Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 40 - 47 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2022

Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context

Öz:
AIM: This study aimed to adapt and validate the Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS) in a puerperal context to the European Portuguese. METHOD: This research was a methodological study. The participant sample comprised 100 puerperal women, with an average age of 31.3 years (SD = 5.65), who attended a public hospital in southern Portugal. The instrument, originally consisting of 22 items, underwent translation, back translation, and semantic and colloquial conciliation. Ethical aspects have been respected. RESULTS: Factor analysis with varimax rotation revealed a set of 17 items with factor weights greater than .400. Three factors emerged, which explain 65.537% of the variance, namely “Being-at-the-Moment” (8 items), “Responsibility-for-the-Other” (5 items) and “Care-Diligent” (4 items). Reliability through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the total scale was .881, and in the subscales, ranged from .713 to .938. Precision was analyzed using the split-half method, reaching an alpha with Spearman-Brown correction of .900. The convergent validity between the instrument versus the discrete variable Care-Offered showed, in the total scale, a Spearman rho of .851 and in the subscales between .528 and .616. In the discriminating validity, the Mann–Whitney test revealed that Portuguese women, vis-à-vis foreign women significantly value the dimensions “Being-at-the Moment” and “Responsibility-for-the-Other” (p < .05), while in the “Care-Diligent” component, there are no significant differences (p > .05). CONCLUSION: The European Portuguese version of the NCPS, in an obstetric context, has reliability and validity. A further study in a random sample and validation in other Lusophone countries will be appropriate.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Almeida, L., & Freire, T. (2017). Metodologia da investigação em psicologia e educação. Psiquilíbrios Edições.
  • Anthoine, E., Moret, L., Regnault, A., Sébille, V., & Hardouin, J. B. (2014). Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 176. [CrossRef]
  • Dancey, C., & Reidy, J. (2019). Estatistica sem matemática para psicologia (7th ed). Penso, Porto Alegre.
  • Darbyshire, P., & Oerther, S. (2020). Heidegger and parenthood: A theoretical and methodological shift from instrumental to ontological understanding. Journal of Child Health Care: For Professionals Working with Children in the Hospital and Community. [CrossRef]
  • Della-Monica, N. R., & Connell, W. F. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of the nurse-caring patient scale. International Journal of Human Caring, 11(3), 56–56. [CrossRef]
  • Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
  • Griffith, R. (2020). The elements of negligence liability in nursing. British Journal of Nursing, 29(3), 176–177. [CrossRef]
  • Hansen, F. T., & Jørgensen, L. B. (2020). A contribution to the ontology of the Fundamentals of Care framework from a wonder-based approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(11–12), 1797–1807. [CrossRef]
  • Hays, R. D., Weech-Maldonado, R., Teresi, J. A., Wallace, S. P., & Stewart, A. L. (2018). Commentary: Copyright restrictions versus open access to survey instruments. Medical Care, 56(2), 107–110. [CrossRef]
  • Hemberg, J., & Wiklund Gustin, L. (2020). Caring from the heart as belonging—The basis for mediating compassion. Nursing Open, 7(2), 660–668. [CrossRef]
  • Ivry, T., Takaki-Einy, R., & Murotsuki, J. (2019). What disasters can reveal about techno-medical birth: Japanese women’s stories of childbirth during the 11 March, 2011 earthquake. Health, Risk and Society, 21(3–4), 164–184. [CrossRef]
  • Jeong, G. H., & Kim, H. K. (2020). Pro-environmental health behaviour and educational needs among pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(7), 1638–1646. [CrossRef]
  • Maroco, J., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2006). Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? Laboratório de Psicologia, 4(1), 65–90. [CrossRef]
  • Moreira, J. M. (2009). Questionarios: Teoria e prática. Almedina, Coimbra.
  • Negron, R., Martin, A., Almog, M., Balbierz, A., & Howell, E. A. (2013). Social support during the postpartum period: Mothers’ views on needs, expectations, and mobilization of support. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(4), 616–623. [CrossRef]
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2020). Nursing research (11th ed). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
  • Power, A. (2015). Contemporary midwifery practice: Art, science or both? British Journal of Midwifery, 23(9), 654–657. [CrossRef]
  • Raleigh, V. S., Hussey, D., Seccombe, I., & Hallt, K. (2010). Ethnic and social inequalities in women’s experience of maternity care in England: Results of a national survey. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103(5), 188–198. [CrossRef]
  • Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2013). Patient neglect in healthcare institutions: A systematic review and conceptual model. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 156. [CrossRef]
  • Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., Schwartz, C., Revicki, D. A., Moinpour, C. M., McLeod, L. D., Lyons, J. C., Lenderking, W. R., Hinds, P. S., Hays, R. D., Greenhalgh, J., Gershon, R., Feeny, D., Fayers, P. M., Cella, D., Brundage, M., et al. (2013).
  • ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1889–1905. [CrossRef]
  • Robertson, J. H., & Thomson, A. M. (2016). An exploration of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on the practice of midwives in England: A phenomenological study. Midwifery, 33, 55–63. [CrossRef]
  • Rosenberg, K. R., & Trevathan, W. R. (2014). Evolutionary obstetrics.
  • Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, 2014(1), 148. [CrossRef] Rosenberg, K., & Trevathan, W. (2005). Bipedalism and human birth: The obstetrical Dilemma Revisited. Evolutionary Anthropology, 4(5), 161–168. [CrossRef]
  • Santos, A. G., Monteiro, C. F., Nunes, B. M., Benício, C. D., & Nogueira, L. T. (2017). O cuidado em enfermagem analisado segundo a essência do cuidado de Martin Heidegger. Rev. Cuba Enferm., 33(3), 1–11. Available at: http://www.revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/ view/1529/295.
  • Watkins, T., Whisman, L., & Booker, P. (2016). Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/ surgical unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(1–2), 278–281. [CrossRef]
  • Weld, K. K., & Garmon Bibb, S. C. (2009). Concept analysis: Malpractice and modern-day nursing practice. Nursing Forum, 44(1), 2–10. [CrossRef]
  • Zolkefli, Z. H. H., Mumin, K. H. A., & Idris, D. R. (2020). Autonomy and its impact on midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery, 28(2), 120–129. [CrossRef]
APA Galhanas A, Frias A, Sim-Sim M (2022). Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. , 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
Chicago Galhanas Ana Isabel,Frias Ana,Sim-Sim Margarida Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. (2022): 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
MLA Galhanas Ana Isabel,Frias Ana,Sim-Sim Margarida Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. , 2022, ss.40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
AMA Galhanas A,Frias A,Sim-Sim M Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. . 2022; 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
Vancouver Galhanas A,Frias A,Sim-Sim M Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. . 2022; 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
IEEE Galhanas A,Frias A,Sim-Sim M "Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context." , ss.40 - 47, 2022. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
ISNAD Galhanas, Ana Isabel vd. "Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context". (2022), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
APA Galhanas A, Frias A, Sim-Sim M (2022). Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), 30(1), 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
Chicago Galhanas Ana Isabel,Frias Ana,Sim-Sim Margarida Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) 30, no.1 (2022): 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
MLA Galhanas Ana Isabel,Frias Ana,Sim-Sim Margarida Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), vol.30, no.1, 2022, ss.40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
AMA Galhanas A,Frias A,Sim-Sim M Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online). 2022; 30(1): 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
Vancouver Galhanas A,Frias A,Sim-Sim M Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context. Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online). 2022; 30(1): 40 - 47. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
IEEE Galhanas A,Frias A,Sim-Sim M "Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context." Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online), 30, ss.40 - 47, 2022. 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
ISNAD Galhanas, Ana Isabel vd. "Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context". Florence Nightingale journal of nursing (Online) 30/1 (2022), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007