Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 70 Sayfa Aralığı: 45 - 62 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-05-2022
Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply
Öz: The contemporary IR craft homogenizes a pluriverse of time-spacescapes as if it were a “one-world world.” We
propose a strategy of recrafting to engender a nimble discipline for actively encountering ‘the world multiply’ and
a generation of scholars capable of engaging various forms of knowing/being/sensing/doing. Worlding multiply
requires: (1) taking seriously the plurality of worlds that emerge through distinct existential assumptions and
(2) learning how to translate/read across time-spacescapes built through incommensurate ways of doing/being
without reducing one to the other. We suggest conscientiously developing tools—new skills, concepts, ways of
being—for encountering complexity in both pedagogy and scholarship.
Anahtar Kelime: Dünyalaştıran Çoğaltma ile Uluslararası İlişkileri Yeniden İmal Etmek
Öz: Çağdaş uluslararası ilişkiler zanaatı, zaman-uzam manzaralarından bir çoğul evreni “tek-dünyalı bir
dünya”ymışçasına homojenleştirir. Biz, “dünya çoğaltmayı” ve muhtelif bilme/varolma/hissetme/yapma
biçimleriyle iştigal edebilen bir araştırmacılar kuşağı ve etkin bir karşılaşmaya yönelik hazırcevap bir disiplini
vücuda getirebilecek bir yeniden imal stratejisi öneriyoruz. Dünyalaştıran çoğaltma şunları içerir: 1) birbirinden
ayrı varoluşsal varsayımlar aracılığıyla kendini gösteren dünyaların çoğulluğunu ciddiye almak ve 2) birini
diğerine indirgemeden, ölçülemez düzeydeki yapma/olma biçimleri aracılığıyla inşa edilen zaman-uzam
manzaraları üstünden nasıl tercüme/okuma yapılacağını öğrenmek. Özenli biçimde hem pedagojide hem
de bilimsel alanda karmaşıklıkla yüz yüze gelmeye yarayan araçlar –yeni beceriler, kavramlar, oluş biçimleri–
geliştirmeyi öneriyoruz.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- “Richard Sennett on Art and Craft”, Getty Museum, 3 December 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LH1aX_6-xkY (Accessed 14 January 2020).
- Abraham, Itty (2006). “The Contradictory Spaces of Postcolonial Techno-Science”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 41, No. 3, p. 210-217.
- Acharya, Amitav (2014). “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4, p. 647-659.
- Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan (eds.) (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory. London, Routledge.
- Agathangelou, Anna M. and L.H.M. Ling (1997). “Postcolonial Dissidence within Dissident IR: Transforming Master Narratives of Sovereignty”, Studies in Political Economy, Vol. 54, No. 1, p. 7-38.
- Agathangelou, Anna M. and L.H.M. Ling (2004). “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism”, International Studies Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 34-22.
- Arian, Anahita (2021). “An Ethics of Understanding”, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 23.
- Aydınlı, Ersel and Gonca Biltekin (eds.) (2018). Widening the World of International Relations: Homegrown Theorizing. London, Routledge.
- Behera, Navnita Chadha (2013). Political Science: Volume 4: India Engages the World. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Bennett, Jane (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, Duke University.
- Berenskoetter, Felix (2018). “‘E Pluribus Unum?’ How Textbooks Cover Theories”, Andreas Gofas , Inanna Hamati-Ataya, and Nicholas Onuf (eds.), The Sage Handbook of History, Philosophy and Sociology of International Relations. New York, Sage, p. 446-468.
- Berman, Morris (1981). The Reenchantment of the World. Ithaca, Cornell University.
- Bilgin, Pınar (2016). ‘“Contrapuntal Reading’ as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR”, International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 134–146.
- Bilgin, Pinar (2016). “Do IR Scholars Engage with the Same World?”, Ken Booth and Toni Erskine (eds.), International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge, Polity, p. 97-108.
- Blaney, David L. and Arlene B. Tickner (2017). “Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR”, Millennium, Vol. 43, No. 3, p. 293-311.
- Blaser, Mario (2016). “Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible?”, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 31, No. 4, p. 545-570.
- Blaser, Mario (2018). “Doing and Undoing Caribou/Atiku: Diffractive and Divergent Multiplicities and their Cosmopolitical Orientations”, Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 47-64.
- Capan, Zeynep Gulsah (2016). “Decolonising International Relations?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, p. 1-15.
- Chan, Stephan and Peter Mandaville (eds.) (2011). The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West. London, Palgrave.
- Chandler, David (2018). Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene. London, Routledge.
- Connolly, William (2011). A World of Becoming. Durham, Duke University.
- Coole, Diana and Samantha Frost (eds.) (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, Duke University.
- Cudworth, Erika et al. (2018). “Introduction—Framing the Posthuman Dialogues in International Relations”, Erika Cudworth , Stephen Hobden and Emilian Kavalski (eds.), Posthuman Dialogues in International Relations. London, Routledge.
- Darby, Phillip (2015). From International Relations to Relations International. New York, Routledge.
- De la Cadena, Marisol and Mario Blaser (eds.) (2018). A World of Many Worlds. Durham, Duke University Press.
- De Sousa Santos, Boaventura (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London, Routledge.
- Escobar, Arturo (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, Duke University Press.
- Eun, Yong-Soo (2018). What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” IR Theory?. London, Routledge.
- Fishel, Stefanie R. (2017). The Microbial State: Global Thriving and the Body Politic. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota.
- Grove, Jarius (2019). Savage Ecology: War and Geopolitics at the End of the World. Durham, Duke University Press.
- Hagmann, James and Thomas Biersteker (2018). “Counter Mapping the Discipline: The Archipelago of Western International Relations Teaching”, Andreas Gofas, Inanna Hamati-Ataya, and Nicholas Onuf (eds.), History, Philosophy and Sociology of International Relations. New York, Sage, p. 428-445.
- Harding, Sandra (2015). Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research. Chicago, University of Chicago.
- Hill, Michael D. and Georgina Maldonado (2020). Para aprender a viajar así: movilidad en la vida de una mujer quechua. Quito/Lima, USFQ Press and Editorial del Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
- Hutchings, Kimberly (2019). “Decolonizing Global Ethics: Thinking with the Pluriverse”, Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 33, No. 2, p. 115-125. I nayatullah, Naeem and David L. Blaney (2004). International Relations and the Problem of Difference. London, Routledge. I nayatullah, Naeem and David L. Blaney (2015). “A Problem with Levels: How to Engage a Diverse IPE”, Contexto Internacional, Vol. 17, No. 3, p. 889-911.
- Jackson, Mark (ed.) (2018). Coloniality, Ontology, and the Question of the Posthuman. London, Routledge.
- Jackson, Patrick T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London, Routledge.
- Kaltofen, Carolin (2017). “Between Radical Posthumanism and Weak Anthropocentrism: The Spectrum of Critical Humanism(s)”, Clara Eroukhmanoff and Matt Harker (eds.), Reflections on the Posthuman in International Relations: The Anthropocene, Security and Ecology. Bristol, E-International Relations, p. 19-28.
- Karagiannis, Nathalie and Peter Wagner (2007). “Introduction: Globalization or World-Making?”, Nathalie Karagiannis and Peter Wagner (eds.), Varieties of World-Making: Beyond Globalization. Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, p. 1-13.
- Lapid, Yosef (1989). “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 235-254.
- Law, John (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London, Routledge.
- Law, John (2011). “What’s Wrong with a One-World World”, Heterogeneities, p. 1-13.
- Law, John and Wen-yuan Lin (2017). “Provincializing STS: Postcoloniality, Symmetry and Method”, East Asian Science, Technology and Society, Vol. 11, No. 2, p. 211-221.
- Ling, L.H.M. (2014). The Dao of World Politics: Towards a Post-Westphalian, Worldist International Relations. New York, Routledge.
- Mitchell, Audra (2017). “‘Posthuman Security’: Reflections from an Open-Ended Conversation”, Clara Eroukhmanoff and Matt Harker (eds.), Reflections on the Posthuman in International Relations: The Anthropocene, Security and Ecology. Bristol, E-International Relations, p. 10-18.
- Onuf, Nicholas (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press.
- Onuf, Nicholas (2018). “What We Do: International Relations as Craft”, Andreas Gofas, Inanna Hamati-Ataya and Nicholas Onuf (eds.), The Sage Handbook of History, Philosophy and Sociology of International Relations. New York, Sage, p. 513-526.
- Peterson, Spike V. (2014). “Family Matters: How Queering the Intimate Queers the International”, International Studies Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 604-608.
- Peterson, Spike V. (ed.) (1992). Gendered States: Feminist (Re)visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Picq, Manuela L. (2013). “Indigenous Wording: Kichwa Women Pluralizing Sovereignty”, Arlene B. Tickner and David Blaney (eds.), Claiming the International. London, Routledge, p. 121-140.
- Puar, Jasbir (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, Duke University Press.
- Querejazu, Amaya (2016). “Encountering the Pluriverse: Looking for Alternatives in Other Worlds”, Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, Vol. 59, No. 2, p. 1-16.
- Querejazu, Amaya (2021). “Why Relational Encounters?”, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 31-34 Querejazu, Amaya (forthcoming). “Cosmopraxis: Relational Methods for a Pluriversal IR”. Review of International Studies.
- Quijano, Anibal (2007). “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality”, Cultural Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2-3, p. 168-178.
- Reddekop, Jarrad and Tamara Trownsell (2021). “Disrupting Anthropocentrism through Relationality”, David Chandler et al, Franziska Müller and Delf Rothe (eds.), International Relations in the Anthropocene. Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, p. 441-458.
- Rojas, Cristina (2016). “Contesting the Colonial Logics of the International: Toward a Relational Politics for the Pluriverse”, International Political Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 369–382.
- Rothe, Delf (2017). “Global Security in a Posthuman Age? IR and the Anthropocene Challenge”, Clara Eroukhmanoff and Matt Harker (eds.), Reflections on the Posthuman in International Relations: The Anthropocene, Security and Ecology. Bristol, E-International Relations, p. 87-101.
- Sennett, Richard (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven, Yale University Press.
- Shani, Giorgio (2008). “Toward a Post-Western IR: The ‘Umma,’ ‘Khalsa Panth,’ and Critical International Relations Theory,” International Studies Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 722-734.
- Shilliam, Robbie (ed.) (2011). International Relations and Non-Western Thought. London, Routledge.
- Shilliam, Robbie (2015). The Black Pacific: Anti-Colonial Struggles and Oceanic Connections. London, Bloomsbury.
- Shimizu, Kosuke (ed.) (2019). Critical International Relations in East Asia: Relationality, Subjectivity, and Pragmatism. London, Routledge.
- Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam (1994). Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media. London, Routledge.
- Smith, Steve (1997). “Epistemology, Postmodernism and International Relations Theory: A Reply to Østerud”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 330-336.
- Tickner, Ann J. (1992). Gender in International Relations. New York, Columbia University Press.
- Tickner, Ann J. (2001). Gendering World Politics. New York, Columbia University Press.
- Tickner, Arlene B. (2013). “By Way of Conclusion: Forget IR?”, Arlene B.Tickner and David Blaney (eds.), Claiming the International. London, Routledge, p. 214-232.
- Tickner, Arlene B. and Amaya Querejazu (2021). “Weaving Worlds: Cosmopraxis as Relational Sensibility”, International Studies Review p. 1-18.
- Tickner, Arlene B. and David L. Blaney (eds.) (2013). Claiming the International. London, Routledge.
- Trownsell, Tamara et al. (8 January 2019). “Recrafting International Relations through Relationality”, https://www.e-ir. info/2019/01/08/recrafting-international-relations-through-relationality/ (Accessed 9 January 2019).
- Trownsell, Tamara et al. (2021). “Differing about Difference: Relational IR from around the World”, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 26-64 Trownsell, Tamara et al. (eds.) (forthcoming). “Pluriversal Relationality: Between Theory and Practice”. Review of International Studies.
- Trownsell, Tamara (2021). “Ontological Agility as Pedagogical Imperative”, Jan Lüdert (ed.), Signature Pedagogies in IR. Bristol: E-International Relations, p. 55-69. Trownsell, Tamara (forthcoming). “Recrafting Ontology: A Strategy for a More Inclusive Discipline”. Review of International Studies.
- Valladolid Rivera, Julio (1998). “Andean Peasant Culture: Nurturing a Diversity of Life in the Chacra”, Frédérique ApffelMarglin and PRATEC (eds.), Spirit of Regeneration: Andean Culture Confronting Western Notions of Development. London, Zed Books, p. 51-88.
- Wæver, Ole and Arlene B. Tickner (2009). “Introduction: Geocultural Epistemologies”, Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Wæver (eds.), International Relations Scholarship Around the World. London, Routledge, p. 9-10.
- Weber, Cynthia (2016). Queer International Relations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Whitehead, Alfred N. (1979 [1929]). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York, Free Press.
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958). Philosophical Investigations. New York, Macmillan.
- Woons, Marc (2014). “Decolonizing Canadian Citizenship: Shared Belonging, Not Shared Identity”, Settler Colonial Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 192-208.
- Woons, Marc (2014). Restoring Indigenous Self-Determination: Theoretical and Practical Approaches. Bristol, E- International Relations Publishing.
- Youatt, Rafi (2014). “Interspecies Relations, International Relations: Rethinking Anthropocentric Politics”, Millennium, Vol. 43, No. 1, p. 207-233.
| APA | Blaney D, Trownsell T (2021). Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . , 45 - 62. |
| Chicago | Blaney David L.,Trownsell Tamara Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . (2021): 45 - 62. |
| MLA | Blaney David L.,Trownsell Tamara Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . , 2021, ss.45 - 62. |
| AMA | Blaney D,Trownsell T Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . . 2021; 45 - 62. |
| Vancouver | Blaney D,Trownsell T Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . . 2021; 45 - 62. |
| IEEE | Blaney D,Trownsell T "Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply ." , ss.45 - 62, 2021. |
| ISNAD | Blaney, David L. - Trownsell, Tamara. "Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply ". (2021), 45-62. |
| APA | Blaney D, Trownsell T (2021). Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . Uluslararası İlişkiler, 18(70), 45 - 62. |
| Chicago | Blaney David L.,Trownsell Tamara Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . Uluslararası İlişkiler 18, no.70 (2021): 45 - 62. |
| MLA | Blaney David L.,Trownsell Tamara Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . Uluslararası İlişkiler, vol.18, no.70, 2021, ss.45 - 62. |
| AMA | Blaney D,Trownsell T Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . Uluslararası İlişkiler. 2021; 18(70): 45 - 62. |
| Vancouver | Blaney D,Trownsell T Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply . Uluslararası İlişkiler. 2021; 18(70): 45 - 62. |
| IEEE | Blaney D,Trownsell T "Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply ." Uluslararası İlişkiler, 18, ss.45 - 62, 2021. |
| ISNAD | Blaney, David L. - Trownsell, Tamara. "Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply ". Uluslararası İlişkiler 18/70 (2021), 45-62. |
