslie WD, McCloskey EV. FRAX Update. J Clin Densitom 2017;20:360-7.
  • 4. Imerci A, Aydogan NH, Tosun K. Agreement between the Turkey Guidelines and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool®- based Intervention Threshold. J Bone Metab 2018;25:79-86.
  • 5. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2019;30:3-44.
  • 6. Available at: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/tool. aspx?country=6. [August 07, 2019]
  • 7. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills 2010;111:278-84.
  • 8. Chittacharoen A, Theppisai U, Sirisriro R. Bone mineral density in natural and surgically-induced menopause. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;66:193-4.
  • 9. Fakkert IE, Teixeira N, Abma EM, Slart R, Mourits M, de Bock GH. Bone mineral density and fractures after surgical menopause: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2017;124:1525-35.
  • 10. Hadjidakis DJ, Kokkinakis EP, Sfakianakis ME, Raptis SA. Bone density patterns after normal and premature menopause. Maturitas 2003;44:279-86.
  • 11. Hayirlioglu A, Gökaslan H, Andaç N. The effect of bilateral oophorectomy on bone mineral density. Rheumatol Int 2006;26:1073-7.
  • 12. Kritz-Silverstein D, von Mühlen DG, Barrett-Connor E. Hysterectomy and oophorectomy are unrelated to bone loss in older women. Maturitas 2004;47:61-9.
  • 13. Rittweger J. Can exercise prevent osteoporosis? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006;6:162-6.
  • 14. Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011;8:115.
  • 15. Hartley S, Garland S, Young E, Bennell KL, Tay I, Gorelik A, et al. A Comparison of Self-Reported and Objective Physical Activity Measures in Young Australian Women. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2015;1:e14.
  • 16. Ilesanmi-Oyelere BL, Roy NC, Coad J, Kruger MC. Associations between Self-Reported Physical Activity, Heel Ultrasound Parameters and Bone Health Measures in Post-Menopausal Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:3177.
  • 17. Melton LJ 3rd, Khosla S, Malkasian GD, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Riggs BL. Fracture risk after bilateral oophorectomy in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:900-5.
APA Utkan Karasu A, karasu y, Ozaksit G, ÜSTÜN Y, Engin-Ustun Y (2021). Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. , 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
Chicago Utkan Karasu Ayça,karasu yetkin,Ozaksit Gulnur,ÜSTÜN YUSUF,Engin-Ustun Yaprak Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. (2021): 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
MLA Utkan Karasu Ayça,karasu yetkin,Ozaksit Gulnur,ÜSTÜN YUSUF,Engin-Ustun Yaprak Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. , 2021, ss.322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
AMA Utkan Karasu A,karasu y,Ozaksit G,ÜSTÜN Y,Engin-Ustun Y Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. . 2021; 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
Vancouver Utkan Karasu A,karasu y,Ozaksit G,ÜSTÜN Y,Engin-Ustun Y Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. . 2021; 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
IEEE Utkan Karasu A,karasu y,Ozaksit G,ÜSTÜN Y,Engin-Ustun Y "Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients." , ss.322 - 327, 2021. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
ISNAD Utkan Karasu, Ayça vd. "Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients". (2021), 322-327. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
APA Utkan Karasu A, karasu y, Ozaksit G, ÜSTÜN Y, Engin-Ustun Y (2021). Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67(3), 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
Chicago Utkan Karasu Ayça,karasu yetkin,Ozaksit Gulnur,ÜSTÜN YUSUF,Engin-Ustun Yaprak Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 67, no.3 (2021): 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
MLA Utkan Karasu Ayça,karasu yetkin,Ozaksit Gulnur,ÜSTÜN YUSUF,Engin-Ustun Yaprak Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.67, no.3, 2021, ss.322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
AMA Utkan Karasu A,karasu y,Ozaksit G,ÜSTÜN Y,Engin-Ustun Y Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021; 67(3): 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
Vancouver Utkan Karasu A,karasu y,Ozaksit G,ÜSTÜN Y,Engin-Ustun Y Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021; 67(3): 322 - 327. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
IEEE Utkan Karasu A,karasu y,Ozaksit G,ÜSTÜN Y,Engin-Ustun Y "Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, ss.322 - 327, 2021. 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918
ISNAD Utkan Karasu, Ayça vd. "Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 67/3 (2021), 322-327. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918